Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Twin Charge And Long Wot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #26  
Veni_Vidi_Vici's Avatar
Veni_Vidi_Vici
5th Gear
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: Washington, PA
Lets face it, there aren't a lot of twin-charged/turbokompressor setups out there. I think Eric at Helix told me he had installed 16 of the turbokompressor kits. There's not enough data out there to make many generalizations. I've followed all of the pertinant threads on NAM and other boards. Here are the issues that I've seen come up Please feel free to chime in with more, correct or edit my list:

1.) Stable performance ip to 23 psi of boost, above which you are in trouble without beefier internals.

2.) Intercooler boot failure with long periods of high rpm running (read road racing). To be fair, Grass Roots had similar problems with 19% pulley on the track.

3.) Clutch wear. This may be driver-related or inadequate clutch (stage 3+?).

All this said, I'm scheduled to have my turbokompressor installed this month.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 12:16 PM
  #27  
minimc's Avatar
minimc
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by onasled
I truly know nothing about the twin charged, at least nothing compared to most here.
You ask about racing and that is where my passion, and small minded knowledge is really based. My theory is to arrive at a track with a fast but most importantly dependable car. The very last thing I want to do is arrive at a race or DE event and end up sitting in the pits because the car is not running. To date, the only two people I know who have attempted this have spent no time actually on the track due to problems.
Would I get a TC? Maybe down the road when I see that in fact they can handle a season of track days without any failures to the car at all.

Maximusmini just posted in the road racing thread that he had just blown his second clutch. Not something I want to have to deal with myself.
I'll wait and see what I can do without it before I think about getting it.
To be very honest, a 3 day Skip Barber school would be a better way for me to spend my $$ if I want a faster car ...
Reliabiliy/depedability is a REAL concern, but we need a better cross-section than the two guy's you know about (or ingsoc referencing Jan/Eldiablito) before we start implying that T/C cars cannot be tracked due to reliability concerns.

RE: Maximusmini's clutch... he's not exactly running a basic T/C car, if one can claim such a thing as 'basic T/C' Others have run the OE clutch for a while. We're not all as skilled (or concerned?) with our application of clutch

As for driving school... I suspect we can all benefit from driving school & track time. But that's control - how to use the power... a faster you, not a faster car. The end result might be quicker lap times, but its not the same thing.

Thanks for sharing your perspectives

EDIT: Too slow Veni Vidi Vici - beat me to it.

- My intercooler boots were failing with 15% pulley & a few other mods. Can't be T/C specific, though maybe a sure issue. Good to know.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 12:26 PM
  #28  
MSFIT's Avatar
MSFIT
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by minimc
- My intercooler boots were failing with 15% pulley & a few other mods. Can't be T/C specific, though maybe a sure issue. Good to know.
tru that, im all stock under the hood (JCW) and i blew a boot.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #29  
jlm's Avatar
jlm
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: NY NY
"An engine flat out [or at any percentage throttle] produces more boost when climbing a hill, for instance, due to increased load on the engine."

???


I disagree. Boost is a function of rpm and throttle positon. The boost would be the same going up a hill or on the level at the same throttle and rpm, but the load on the engine, specifically the pistons and rods would be higher going up the hill.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #30  
kalbone's Avatar
kalbone
5th Gear
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Tuls
ON mine I have about 8 k...some of the TCs I have seen and or worked one have as many as 30k

I agree highly with Doc Ob about driving school...it's the one thing I ALWAYS tell people...there's a difference between driving fast, and know how to...

I have a 7500 rev limit...and although I shift ussually around 7200 there are times I like to take her up to the limit...just crusiing for about 5 mins in 5th WOT here's a pic...

ok I am not sure about RPM accually...I wasn't looking...I was driving......but it was somewhere around that...for most of that pull...6th just seems to loose power...heh heh


 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 04:53 AM
  #31  
onasled's Avatar
onasled
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 3
From: Northeast CT
Originally Posted by minimc
Reliabiliy/depedability is a REAL concern, but we need a better cross-section than the two guy's you know about (or ingsoc referencing Jan/Eldiablito) before we start implying that T/C cars cannot be tracked due to reliability concerns.

RE: Maximusmini's clutch... he's not exactly running a basic T/C car, if one can claim such a thing as 'basic T/C' Others have run the OE clutch for a while. We're not all as skilled (or concerned?) with our application of clutch

As for driving school... I suspect we can all benefit from driving school & track time. But that's control - how to use the power... a faster you, not a faster car. The end result might be quicker lap times, but its not the same thing.

Thanks for sharing your perspectives

EDIT: Too slow Veni Vidi Vici - beat me to it.

- My intercooler boots were failing with 15% pulley & a few other mods. Can't be T/C specific, though maybe a sure issue. Good to know.
It's times like this that I realize that posting on any of these forums these days is usually a mistake ....
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 05:07 AM
  #32  
Veni_Vidi_Vici's Avatar
Veni_Vidi_Vici
5th Gear
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: Washington, PA
Originally Posted by onasled
It's times like this that I realize that posting on any of these forums these days is usually a mistake ....
Can you clarify what your beef is?
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 06:55 AM
  #33  
minimc's Avatar
minimc
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by onasled
It's times like this that I realize that posting on any of these forums these days is usually a mistake ....
Huh

I wasn't being sarcastic or disrespectful. My point was that neither your nor my experience with T/C cars is representative of the whole. Nothing more.

I asked you because I believed you were better qualified than most to comment. You own a modified MINI, have spent a substancial amount of time on the track, and I assumed your experience would afford greater perspective.

I realize my question was of a speculative nature, and thus your answer is on base. That said, I'd hoped you would elaborate - specifically regarding the drivetrain... Issues that concern you... or problems you'd heard of... maybe related issues you have personal knowledge of from tracking your own car. etc.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 07:51 AM
  #34  
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by jlm
I disagree. Boost is a function of rpm and throttle positon. The boost would be the same going up a hill or on the level at the same throttle and rpm, but the load on the engine, specifically the pistons and rods would be higher going up the hill.
With a turbo'd car, it's a little different. My understanding is the turbo spools on exhaust gasses, whereas the s/c is driven by the crank (RPM related). So with turbos.... The more load on the engine = more exhaust gasses. The more gasses = more spool. The more spool = more boost.

...or maybe I don't get it...i have been wrong before
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 08:30 AM
  #35  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
With a turbo'd car, it's a little different. My understanding is the turbo spools on exhaust gasses, whereas the s/c is driven by the crank (RPM related). So with turbos.... The more load on the engine = more exhaust gasses. The more gasses = more spool. The more spool = more boost.

...or maybe I don't get it...i have been wrong before
that is correct....as a sum
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 09:48 AM
  #36  
gt5816v's Avatar
gt5816v
2nd Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jlm
??? I disagree. Boost is a function of rpm and throttle positon. The boost would be the same going up a hill or on the level at the same throttle and rpm, but the load on the engine, specifically the pistons and rods would be higher going up the hill.
Boost is a function of load and airflow. The boost control, be it a waste gate or just the ultimate flow of the exhaust or intake will determine maximum boost. That's not to say throttle and RPM don't come into play but load, such as a hill, is a huge factor. Given enough load you can build tremendous boost at low throttle angles and RPM that you cannot on flat ground but it's rare in normal driving situations.

On a turbo vehicle you'll often find yourseld backing out of the throttle to maintain acceleration and boost in normal street driving conditions. It's not a linear relationship like a blower. Obviously a the mini boost level follows the VE curve of the motor but boost is a function of RPM and throttle angle with the blower.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 11:05 AM
  #37  
onasled's Avatar
onasled
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 3
From: Northeast CT
Originally Posted by Veni_Vidi_Vici
Can you clarify what your beef is?
Originally Posted by minimc
Huh

I wasn't being sarcastic or disrespectful. My point was that neither your nor my experience with T/C cars is representative of the whole. Nothing more.

I asked you because I believed you were better qualified than most to comment. You own a modified MINI, have spent a substancial amount of time on the track, and I assumed your experience would afford greater perspective.

I realize my question was of a speculative nature, and thus your answer is on base. That said, I'd hoped you would elaborate - specifically regarding the drivetrain... Issues that concern you... or problems you'd heard of... maybe related issues you have personal knowledge of from tracking your own car. etc.
Don't mind me, I'm just being a big baby these days ....
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 11:14 AM
  #38  
ingsoc's Avatar
ingsoc
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: New Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by jlm
"An engine flat out [or at any percentage throttle] produces more boost when climbing a hill, for instance, due to increased load on the engine."

???


I disagree. Boost is a function of rpm and throttle positon. The boost would be the same going up a hill or on the level at the same throttle and rpm, but the load on the engine, specifically the pistons and rods would be higher going up the hill.
My reply is in line with Tuls, et al. Sorry.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 11:20 AM
  #39  
willy69's Avatar
willy69
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by onasled
It's times like this that I realize that posting on any of these forums these days is usually a mistake ....
onasled,
i started this thread to hear facts regarding my driving style and what would be best for my application, it seems it has turned into a theory based tc thread. i really did not want this. so far the only info that means anything is yours, tuls, and maximus, you guys have gave real situations that you all have seen or experienced PERSONALLY. i really think this up hill and load thing is for a different thread. we must all realize there is NO 100% SAFE engine mod, my car drives and handles very nicely at sustained rpms the way it is. the problem is getting beat by a (ugly) subaru from a red light. this is why i am trying to decide tc or nitrous. the tc route sounds great as long as the motor holds together, i would creme myself with this kind of power 100% of the time, but i don't want to be wrenching every time i beat my little car. so please anyone who has experience with long periods of WOT using tc please chime in and give your experience. i am sure there are more people with my concerns. this is why i was leaning towards the 40 shot of nos, to kill rice burners. if tc proves reliable with this kind of driving i would change my mind.

thanks to all for the info
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 12:07 PM
  #40  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
I vote TC

I just don't like the idea of the bottle you keep having to fill. The stresses of similar power adders will be the same. And having it on tap all the time with the TC is a real plus. And it doesn't take up room in the very small trunk, as a bottle does.

Matt
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 12:50 PM
  #41  
willy69's Avatar
willy69
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
I just don't like the idea of the bottle you keep having to fill. The stresses of similar power adders will be the same. And having it on tap all the time with the TC is a real plus. And it doesn't take up room in the very small trunk, as a bottle does.

Matt
i agree with filling the bottle, though a 40 shot should last about 30 pulls, problem is i will probably get addicted! at 50.00 a fill, the tc would pay for itself in about, oh, a month, ha.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 08:01 PM
  #42  
jlm's Avatar
jlm
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: NY NY
I realize that turbo boost is a function of exhaust gas flow. My point is the amount of ex gas depends entirely on how much air the engine is processing which is a function of rpm and throttle position. I think the confusion comes from the fact that you need a load on the engine to maintain rpm and WOT. that load can come from air resitance, friction or gravity. The point I am making is that an uphill load does not cause more ex gas flow, it it the engine processing more air that does it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 05:29 AM
  #43  
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by jlm
The point I am making is that an uphill load does not cause more ex gas flow, it it the engine processing more air that does it.
Cool
So you're saying at WOT (which is one of the key factors in this thread) with my t/c'ed car (which is another point of this thread), I'm going to see the same boost level on level land at a given RPM in a given gear as I would climbing a hill in that same gear and same RPM. So in other words, although there's additional load on the engine when climbing, there won't be any boost level differences?
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 08:15 AM
  #44  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
If you're at WOT.....

Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
Cool
So you're saying at WOT (which is one of the key factors in this thread) with my t/c'ed car (which is another point of this thread), I'm going to see the same boost level on level land at a given RPM in a given gear as I would climbing a hill in that same gear and same RPM. So in other words, although there's additional load on the engine when climbing, there won't be any boost level differences?
You will accelerate faster on level ground than going up the hill! WOT is maximum umph (to use the technical term)....

The point you're trying to make would make sense if you're not at WOT, but at some partially open throttle, then going up hill (and holding speed, for example) would have increased load, as you have to overcome internal losses, move air AND lift the car up the hill. The computer would then open the throttle more, and you get more work out of the motor, but it becomes an apples to oranges comparison then....

Matt
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 08:23 AM
  #45  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
it becomes an apples to oranges comparison then....

Matt
mmmm I like apples and oranges....peaches are good too
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 08:28 AM
  #46  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
I've been rather enjoying ripe pears lateley!

Originally Posted by Tuls
mmmm I like apples and oranges....peaches are good too
We got some fancy ones for christmass that were more juice than anything else. Like little sweet waterbaloons!

Oh, to stay on topic, that's at WOT, tced or not!
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 11:44 AM
  #47  
jlm's Avatar
jlm
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: NY NY
dominic: that is my contention.
The only way you could see more boost is if the turbo is spinning faster and it would not be if the same amount of air is going through the engine.

compressive load on the pistons,rods crank is a sum of the combustion (pressure x piston area) plus the work load. if the work load is greater (driving uphill, high velocity or a headwind) there will be that much more compressive load on the piston. Boost and conbustion load wiull be the same will be the same.

ingsoc's remark (""An engine flat out [or at any percentage throttle] produces more boost when climbing a hill, for instance, due to increased load on the engine.") makes it sound like your boost gauge reads higher when you go uphill
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Filmy
MINI Parts for Sale
7
Apr 28, 2019 11:37 AM
minimofo
JCW Garage
28
Sep 30, 2015 12:26 AM
gmonde
MINI Parts for Sale
8
Sep 28, 2015 05:22 PM
OutMotoring
Drivetrain (Cooper S)
5
Sep 8, 2015 06:27 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:37 AM.