Drivetrain Power Conversion
As the Doc said, some use 12% drivetrain loss; I use 11%. A stock 2002-2004 MCS makes about 146 WHP and a 2005 & 2006 about 149 WHP (+/- 2.5 WHP). If you dyno numbers reads more then it needs to be recalibrated and/or the correction factor adjusted.
Thus, you must have some engine modifications because your dyno number reads about 170 HP.
Thus, you must have some engine modifications because your dyno number reads about 170 HP.
Last edited by dmh; Dec 20, 2006 at 07:23 PM.
POwer Conversion
Thats cool but i still don't know how to calculate the figure. Do i take 154.2 and divide but something or take 154.2 and times it by something. I still don't don't know what to do with the 12%, 11% thing to get the figure
My wife's bone-stock 'S' made 158 hp at the wheels, SAE-corrected. Assuming the crank HP is close to the 168 that MINI advertises, that's about a 6% driveline loss with the 6-speed manual.
Your numbers sound like they're in the ballpark for a stock 'S' - do you have any mods?
Your numbers sound like they're in the ballpark for a stock 'S' - do you have any mods?
Trending Topics
POwer Conversion
Thanks for that, disappointed with the figure. Surely with my mods i'd get more than that. I have 15% reduced pulley, xforce manifold, xforce racing cat, xforce cat back, pipercross induction, madnacore leads, NGK iridiums and engine damper. With all that i'm get 10hp more than stock???. I've got a alta intercooler V2 coming should i see increased numbers with that installed.
thanks
Perry
thanks
Perry
My wife's bone-stock 'S' made 158 hp at the wheels, SAE-corrected. Assuming the crank HP is close to the 168 that MINI advertises, that's about a 6% driveline loss with the 6-speed manual.
Your numbers sound like they're in the ballpark for a stock 'S' - do you have any mods?
Your numbers sound like they're in the ballpark for a stock 'S' - do you have any mods?
Also, I know there's a variance in "stock" horsepower depending on the miles on the car, fuel used, manufacturing variances, and things like that.
The only conclusion I felt comfortable drawing was that *if* his car's stock, it looks like he's in the ballpark - nothing more, nothing less. Considering the list of mods he posted later, I'm at a loss. Maybe the bonnet being closed was boosting the IAT drastically.
Also keep in mind that unless you did a pre-mod dyno, you have no idea how close your car was to the sticker crank hp. Besides, the intake exhaust isn't going to get you HIGH hp gains. Try a header to complete the exhaust system...but for all you know, you could have been running with 140 at the wheels which would give you a 14 hp increase at the wheels. Don't be disappointed with the results unless you know what you started with. Does the car feel 15 hp faster?...because it could be. If you noticed hp increases with each mod and it was enough of an increase that you can rule out placebo, than you did pretty good. You also dynoed with no air flow! You were sucking in hot air as there was nothing to move the heated air from under the bonnet. You will probably get 5 hp more if you open the hood and put a nice fan infront. You could have even gained 20 hp...there's no way to know until you redyno correctly...who set up the car for dyno? anyone who has a dyno...should probably know how to use it...
Power Conversion
The guys that set up the dyno were having a dyno day so they were quick about getting the cars on and off, so with the proper time spent on setting up a fan i'm sure it would of helped a bit. The car does have a Xforce header.
I think the dyno might have been a bit off becuase my brother has an EVO 6 TME with HKS front mount, HKS custom manifold, Trust Turbo back exhaust, ARC air filter, HKS blow off valve and it only made 207hp.
I think the dyno might have been a bit off becuase my brother has an EVO 6 TME with HKS front mount, HKS custom manifold, Trust Turbo back exhaust, ARC air filter, HKS blow off valve and it only made 207hp.
An MTH file would help.
An "uprated" intercooler does not need to be accounted for as I have yet to find one that makes any discernable difference. For you modifications I'd look to the new GP intercooler and related parts.
An "uprated" intercooler does not need to be accounted for as I have yet to find one that makes any discernable difference. For you modifications I'd look to the new GP intercooler and related parts.
The guys that set up the dyno were having a dyno day so they were quick about getting the cars on and off, so with the proper time spent on setting up a fan i'm sure it would of helped a bit. The car does have a Xforce header.
I think the dyno might have been a bit off becuase my brother has an EVO 6 TME with HKS front mount, HKS custom manifold, Trust Turbo back exhaust, ARC air filter, HKS blow off valve and it only made 207hp.
I think the dyno might have been a bit off becuase my brother has an EVO 6 TME with HKS front mount, HKS custom manifold, Trust Turbo back exhaust, ARC air filter, HKS blow off valve and it only made 207hp.
What type of Dyno was it? Those mods on en EVO 6 (With stock boost on a stock turbo) would be around that on a Mustang Dyno, keep in mind the EVO will have much more drivetrain loss through it's AWD system than the MINI's FWD. Mustang Dynos typically read lower but are concidered to be more consistent from run to run. I'd take the number as a performance benchmark and see where you're at a few more modifications down the road. We don't drive Supra's here, our cars aren't dyno queens.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
paul7878
1st Gen Countryman (R60) Talk (2010-2015)
4
Sep 14, 2015 07:44 AM





