R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 R53 JCW vs R56 JCW in a straight line?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2016 | 06:52 AM
  #1  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
R53 JCW vs R56 JCW in a straight line?

Hi everyone,

i have been searching for the answer of this, but i haven't found my answer yet.

Cooper R53 JCW (210hp) vs Cooper R56 JCW (211hp)

I've come across alot of 'theories' about which one is faster and most people say the R56 will be, because it has more torque.
I can't agree 100% since the R53 has it's torque higher up, so better use of it during a drag.

I'm not after the whole physics story of torque*rpm/5252 blabla, since the real world is always different...

So my question to you guys, which one is faster in a straight line (any first hand experience?)
And how big is the difference?

I would love to know!
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2016 | 08:01 AM
  #2  
bavmotors's Avatar
bavmotors
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,387
Likes: 14
From: Near Buffalo NY
The r56 is the faster car, they usually don't make new models slower.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2016 | 08:21 AM
  #3  
JPMM's Avatar
JPMM
6th Gear
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,796
Likes: 11
From: East IA
I had a lightly modded JCW R53 when I met up with a guy that had a stock FJCW R56 , I drove his car and he drove my car . I spanked him every time we took off. But I think, he never revved my car out as much as he should, as he was driving it more like his turbo car. But overall the turbo car spanked the R53.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2016 | 09:30 AM
  #4  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Okay, i'm wondering, since the 0-100 times and 1/4 mile don't seem to differ a lot (from what i've seen on the web), i quess it's pretty much down to the driver as well..
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2016 | 10:07 AM
  #5  
JPMM's Avatar
JPMM
6th Gear
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,796
Likes: 11
From: East IA
We were doing slow speed roll ons, so traction wasn't as much an issue.Dead stop runs the cars would be matched more closely IMHO.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2016 | 03:49 PM
  #6  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Yes, i can imagine.. always had the same problem with my Volvo diesel, it never worked to pull away fast and clean at the traffic light, since it was spinning all over the place..
The R56 (especially tuned) should require the same "soft foot" while leaving from standstill.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2016 | 04:55 PM
  #7  
JPMM's Avatar
JPMM
6th Gear
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,796
Likes: 11
From: East IA
Originally Posted by DutchMini
......
The R56 (especially tuned) should require the same "soft foot" while leaving from standstill.

you got that right! ( even with 235's)
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2016 | 08:30 AM
  #8  
nkfry's Avatar
nkfry
Vendor - Detroit Tuned 15 Years
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 34
From: Clawson, MI
Stock for stock the R56 is going to have a better low end, but the R53 should over take on the top end. R56 power falls of around 5900 RPM, R53 will pull all the way to redline.
 
__________________
https://www.northamericanmotoring.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic151635_2.gif
MINI Specialists * Parts * Performance * Service
Phone:586-792-6464
Info@DetroitTuned.com
Nick@DetroitTuned.com
Reply
Old May 31, 2016 | 09:41 AM
  #9  
MarioKart's Avatar
MarioKart
Vendor
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 117
From: Ventura, CA
I have done his race and I have owned both cars. The R56 will win every time. The torque puts the car way in front.

mQubed Motorsport, Manic Tuning Dealer
 
__________________
2013 GP2 #295, 270whp/310wtq, KO4 47mm Turbo, 18" NM Wheels, Alta intake, Manic Stage III+, HFS-3 Meth, 30% E85 Blend, Forged IC, Alta Hot Pipe, P&P/Ceramic Exhaust Manifold, m3 Extreme Ceramic DP, Vibrant mid res, 4" Double walled Tips, WMW/KW V3 CO, Alta Rear CA, CREE Fogs, Black out F/R Rings and Gas Cap, M7 CF Front Splitter, and No Stickers. MORE TO COME!! Previous 04Triple Black 17% Alta, MM Air/H2O, CAI, OBX Header, FBT Head, Shrick Cam, 234whp
Reply
Old May 31, 2016 | 10:03 AM
  #10  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Okay, well today i raced a kitted R56 (N18 engine with JCW kit = 200hp) and since i have the R53 JCW (210hp with GP intercooler, stock tune), i was wondering who would be faster...

We did 2 runs, one from low speed (40 km/h) and one from a bit higher (80 km/h) and my car was quite a bit faster than his.
I expected his torque to have the advantage initially, but as soon as my rpm's got higher, i started to pull away harder than he did.

A JCW 211 would probably be a bit different, but i think we'd match quite nice in terms of acceleration.
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2016 | 12:01 PM
  #11  
Shawnnn's Avatar
Shawnnn
5th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 680
Likes: 5
From: SE Wisconsin
http://www.zeroto60times.com/vehicle...-quarter-mile/

From credible sources, whatever that means.

Every driver is different and every car is different, even the the same model and year, even more so as they get older.
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2016 | 03:16 PM
  #12  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Yes, i agree!
However my car is from 2006 (30k miles) and his is from 2010 (40k miles) so i don't expect a lot of engine 'wear' causing a bigger difference than usual.

I know mine is a genuine factory JCW with certificate, but his car has been retrofitted with the 200 kit.
You could ask yourself how that's been done?
He does have the intake, exhaust, badges and engine serial number, so i expect a full kit.
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2016 | 05:43 PM
  #13  
MarioKart's Avatar
MarioKart
Vendor
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 117
From: Ventura, CA
Originally Posted by DutchMini
Yes, i agree! However my car is from 2006 (30k miles) and his is from 2010 (40k miles) so i don't expect a lot of engine 'wear' causing a bigger difference than usual. I know mine is a genuine factory JCW with certificate, but his car has been retrofitted with the 200 kit. You could ask yourself how that's been done? He does have the intake, exhaust, badges and engine serial number, so i expect a full kit.
His JCW might be missing the larger turbo and more aggressive software.

mQubed Motorsport, Manic Tuning Dealer
 
__________________
2013 GP2 #295, 270whp/310wtq, KO4 47mm Turbo, 18" NM Wheels, Alta intake, Manic Stage III+, HFS-3 Meth, 30% E85 Blend, Forged IC, Alta Hot Pipe, P&P/Ceramic Exhaust Manifold, m3 Extreme Ceramic DP, Vibrant mid res, 4" Double walled Tips, WMW/KW V3 CO, Alta Rear CA, CREE Fogs, Black out F/R Rings and Gas Cap, M7 CF Front Splitter, and No Stickers. MORE TO COME!! Previous 04Triple Black 17% Alta, MM Air/H2O, CAI, OBX Header, FBT Head, Shrick Cam, 234whp
Reply
Old May 31, 2016 | 08:50 PM
  #14  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MarioKart
His JCW might be missing the larger turbo and more aggressive software.

mQubed Motorsport, Manic Tuning Dealer
I've read the larger turbo is part of the factory 211 car and not the 200 kit, is this true?

He told me it's the 200 kit with the appropriate software.
Obviously a remap would give him gains, but that would be the same for me..
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2016 | 09:05 AM
  #15  
MINIAC's Avatar
MINIAC
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 94
From: Tsunami Zone
2nd Gen MCS JCW Tuning Kits and Factory Models - The MINI Wiki
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2016 | 09:15 AM
  #16  
Saltysalt's Avatar
Saltysalt
6th Gear
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 15
From: Dover, NH
from a dig, I think the r53 would have it, I don't think the JCW r56 has a limited slip? stock for stock, whereas the r56 has more potential within an easier access to be faster
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2016 | 10:09 AM
  #17  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
I don't know wether he has a limited slip diff or not..
I know i have and it makes a lot of difference from standstill, it can be nailed almost perfectly everytime with minimal wheelspin!

And obviously a turbo'ed car has tons of potential, but i thought the character and sound of the supercharger was that tiny bit more important to me
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2016 | 10:18 AM
  #18  
Saltysalt's Avatar
Saltysalt
6th Gear
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 15
From: Dover, NH
I like both, rotary mufflers are really good sounding, but so is an unrestricted intake tract for a supercharger. I like the driving dynamics of an r53 over an r56. the r53 feels more connected to the driver. but after the first few mods, it becomes very pricy to upgrade, and now that the 3rd gen is out, the aftermarket is slowly dieing off for the 1st gen
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2016 | 11:13 AM
  #19  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
I can only agree!

I'd love a supercharged 2.0 in a Cooper
(Would never happen though...)
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2016 | 01:50 PM
  #20  
Saltysalt's Avatar
Saltysalt
6th Gear
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 15
From: Dover, NH
why wouldn't it? theres k20 swaps and 1.8t swaps
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2016 | 02:00 PM
  #21  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Yes, but i was talking about a factory model, would love that!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ebowling
Stock Problems/Issues
16
May 6, 2016 03:11 PM
Pertplus
JCW Garage
17
Mar 23, 2016 08:11 PM
1004ron
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
9
Mar 22, 2016 09:39 AM
mcn02
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
1
Mar 17, 2016 03:59 PM
Doc Pain
Stock Problems/Issues
1
Mar 14, 2016 09:01 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:05 PM.