Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Question about chassis dynos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-18-2005, 01:26 AM
regalic's Avatar
regalic
regalic is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hawaii (Oahu)
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question about chassis dynos

Just a quick question.

Since they measure WHP and since more weight on the drivetrain will increase the loses between the crank and the wheel. Then it would seem that the wheel weight would have a large effect on you chassis dyno.

Now could this explain why some people can run on a dyno with say the JCW kit against someone with just a intake and 15% pulley and the JCW showing very poorly. If the 15% car had wheels/rims of ~30 pounds while the JCW had say stock s-lites of ~48 pounds.

Or am I completely of the mark. (This is in regards to several threads where people have complained about thier hp based on thier mods, but few if any list what wheels they are running)
 
  #2  
Old 02-18-2005, 06:10 AM
andy@ross-tech.com's Avatar
andy@ross-tech.com
andy@ross-tech.com is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
  #3  
Old 02-18-2005, 08:15 AM
meb's Avatar
meb
meb is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I haven't had the patience to read all of these posts, but the conclusion should be that:

-an inertia dyno will show different results for different weight (mass) wheels; and
-a load dyno, at a steady state measuring power at a given RPM, would not.

Regards,

Jeff




andy@ross-tech.com


Yup


Andy,

Still not quite sure about the outcome here. I understand that the two types of dynos measure different forces - one accelerating (curved) and one constant.

By example, and as a way for me to understand the relationships, I race bicycles. Much of my training occurs indoors this time of year on a fixed trainer - no aero forces. I have a computer and heart rate monitor hooked up to me while training. I occasionally use different wheels in my training - a short but boring story. Assuming my results are repeated accurately - and I try very hard to repeat speed and cadence accurately - the heavier wheel takes more energy to maintain at a constant speed. My PF as it's called - Percieved Effort, and HR - heart rate, show this clearly. And the efforts increase with increased, but constant speed. I'm compelled to write that a heavier wheel is in fact harder to maintain at a constant speed. ???
 
  #4  
Old 02-18-2005, 10:44 AM
jlm's Avatar
jlm
jlm is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY NY
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if so, you have violated the sacred laws of Newton. In reality, it is extra friction or some other parasitic load (maybe due to the extra weight) that makes the heavier wheel harder to keep at a constant velocity.
 
  #5  
Old 02-18-2005, 10:48 AM
regalic's Avatar
regalic
regalic is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hawaii (Oahu)
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay so when people post dyno's (chassis ones) for comparison then they should include thier wheel weight since it does appear that it will have an effect.
 
  #6  
Old 02-18-2005, 10:55 AM
andy@ross-tech.com's Avatar
andy@ross-tech.com
andy@ross-tech.com is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
This test shows not too much difference between very heavy wheels, and very light wheels (14 lb difference per wheel alone!):

http://www.nissanperformancemag.com/may01/dyno.shtml
 
  #7  
Old 02-18-2005, 11:19 AM
meb's Avatar
meb
meb is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jlm
if so, you have violated the sacred laws of Newton. In reality, it is extra friction or some other parasitic load (maybe due to the extra weight) that makes the heavier wheel harder to keep at a constant velocity.
Andy, thanks.

jlm "maybe due to the extra weight" That's the question. I've only read Netwton's Optiks, not much else - by Netwon!

Never mind, got it; more weight=more friction. So just how much more psi does it take to overcome friction generated by additional weight? Might be an interesting, albeit, academic experiment. Tires are maxed at 140 psi.

You guys Attorneys? You sure do quote a lot of laws.
 
  #8  
Old 02-18-2005, 12:09 PM
macncheese's Avatar
macncheese
macncheese is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
How about this one:

Do your brakes have zero drag?

 
  #9  
Old 02-18-2005, 12:22 PM
meb's Avatar
meb
meb is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Are you trying to hurt my brain Cheese? They do to a certain degree, correct? If so, brakes affect dyno results too.
 
  #10  
Old 02-19-2005, 05:59 AM
macncheese's Avatar
macncheese
macncheese is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by meb
Are you trying to hurt my brain Cheese? They do to a certain degree, correct? If so, brakes affect dyno results too.
Are your rotors perfectly straight or do they brush the pads for 20 degrees of rotation?

--
Cheese
 
  #11  
Old 02-19-2005, 10:35 AM
meb's Avatar
meb
meb is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Okay, I'll bite. But, not quite sure what question to ask here. I know some rotor designs are design to push pads away from the rotor - can't remember how, I'm old. But assuming rotors are not absolutel square or plumb to the pads I would say that there is contact.
 
  #12  
Old 02-19-2005, 03:22 PM
jlm's Avatar
jlm
jlm is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY NY
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was speaking more about possible larger frictional losses related to the heavier wheel being heavier. as far as a rotating mass, angular velocity is independent of mass, but angular acceleration depends on mass and its geometric location to the rotation axis (moment of inertia; remember why flyweels have heavy rims?)
 
  #13  
Old 02-19-2005, 07:22 PM
namwob's Avatar
namwob
namwob is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: hou,tx
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by macncheese
How about this one:

Do your brakes have zero drag?

yes my brakes have -0- drag because the warp in my rotors & clearence in my wheel bearings pushed the pads with their little clips & sensors out o da whey/curds. The reason Dynos don't see wheel changes is the same reason they cant give the same results twice if nothing is different. Next question. Is it because they are that sensitive, or ,that insensitive? Tag your it.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USA-RET
JCW Garage
22
11-09-2015 07:27 PM
donniedarko
Drivetrain (Cooper S)
8
10-21-2015 01:15 PM
Filmy
Navigation & Audio
5
09-07-2015 08:27 PM
M7Speed
R58 :: Coupé Talk (2012+)
0
09-03-2015 07:29 AM
M7Speed
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
0
09-03-2015 07:27 AM



Quick Reply: Drivetrain Question about chassis dynos



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:35 AM.