Drivetrain Low compression
Low compression
Had my car on the dyno for the 1st time last week when Jan came to Seattle. My initial pull was pretty low given the numbers I’d seen others pull with similar mods:
2003 MCS
Dinan CAI
Miltek Catback
15% pulley
380 injectors
Initial pull HP 163.7 @ 6900
Initial pull TQ 156.2 @ 3936
Jan worked his magic, and the car ran much better, and a nice increase:
Final pull HP 178.2 @ 6635
Final pull TQ 162.7 @ 3853
But still lower than I’d expected. At first I thought I just had a Friday afternoon build, but someone suggested a compression check, so I thought what the heck.
well, I’m starting to get an inkling of why my numbers were so depressing:
#1 - 150psi (180 wet)
#2 - 132psi (150 wet)
#3 - 135psi (190 wet)
#4 - 150psi (didn't bother...
)
So, where to go from here? Is it worth getting a leak down test done? The diff in the wet #'s seem to suggest that it's a piston/rings problem.
Anyone know of a shop in the Seattle area?
2003 MCS
Dinan CAI
Miltek Catback
15% pulley
380 injectors
Initial pull HP 163.7 @ 6900
Initial pull TQ 156.2 @ 3936
Jan worked his magic, and the car ran much better, and a nice increase:
Final pull HP 178.2 @ 6635
Final pull TQ 162.7 @ 3853
But still lower than I’d expected. At first I thought I just had a Friday afternoon build, but someone suggested a compression check, so I thought what the heck.
well, I’m starting to get an inkling of why my numbers were so depressing:
#1 - 150psi (180 wet)
#2 - 132psi (150 wet)
#3 - 135psi (190 wet)
#4 - 150psi (didn't bother...
)So, where to go from here? Is it worth getting a leak down test done? The diff in the wet #'s seem to suggest that it's a piston/rings problem.
Anyone know of a shop in the Seattle area?
Had my car on the dyno for the 1st time last week when Jan came to Seattle. My initial pull was pretty low given the numbers I’d seen others pull with similar mods:
2003 MCS
Dinan CAI
Miltek Catback
15% pulley
380 injectors
Initial pull HP 163.7 @ 6900
Initial pull TQ 156.2 @ 3936
Jan worked his magic, and the car ran much better, and a nice increase:
Final pull HP 178.2 @ 6635
Final pull TQ 162.7 @ 3853
But still lower than I’d expected. At first I thought I just had a Friday afternoon build, but someone suggested a compression check, so I thought what the heck.
well, I’m starting to get an inkling of why my numbers were so depressing:
#1 - 150psi (180 wet)
#2 - 132psi (150 wet)
#3 - 135psi (190 wet)
#4 - 150psi (didn't bother...
)
So, where to go from here? Is it worth getting a leak down test done? The diff in the wet #'s seem to suggest that it's a piston/rings problem.
Anyone know of a shop in the Seattle area?
2003 MCS
Dinan CAI
Miltek Catback
15% pulley
380 injectors
Initial pull HP 163.7 @ 6900
Initial pull TQ 156.2 @ 3936
Jan worked his magic, and the car ran much better, and a nice increase:
Final pull HP 178.2 @ 6635
Final pull TQ 162.7 @ 3853
But still lower than I’d expected. At first I thought I just had a Friday afternoon build, but someone suggested a compression check, so I thought what the heck.
well, I’m starting to get an inkling of why my numbers were so depressing:
#1 - 150psi (180 wet)
#2 - 132psi (150 wet)
#3 - 135psi (190 wet)
#4 - 150psi (didn't bother...
)So, where to go from here? Is it worth getting a leak down test done? The diff in the wet #'s seem to suggest that it's a piston/rings problem.
Anyone know of a shop in the Seattle area?
How many miles do you have on your car?
150psi doesn't worry me, fairly typical from what i've read, but 2 & 3 do. I though the "uh oh" point was if there was more than a 10% variance between cylinders?
Yep, the wet #'s for 3 suprised me. Maybe i'll test agian to double check.
63k on the car. Doesn't seem to burn oil, and certainly no smoke (even when on the dyno).
150psi doesn't worry me, fairly typical from what i've read, but 2 & 3 do. I though the "uh oh" point was if there was more than a 10% variance between cylinders?
Yep, the wet #'s for 3 suprised me. Maybe i'll test agian to double check.
150psi doesn't worry me, fairly typical from what i've read, but 2 & 3 do. I though the "uh oh" point was if there was more than a 10% variance between cylinders?
Yep, the wet #'s for 3 suprised me. Maybe i'll test agian to double check.
Trending Topics
I was in a similar position to you a few months ago (33,000 miles on car)
150psi
135psi
150psi
150psi
As you are only suposed to have a difference between cylinders of 7 psi I took it to BMW as my car is still under warranty...... result was they fitted a new engine
even though it probabily was just rings needed
My compression now on all cylinders is over 180 psi
150psi
135psi
150psi
150psi
As you are only suposed to have a difference between cylinders of 7 psi I took it to BMW as my car is still under warranty...... result was they fitted a new engine
even though it probabily was just rings neededMy compression now on all cylinders is over 180 psi
If it was a head gasket you'd have coolant in the oil.
no coolant in the oil as far as i can tell. If memory serves from blowing the headgasket in my 66 Mini 20 years ago, the emulsion is pretty obvious!
I'm pretty sure it's not the gasket - just in denial
Well, that and the fact that adjecent cylinders were low seemed suspicous.
I'm pretty sure it's not the gasket - just in denial
Well, that and the fact that adjecent cylinders were low seemed suspicous.
Hmm, curiouser and curiouser…
Redid my compression check today at rustyboy155’s suggestion. I’m seeing around 160psi all round
. The only thing I can think of is that I didn’t have the compression tester tight enough, or there was some goop or something on the O ring preventing a good seal. Rechecked twice to make sure, and yep, 160 all round.
Aside from me b*llocksing it up in the 1st place, would anything else cause this? It’s mighty hot here in seattle, but I can’t see that affecting things at all.
. The only thing I can think of is that I didn’t have the compression tester tight enough, or there was some goop or something on the O ring preventing a good seal. Rechecked twice to make sure, and yep, 160 all round. Aside from me b*llocksing it up in the 1st place, would anything else cause this? It’s mighty hot here in seattle, but I can’t see that affecting things at all.
I've actually scared myself in the same way - it was the tester. If you don't have a good seal, it will look exactly like yours did the first time.
As an interesting side note, I saw a busted exhaust valve (a chunk was actually missing) on a 2002 JCW the other day. It was pretty close to stock JCW, but he had run regular fuel in it. Low mileage too. The valve blew right through the head into the exhaust though, and it didn't hurt the piston or cylinder a bit. With a new head, the car runs like a champ again. The compression for #3 was zero!
Randy
As an interesting side note, I saw a busted exhaust valve (a chunk was actually missing) on a 2002 JCW the other day. It was pretty close to stock JCW, but he had run regular fuel in it. Low mileage too. The valve blew right through the head into the exhaust though, and it didn't hurt the piston or cylinder a bit. With a new head, the car runs like a champ again. The compression for #3 was zero!
Randy
I was in a similar position to you a few months ago (33,000 miles on car)
150psi
135psi
150psi
150psi
As you are only suposed to have a difference between cylinders of 7 psi I took it to BMW as my car is still under warranty...... result was they fitted a new engine
even though it probabily was just rings needed
My compression now on all cylinders is over 180 psi

150psi
135psi
150psi
150psi
As you are only suposed to have a difference between cylinders of 7 psi I took it to BMW as my car is still under warranty...... result was they fitted a new engine
even though it probabily was just rings neededMy compression now on all cylinders is over 180 psi
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kjd186
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
2
Sep 9, 2015 10:02 AM






