Drivetrain My next mod....GRS Intercooler or RMW Street Header?
How fast you go through the meth has nothing to do with temps. It depends on pump/nozzle size, boost, how you drive, and what settings you use
But on average, the meth will last me with a whole full gas tank cos im constantly on boost...
Ive setup mine starting min spray at 7.5psi and max spray at 14psi
As with most IC evaluations/comparisons the data is subjective
Check out this link
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...e-numbers.html
Tony B did a comparison of the "new improved" GRS intercooler and a DFIC a while ago
As with most IC evaluations/comparisons the data is subjective
Check out this link
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...e-numbers.html
As with most IC evaluations/comparisons the data is subjective
Check out this link
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...e-numbers.html
Im using an M2 nozzle with my meth kit (w 1.5gallon tank) and the tank can run out pretty quickly if your gunning it (I sometimes drive my car to the max over 200+kph on the freeway).
But on average, the meth will last me with a whole full gas tank cos im constantly on boost...
Ive setup mine starting min spray at 7.5psi and max spray at 14psi
But on average, the meth will last me with a whole full gas tank cos im constantly on boost...
Ive setup mine starting min spray at 7.5psi and max spray at 14psi
If you just use water while it will cool you will loose hp...
Long ago Dr Obnxs did testing of GTT, DFIC, GRS and STOCK.
I'll give you the summary of what I have learned about ICs (I've had stock, GTT, DFIC and Forge).
1) Stocker is a dam good unit.
2) Aftermarkets if they beat the stocker from a temp perspective they do so at a cost of pressure drop. And vise versa, an IC that beats the stocker from a pressure perspective does so at a cost of temp.
I have yet to see any data on an aftermarket IC that out performs the stock unit in both categories - temp and pressure.
That's why I want to see this UK data.
I can see why the GRS would be popular in the UK - its less restictive over stock (pressure drop) and the UK has cool climate (less temp sensitve - i.e. its not FLORIDA). Same holds true for the DFIC in hot climates while at a cost of pressure drop it lowers temps.
While an aftermarket might make your car feel a bit more lively - the reality is your splitting hairs. From a pure performance perspective one cannot justify an aftermarket IC and that is why it would be the last thing to do. From a cool factor, absolutely, its the first thing you see when you pop the hood. [
this puts a grin on face evertime I pop the hood

Thanks, and Intese did some IC testing last year also. Thats why I still run the stock IC, nothing has caught my interest yet. What IC is that you are using?
while I agree that the IC is not the best bang for your buck, but my point is if your looking into getting an aftermarket IC..then the GRS is the best one out there...
but back to the OP question...would definitely go for a performance header first
but back to the OP question...would definitely go for a performance header first
Of the (now three) options here...
I'd do water/meth...
header....
I/C (if you must.... but most of the posts here are on the money)....
Another way to go is to hold onto that cash and save for a head. Now that's a REAL difference in power. And after you have a head on the car, then you'll have a good reason to do a header!
On the stock S motor, the biggest bottleneck to real power gains is the size of the stock exhaust valves and gas flow out of the head.
FWIW, I run a GP IC with thermal dispersant coating...
Matt
header....
I/C (if you must.... but most of the posts here are on the money)....
Another way to go is to hold onto that cash and save for a head. Now that's a REAL difference in power. And after you have a head on the car, then you'll have a good reason to do a header!
On the stock S motor, the biggest bottleneck to real power gains is the size of the stock exhaust valves and gas flow out of the head.
FWIW, I run a GP IC with thermal dispersant coating...
Matt
A good thing to do on any I/C
is the thermal dispersant coating. Check out Cradin (www.cradin.com) for info. It's less than $100, and improves IATs about 1%.
Matt
Matt
The IC is a modified FORGE IC - It has an increase slope (front to back) and then it has the fixed scoop. Work quite well for an aftermarket.
I dont have a GP VIN and wouldnt that be kind of suspicious giving them a VIN that isnt mine?
to the GP Intercooler, but good luck getting one. We got very lucky to get ours. To get one from the dealer, you will need a vin # and show a damaged one. If you also order the cover and brackets for a complete kit, then it is going to raise flags and MINI USA isn't letting them go.
That is not very inspiring
is the thermal dispersant coating. Check out Cradin (www.cradin.com) for info. It's less than $100, and improves IATs about 1%.
Matt
Matt
Not sure if it would be worth it though?
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
If you mated the ideas of Partsman with those of Bahamabart, you'd have a really effective "stock" intercooler that, if paired with a bigger scoop and effective diverter, would give you almost ALL the beneficial impact every IC mod in the last 5 years has created. It would look neat, be cool, and cost relatively little.
btw, once Partsman posts to this thread, I think we have once again recreated the official "Low IAT Group." We have quarterly meetings, here on NAM...
btw, once Partsman posts to this thread, I think we have once again recreated the official "Low IAT Group." We have quarterly meetings, here on NAM...



