Drivetrain JCW baseline dyno + NSW/XXX/hardcore under bonnet porn!
But that's without Jan's tune, right?
Mark
Mark
We'll get the sheets scanned shortly, but here's exactly how the numbers broke down...
Peak HP was 213.8 @ 5682 RPMs. At that RPM torque was 197.6 and the AFR was 12.61...
Peak torque was 225.9 @ 2733 RPMS. At that RPM HP was 117.6 and the AFR was 14.24...
We have some videos of the run too and will try to get those loaded. The car sounds great, but the dyno rollers definitely drown it out sometimes...
Peak HP was 213.8 @ 5682 RPMs. At that RPM torque was 197.6 and the AFR was 12.61...
Peak torque was 225.9 @ 2733 RPMS. At that RPM HP was 117.6 and the AFR was 14.24...
We have some videos of the run too and will try to get those loaded. The car sounds great, but the dyno rollers definitely drown it out sometimes...
post mods/pre-tune dyno graphs POSTED!
Here's the dyno showing 225.9 ft/lbs of peak torque:

...and the dyno showing 213.8 peak HP:

Kind of interesting that the peak torque dyno also had the lowest HP reading (202.8 HP) of all the pulls done (and this one was the first). Again, this is post-mods and pre-tune, so there should be s'more HP and torque coming. Stay tuned...pun intended!

...and the dyno showing 213.8 peak HP:

Kind of interesting that the peak torque dyno also had the lowest HP reading (202.8 HP) of all the pulls done (and this one was the first). Again, this is post-mods and pre-tune, so there should be s'more HP and torque coming. Stay tuned...pun intended!
I agree with orangecrush, you should definitely get an IC.
Forge or helix.
Also, apparently RMW tunes on JCWs don't yield massive dyno gains, but you can tell from orangecrush's posts that the difference is massive
Forge or helix.
Also, apparently RMW tunes on JCWs don't yield massive dyno gains, but you can tell from orangecrush's posts that the difference is massive
It's not a DynoMite (that's the data acquisition computer) it's a Land and Sea chassis dynamometer.
They read more "realistic" like a Mustang dyno as opposed to some of the more "optimistic" dynos out there, like a Dynojet. No matter, that's why I use the same dyno for ALL of our vehicles; I don't care what it runs anywhere else, I want a consistent baseline so I know what I'm getting...or not getting from the mods...
Last edited by MBW Motorsports; Mar 29, 2010 at 07:35 PM. Reason: added specific dyno info
Here's the 411 on the dyno: http://www.ondemandperformance.com/equipment.php
It's not a DynoMite (that's the data acquisition computer) it's a Land and Sea chassis dynamometer.
They read more "realistic" like a Mustang dyno as opposed to some of the more "optimistic" dynos out there, like a Dynojet. No matter, that's why I use the same dyno for ALL of our vehicles; I don't care what it runs anywhere else, I want a consistent baseline so I know what I'm getting...or not getting from the mods...
It's not a DynoMite (that's the data acquisition computer) it's a Land and Sea chassis dynamometer.
They read more "realistic" like a Mustang dyno as opposed to some of the more "optimistic" dynos out there, like a Dynojet. No matter, that's why I use the same dyno for ALL of our vehicles; I don't care what it runs anywhere else, I want a consistent baseline so I know what I'm getting...or not getting from the mods...
Not trying to give you a hard time, but it's hard to gauge.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
Jul 16, 2020 12:54 PM
ebowling
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
90
Aug 4, 2019 09:15 AM
bctf1
F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+)
9
Aug 6, 2015 12:55 PM



