Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Evotech Tune from Mini Madness

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 11:38 AM
  #101  
searocko's Avatar
searocko
4th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by Nitrominis
You know if it were just the problem with the Evo Tech tune and questions to others about it was all that would be fine. But the mere fact that pure13 choose not to resolve Evo Tech issues and bought/given (?) the other tune does not warrant claiming an inferior product or that it was not as advertised until all parties concerned have had a chance to correct/rectify the claim.
It has been determined since Pure13's findings that there is at least one more car (safety sean) that has the same map as Pure did. There were 3 other Evotech cars at the May PSMINI dyno day that obtained low numbers, and they're being contacted in hopes of having their ECUs checked as well.

It looks like we've moved past Pure13's issues but in light of the discovery of other examples, this issue will be further investigated and hopefully resolved to the satisfaction of all parties.
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #102  
billzcat1's Avatar
billzcat1
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Everett, WA
OK let's review.

Pure13 bought a product that was not as-advertised. He did not know that the fuel/ignition maps were not altered until the Jan tune (because very few people have the ability to view fuel maps on their own). Upon discovering the problem, you expected him to give Jan the finger and pass off this extremely-rare-three-months-in-the-making opportunity? "Thanks for reading my software Jan, but now that I know there's a problem, I'm going to pass up the opportunity to fix it and see if I can get some resolution out of a vendor who merely distributes the product."

Fact: pure13's product was not as advertised. He has a right to say so without resolution from the vendor, regardless of what action he takes next. I deal with this ALL the time in retail management. Let me tell you how that goes... "I bought Product X here 2 weeks ago and it broke." "Would you like me to exchange it for you?" "I already got a new one from Vendor Y"... do I then berate the customer for not giving me the opportunity to fix the problem? No. I give them their money back and thank them for shopping with us in the first place.

I have nothing against Madness here. While I believe that the distributor is responsible for the quality of the products they choose to sell, in this case, Madness had no way to verify the quality of the product they were selling. Now that they know, I am sure they are taking steps with Evotech to improve it because I believe they are a reputable vendor. If they chose to do nothing and continue selling the product, I would be a little more worried.

One thing I am getting tired of seeing is that no one can ever post an opinion or experience here without getting ripped apart.
 

Last edited by billzcat1; Jun 22, 2008 at 12:24 PM.
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #103  
Rorik's Avatar
Rorik
2nd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Nitrominis
The start of this thread by Pure13 posting #1
“Please share your expereince with me either on this forum or PM.”

Longboard posting #2
“Did you call George at Mini Madness before posting this? “

Pure13 post 3 still on the 6-19.
“FYI: I had RWM tune today”

It really does not look like Mini Madness had time to respond to this thread. So I would be a little miffed myself ? Not everybody reads this forum everyday like some of us.

And Mini Madness did reply on posting # 36 on 6-20
“At this time Pure 13 has not called us to discuss determining if there is in fact a problem with his ECU or to arrange the evaluation. We are anxiously await his call.”

You know if it were just the problem with the Evo Tech tune and questions to others about it was all that would be fine. But the mere fact that pure13 choose not to resolve Evo Tech issues and bought/given (?) the other tune does not warrant claiming an inferior product or that it was not as advertised until all parties concerned have had a chance to correct/rectify the claim.
So pure13 shows up to build upon what he thinks is a 230whp car (according to MM site info) and finds out that he has a 188whp car.
I asked several posts ago:
If there is nothing wrong with the Evotech software where is the missing 42whp? When was the last time a MINI got that kind of HP bump with just the hardware in that particular package?
Anybody have an answer yet?
As a couple of others have stated, either here or on psmini.org, when the car is on the dyno and there are other cars waiting in line, there's no time to sit and wait for a dealer response.
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 12:24 PM
  #104  
Nitrominis's Avatar
Nitrominis
Banned
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 715
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by billzcat1
Oh wow. This is the first time I've heard of free Jan tunes at tuning parties.... Oh wait I was there! And while the tunes were worth every penny (or a bargain at twice the price, judging by what you get from Evotech for $650), they were definetly not free.

Sometimes I wonder where people pull this information from? Is it out of the air? Or somewhere else?
I do not see where anyone mention a name and the word free ? That must be the air thing you were talking about.

I wonder how you buy one product have a problem do not wait to get it taken care of and get another? The excuse even by some NAM moderator to take advantage of a "tune party" to justify reasoning of some things discussed here. That is just Bad Business ethic's !


You have to think about how this started. Instead of perhaps a personal experience with Evo Tech from start to resolve and asking for other experiences would have been more appropriate. Instead it was some what different?

"fishy"

You know the truth/facts eventually comes out. It may take some time but it always does. And some things are like Pandora's box to.
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #105  
//MZero's Avatar
//MZero
4th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 565
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Rorik
So pure13 shows up to build upon what he thinks is a 230whp car (according to MM site info) and finds out that he has a 188whp car.
I asked several posts ago:
If there is nothing wrong with the Evotech software where is the missing 42whp? When was the last time a MINI got that kind of HP bump with just the hardware in that particular package?
Anybody have an answer yet?
As a couple of others have stated, either here or on psmini.org, when the car is on the dyno and there are other cars waiting in line, there's no time to sit and wait for a dealer response.
IMO Mini-Madness does not advertise there packages as WHEEL hp but rather, simply hp. At 188.8whp *1.15 for drivetrain loss he was at 217hp. Still 15-20hp shy of the claimed number, this 15-20 hp could easily be found in simple retuned fuel maps by Evotech which seem to be the only thing missing.

Now with the RMW tune and 203.7whp * 1.15 he is right at 234hp. Right where he should be based on the packge.

Now I would find it hard to believe that a "canned" tune could make as much power as a custom tune...but there is no reason it couldn't bring him to 225-230hp which is pretty close to as advertised.
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 12:59 PM
  #106  
ScottinBend's Avatar
ScottinBend
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 2
From: Oregon, USA
Originally Posted by Nitrominis
I do not see where anyone mention a name and the word free ? That must be the air thing you were talking about.

I wonder how you buy one product have a problem do not wait to get it taken care of and get another? The excuse even by some NAM moderator to take advantage of a "tune party" to justify reasoning of some things discussed here. That is just Bad Business ethic's !


You have to think about how this started. Instead of perhaps a personal experience with Evo Tech from start to resolve and asking for other experiences would have been more appropriate. Instead it was some what different?

"fishy"

You know the truth/facts eventually comes out. It may take some time but it always does. And some things are like Pandora's box to.
WTF ! ! !

Are you even capable of reading and comprehending the written word?

As posted before.......pure13 was in Tacoma for a scheduled tune by Jan to try and eek out a bit more from his car. He had already commited to buying Jans tune and the dyno time BEFORE finding out his Evotech was garbage. When Jan downloaded the map from his car the only mods done to it were the traction control (DSC) and the RPM limit. Pure13 didn't know he had a problem with the Evotech tune until Jan pointed out the problem (other than lower expected dyno results). I saw the file. No other changes were made. Why would he refuse to get a custom tune just to try and get a fix from MM? MM didn't screw-up, Evotech did. MM was simply the retailer.

As for the free comment........So Pure13 was at a tune party? That means he got free work.Kind of like Tupperware. Heck I would have done that myself. Look familiar, it should it's from your post........
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 01:44 PM
  #107  
billzcat1's Avatar
billzcat1
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Everett, WA
Originally Posted by Nitrominis
I do not see where anyone mention a name and the word free ?
Originally Posted by Nitrominis
So Pure13 was at a tune party? That means he got free work.Kind of like Tupperware. Heck I would have done that myself.
That's it. You're done. You talk about facts then dispute them. You continuously contradict yourself. At this point I don't even remember what we are arguing about, because if you consider yourself a purveyor of facts, then there would be no arguement.
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 02:00 PM
  #108  
Rorik's Avatar
Rorik
2nd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by AeroCooper
IMO Mini-Madness does not advertise there packages as WHEEL hp but rather, simply hp. At 188.8whp *1.15 for drivetrain loss he was at 217hp. Still 15-20hp shy of the claimed number, this 15-20 hp could easily be found in simple retuned fuel maps by Evotech which seem to be the only thing missing.

Now with the RMW tune and 203.7whp * 1.15 he is right at 234hp. Right where he should be based on the packge.

Now I would find it hard to believe that a "canned" tune could make as much power as a custom tune...but there is no reason it couldn't bring him to 225-230hp which is pretty close to as advertised.
If MM lists BHP rather than WHP and what you have posted above is correct, I have no issues with rephrasing my questions to reflect that. But your post, as polite as it is, still doesn't answer my questions.
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 02:13 PM
  #109  
billzcat1's Avatar
billzcat1
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Everett, WA
Originally Posted by Rorik
One question: Where is the 18 bhp that the OP is missing?
Apparently it is in the software which did not include fuel/ignition tuning whatsoever.

Originally Posted by Rorik
Would that have been achieved with just the hardware, rev limit and DSC adjustment provided by the stage 3 kit?
Apparently not, as adjustments to the fuel/timing/magical torque-increaser that Jan did actually made the advertised horsepower.

This would support the position that the Evotech software caused the Madness "Stage 3" kit to perform under expectations and advertised claims. While the hardware included is now proven at the levels claimed, the software seems to have let it down.

I hope Madness gets this sorted with Evotech as they are obviously providing a good hardware package that just needs proper tuning support.
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 02:14 PM
  #110  
newbs49's Avatar
newbs49
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: North Tonawanda NY
Well said ScottinBend. Some guys have no clue about ECU tuning. We had the same Evotech issue in Detroit. I don't believe that MM would even know of the problem if they send the ECU out, which they most likely do. The facts are the facts.
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 02:38 PM
  #111  
//MZero's Avatar
//MZero
4th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 565
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Rorik
If MM lists BHP rather than WHP and what you have posted above is correct, I have no issues with rephrasing my questions to reflect that. But your post, as polite as it is, still doesn't answer my questions.
I think billzcat got it for you. Basically...the 18hp that is missing is due to the software...it is an Evotech problem. The MM hardware can most certainly support the number, but the lack of actual fuel/timing tuning is where it is fallng short. I guess that is what a lot of the craziness in this thread is about
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 02:49 PM
  #112  
ScottinBend's Avatar
ScottinBend
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 2
From: Oregon, USA
Yep......too many bozo's not actually reading the post and then jumping to conclusions......
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 05:07 PM
  #113  
Nitrominis's Avatar
Nitrominis
Banned
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 715
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by billzcat1
That's it. You're done. You talk about facts then dispute them. You continuously contradict yourself. At this point I don't even remember what we are arguing about, because if you consider yourself a purveyor of facts, then there would be no arguement.
First of all you have no position to tell me I am done! BIG( )

I guess I did mention the word free. ops my bad. But I think the point went where it I wanted it to go.

Scottbend is right about one thing and I quote his post " Yep......too many bozo's not actually reading the post and then jumping to conclusions......"

This thread should have been Moderated a long time ago

 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 05:16 PM
  #114  
Guest's Avatar
Guest
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 2
From: SoCaL (Agoura Hills)
Originally Posted by Nitrominis
First of all you have no position to tell me I am done! BIG( )

I guess I did mention the word free. ops my bad. But I think the point went where it I wanted it to go.

Scottbend is right about one thing and I quote his post " Yep......too many bozo's not actually reading the post and then jumping to conclusions......"

This thread should have been Moderated a long time ago

Why?
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #115  
muladesigns1's Avatar
muladesigns1
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix AZ
As far as i can tell, the OP has a reason to gripe about what he paid for and what he received.
I think that the issue should be taken up with the chip maker though, not the distributor.
It should be as simple as a phone call to the distributor. let him know the problem, and the distributor should take the part back and either exchange it with another, or refund the money in full.
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 05:29 PM
  #116  
ScottinBend's Avatar
ScottinBend
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 2
From: Oregon, USA
Originally Posted by Nitrominis
First of all you have no position to tell me I am done! BIG( )

I guess I did mention the word free. ops my bad. But I think the point went where it I wanted it to go.

Scottbend is right about one thing and I quote his post " Yep......too many bozo's not actually reading the post and then jumping to conclusions......"

This thread should have been Moderated a long time ago


Yep..........too many bozo's and yes you are done.

oh.....oops my bad
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #117  
HighLife4136's Avatar
HighLife4136
5th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere just left of off center
This thread is starting to exemplify NAM hypocrisy
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 05:45 PM
  #118  
Nitrominis's Avatar
Nitrominis
Banned
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 715
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by ScottinBend
Yep..........too many bozo's and yes you are done.

oh.....oops my bad
off topic:
I don't think so not by anything you can do !


on topic:

I guess will all just have to see what progress is made this week with Evo Tech and Mini Madness on this issue. During the weekday when there tech people available to contact.
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #119  
HighLife4136's Avatar
HighLife4136
5th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere just left of off center
Originally Posted by Nitrominis
off topic:
I don't think so not by anything you can do !


on topic:

I guess will all just have to see what progress is made this week with Evo Tech and Mini Madness on this issue. During the weekday when there tech people available to contact.
I think everyone should take a break from this thread until George and Jan can converse on the topic...I know, a little too much to ask, but worth a try
 
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 05:51 PM
  #120  
gnatster's Avatar
gnatster
6th Gear
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by HighLife4136
I think everyone should take a break from this thread until George and Jan can converse on the topic...I know, a little too much to ask, but worth a try
Thats easy enough to do...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
Jul 16, 2020 12:54 PM
Motown
Drivetrain (Cooper S)
4
Apr 20, 2018 09:31 AM
M7Speed
Vendor Group Buys
0
Aug 10, 2015 12:32 PM
ECSTuning
Vendor Announcements
0
Aug 7, 2015 08:02 AM
M7Speed
Vendor Announcements
0
Aug 6, 2015 01:48 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:54 PM.