Drivetrain 04 MCS air intake/exhaust looking for a tuner, any suggestions?
Last year when we met, if you guys could have properly answered any of my technical questions when I was looking at purchasing Bytetronik FA I would have bought it and been done. Instead I had to reverse engineer my Mini's ECU to properly tune it myself. When you guys couldn't answer the majority of my questions, the limited progress on the ECU was made obvious. Also instead of being helpful you guys chose to get irate & make arrogant comments as to how nobody else could figure this out, which is obviously hilarious. However, now that I have figured this out, I see where all the Mini tuners (& tuning software kits for sale) have gone wrong by misinterpreting maps & not having the majority of necessary maps figured out & also misunderstanding how the Siemens ECU operates. Some of the descriptions I've seen even in the updated Bytetronik FA screen shots don't properly describe various Mini map functionality, and other maps that are necessary to properly adjust the VE table on highly modified cars are simply not there from the screen shots I've seen you publish.
.
.
1. A lot of evolution can happen in a year
... so i wouldn't based your current opinion on a conversation that happened last year.2. At that time, you had a 2.0L stroker from another vendor and it was having issues (as you decribed it). Obviously, the other tuner's sw was not up to your standards. And that's why you were interested in purchasing the FA Tuning Kit...
3. Having heard first-hand from "people in the know" what happened to the Cobb AccessPort and how the other tuner took the AP map and called it their own, we were very cautious of how much info to divulge to you (you being his customer with all his parts, of course we have to be careful on what we say).
4. Honestly, we don't want to step into other people's mess. If your car was tuned by someone else and you're having issues, take it back to that tuner and get it resolved first.
5. We would rather not make the sale than to get blame for someone else's mishap.

If you're fine with giving away your IP, then that's on you. Don't knock other company who are in the business to profit so they can continue to innovate and improve on their products.
So if I come to you and ask, "hey 4wheels, can you give me a list of your maps and what they do, is that cool with you?" What would your answer be?
I think a little more "full disclosure" on your part would be nice for potential customers to be aware of what they're getting into with the Bytetronik FA kit.
You (either Mike or Jason) are not coders nor software developers. They rely on Colby, who left Cobb under suspicious circumstances regarding "borrowed IP" from his tenure there. He developed open ECU, which Bytetronik is based on, with different ECU definitions & plug ins to add features. Jason helps find maps & test.
The "feature" that you say is "required" for CARB of locking the ECU isn't entirely true now, is it? You could have left the seed keys the same as OEM, and the ECU would still be locked. This is the way the majority of other vehicle (other brands than Mini) tuning software works. The way you guys appear to have done it is rewrite portions of the OS layer (the Mini's Siemens ECU has 3 partitions, bootloader, OS, and tune/calibration data) and change a few things like the keys, so NOBODY else can read/write unless they have Bytetronik FA (or hack your altered keys). How is that a feature? That basically means if a customer purchases Bytetronik and uses it on their Mini even once, their ECU will forever be locked & no other tuner, or dealer, can work on it ever again. This keeps the customer locked to you & limits them to the maps you have figured out. The only IP you're protecting is the maps, as there's plenty of people who've figured out how to read/write the ECU, and the maps (lets face it) aren't worth all this hassle to real coders.
What if a customers FA kit breaks in the future & you've gone out of business? They're screwed! It's new ECU time, pay a dealer to code it to their vehicle, and start over with a new tune (or pay someone to hack their ECU & crack the Bytetronik keys, which will cost more than it's worth).
Also simply changing the supercharger to a Sprintex & tuning the car isn't that difficult. The factory ECU has VE maps that can extend beyond what the car comes with. Massive changes to hardware that completely alter the VE curve (big injectors combined with major headwork, race cams, long tube "tuned" resonance headers, custom intakes, turbos), especially changes that result in huge dips or spikes that are out of range of the factory calibration is where you'll run into problems. That and errors in tunes requiring the ECU to try & adapt where it shouldn't have to. That's the reason you guys talked about one of the main features of Bytetronik being able to "reset" adaptations. If the tune is right you don't have to do this at all.
You (either Mike or Jason) are not coders nor software developers. They rely on Colby, who left Cobb under suspicious circumstances regarding "borrowed IP" from his tenure there. He developed open ECU, which Bytetronik is based on, with different ECU definitions & plug ins to add features. Jason helps find maps & test.
The "feature" that you say is "required" for CARB of locking the ECU isn't entirely true now, is it? You could have left the seed keys the same as OEM, and the ECU would still be locked. This is the way the majority of other vehicle (other brands than Mini) tuning software works. The way you guys appear to have done it is rewrite portions of the OS layer (the Mini's Siemens ECU has 3 partitions, bootloader, OS, and tune/calibration data) and change a few things like the keys, so NOBODY else can read/write unless they have Bytetronik FA (or hack your altered keys). How is that a feature? That basically means if a customer purchases Bytetronik and uses it on their Mini even once, their ECU will forever be locked & no other tuner, or dealer, can work on it ever again. This keeps the customer locked to you & limits them to the maps you have figured out. The only IP you're protecting is the maps, as there's plenty of people who've figured out how to read/write the ECU, and the maps (lets face it) aren't worth all this hassle to real coders.
What if a customers FA kit breaks in the future & you've gone out of business? They're screwed! It's new ECU time, pay a dealer to code it to their vehicle, and start over with a new tune (or pay someone to hack their ECU & crack the Bytetronik keys, which will cost more than it's worth).
Also simply changing the supercharger to a Sprintex & tuning the car isn't that difficult. The factory ECU has VE maps that can extend beyond what the car comes with. Massive changes to hardware that completely alter the VE curve (big injectors combined with major headwork, race cams, long tube "tuned" resonance headers, custom intakes, turbos), especially changes that result in huge dips or spikes that are out of range of the factory calibration is where you'll run into problems. That and errors in tunes requiring the ECU to try & adapt where it shouldn't have to. That's the reason you guys talked about one of the main features of Bytetronik being able to "reset" adaptations. If the tune is right you don't have to do this at all.
You (either Mike or Jason) are not coders nor software developers. They rely on Colby, who left Cobb under suspicious circumstances regarding "borrowed IP" from his tenure there. He developed open ECU, which Bytetronik is based on, with different ECU definitions & plug ins to add features. Jason helps find maps & test.
He was a Microsoft Software Engineer from Seattle.. Get your facts straight. Just b/c your tuner 'borrowed maps' from Cobb, you automatically assumed that we did the same.The "feature" that you say is "required" for CARB of locking the ECU isn't entirely true now, is it? You could have left the seed keys the same as OEM, and the ECU would still be locked. This is the way the majority of other vehicle (other brands than Mini) tuning software works.
That basically means if a customer purchases Bytetronik and uses it on their Mini even once, their ECU will forever be locked & no other tuner, or dealer, can work on it ever again. This keeps the customer locked to you & limits them to the maps you have figured out. The only IP you're protecting is the maps, as there's plenty of people who've figured out how to read/write the ECU, and the maps (lets face it) aren't worth all this hassle to real coders.
What if a customers FA kit breaks in the future & you've gone out of business? They're screwed! It's new ECU time, pay a dealer to code it to their vehicle, and start over with a new tune (or pay someone to hack their ECU & crack the Bytetronik keys, which will cost more than it's worth).
Massive changes to hardware that completely alter the VE curve (big injectors combined with major headwork, race cams, long tube "tuned" resonance headers, custom intakes, turbos), especially changes that result in huge dips or spikes that are out of range of the factory calibration is where you'll run into problems. That and errors in tunes requiring the ECU to try & adapt where it shouldn't have to. That's the reason you guys talked about one of the main features of Bytetronik being able to "reset" adaptations. If the tune is right you don't have to do this at all.

We recently sold a FA Kit to a local MINI Shop b/c their GT1 Tool was not able to clear adaptations. He had 3 different cars that came in with misfiring issues, P420 issues, and he couldn't get the codes to stay off even after new O2 sensors were replace and coil/wires were changed out... We went in with FA, clear all adaptations, and whalaa... guess what, the codes stayed off and remained off
BTW, you have not answered my questions yet. You are such a philanthropist, why not share your maps and findings with the rest of the world?
The Sprintex SC was running so much more efficient than the M45 that the ECU was NOT able to Adapt (or compensate) for the extra added air. . . and FA Mapping was needed to it pass the rigorous CARB testing procedure. FACT!
I think you're right... I've been thinking of starting a thread on these forums telling people how to properly tune the Mini's ECU. I think I will. Then they won't need to buy Bytetronik.
The below information is from experience, and you can take it to the bank:
The Sprintex SC was running so much more efficient than the M45 that the ECU was NOT able to Adapt (or compensate) for the extra added air. . . and FA Mapping was needed to it pass the rigorous CARB testing procedure. FACT!
The Sprintex SC was running so much more efficient than the M45 that the ECU was NOT able to Adapt (or compensate) for the extra added air. . . and FA Mapping was needed to it pass the rigorous CARB testing procedure. FACT!
Where most tuners go wrong when doing this type of mod is they simply change injector scaling (often incorrectly) and then adjust only a part throttle VE trim map & they presume this adjusts the entire VE map, but it doesn't. Also there is a setting in the ECU for engine/cylinder volume up & downstream of the supercharger that often needs adjustment with radical changes.
Besides, there's nearly 1000 maps & settings in the calibration data of a Mini ECU. Some of the most important ones are rather obscure looking.
That's your customer's impression... fact is changing one positive displacement blower for another only moves the curve, but doesn't drastically change it's shape in a way that any tuner software couldn't fix if the tuner knew what they were doing. Load cells will likely require adjustment for load based injection time, but this is not complicated.
That's funny, as my previous tuner who originally did the work & others who apparently were in contact stated you guys borrowed maps from him while trying to figure out what to put in the ECU def's for Bytetronik FA... funny how the story changes.
Besides, there's nearly 1000 maps & settings in the calibration data of a Mini ECU. Some of the most important ones are rather obscure looking.
Besides, there's nearly 1000 maps & settings in the calibration data of a Mini ECU. Some of the most important ones are rather obscure looking.
As, an outsider to this entire argument, I'd like to point out how unprofessional it appears that a vendor is publicly arguing with a potential customer...this shows that the vendor has poor customer service reps and, personally, I would want nothing to do with a company that hires people whom are so easily instigated...
Apparently you still don't get it. Re-read my post. I said the job of re-mapping the Mini ECU when swapping one positive displacement supercharger for another isn't a big deal if you know what you're doing. Any of the tuner tools I've seen can do it. Heck you can do it in raw hex if you know what you're doing.
As, an outsider to this entire argument, I'd like to point out how unprofessional it appears that a vendor is publicly arguing with a potential customer...this shows that the vendor has poor customer service reps and, personally, I would want nothing to do with a company that hires people whom are so easily instigated...

You stated the operational word there... "... instigated".
power loss after exhaust and remap
hi,
i have a problem with my 2005 mcs r53 ..i did dyno my car before i did the exaust and a remap and with my engine check light 'on', they manage to get 200whp..and so i decided to change the whole exhaust system and fix the o2 sensors( engine check light problem) and a remap..the exhaust i change the whole system from the header..initially was runnig with a 4-1 , and now 4-2-1..i also increased the piping from 2.2" to 2.5"...i lost alomost 9whp..:( other mods i have is nology and iridium spark plug...BMC open port and 15% pulley..
not to forget i have a schrick cam
i have a problem with my 2005 mcs r53 ..i did dyno my car before i did the exaust and a remap and with my engine check light 'on', they manage to get 200whp..and so i decided to change the whole exhaust system and fix the o2 sensors( engine check light problem) and a remap..the exhaust i change the whole system from the header..initially was runnig with a 4-1 , and now 4-2-1..i also increased the piping from 2.2" to 2.5"...i lost alomost 9whp..:( other mods i have is nology and iridium spark plug...BMC open port and 15% pulley..
not to forget i have a schrick cam
Why did you do that? There is no telling what the ECU/map thought of that.
Thank God i manage to solve the problem....the tuner sent me another program to be installed...and after this, its running better, the top speed and the g force feel increased tremendously...cant wait to dyno to see whats the digits on wheels!!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Beau B
1st Gen Countryman (R60) Talk (2010-2015)
12
Aug 24, 2015 01:50 PM
ki7hy
F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+)
3
Aug 12, 2015 07:07 PM



