Drivetrain Dyno Run After MTH Installed
Dyno Run After MTH Installed
Is there anyone who had done a dyno run, after they installed the MTH ECU flash?
If so, is it a smooth map? Are there any flat spots? Any dips?
Better yet, could you post the map?
If so, is it a smooth map? Are there any flat spots? Any dips?
Better yet, could you post the map?
Originally Posted by webstrands
Is there anyone who had done a dyno run, after they installed the MTH ECU flash?
If so, is it a smooth map? Are there any flat spots? Any dips?
Better yet, could you post the map?
If so, is it a smooth map? Are there any flat spots? Any dips?
Better yet, could you post the map?
I will say that subjectively the car's power band feels smoother and stronger than the original map.
/gary mc
Originally Posted by kaelaria
Will you be also running it without the MTH?
/gary
Originally Posted by kaelaria
So what are you doing it for? Setting a baseline for future mods?
That's unfortunate...not for the fun part, but because one run won't produce any actual data :( I'd like to see exactly what MTH is pulling.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by kaelaria
That's unfortunate...not for the fun part, but because one run won't produce any actual data :( I'd like to see exactly what MTH is pulling.
Here is my Dyno runs...
they were done on the same day.. the orginal map was loaded and the car reset as a baseline.
the MTH was then uploaded and the car run for only a couple of miles..
you can make your own observations....
they were done on the same day.. the orginal map was loaded and the car reset as a baseline.
the MTH was then uploaded and the car run for only a couple of miles..
you can make your own observations....
Nice to see a real post!
I think MTH improves the car, but I don't have data like that. I also think that with good data logging, the maps could be improved even more! One time I asked Franz if he could reprogram the ECU to use the output of a wide band, and he said yes, but I haven't done anything about it....
Matt
Matt
Originally Posted by D_Nyholm
Whoa!! Why so rich?
Even with a computer reprogram and you are seeing 10:1 at 5500 rpm? Seems strange to me 
Even with a computer reprogram and you are seeing 10:1 at 5500 rpm? Seems strange to me 
this is why apexi is a good thing..
I am not a mechanic.. and I dont' play one on tv..
Originally Posted by gmcdonnell
I don't see what you're getting at. Three runs will produce plenty of data for one configuration. And if I get the other three runs in without the MTH map then I'll also have a baseline. It's just a matter of how many runs are available - I didn't want to be a pig by prepurchasing six runs because that could well keep someone else from getting their car dyno'd during the event.
Compare that crap to a unichip and youll see why its worth the money. MTH sucks, GIAC sucks... Ive never seen them break a 5hp gain. the apexi is good for the money, but the unichip is able to tune 2x as many paramters. This allows you to not only make more power, but also improve drivability. Compare before tuned (the map that came on the unichip) to after tuned.... keep in mind that the car pulled timing on what SHOULD have been my best run (knock sensor).
http://www.motoringcentral.com/images/dyno.jpg
http://www.motoringcentral.com/images/dyno2.jpg
Even with the motor dropping 10hp after the knock sensor kicked in, I still made 6hp and 12ft/lbs of torque more than the program that comes on the unichip. Should have been more like 12/12, but Ill have to do another dyno pull with better gas to prove that. Oh, and just look at how much the air fuel ratios improved
Bottom line, **** flashes.
http://www.motoringcentral.com/images/dyno.jpg
http://www.motoringcentral.com/images/dyno2.jpg
Even with the motor dropping 10hp after the knock sensor kicked in, I still made 6hp and 12ft/lbs of torque more than the program that comes on the unichip. Should have been more like 12/12, but Ill have to do another dyno pull with better gas to prove that. Oh, and just look at how much the air fuel ratios improved
Bottom line, **** flashes.
Pretty harsh there....
If you look at HP per $, the MTH is a good value. No one is gonna argue that custom tuning your car is better than a "canned" tune. Tolerance stacking and regional gas variations guarantee that.
Same thing with my mustang. But that was at the point a factory tune wouldn't run worth crap. Had to get a chip. Car ran good, and power was decent, but a dyno tune found another 12 HP. Does that mean the chip sucked and I should F it? Nope.
Also, MTH has tuned the Cosworth maps for M7. It would be interesting to see that A/F data. The control maps are all changable (if you can get into the code....), so you just need enough data logging to really dial it in. If the OBX ever gets back in stock, or the Pilo Racing Header comes out at a decent price, I plan on doing a wide-band for logging.....
Matt
Same thing with my mustang. But that was at the point a factory tune wouldn't run worth crap. Had to get a chip. Car ran good, and power was decent, but a dyno tune found another 12 HP. Does that mean the chip sucked and I should F it? Nope.
Also, MTH has tuned the Cosworth maps for M7. It would be interesting to see that A/F data. The control maps are all changable (if you can get into the code....), so you just need enough data logging to really dial it in. If the OBX ever gets back in stock, or the Pilo Racing Header comes out at a decent price, I plan on doing a wide-band for logging.....
Matt
I got very improved driveability, a little bump in HP and torque, and most importantly a detuned TCS for under $150 with MTH, plus I can update it with different maps or back to stock at will. I'm sure others make a little more HP, but frankly it's not much and certainly not $500+ worth to me.
I got exactly what I wanted with my MTH. Improved throttle response, the elimination of a high RPM flat spot, and all around better driveability. Money well spent in MY opinion.
Jim Williams
Jim Williams
But, like the Doctor said,
Originally Posted by JCampos
Compare that crap to a unichip and youll see why its worth the money. MTH sucks, GIAC sucks... Ive never seen them break a 5hp gain. the apexi is good for the money, but the unichip is able to tune 2x as many paramters. This allows you to not only make more power, but also improve drivability. Compare before tuned (the map that came on the unichip) to after tuned.... keep in mind that the car pulled timing on what SHOULD have been my best run (knock sensor).
Bottom line, **** flashes.
Bottom line, **** flashes.
Don't want to be picky, but the Unichip is plug n play. No cutting of the original harness is necessary. You simply plug the original harness into one that lies between the Siemens and the Unichip. 10 minutes to put in and less to take out.
I'm just glad there are different options for folks to choose from. Some folks place a higher priority on value, whereas others on getting the more costly ponies out and cost is less of an issue. To each his/her own
.
I'm just glad there are different options for folks to choose from. Some folks place a higher priority on value, whereas others on getting the more costly ponies out and cost is less of an issue. To each his/her own
Sure, but....
I don't think JCampos got his gains until the unit was tuned for his car. Proving once again that no matter how good a solution, the canned ones aren't perfect... Custom tune is the way to go if you want the best bang for the buck. But until you get a way to log, remap, and reprogram at $0 a turn, custom tuning is pretty expensive if your mods aren't done..... Even at $100 a turn, if you could find that, I'd be into $400-$500 for tuning alone, and I've just really started the power quest (more to come....) I think with an Apexi or some other home tuned device, a good GTECH dyno (or one of the other intertial ones), a wideband and some data logging, you could actually tune your motor pretty good for pretty cheap.
Matt
Matt
Originally Posted by bouray
Don't want to be picky, but the Unichip is plug n play. No cutting of the original harness is necessary. You simply plug the original harness into one that lies between the Siemens and the Unichip. 10 minutes to put in and less to take out.
I'm just glad there are different options for folks to choose from. Some folks place a higher priority on value, whereas others on getting the more costly ponies out and cost is less of an issue. To each his/her own
.
I'm just glad there are different options for folks to choose from. Some folks place a higher priority on value, whereas others on getting the more costly ponies out and cost is less of an issue. To each his/her own
Looks like this sort of evolved into another MTH - UNIChip comparo...
Threre are several threads on this apples to oranges subject, and I think this is one of the more recent ones (starting at post #44):
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...ip+future+mods
For those who see themselves mod'ing from the intake to exhaust, and everything in between, the few extra bills will most likely be seen as worth it to those folks...
Threre are several threads on this apples to oranges subject, and I think this is one of the more recent ones (starting at post #44):
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...ip+future+mods
For those who see themselves mod'ing from the intake to exhaust, and everything in between, the few extra bills will most likely be seen as worth it to those folks...
I recently had a similar dyno run with my slightly modified 2005 MCS (15% pulley, 62 mm TB, Alta CAI and one-ball exhaust) with MTH. I then sent the dyno results to Franz and he was able to change the A/F ratios. The A/F ratio no longer falls into the 10s at high rpm but still runs rich enough for safety. My last dyno run with 95 octane gas was 194 WHP and 176 ft-lb torque. If you send me a PM I will send you the before and after dyno chart.


