Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain DINAN says NO to crank pulley

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #126  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MINIotaple
I think what's being lost in the argument is the fact that even if Dinan never tested it on a MINI, making their argument invalid, that still does not remove the uncertainty concerning the reliability of the lightened crank pullies. The only way that the crank pulley can be proven one way or another is to test the effects of the lightened crank pulley on the vibration or whatever on the crank. Just because a supporter of one side is proven to be negligent in their statement does not automatically mean that the other side is right.
I just deleted three paragraphs...... maybe I am growing up....at least a little.....

My engine may blow with the undamped pulley..... I don't know.....but I have made no claims.....
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 01:06 PM
  #127  
MINIotaple's Avatar
MINIotaple
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by SpiderX
I just deleted three paragraphs...... maybe I am growing up....at least a little.....

My engine may blow with the undamped pulley..... I don't know.....but I have made no claims.....
I hope you didn't think that my comment was directed toward you. It's just a feeling that I get from the general mood of the thread. Most of the time, I don't even check who posted and the only way I can tell who posted is by a memorable signature.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 01:11 PM
  #128  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MINIotaple
I hope you didn't think that my comment was directed toward you. It's just a feeling that I get from the general mood of the thread. Most of the time, I don't even check who posted and the only way I can tell who posted is by a memorable signature.
My point is that so far no "lab" evidence either way has been made public......there are a lot of pulleys out there working......if your going to say No....give us something substantial to go on......... were just bumblebees we don't know we can't fly.

no harm,.... no foul
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 01:19 PM
  #129  
MINIotaple's Avatar
MINIotaple
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by SpiderX
My point is that so far no "lab" evidence either way has been made public......there are a lot of pulleys out there working......if your going to say No....give us something substantial to go on......... were just bumblebees we don't know we can't fly.

no harm,.... no foul
We agree that there are no tests in favor of one position or another. The only pieces of evidence that we can point at and say that crank pullies work are the tests done by Randy, the numerous people that are currently running crank pullies, and the word of the developer of the Tritec motor who said the dampener was a BMW add-on.

As has been said before, the mileage logged by Randy and the users simply isn't enough to mean anything statistically. In addition, there have been examples of people having problems with it so who knows...

The most credible piece of evidence seems to me to be the word of the Tritec developer. We should call the guy up or something.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 02:02 PM
  #130  
mtrspt5's Avatar
mtrspt5
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Naperville, IL
This should satisfy almost everyone

Instead of a "no" weight pulley, I just went ahead with a 4% larger, lightened (about 50%) true harmonic balancer that was originally developed by Mercedes. Because it is a clutch type ( there are weights on the inside), it was very noticeable how much smoother the engine ran at idle.
 
Attached Thumbnails DINAN says NO to crank pulley-photo_081205_002.jpg   DINAN says NO to crank pulley-photo_081205_004.jpg   DINAN says NO to crank pulley-photo_081205_011.jpg  
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 02:07 PM
  #131  
MINIotaple's Avatar
MINIotaple
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by mtrspt5
Instead of a "no" weight pulley, I just went ahead with a 4% larger, lightened (about 50%) true harmonic balancer that was originally developed by Mercedes. Because it is a clutch type ( there are weights on the inside), it was very noticeable how much smoother the engine ran at idle.
50% of the '02-'04 or '05-'06 crank pulley?
Where do I get one and how much is it going to put me out? Are there any other sizes?
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 02:18 PM
  #132  
mtrspt5's Avatar
mtrspt5
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Naperville, IL
Originally Posted by MINIotaple
50% of the '02-'04 or '05-'06 crank pulley?
Where do I get one and how much is it going to put me out? Are there any other sizes?
A fellow Mini enthusiast and engineer, Bob Townsend, is selling these. There are about 20 or so currently on cars in the Chicago area. They are not inexpensive – $495. This is one of the reasons Mercedes is not using this design anymore.

Bob can be reached at 630-742-1200. He can also tell you what the weight difference is compared to the 02-04 pulley. My memory may need a little correction in this regard.

It is only being produced in a 4%.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2006 | 04:06 PM
  #133  
Larry Clemens's Avatar
Larry Clemens
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Larry Clemens
UPDATE FROM DINAN - JUST REC'D THIS EMAIL RESPONSE. I will post an update if/when I hear from the Dinan engineering staff

Larry,

After some discussion here I've found that my original comments to you were in error. I was basing my original email on the pulley information from Steve's white paper and other discussions I've had here regarding pulley's but those were not directly in regard to lightweight pulley's for the MINI. So, in my email to you,I misspoke regarding any experiments using lightweight pulleys and MINIs. I'll refrain from commenting further on this and refer your questions to our engineering staff, having someone contact you regarding this issue.

Micah
Still have not heard back from the DINAN technical department
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 12:41 PM
  #134  
Oranji's Avatar
Oranji
Neutral
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Did everyone feel that "vibration" at low RPM after the crank pulley install? I just had a 2% crank pulley installed and I am getting that "vibration" at around 2000 RPM.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #135  
XAlfa's Avatar
XAlfa
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by Oranji
Did everyone feel that "vibration" at low RPM after the crank pulley install? I just had a 2% crank pulley installed and I am getting that "vibration" at around 2000 RPM.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 03:16 PM
  #136  
norm03s's Avatar
norm03s
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 2
From: Ellicott City, Maryland USA
Oh No

Yikes!!!
Don't like the sound of that

Originally Posted by Oranji
Did everyone feel that "vibration" at low RPM after the crank pulley install? I just had a 2% crank pulley installed and I am getting that "vibration" at around 2000 RPM.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #137  
MINIotaple's Avatar
MINIotaple
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by norm03s
Yikes!!!
Don't like the sound of that
I would say.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 10:13 PM
  #138  
latte hiatus's Avatar
latte hiatus
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
From: East SF Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Oranji
Did everyone feel that "vibration" at low RPM after the crank pulley install? I just had a 2% crank pulley installed and I am getting that "vibration" at around 2000 RPM.
I've got the vibrations at around 2000 RPMs, too. Frankly, it doesn't bother me too much at this point (and I can't do anything about it until I'm back in the US and reunited with my MINI), but to begin with, you may want to check your engine mount bushings to ensure that they're securely in place. That was the first thing I was intending to do after I felt the vibrations, but never got around to taking care of it.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 10:17 PM
  #139  
XAlfa's Avatar
XAlfa
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by latte hiatus
I've got the vibrations at around 2000 RPMs, too. Frankly, it doesn't bother me too much at this point...
Yeah, don't worry about it. Worst case, you just replace the entire bottom end. That couldn't be too expensive.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 10:20 PM
  #140  
latte hiatus's Avatar
latte hiatus
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
From: East SF Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by XAlfa
Yeah, don't worry about it. Worst case, you just replace the entire bottom end. That couldn't be too expensive.
It's certainly not ideal to have engine vibrations, but if I wanted the safest modding route, I would have gone the craptastic JCW route.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 10:23 PM
  #141  
XAlfa's Avatar
XAlfa
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by latte hiatus
It's certainly not ideal to have engine vibrations, but if I wanted the safest modding route, I would have gone the craptastic JCW route.
Yeah, that would have been so boring... but you would end up with a totally crappy car.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 10:31 PM
  #142  
latte hiatus's Avatar
latte hiatus
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
From: East SF Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by XAlfa
Yeah, that would have been so boring... but you would end up with a totally crappy car.
Touche, sir.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 10:35 PM
  #143  
MGear's Avatar
MGear
5th Gear
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
There is another component to this debat I haven't seen anyone mention and that is BMW/Mini's relationship with John Cooper Works. Allowing Dinan to create and sell a product that would directly compete with an agreement that Mini has with JCW might also be part of the "invisible equation". BMW telling Dinan you can't do this is would not be that far off from the possible.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 11:09 PM
  #144  
XAlfa's Avatar
XAlfa
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by MGear
There is another component to this debat I haven't seen anyone mention and that is BMW/Mini's relationship with John Cooper Works. Allowing Dinan to create and sell a product that would directly compete with an agreement that Mini has with JCW might also be part of the "invisible equation". BMW telling Dinan you can't do this is would not be that far off from the possible.
Not following the logic here. Why would BMW say no to a Dinan crank pulley? They are already selling many other products that compete with JCW. And JCW don't offer a crank pulley afaik, so this wouldn't compete anyway.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 06:28 AM
  #145  
MotoringSpeed's Avatar
MotoringSpeed
Former Vendor
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Houston Texas
Originally Posted by XAlfa
Not following the logic here. Why would BMW say no to a Dinan crank pulley? They are already selling many other products that compete with JCW. And JCW don't offer a crank pulley afaik, so this wouldn't compete anyway.
Go read the Dinan white paper.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 07:09 AM
  #146  
dairyboy's Avatar
dairyboy
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mtrspt5
A fellow Mini enthusiast and engineer, Bob Townsend, is selling these. There are about 20 or so currently on cars in the Chicago area. They are not inexpensive – $495. This is one of the reasons Mercedes is not using this design anymore.

Bob can be reached at 630-742-1200. He can also tell you what the weight difference is compared to the 02-04 pulley. My memory may need a little correction in this regard.

It is only being produced in a 4%.
Is that an off the shelf Merc parts or something knocked up by Bob?
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 07:38 AM
  #147  
TheBlackBrian's Avatar
TheBlackBrian
4th Gear
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
I would say to check the motor mount, especially if you have the later style. We have seen many failures - the oil leaks out. It is the mount on the passenger side that uses the 18mm nut. They can induce slight - very slight - vibrations.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #148  
mtrspt5's Avatar
mtrspt5
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Naperville, IL
Originally Posted by dairyboy
Is that an off the shelf Merc parts or something knocked up by Bob?
They are being produced out in California by a firm that took over the production of the piece. Something about Mercedes selling them the rights.

I can't remember the name of the firm. Bob can fill you in.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 09:33 PM
  #149  
///ACS330Ci's Avatar
///ACS330Ci
5th Gear
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 1
From: AZ
Originally Posted by Brian@WebbMotorsports
I would say to check the motor mount, especially if you have the later style. We have seen many failures - the oil leaks out.
I can attest to that
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #150  
002's Avatar
002
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MotoringSpeed
Go read the Dinan white paper.
Go read post 133
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:42 AM.