MTH header and tuner file combo
Originally Posted by dapickler
Interesting that M7 sells their Cosworth kit for almost $4700 and it comes with the special MTH yet that kit on American dyno's only puts out 200whp according to Peter.
Can someone please clarify this?
Can someone please clarify this?
Originally Posted by Volker@MTH
Let me see what I can put together for you guys. But please bare in mind, that we are running on 98+ fuel over here.
Also I think that what is written on a piece of paper is not what counts. It is how the car feels afterwards. So I think best is, to get one header over to Pat, find a customer who is willing to put his car on the dyno and do a little write up on his/hers impression. Should be a standard S and/or one with a 15% pulley. For this customer we would make a special price. Pat, what do you think?
Also I think that what is written on a piece of paper is not what counts. It is how the car feels afterwards. So I think best is, to get one header over to Pat, find a customer who is willing to put his car on the dyno and do a little write up on his/hers impression. Should be a standard S and/or one with a 15% pulley. For this customer we would make a special price. Pat, what do you think?
btw, all we have for gas is us-grade 91 octane here in california.. (dont want to spend more money on higher octane. hotter gas will burn holes in my pockets):smile:
lastly, will the header fit my miltek cat-back??? i dont want too many issues.. (plug and play is my way)
Originally Posted by BMDoubleU
i wouldn't mind putting my car on a dyno to test the numbers you posted as long as i get the best deal on stage one.. also, i live in san franisco bay area, california.. i have no i idea where to get my car dynoed.. let me know how you want to work it out.. (or if you already havs some one)
btw, all we have for gas is us-grade 91 octane here in california.. (dont want to spend more money on higher octane. hotter gas will burn holes in my pockets):smile:
lastly, will the header fit my miltek cat-back??? i dont want too many issues.. (plug and play is my way)
btw, all we have for gas is us-grade 91 octane here in california.. (dont want to spend more money on higher octane. hotter gas will burn holes in my pockets):smile:
lastly, will the header fit my miltek cat-back??? i dont want too many issues.. (plug and play is my way)

91 Octane (R+M/2) will result in slightly lower numbers than optimal, but they'll be good numbers for people where 91 is all you can get (like CA).
It should be plug and play, but I'll let Volker comment on that.
Last edited by tradiuz; Sep 16, 2005 at 08:05 PM.
****??off-road??***
??> does anybody listen or pay attention to that, 'not for highway use'..... story?!?!?!
**plug&play is the way!!***
--MTH or tradiuz, about how much different in #'s would u say??
--will this header line up well, w/a milltek cat-bak ??
**plug&play is the way!!***
--MTH or tradiuz, about how much different in #'s would u say??
--will this header line up well, w/a milltek cat-bak ??
1 kw = 1,34102 hp = 1,35962 PS
The fuel is very important. Running on 91 or 93 will not produce those figures. Standard fuel over here is minimum 95 (super), 98 (super+) and 100+ (Vmax). The Dynos we are using here are acc. DIN 70020.
The header is a straight swap and can be installed within 30 minutes. It will fit with other exhaust systems but produces best power with standard, Hartge or JCW exhaust. These are the ones we tested and that are TÜV approved with our header.
Pat and I just put a nice package together for the test car. But this person must live near Pat in order to do everything 100%. Wait what that car will show on the dyno and then make up your mind.
We have a JCW S 210 tested in a car magazine next month and we will post the article. They did the 0-100 km/h testings already.
Standard JCW 210 worst 7.1 s best 6.9 s
with tuner file worst 6.2 s best 6.04 s
Not yet tested with header but they expect 5.8 s .
The fuel is very important. Running on 91 or 93 will not produce those figures. Standard fuel over here is minimum 95 (super), 98 (super+) and 100+ (Vmax). The Dynos we are using here are acc. DIN 70020.
The header is a straight swap and can be installed within 30 minutes. It will fit with other exhaust systems but produces best power with standard, Hartge or JCW exhaust. These are the ones we tested and that are TÜV approved with our header.
Pat and I just put a nice package together for the test car. But this person must live near Pat in order to do everything 100%. Wait what that car will show on the dyno and then make up your mind.
We have a JCW S 210 tested in a car magazine next month and we will post the article. They did the 0-100 km/h testings already.
Standard JCW 210 worst 7.1 s best 6.9 s
with tuner file worst 6.2 s best 6.04 s
Not yet tested with header but they expect 5.8 s .
will ur header have enough room to match port??
*what is it about JCW & Hartge thats different from Milltek? which is also TUV approved!
what Mag will u b in??
*what is it about JCW & Hartge thats different from Milltek? which is also TUV approved!
what Mag will u b in??
Originally Posted by Volker@MTH
1 kw = 1,34102 hp = 1,35962 PS
The fuel is very important. Running on 91 or 93 will not produce those figures. Standard fuel over here is minimum 95 (super), 98 (super+) and 100+ (Vmax). The Dynos we are using here are acc. DIN 70020.
The header is a straight swap and can be installed within 30 minutes. It will fit with other exhaust systems but produces best power with standard, Hartge or JCW exhaust. These are the ones we tested and that are TÜV approved with our header.
Pat and I just put a nice package together for the test car. But this person must live near Pat in order to do everything 100%. Wait what that car will show on the dyno and then make up your mind.
We have a JCW S 210 tested in a car magazine next month and we will post the article. They did the 0-100 km/h testings already.
Standard JCW 210 worst 7.1 s best 6.9 s
with tuner file worst 6.2 s best 6.04 s
Not yet tested with header but they expect 5.8 s .
The fuel is very important. Running on 91 or 93 will not produce those figures. Standard fuel over here is minimum 95 (super), 98 (super+) and 100+ (Vmax). The Dynos we are using here are acc. DIN 70020.
The header is a straight swap and can be installed within 30 minutes. It will fit with other exhaust systems but produces best power with standard, Hartge or JCW exhaust. These are the ones we tested and that are TÜV approved with our header.
Pat and I just put a nice package together for the test car. But this person must live near Pat in order to do everything 100%. Wait what that car will show on the dyno and then make up your mind.
We have a JCW S 210 tested in a car magazine next month and we will post the article. They did the 0-100 km/h testings already.
Standard JCW 210 worst 7.1 s best 6.9 s
with tuner file worst 6.2 s best 6.04 s
Not yet tested with header but they expect 5.8 s .
Agreed. That is pretty well-accepted. I've seen tests on other cars (VW/Audi) that showed similar knock sensor behavior for US and European cars running the same timing/fuel/boost settings on 93 US and 98 EU, respectively.
Originally Posted by JPit
A USA Octane rating of 93(R+M/2) is almost equal to Europe's octane rating of 98.
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
Agreed. That is pretty well-accepted. I've seen tests on other cars (VW/Audi) that showed similar knock sensor behavior for US and European cars running the same timing/fuel/boost settings on 93 US and 98 EU, respectively.
Here's the deal. I'm looking for a Houston Area MINI Cooper S (Relatively stock please), or someone close enough that they can come to Houston for a Saturday.
$1200 for the Stage 1 Kit (Manifold + Tuner File).
This includes shipping, installation, and 9 dyno runs (3 sets of 3), and lunch.
Installation and Dyno's would be done at Bavarian Hypersports. They are among the best MINI Tuners in Houston, and have a Dynojet 248C.
This is a one time deal, first come, first serve. This is a savings of over $500.
$1200 for the Stage 1 Kit (Manifold + Tuner File).
This includes shipping, installation, and 9 dyno runs (3 sets of 3), and lunch.
Installation and Dyno's would be done at Bavarian Hypersports. They are among the best MINI Tuners in Houston, and have a Dynojet 248C.
This is a one time deal, first come, first serve. This is a savings of over $500.
Last edited by tradiuz; Oct 4, 2005 at 01:10 PM.
Clarification
Originally Posted by Volker@MTH
1 kw = 1,35962 PS so 157,7 kw = 214,41207
PS
PS
hp (DIN)
This is the power measured according to the German standard DIN 70020. It is measured at the flywheel, and is in practical terms equivalent to the SAE net figure. However, be aware that DIN "horsepower" may in fact be expressed in PS (Pferdestärke) - see "Metric horsepower" below.
PS
This unit (German: Pferdestärke = horse strength) is no longer a lawful unit, but is still commonly used in Europe, South America and Japan, especially by the automotive and motorcycle industry. It was adopted throughout continental Europe with designations equivalent to the English "horse power", but mathematically different from the British unit. It is defined by the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB)[2] in Braunschweig as exactly:
1 PS = 75 kp·m/s = 735.49875 W = 0.9863201652997627 hp (SAE) The PS was adopted by the Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN), and subsequently, by the automotive industry throughout most of Europe. (In the nineteenth century, however, the French did not use this German unit, but had one of their own, the Poncelet.) In 1992, the PS was rendered obsolete by EEC directives, where it was replaced by the kilowatt as the official power measuring unit, but in situations where horsepower was used for commercial and advertising purposes, it continued to be used, as customers are not familiar with the usage of kilowatts for combustion engines.
The European and Japanese automotive industries may use "horsepower" or "hp" (rather than "PS" or "CV", etc.) when referring to metric horsepower in their press-releases or in the media.
I will be adjusting the numbers on MTH-USA to reflect SAE HP instead of metric HP, but the point will be moot soon anyway, because I'll have dyno graphs up instead of numbers mid October.
good read/info!!
so im a little bothered by the milltek not beign 'TUV approved'.....
should i worry about this, much?
so im a little bothered by the milltek not beign 'TUV approved'.....
should i worry about this, much?
Originally Posted by tradiuz
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_power
hp (DIN)
This is the power measured according to the German standard DIN 70020. It is measured at the flywheel, and is in practical terms equivalent to the SAE net figure. However, be aware that DIN "horsepower" may in fact be expressed in PS (Pferdestärke) - see "Metric horsepower" below.
PS
This unit (German: Pferdestärke = horse strength) is no longer a lawful unit, but is still commonly used in Europe, South America and Japan, especially by the automotive and motorcycle industry. It was adopted throughout continental Europe with designations equivalent to the English "horse power", but mathematically different from the British unit. It is defined by the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB)[2] in Braunschweig as exactly:
1 PS = 75 kp·m/s = 735.49875 W = 0.9863201652997627 hp (SAE) The PS was adopted by the Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN), and subsequently, by the automotive industry throughout most of Europe. (In the nineteenth century, however, the French did not use this German unit, but had one of their own, the Poncelet.) In 1992, the PS was rendered obsolete by EEC directives, where it was replaced by the kilowatt as the official power measuring unit, but in situations where horsepower was used for commercial and advertising purposes, it continued to be used, as customers are not familiar with the usage of kilowatts for combustion engines.
The European and Japanese automotive industries may use "horsepower" or "hp" (rather than "PS" or "CV", etc.) when referring to metric horsepower in their press-releases or in the media.
I will be adjusting the numbers on MTH-USA to reflect SAE HP instead of metric HP, but the point will be moot soon anyway, because I'll have dyno graphs up instead of numbers mid October.
hp (DIN)
This is the power measured according to the German standard DIN 70020. It is measured at the flywheel, and is in practical terms equivalent to the SAE net figure. However, be aware that DIN "horsepower" may in fact be expressed in PS (Pferdestärke) - see "Metric horsepower" below.
PS
This unit (German: Pferdestärke = horse strength) is no longer a lawful unit, but is still commonly used in Europe, South America and Japan, especially by the automotive and motorcycle industry. It was adopted throughout continental Europe with designations equivalent to the English "horse power", but mathematically different from the British unit. It is defined by the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB)[2] in Braunschweig as exactly:
1 PS = 75 kp·m/s = 735.49875 W = 0.9863201652997627 hp (SAE) The PS was adopted by the Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN), and subsequently, by the automotive industry throughout most of Europe. (In the nineteenth century, however, the French did not use this German unit, but had one of their own, the Poncelet.) In 1992, the PS was rendered obsolete by EEC directives, where it was replaced by the kilowatt as the official power measuring unit, but in situations where horsepower was used for commercial and advertising purposes, it continued to be used, as customers are not familiar with the usage of kilowatts for combustion engines.
The European and Japanese automotive industries may use "horsepower" or "hp" (rather than "PS" or "CV", etc.) when referring to metric horsepower in their press-releases or in the media.
I will be adjusting the numbers on MTH-USA to reflect SAE HP instead of metric HP, but the point will be moot soon anyway, because I'll have dyno graphs up instead of numbers mid October.
Vehicle Emissions Testing
TÜV Rheinland is the world leader in automotive emissions testing, and has been setting the standard for vehicle inspection for more than 30 years.
TÜV Rheinland performs millions of automobile emissions exams every year in countries around the world. In Germany, France, Spain, Latvia, Chile and Argentina, TÜV Rheinland supports emissions testing programs by providing independently staffed and operated diagnostic facilities. These operations provide efficient and cost-effective vehicle inspections to the host country.
In hundreds of other locations worldwide TÜV Rheinland provides technical support and operational advice to state-sponsored emissions testing programs.
TÜV Rheinland is the world leader in automotive emissions testing, and has been setting the standard for vehicle inspection for more than 30 years.
TÜV Rheinland performs millions of automobile emissions exams every year in countries around the world. In Germany, France, Spain, Latvia, Chile and Argentina, TÜV Rheinland supports emissions testing programs by providing independently staffed and operated diagnostic facilities. These operations provide efficient and cost-effective vehicle inspections to the host country.
In hundreds of other locations worldwide TÜV Rheinland provides technical support and operational advice to state-sponsored emissions testing programs.
.The reason I posted this information is to prevent any misconception about our products, or doubts about our claims based on numbers being listed incorrectly (even though the terms PS/HP are interchangeable in parts of Europe). For the record, its only 1.94% different.
Last edited by tradiuz; Sep 26, 2005 at 09:07 PM.
?
yea that's what i was wonderin' (carb approved) but oh well.....
will u be addin' any more interior 'bitz' to ur list?
yea that's what i was wonderin' (carb approved) but oh well.....will u be addin' any more interior 'bitz' to ur list?
Originally Posted by tradiuz
It would only matter if you were going to drive your car in Germany. TUV is similar to CARB, UL, and EPA. I doubt the Miltek is CARB approved either
.
The reason I posted this information is to prevent any misconception about our products, or doubts about our claims based on numbers being listed incorrectly (even though the terms PS/HP are interchangeable in parts of Europe). For the record, its only 1.94% different.

.The reason I posted this information is to prevent any misconception about our products, or doubts about our claims based on numbers being listed incorrectly (even though the terms PS/HP are interchangeable in parts of Europe). For the record, its only 1.94% different.

Originally Posted by joker
?
yea that's what i was wonderin' (carb approved) but oh well.....
will u be addin' any more interior 'bitz' to ur list?
yea that's what i was wonderin' (carb approved) but oh well.....will u be addin' any more interior 'bitz' to ur list?


