Drivetrain Which 17% Pulley?
Which 17% Pulley?
So, I'm looking at a 17%, smaller belt, larger injectors, and a GIAC chip. My question is which pulley? I had originally thought that I would go with the Helix because they work so closely with GIAC and their pulley/chip/injector combos seem to be very popular. I also like the fact that I can update to a 19% easily with their changeable system. However, I read Randy Webb's reasons behind recommending the Alta pulley on his site, and it's not that everything made sense so much as that this guy seems to know what he is talking about. Additionally, he doesn't seem to pull punches with product reviews and isn't necessarily loyal to a specific brand (he obviously loves a lot of the Alta stuff, but doesn't use their exhaust, etc.). Anyway, the two things that struck me about his review were that 1) the Alta pulley will always align itself to the hub correctly (do other pulleys not do this?) and 2) that the Alta is all steel, which means it will stay in the same temp range as the shaft and hub. So does that mean that the Helix, which has aluminum parts, could compromise something by expanding at a different rate or eventually corroding? I'd like some technical input here from people who can tell me what the key attributes needed in a pulley are, and which are superfluous. Also, I'd love to hear from people with real experiences with either of these products. Maybe someone running the GIAC chip with a 17% Alta.
http://www.helix13.com/html/products...ew.php?p=6&h=m
http://www.altaminiperformance.com/p...ey/PULLEY.html
http://www.webbmotorsports.com/performance.php
http://www.helix13.com/html/products...ew.php?p=6&h=m
http://www.altaminiperformance.com/p...ey/PULLEY.html
http://www.webbmotorsports.com/performance.php
I was contemplating the 17%, injector,Giac route too before going for a 19%, injector, Giac setup. After several conversations with Erik at Helix, I'm under the impression that the Giac, injector package was developed for the 19% pulley and there is no 17% specific, injectors, Giac software. The 19% pulley I just got from Helix is all stainless steel. My previous reduccion pulley was the old style heat on type with a steel hub and 15% aluminium bolt on belt track. That 15% pulley went 31,000 miles and looked in perfect condition, it was also completely trouble free and dead on reliable. I think you'll find out that belt failure can occur wether you have a 15%, 17% or 19%, I was concerned about belt failure and 19% pulleys until I found out that guys with 15% pulleys at the track suffer belt failure too. I hope that helps, it's good to do the homework. I just did it and as a result I'm very satisfied with my decision.
I think the Helix is a great product too. I prefer the Alta because of the reasons you had already read about, but Eric certainly knows his stuff as well.
I like the Alta positive stop on the inside of the pulley, but other than that, the Helix has all of the other attributes you would want in a pulley - all stainless steel, taper bore fit, capped end.
Hope that helps!
Randy
I like the Alta positive stop on the inside of the pulley, but other than that, the Helix has all of the other attributes you would want in a pulley - all stainless steel, taper bore fit, capped end.
Hope that helps!
Randy
Originally Posted by minibrute
I was contemplating the 17%, injector,Giac route too before going for a 19%, injector, Giac setup. After several conversations with Erik at Helix, I'm under the impression that the Giac, injector package was developed for the 19% pulley and there is no 17% specific, injectors, Giac software. 
My theory is if you're going to go over 15%, make the big really noticeable jump. Go to 19%
Trending Topics
this is incorrect
That's interesting greatgro, on an email I asked Erik if there is a 17% specific, bigger injector Giac setup. He never answered that question directly, instead he recomended going 19% for the best results. To that my take was that there was no optimized 17%, bigger injector Giac software. You are saying there is, so there you go. Thank you for the clarification.
Man, everybody with 19% swears by it and wants to convert everyone! There must be something there...
I'm not so much worried about belt slippage as I would definitely go with a smaller belt no matter which pulley I got. Similarly, with an aftermarket pulley, I would treat the belt like any other maintenance item on the car i.e. oil, filters, tires, etc., and would change it on a regular basis. However, I am worried about overboosting with a 19%. I've read that during front wheel traction loss a 19% can cause the SC boost to raise to dangerous levels. If done repeatedly over the years, I imagine it's just a matter of time before you compromise something. I have an 05 MCS with about 3000 miles on it, and I want it to last as long as possible (doesn't everyone?). If I put a 19% on now and I experience just routine wheel slippage over the years, what condition will my SC/engine be in at 50k?
Surely there are always risks in upping the performance of your engine, but I just want to make sure that the risks I take have minimal consequences. Purchasing an MCS was a little bit of a financial stretch for me. Modding it will only happen on special occasions (like tax return day!). But repairing/replacing parts that would otherwise be fine if I didn't run the car at uber-psi levels is something I don't want to do. Now, I see we have some of the gurus on this thread, so if the idea that a 19% reduces the life of your SC/engine is wrong let me know. Also, to Randy and jlm, I appreciate the fact that you guys can answer questions here and talk openly about your preferences. It helps to hear opinions from guys who have tested umpteen different products and can just express their opinions, not badmouth competitors. Leave the badmouthing up to us customers! No really, it makes for a nice informative community here. Thanks.
I'm not so much worried about belt slippage as I would definitely go with a smaller belt no matter which pulley I got. Similarly, with an aftermarket pulley, I would treat the belt like any other maintenance item on the car i.e. oil, filters, tires, etc., and would change it on a regular basis. However, I am worried about overboosting with a 19%. I've read that during front wheel traction loss a 19% can cause the SC boost to raise to dangerous levels. If done repeatedly over the years, I imagine it's just a matter of time before you compromise something. I have an 05 MCS with about 3000 miles on it, and I want it to last as long as possible (doesn't everyone?). If I put a 19% on now and I experience just routine wheel slippage over the years, what condition will my SC/engine be in at 50k?
Surely there are always risks in upping the performance of your engine, but I just want to make sure that the risks I take have minimal consequences. Purchasing an MCS was a little bit of a financial stretch for me. Modding it will only happen on special occasions (like tax return day!). But repairing/replacing parts that would otherwise be fine if I didn't run the car at uber-psi levels is something I don't want to do. Now, I see we have some of the gurus on this thread, so if the idea that a 19% reduces the life of your SC/engine is wrong let me know. Also, to Randy and jlm, I appreciate the fact that you guys can answer questions here and talk openly about your preferences. It helps to hear opinions from guys who have tested umpteen different products and can just express their opinions, not badmouth competitors. Leave the badmouthing up to us customers! No really, it makes for a nice informative community here. Thanks.
Originally Posted by minibrute
That's interesting greatgro, on an email I asked Erik if there is a 17% specific, bigger injector Giac setup. He never answered that question directly, instead he recomended going 19% for the best results. To that my take was that there was no optimized 17%, bigger injector Giac software. You are saying there is, so there you go. Thank you for the clarification.
Maybe b/c the way you worded it. "a 17% specific, bigger injector Giac setup". Although the GIAC software is unique to each pulley, they use the same injectors as the 19% does. And in this case, I think going all the way to the 19% makes more sense again. The pulley costs the same, the injectors cost the same (and are fairly expensive) and the GIAC costs the same. So for the same money (and almost the same parts), you might as well get all the power. He gets paid the same either way but you get more power and fun with the 19%. If anything he'll sell you less stuff after you go the 19% route b/c you're more likely to find that you have enough power. So he's probably losing sales by recommending the 19%.
Originally Posted by UnderRadar
Man, everybody with 19% swears by it and wants to convert everyone! There must be something there...
But since most of the daily MINIs I see are Coopers and the few weekly MCSs I see have stock exhausts, I don't think I'll be running into any MINIs faster than mine any time soon.
If I put a 19% on now and I experience just routine wheel slippage over the years, what condition will my SC/engine be in at 50k?
Greatgro, I think you are right about Eriks response as to a specific 17% setup. At that point I still had concerns about going to the more extreme pulley size and running into problems. I don't doubbt Erik's honesty as he's demonstrated plenty honesty in my dealings with him. I didn't question his reasoning and went with his advise because he is the expert and from my previous experience with him he had steered me in the right direction. All I can say is thank you for your help and I'm glad I listened.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fkrowland
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
5
Sep 30, 2015 10:30 AM
daviday
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
1
Sep 25, 2015 01:31 AM



