Drivetrain DFIC mods
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
Thanks for posting the images, Partsman! I don't know if we could ever measure the impact of air-streaming the flow through the DFIC, but thanks to you, it inspired me to do what I had wanted to do ever since I got my DFIC up at MITM. It sure looks *right* and cant' hurt, that's for sure. The airfoils add about 2 oz total in weight.
As I said, I had problems with the grommets on the Aerogel blanket, because I am not running the M7 diverter, but one of my own design. It tries to send a little fresh air under the IC, which causes some interference with the Aerogel grommets. I've no doubt that Peter's more extensive experience will hold true for all those who are getting this new addition to the thermal control arsenal.
I am very confident that the M7 boots will provide the best seal of all the available options--there's no doubt they are more pliable than the other silicone boots I've used.
Peter--was there enough M7 logos in the 3rd photo? I count 3 -- maybe I need one of those valve cover ones...
As I said, I had problems with the grommets on the Aerogel blanket, because I am not running the M7 diverter, but one of my own design. It tries to send a little fresh air under the IC, which causes some interference with the Aerogel grommets. I've no doubt that Peter's more extensive experience will hold true for all those who are getting this new addition to the thermal control arsenal.
I am very confident that the M7 boots will provide the best seal of all the available options--there's no doubt they are more pliable than the other silicone boots I've used.
Peter--was there enough M7 logos in the 3rd photo? I count 3 -- maybe I need one of those valve cover ones...
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
Thanks for posting the images, Partsman! I don't know if we could ever measure the impact of air-streaming the flow through the DFIC, but thanks to you, it inspired me to do what I had wanted to do ever since I got my DFIC up at MITM. It sure looks *right* and cant' hurt, that's for sure. The airfoils add about 2 oz total in weight.
Originally Posted by DrPhilGandini
As I said, I had problems with the grommets on the Aerogel blanket, because I am not running the M7 diverter, but one of my own design. It tries to send a little fresh air under the IC, which causes some interference with the Aerogel grommets. I've no doubt that Peter's more extensive experience will hold true for all those who are getting this new addition to the thermal control arsenal.

and try to duct some air underneath the DFIC.
Originally Posted by DrPhilGandini
I am very confident that the M7 boots will provide the best seal of all the available options--there's no doubt they are more pliable than the other silicone boots I've used.

nice and smooth for the diverter rubber seal to seal it off.
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
No, I understood what you were meaning about the bung dummies. I was actually going to keep them as Peter has told me they will accept probes, etc for even more measurements... My diverter will seal against the welds once I put the rubber gaskets on--not in my photos as posted.
I was actually talking about the IC inlet and outlet boots--I had been waiting for all the mods to do at once--the airfoils, the blanket and the boots. This weekend was the right time. These boots are really good.
cheers,
I was actually talking about the IC inlet and outlet boots--I had been waiting for all the mods to do at once--the airfoils, the blanket and the boots. This weekend was the right time. These boots are really good.
cheers,
Just a quick question to Dr Phil and Partsman - where did you guys find the half round aluminum stock to JB weld to your DFIC?
I've looked at our local RC Radio Plane shop and they don't carry them.
Thanks, I'm always interested in what you brainiacs are working on, it betters us all.
Paul
I've looked at our local RC Radio Plane shop and they don't carry them.
Thanks, I'm always interested in what you brainiacs are working on, it betters us all.
Paul
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
No, I understood what you were meaning about the bung dummies. I was actually going to keep them as Peter has told me they will accept probes, etc for even more measurements... My diverter will seal against the welds once I put the rubber gaskets on--not in my photos as posted.
I was actually talking about the IC inlet and outlet boots--I had been waiting for all the mods to do at once--the airfoils, the blanket and the boots. This weekend was the right time. These boots are really good.
cheers,
I was actually talking about the IC inlet and outlet boots--I had been waiting for all the mods to do at once--the airfoils, the blanket and the boots. This weekend was the right time. These boots are really good.
cheers,
Just a quick question to Dr Phil and Partsman - where did you guys find the half round aluminum stock to JB weld to your DFIC?
I've looked at our local RC Radio Plane shop and they don't carry them.
Thanks, I'm always interested in what you brainiacs are working on, it betters us all.
Paul
I've looked at our local RC Radio Plane shop and they don't carry them.
Thanks, I'm always interested in what you brainiacs are working on, it betters us all.
Paul
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
I'm still very curious to see what this will look like and how it will be setup.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
Nice. That looks pretty cool.
About the foam on the diverter, how well does that work? That's the first i've seen that way.
About the foam on the diverter, how well does that work? That's the first i've seen that way.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
Cool. I'll have to try that.
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
Here are the numbers from this morning's run to work.
Conditions: cold, fresh air. Some moisture/humidity. Highway cruising 3000rpm 6th gear.
IC was heat soaked after a 15minute wait in traffic to drop my daughter off at school, stop start jammed up.
(all temps F -- instrument in parens)
ambient: 27 (MINI probe)
airbox: 25 (drP probe)
SC out: 175 (VR gauge)
IC out: 55 (VR gauge)
IA: 48 (ScangaugeII)
TE: (175-55)/(175-27) = 80% approx.
That's a 28F approach. I've more often seen 20-10F approaches so I don't think the IC had enough time to settle down after the heat soak.
IN terms of TE, though, this is about what I was seeing before, so all my mods (FAD, Aerogel, airfoils) don't do much better than my big hole scoop alone...
Or not
Conditions: cold, fresh air. Some moisture/humidity. Highway cruising 3000rpm 6th gear.
IC was heat soaked after a 15minute wait in traffic to drop my daughter off at school, stop start jammed up.
(all temps F -- instrument in parens)
ambient: 27 (MINI probe)
airbox: 25 (drP probe)
SC out: 175 (VR gauge)
IC out: 55 (VR gauge)
IA: 48 (ScangaugeII)
TE: (175-55)/(175-27) = 80% approx.
That's a 28F approach. I've more often seen 20-10F approaches so I don't think the IC had enough time to settle down after the heat soak.
IN terms of TE, though, this is about what I was seeing before, so all my mods (FAD, Aerogel, airfoils) don't do much better than my big hole scoop alone...
Or not
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
Here are the numbers from this morning's run to work.
Conditions: cold, fresh air. Some moisture/humidity. Highway cruising 3000rpm 6th gear.
IC was heat soaked after a 15minute wait in traffic to drop my daughter off at school, stop start jammed up.
(all temps F -- instrument in parens)
ambient: 27 (MINI probe)
airbox: 25 (drP probe)
SC out: 175 (VR gauge)
IC out: 55 (VR gauge)
IA: 48 (ScangaugeII)
TE: (175-55)/(175-27) = 80% approx.
That's a 28F approach. I've more often seen 20-10F approaches so I don't think the IC had enough time to settle down after the heat soak.
IN terms of TE, though, this is about what I was seeing before, so all my mods (FAD, Aerogel, airfoils) don't do much better than my big hole scoop alone...
Or not
Conditions: cold, fresh air. Some moisture/humidity. Highway cruising 3000rpm 6th gear.
IC was heat soaked after a 15minute wait in traffic to drop my daughter off at school, stop start jammed up.
(all temps F -- instrument in parens)
ambient: 27 (MINI probe)
airbox: 25 (drP probe)
SC out: 175 (VR gauge)
IC out: 55 (VR gauge)
IA: 48 (ScangaugeII)
TE: (175-55)/(175-27) = 80% approx.
That's a 28F approach. I've more often seen 20-10F approaches so I don't think the IC had enough time to settle down after the heat soak.
IN terms of TE, though, this is about what I was seeing before, so all my mods (FAD, Aerogel, airfoils) don't do much better than my big hole scoop alone...
Or not
Cruising at 3000rpm, were you showing boost?
I think being into boost while you're taking your readings may give you a better idea as to the effects of the mods.
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
I doubt there was boost. This has been one of the "measurement topics" since Dr Obnxs always measures the IC pressure drop and TE at WOT in 2nd gear. Others, like me, measure it at cruise, no boost, etc. TBH, I only do it my way because I'm manually logging the data--I would really like a 4 temp and 2 pressure data logger that I could just plug into my laptop... It's just too hard, without a passenger (and why add all that weight?) to log all the data that I'm generating at the moment.
...but your point is well taken. From past measurements, I'd say that while TE falls under boost conditions, the improvement in TE might actually be greater.
I installed the rubber gaskets for the diverter to the IC, and that puppies nice and sealed now--all the air coming in the RBH scoop is going through the IC, I have no doubts at all! The FAD is also sending lots of fresh, cold, and this morning damp, air into the airbox--the airbox temp is actually colder than ambient! sweet...
Are we gilding the lily, Partsman?
...but your point is well taken. From past measurements, I'd say that while TE falls under boost conditions, the improvement in TE might actually be greater.
I installed the rubber gaskets for the diverter to the IC, and that puppies nice and sealed now--all the air coming in the RBH scoop is going through the IC, I have no doubts at all! The FAD is also sending lots of fresh, cold, and this morning damp, air into the airbox--the airbox temp is actually colder than ambient! sweet...
Are we gilding the lily, Partsman?
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
I doubt there was boost. This has been one of the "measurement topics" since Dr Obnxs always measures the IC pressure drop and TE at WOT in 2nd gear. Others, like me, measure it at cruise, no boost, etc. TBH, I only do it my way because I'm manually logging the data--I would really like a 4 temp and 2 pressure data logger that I could just plug into my laptop... It's just too hard, without a passenger (and why add all that weight?) to log all the data that I'm generating at the moment.
...but you're point is well taken. From past measurements, I'd say that while TE falls under boost conditions, the improvement in TE might actually be greater.
...but you're point is well taken. From past measurements, I'd say that while TE falls under boost conditions, the improvement in TE might actually be greater.
I can get 15psi in 6th gear on the highway, the car just pulls, smooth as butter.
Originally Posted by DrPhilGandini
I installed the rubber gaskets for the diverter to the IC, and that puppies nice and sealed now--all the air coming in the RBH scoop is going through the IC, I have no doubts at all! The FAD is also sending lots of fresh, cold, and this morning damp, air into the airbox--the airbox temp is actually colder than ambient! sweet...
Are we gilding the lily, Partsman?
Are we gilding the lily, Partsman?
Airbox temps lower than ambient is great, nice job!
Phil, I still don't understand how your SC exit temps are 175 F while cruising on the highway (no boost situation), and the ambient temps are like 27 F! Not that I doubt your experimental technique or equipment, but this is just so much higher than others have posted (see Andy's early work) or what I've seen myself (~55F day, 120F SC out). And I've even got the VGS hooked up! Could there be that much difference between SC performance?
Partsman, it would be nice to measure TEs under boost, but the trouble is getting steady state conditions. For example, I find TE is highest under short term acceleration, probably because of thermal mass in the IC. I think it is better to use steady state numbers from non-boost conditions rather than unsteady state in boost. Agreed, the ideal situation is steady state boost, and there is a hill that I drive everyday to work where I can get about 20 sec of steady 5 psi boost in 6th gear. So, this might work. But heat transfer is heat transfer, so if the TE improves under non-boost conditions, it WILL improve under boost conditions!
Partsman, it would be nice to measure TEs under boost, but the trouble is getting steady state conditions. For example, I find TE is highest under short term acceleration, probably because of thermal mass in the IC. I think it is better to use steady state numbers from non-boost conditions rather than unsteady state in boost. Agreed, the ideal situation is steady state boost, and there is a hill that I drive everyday to work where I can get about 20 sec of steady 5 psi boost in 6th gear. So, this might work. But heat transfer is heat transfer, so if the TE improves under non-boost conditions, it WILL improve under boost conditions!
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
I agree, inimmini--but the temperatures before the experiment are consistent--every gauge measures the same temperature within 1F when I get in the car in the morning. So if the SC out temps are high, then that probe is measuring non-linearly. I did put the VGS back in for smooth pulling, and we know it does raise temps, but only about 10F. My SC out temps are consistent with those reported by M7 and Webb on other threads, and at earlier times.
TBH, your temps are consistently the lowest I've ever seen reported. I too don't doubt them, becuase I really wish I had an intake system that ran that cold. But your IAs aren't all that much lower than the ones I'm seeing, if I remember the charts you posted--although ambient was much higher. And in the end, it's the approach that's important. The 28F approach reported above is one of the highest I've seen over the last couple of months. Normally it's 10F cruising, and 20F in traffic, rising to 40F in jams and idling for minutes.
Still, I'll keep reporting temps, and by the end of this year, we'll have a good range over lots of ambient temps for one car, at least!
Concerning SS verses transitional TEs--as we all know, these IA temps jump around all over the place--it's very difficult to get a good "picture" of what's really happening. Auto logging tools would help, for sure.
TBH, your temps are consistently the lowest I've ever seen reported. I too don't doubt them, becuase I really wish I had an intake system that ran that cold. But your IAs aren't all that much lower than the ones I'm seeing, if I remember the charts you posted--although ambient was much higher. And in the end, it's the approach that's important. The 28F approach reported above is one of the highest I've seen over the last couple of months. Normally it's 10F cruising, and 20F in traffic, rising to 40F in jams and idling for minutes.
Still, I'll keep reporting temps, and by the end of this year, we'll have a good range over lots of ambient temps for one car, at least!
Concerning SS verses transitional TEs--as we all know, these IA temps jump around all over the place--it's very difficult to get a good "picture" of what's really happening. Auto logging tools would help, for sure.
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
I went back and looked at the IC TE thread: obehave posted some TEs, 22 in total and the average approach is 17F. inimmini posted in the same thread a table with 9 observations for an average approach of 12.7F
I'd say 10-20F approaches are reasonable for our ICs, and pretty darn good in the world of ICs in general!
cheers,
I'd say 10-20F approaches are reasonable for our ICs, and pretty darn good in the world of ICs in general!
cheers,
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
I went back and looked at the IC TE thread: obehave posted some TEs, 22 in total and the average approach is 17F. inimmini posted in the same thread a table with 9 observations for an average approach of 12.7F
I'd say 10-20F approaches are reasonable for our ICs, and pretty darn good in the world of ICs in general!
cheers,
I'd say 10-20F approaches are reasonable for our ICs, and pretty darn good in the world of ICs in general!
cheers,
Unfortunately, I do not have the equipment(yet) to gather data, so I can offer no input, sorry.
I do know that my car runs like a raped ape, when it's cold out.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
This is where I bought mine...
http://onlinemetals.com/merchant.cfm...owunits=inches
4- 2' pieces would be enough to do the inlet side and the front face of the core.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
I wish I had those for the outlet, those are DrPhil's. He did a nice job.







