Drivetrain MTH Dyno Results
MTH Dyno Results
Here is a comparison of my wifes '04 MCS with the MTH software with about 300 miles drivetime, VS. the BEST run it made stock. The car has no other engine performace modifications.
I can't get it to give access... here is a link to Metroplex mini forums where it is already posted:
http://www.metroplexmini.com/forum/s...ead.php?t=7626
Pretty darn good for $75.
Todd
I can't get it to give access... here is a link to Metroplex mini forums where it is already posted:
http://www.metroplexmini.com/forum/s...ead.php?t=7626
Pretty darn good for $75.
Todd
Did you happen to have the raw, uncorrected figures for both days too? Were you spraying the intercooler with water during both runs?
Trending Topics
I have the run files at the shop on the dyno P.C. I'll try to remember to get them. IIRC the 160.9 run was watered only at the beginning, that was the best it ever did though with the stock software. the worst run with the Mth was a 165Hp run but i didn't rev it all the way to redline because i wasn't paying attention and it took a dip at about 6K , looked like it was pulling a bit of timing. I don't think my wife was spraying water all the way through that one, being her first time.. All the others were between 168 and 170 and one at 174 but that was my fault as well, I hit the clutch right at the end before I hit the stop button, and it spiked about 4 Hp.Todd
Since you have a dyno and the ability to swap back and forth between stock and chipped programs, it would be interesting to see a back to back to back comparison like this:
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...t=29748&page=2
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...t=29748&page=2
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
Since you have a dyno and the ability to swap back and forth between stock and chipped programs, it would be interesting to see a back to back to back comparison like this:
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...t=29748&page=2
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...t=29748&page=2
DynoJet Runfiles
Here is a link to all the runfiles for your viewing pleasure.
http://atsracing.net/todd/dyno%20graphs/COOPER%20S/Emily's/
hopefully it will work
Todd
http://atsracing.net/todd/dyno%20graphs/COOPER%20S/Emily's/
hopefully it will work
Todd
Originally Posted by Mugami
The impressive part. is the 160-170 at the wheels in stock trim. no pulley etc. 
Todd
Nope the 160hp was measured at the Wheels on a Dynojet 248c using the Standard correction factor. We have run several close to stock minis on our dyno and none have ever been as low as 144-145 Hp. I was under the impression that Mini intentionally underrated the motors for whatever reason.
Todd
Todd
Originally Posted by meanboy
interesting...haven't read that anywhere else. Guess you have some strong cars in your town.
I made the comment about strong cars because a few people have reported 140-145 dyno'd at the wheels on a stock S, and I recorded an episode of sports car revolution where they dyno'd a cooper s with ecu, cai, and pulley upgrades and it dyno'd at 175 hp. I am not sure if it had an exhaust or not. I have the MTH and the car pulls much stronger then stock but I didn't have it dyno'd yet so I don't know how much whp it has.
On the other hand, the newest M/T road test on the 05 MCS has it doing 0-60 at 6.8 and 14.8@95 mph in the quarter mile so the newer cars might be much stronger then they are letting people know.
On the other hand, the newest M/T road test on the 05 MCS has it doing 0-60 at 6.8 and 14.8@95 mph in the quarter mile so the newer cars might be much stronger then they are letting people know.
The stock number being that high is why i stated impressive. On a local Dynojet so far we have tested 3 MCS with 15% pullies and the MTH programming. no cooling on the IC except a fan. All three pulled 178 hp at the wheels which is equal to about 200 at the crank. using the 12% drivetrain loss. Also did a JCW that was retro fitted with the 210 upgrade kit. it pulled 188 hp equaling to 210 hp at the crank.
The important part about these results done by ATSTODD isnt the numbers themselves in comparing car vs car. (different dyno's can give different reading of the same car) But the gain which is important since it was done on the same dyno in approx same conditions.
If i may ask Todd are you getting A/F readings when your doing the pulls. if so i would like to see them for the stock run and after you switch to the 15% pulley. We are going to be getting intouch with Franz on our finding to see if he can fine tune the setting for our area. So i would like to see the comparison
Thanks a bunch
The important part about these results done by ATSTODD isnt the numbers themselves in comparing car vs car. (different dyno's can give different reading of the same car) But the gain which is important since it was done on the same dyno in approx same conditions.
If i may ask Todd are you getting A/F readings when your doing the pulls. if so i would like to see them for the stock run and after you switch to the 15% pulley. We are going to be getting intouch with Franz on our finding to see if he can fine tune the setting for our area. So i would like to see the comparison
Thanks a bunch
Originally Posted by ATSTodd
I have seen a few plots of MCS's making almost the same power in stock configuration. Also I typically spray water (a mist not a garden hose) on the I/c to keep the IAT at a reasonable level to fight off knock retard. This will increase the #'s a bit as well as the correction factor we typically use adds a bit more. I don't think ANY of the correction factors that dynojet uses are particularly suited to a Forced induction car but the STD factor seems to be closest.
2- There is no SAE correction factor for forced induction so different dynos using different correction factors also make comparisons impossible.
Even so, most dynos still show a stock MCS in the 140-145 whp range.
On the other hand, the newest M/T road test on the 05 MCS has it doing 0-60 at 6.8 and 14.8@95 mph in the quarter mile so the newer cars might be much stronger then they are letting people know.
I checked a similarly configured car on C&D and it pulled 92 mph in the traps so it seems that the 05 changes did bump up the mph. I look at trap speed more then anything to determine hp.:smile:
Nine to ten Hp improvment seems to be the norm for the MTH software. Not bad for $ 75
If I had one of the $ 750 upgrades would I be seeing 90 to 100 hp gains ?
Just kidding but you get the point .
Randy
If I had one of the $ 750 upgrades would I be seeing 90 to 100 hp gains ?
Just kidding but you get the point .Randy
Originally Posted by supercoopers
Franz is the MAN!
He is slowly but surely spelling an end to overpriced vendor marked-up ECU prices
Henry
He is slowly but surely spelling an end to overpriced vendor marked-up ECU prices
Henry
maxmini [/QUOTE]
Nine to ten Hp improvment seems to be the norm for the MTH software. Not bad for $ 75
If I had one of the $ 750 upgrades would I be seeing 90 to 100 hp gains ?
Just kidding but you get the point .Perfect example of "where's the meat!"
I'll bet there has been more than one Vendor that has tried to get a sole distributorship deal on Franz's MTH software.




