General MINI Talk Shared experiences, motoring minutes, and other general MINI-related discussion that applies to all MINIs, regardless of model, year or trim.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Engine Carbon Buildup Problem census count

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2012 | 10:33 PM
  #76  
carverbaby's Avatar
carverbaby
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: bay area, ca
so for all you guys that have run into this problem, what are your driving styles like?

i used to baby my car, rarely gassing it, but i've been told that regularly revving the engine helps avoid this...
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2012 | 10:47 PM
  #77  
ra2fanatic's Avatar
ra2fanatic
6th Gear
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 22
From: SoCal
Walnut shell blasting performed at 39k miles. Now I'm at 47k miles. In the 8k miles after the valve cleaning I had been running meth via Aquamist HFS-4, so I'm a happy camper.

No issues to date since. I drive aggressive and I track, so no babying the MINI here.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2012 | 06:25 AM
  #78  
Helix13mini's Avatar
Helix13mini
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 17
From: Under your car
Originally Posted by carverbaby
so for all you guys that have run into this problem, what are your driving styles like?

i used to baby my car, rarely gassing it, but i've been told that regularly revving the engine helps avoid this...
This isn't going to help. That idea is from the old days, when cylinders of carbureted cars would build up carbon, and getting the engines really hot would burn some of that carbon off. This build-up is outside of the cylinders, on the intake valves and runners.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2012 | 07:51 AM
  #79  
jhull413's Avatar
jhull413
4th Gear
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Lake Saint Louis, MO
Originally Posted by Helix13mini
This isn't going to help. That idea is from the old days, when cylinders of carbureted cars would build up carbon, and getting the engines really hot would burn some of that carbon off. This build-up is outside of the cylinders, on the intake valves and runners.
What!!! You mean now I'm going to have to drive aggressively just for fun?
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 03:30 PM
  #80  
shmachelo's Avatar
shmachelo
Neutral
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
'09 MCS
25K miles
Engine light came on, brought it to Universal City Mini.
Repaired at no charge because still under manufacturer warranty.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 10:47 PM
  #81  
timwu13's Avatar
timwu13
3rd Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
so, just to confirm, that harbor freight 15lb portable soda blaster is good for cleaning the carbon on the intake valves?

As in, I can use this blaster and a vacuum to suck out the media instead of manually cleaning with a brush, right?
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 11:02 PM
  #82  
Scooter09's Avatar
Scooter09
4th Gear
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 310
Likes: 3
From: Mililani, HI
Originally Posted by timwu13
so, just to confirm, that harbor freight 15lb portable soda blaster is good for cleaning the carbon on the intake valves?

As in, I can use this blaster and a vacuum to suck out the media instead of manually cleaning with a brush, right?

Check out this thread.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 02:43 AM
  #83  
timwu13's Avatar
timwu13
3rd Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
thanks, scooter! That was extremely helpful!
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2012 | 08:40 AM
  #84  
Cricket09's Avatar
Cricket09
Neutral
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Columbus Ohio
2008 MiniS dx'd with carbon buildup at 27k miles; engine was "missing" before the cleanup and now runs fine; question: when shifting, I have skipped gears i.e., I'll shift from 3rd to 5th or 4th to 6th when I'm going fast enough to do so...never noticed any lagging, but could this have contributed to the carbon issue?
 

Last edited by Cricket09; Dec 31, 2012 at 08:43 AM. Reason: added more info
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 07:56 AM
  #85  
Helix's Avatar
Helix
1st Gear
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
i've had the check engine light multiple times for various reasons, but mostly because of buildup. i have a 2010 S which now has 52,000 miles. most recent buildup problem was fixed yesterday for more than $600. i would have to check my records to be sure, but i think this was the third time for the exact same problem, though it was the first time i actually had to pay for it. apparently, the extended warranty doesn't cover this, even though it appears to be a vehicle design defect.

i've never put anything but 93 octane in the car, and i routinely add a bottle of techron. this has not fixed the problem, though that's what they tell me to do every time i bring it in for the same issue. this time, they're recommending crud b gone, so i'll do that.

i love the car, but i've never had this many issues with a brand new vehicle right out of the gate. when this happens again, i'm contacting Mini, because they need to make this right.
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 08:02 AM
  #86  
Helix13mini's Avatar
Helix13mini
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 17
From: Under your car
Originally Posted by Helix
i've had the check engine light multiple times for various reasons, but mostly because of buildup. i have a 2010 S which now has 52,000 miles. most recent buildup problem was fixed yesterday for more than $600. i would have to check my records to be sure, but i think this was the third time for the exact same problem, though it was the first time i actually had to pay for it. apparently, the extended warranty doesn't cover this, even though it appears to be a vehicle design defect.

i've never put anything but 93 octane in the car, and i routinely add a bottle of techron. this has not fixed the problem, though that's what they tell me to do every time i bring it in for the same issue. this time, they're recommending crud b gone, so i'll do that.

i love the car, but i've never had this many issues with a brand new vehicle right out of the gate. when this happens again, i'm contacting Mini, because they need to make this right.
Nice handle! Private shops such as Helix can do it for much less. We charge $350 for the job, utilizing the factory walnut shell cleaning machine.
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 08:12 AM
  #87  
Helix's Avatar
Helix
1st Gear
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Helix13mini
Nice handle! Private shops such as Helix can do it for much less. We charge $350 for the job, utilizing the factory walnut shell cleaning machine.
thanks!

i'll certainly look into other options. i generally keep my cars for a very long time, and had planned to do so with the S, as well. however, exorbitant maintenance costs might keep me from doing that. i'm cautiously optimistic, though, because i really like the car.
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 09:09 AM
  #88  
J*Hawk*83's Avatar
J*Hawk*83
Neutral
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
I ended up taking mine to the MINI house since mechanics nearby either couldnt do it, or werent giving much of a price break. I also tried to take it apart and manually clean it like some of the other threads mentioned, NOT easy as it seems. Ended up $768.00 :(
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 04:10 PM
  #89  
LASRGUY's Avatar
LASRGUY
2nd Gear
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Thousand Oaks, CA
Motoring Magic in Thousand Oaks(north of Los Angeles) does it for about $400
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 12:40 PM
  #90  
hockeydad51's Avatar
hockeydad51
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: NJ
07 MCS - 90k miles - $400 for the cleaning.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 03:16 PM
  #91  
james.hinkle's Avatar
james.hinkle
Neutral
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
07 Mini S, 75,000mi, $500 for walnut shell cleaning.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 11:30 PM
  #92  
PatM's Avatar
PatM
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,194
Likes: 2
From: Washington
Can't believe I am posting this.

I have been a Mini supporter since we bought our first Mini's in 2009. I traded in my 09 MCS on a 2012 JCW Coupe. We really like the cars. But I am starting to be a guy who has Mini's but is now starting to make plans to off em.

I'm starting to have that "I've been taken" feeling. My wife's car has about 56000 miles on it now. She drives 48 miles to work round trip 4 days per week. This is freeway driving at 60 to 65 mph. So her car gets warm. We put the gas treatment in every 3000 miles, change the oil every 7500 miles, only Chevron top tier premium fuel and we drive them. Drive them hard.

Trust me it makes no difference. You can do all you want but it will not stop the problem. She has now had the top end of the car done due to timing chain issue, replaced the turbo pipes, had the walnut cleaning due to CEL misfires caused from carbon buildup 11,000 miles ago, and had to have it done again last week. The car is out of factory warranty but does have the extended bumper to bumper and extended maintenance warranties. Neither which cover the carbon problem. The dealer was kind enough to comp the cleaning, the dealership paid 66% of the bill and Mini paid the balance. I was told the next time I would have to pay $350. I guess since I have spent about 100K with the dealership they thought it a decent thing to do. It was.

It was kind of demeaning to my wife. The service guys says, this is your wife's car right, I said yes , he said well she needs to drive it harder. Trust me my wife's drives her car hard enough. That has nothing to do with it. It's a design defect plain and simple.

Anyway I'm not going to go on and on. It's just apparent to me that the Mini is overpriced for what it is and I guess it's my fault for not doing my due diligence. I have to take responsibility for that.

So were to the point where were just going to drive the crap out of them and trade em off. It's good both cars are paid for so that isn't an issue. We'll keep my wife's car till the warranty is up. 100K or 6 years. Mine is a different issue. I'm not going to buy the extended warranty on mine. WAYYYYYY to expensive. So I'm going to trade it in at 4 yrs or 50K. Someone will get a good ride. We take good care of our cars.

Anyway the point is these cars are way expensive for what they are. Sure they handle great and all that, I agree, fun as all get out. But the cost to maintain at this point has got me down. I was never like this but I guess age is getting to me.

Jeez what a windbag I was on this post. Sorry. But I do feel a bit better. In the meantime we'll just keep driving till it's trade in time. I guess we'll buy a couple of Toyota Corollas. Low maintenance costs and they actually get better fuel economy than the Mini MCS and Coupe JCW by a mile and on regular gas. (But the Mini's are gonna kick my butt on the road. Fair enough trade for me now.)
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 12:46 AM
  #93  
Vindr's Avatar
Vindr
1st Gear
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
I am new to mini's. I guess this is something for me to watch for. Does the oil catch cans really help this problem? What about Seafoam?
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 04:52 AM
  #94  
fastzombie's Avatar
fastzombie
4th Gear
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 579
Likes: 15
From: Maine
So I have an R53 2004 S and it doesn't seem like this is a problem for these models...it looks like just the newer models?
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 06:00 AM
  #95  
bratling's Avatar
bratling
Super Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 218
From: North of Boston, MA
Originally Posted by fastzombie
So I have an R53 2004 S and it doesn't seem like this is a problem for these models...it looks like just the newer models?
Correct: the engines up through 2006 don't have the serious build up problem. It's the 2007+ turbo charged, direct injection N14 engines that are troublesome. The newer N18 (2011+ I think?) may be better.

In any case you are safe.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 06:04 AM
  #96  
actasci's Avatar
actasci
2nd Gear
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 149
Likes: 5
From: Ankara, Turkey
09 mcs, around 40k. at about 30k, check engine light blinked. i ask this to my dealer, and they said that was just a misfire. they just erased diagnostic data and no problems ever since. never did a cleaning for carbon buildup.

and believe me, i am using the worst gasoline in my country. 95 octane without additives, cheapest. and i never drive hard. just plain economy drive under 2k rpm. well, sometimes i ask myself too, why am i using this car? but i am green from genes.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 07:21 AM
  #97  
PatM's Avatar
PatM
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,194
Likes: 2
From: Washington
Trust me you will be back. The problem will manifest itself again. Get your checkbook ready.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 03:38 PM
  #98  
LASRGUY's Avatar
LASRGUY
2nd Gear
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Thousand Oaks, CA
Catch can, Seafoam, and methanol injection likely slow down the problem but there's no cure. I use them all and made it to 60k miles with no CEL from this issue but wow what a difference in power when I finally did get a walnut shell cleaning.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 11:16 AM
  #99  
shaslers's Avatar
shaslers
1st Gear
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
'07 MCS media blasted (walnut shell) at 75K mi. Quoted me $900 and "discounted" it to $800.

After blasting the hesitation was better, but not completely gone when accelerating.

Was told to add Techron every six weeks or so, which I've been doing and am now at 100K miles and I almost never notice it anymore. I understand that Chevron and Texaco fuels already have Techron mixed in, but I rarely encounter these stations in my area.

I admit that I did not use 93 octane fuel for the first year or so of ownership until I saw the light, and it has been suggested to me that this contributed to the gunkage.

I'm still a bit confused, however, since I was under the impression that with direct injection the fuel never gets to the top of the valves and therefor the quality of the fuel, or Techron for that matter, can't keep things clean.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 11:53 AM
  #100  
Helix13mini's Avatar
Helix13mini
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 17
From: Under your car
Originally Posted by shaslers
'07 MCS media blasted (walnut shell) at 75K mi. Quoted me $900 and "discounted" it to $800.


I admit that I did not use 93 octane fuel for the first year or so of ownership until I saw the light, and it has been suggested to me that this contributed to the gunkage.
Wow. We're less than half your 'discounted price'. I doubt you would experience a measurable difference in build-up based upon your use of lower octane fuel.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:40 PM.