General MINI Talk Shared experiences, motoring minutes, and other general MINI-related discussion that applies to all MINIs, regardless of model, year or trim.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Acetone in fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #1  
xbritt's Avatar
xbritt
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 270
Likes: 3
From: So. California
Acetone in fuel

I just read an article about adding 100% pure acetone in your gas. 2 oz added to 10 gals. Supposedly it adds up to 35% more MPG. Is anyone doing this in their MINI?

Article
http://www.pureenergysystems.com/new...00069_Acetone/
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 03:13 PM
  #2  
planeguy's Avatar
planeguy
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Kansas
since thier own claim is that this is only a vaporization aid and the quantity and purpose is not to increase the amount of energy in the chemical being used for combustion the claim of 15% to 35% increase is HIGHLY SUSPECT....simply put we are talking about energy, if you are to get 35% more energy you have to be wasting 35% of energy....meaning 35% of the fuel injected is exhausted unburned and uncombusted that simply defies the test of common sense.

Furthermore the notion that there is this simple great overlooked secret to greater fuel economy simply strikes me as ridiculous.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 03:36 PM
  #3  
SEAL6's Avatar
SEAL6
4th Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 1
From: Eugene, Oregon
Their claims look very interesting.
Wiki info here: http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directo..._Fuel_Additive

However what frightens me is what acetone is. How harmful it is to us as well as our car's paint and potentially causing fuel lines or fuel system damage.

With that in mind...anyone up for testing it out???
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #4  
4xAAA's Avatar
4xAAA
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
From: Bryan Texas
I agree with the above response as I too am a skeptic. 35% seems to be an extremely high number.
On the other hand, there is some room for improvement. Catalytic converters, under cars since '73, have 3 tasks. Reduce NO2 and VOC emissions and provide feedback for the fuel mixture control system. To my knowledge VOC=fuel. The first stage is the O2 sensor.
Nitrogen is scavenged from the exhaust in the second stage of the converter (reduction). The liberated oxygen then continues through the converter with the VOCs where it is burned in the Oxidation stage.
So, how much is burned? I don't know, but every molecule that burns in the exhaust is wasted product.
I think there is a simpler way to evaluate this process. An absolute measurement of VOC exhaust load, with and without acetone, upstream of the catalytic converter would put this to rest.
Since that data is not provided.... I remain a skeptic.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #5  
Yucca Patrol's Avatar
Yucca Patrol
Coordinator :: Alabama Motoring Society & South East
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 2
From: Burning-Ham Alabama
I don't know about acetone, but toluene and xylene have been commonly used as octane boosters. Search for "home brew race gas"
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 06:38 AM
  #6  
cristo's Avatar
cristo
Alliance Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,100
Likes: 229
From: York, Pennsylvania
here's an old thread (with references to several other threads as well):
https://www.northamericanmotoring.com/forums/showthread.php?t=54520
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 07:03 AM
  #7  
planeguy's Avatar
planeguy
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by Yucca Patrol
I don't know about acetone, but toluene and xylene have been commonly used as octane boosters. Search for "home brew race gas"
But octane is just "resistance to pre-ignition" or pinping and is not a measure of energy....the fuel is combusting to early, increasing "vaporization" to me makes that more likely not less likely. pre-ignition is by nature ineffecient. but ultimately raising octane does not improve mpg one bit unless you geting pinging at the lower octane, in which case the uncontolled combustion is in effecient
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IQRaceworks
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
53
Jun 28, 2024 07:29 AM
OutMotoring
Vendor Announcements
118
Mar 3, 2017 06:29 AM
wildwestrider
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
11
Jan 29, 2016 05:06 PM
HK_MCS
R58 :: Coupé Talk (2012+)
5
Oct 4, 2015 08:03 PM
dutchhome
Stock Problems/Issues
15
Sep 30, 2015 07:17 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:59 PM.