Drivetrain Project "Low IAT"-Intake Manifold Cooling

If you cut the shroud like this:
Use a tray like Dr Phil that ataches to the cut shroud
Only make a plate that fits across the top of the cut shroud that includes the Docs piece, allow for the hose to go under the plate & divert air to the engine
Then fence off different sections of the plate, IE - AGS area or where you want air & build some fence for the radiator below ala Dr Phils post - air leakage. There may be too much air taken from the 2 radiators if there is no box. When I refer to a radiator box, this does not mean an offical sealed box but rather some type of collection fence to keep as much air to the radiator as possible ( BMW thought enough about it to seal off the shroud. We need to know more from Dr Phil on this issue since it's warm where he is, hot might be a better description ).
You can see in Sids pic that there is plenty of area to devide as needed with various fences without the time spent to make compound bends. I'v been thinking about this pic all day & how much sealing there would need to be done so that the best air would be available for the vaioius issues. Not there yet. I need some time so I can get to work on the car......... No time for the wicked I guess.
TonyBs pic shows how much more air is available over the stock "S" when the areo grill is used ( I like that there is some air diversion on the radiator ).
When removing the rubber seal from the radiator shroud there is a noticeable difference in under hood temps with the areo grill but only when the car is moving. In heavy traffic, with hot weather, the system recovery is slow, enough that the ruber seal, indeed, makes a difference.
Venting on top helps also with an exit or flow path, from my readings (need to qualify my statements). As I said, I think in another thread, the cowl grilles, with bonnet liner removed (and more so with the rubber stripping also), act as an escape for hot air, paricularly when motionless.Today 03:23 PM
As TonyB points out with this statement, the sealing part, where & how much.
Whatever you use you need to make sure that it conducts heat well, otherwise the heatsink won't really do you any good. I wonder what kind of adhesive they use when they attach them in computers and what not.
I believe they're kinda like a jell substance...not really good for bonding...I think JBweld is dense enough to conduct heat and the material needed would be relatively thin anyway...
epoxy with silver shavings in it.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16835100005
not sure how hot it can get before it melts... i've personally pushed it to 90 deg celcius on some parts of my motherboard and video card memory.

edit:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16835100005
not sure how hot it can get before it melts... i've personally pushed it to 90 deg celcius on some parts of my motherboard and video card memory.
edit:
Originally Posted by newegg.com
Features Made with 99.8% pure micronized Silver
62% to 65% Silver content by weight
Superior thermal conductivity. Greater than 7.5W/mK.
Temperature Range is -40C to >150C
Caution:
Arctic Silver Thermal Adhesive is a permanent adhesive. Components you attach with
Arctic Silver Thermal Adhesive will stay attached forever.
62% to 65% Silver content by weight
Superior thermal conductivity. Greater than 7.5W/mK.
Temperature Range is -40C to >150C
Caution:
Arctic Silver Thermal Adhesive is a permanent adhesive. Components you attach with
Arctic Silver Thermal Adhesive will stay attached forever.
Last edited by minimusprime; May 15, 2007 at 05:28 PM.
epoxy with silver shavings in it.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16835100005
not sure how hot it can get before it melts... i've personally pushed it to 90 deg celcius on some parts of my motherboard and video card memory.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16835100005
not sure how hot it can get before it melts... i've personally pushed it to 90 deg celcius on some parts of my motherboard and video card memory.
Just exactly how much glue is in this kit? I can't tell by the picture...I need enough to cover two 1" x 4.5" surfaces...
Last edited by MSFITOY; May 15, 2007 at 05:31 PM.
I too was thinking of JB, but it's darn near permanent though. It might conduct quite well, but I'm not sure. Wouldn't take much experimentation to find-out...
That epoxy seems to be the way to go!
That epoxy seems to be the way to go!
You'll probobly want a bit more so I'd honestly get 2 if you are going to order. The stuff is cool as heck to have around. It's the real deal epoxy and dries hard. Conducts electicity to a small degree as well. This stuff, jb weld, duct tape and a hammer and i could piece a house back together. lol
Sold...I'll order two...Thanks for the tip
I just went and looked at my tubes of it. I'd say that it will cover the bottom of both of the heatsinks with a layer sufficient to use them on computer applications. With that you want it ample to make contact but thin enough to not waste energy.
You'll probobly want a bit more so I'd honestly get 2 if you are going to order. The stuff is cool as heck to have around. It's the real deal epoxy and dries hard. Conducts electicity to a small degree as well. This stuff, jb weld, duct tape and a hammer and i could piece a house back together. lol
You'll probobly want a bit more so I'd honestly get 2 if you are going to order. The stuff is cool as heck to have around. It's the real deal epoxy and dries hard. Conducts electicity to a small degree as well. This stuff, jb weld, duct tape and a hammer and i could piece a house back together. lol
OOOOOOOOoooo...I hate you and your sheet metal bench...



My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
Joaquin, what about engine movement? I left about 3/4" between my diverter and the manifold and the diverter is bent down to let air flow under the manifold. Are you running an engine damper? Before I put mine on, the engine moved 3/4" totally--now it moves about 3/8".
And are you going to add sides to the diverter, like I have? What about air that will leak out the sides?
Lookin' good, my man!
And are you going to add sides to the diverter, like I have? What about air that will leak out the sides?
Lookin' good, my man!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
Where's yours? I've been waiting all day to see it.
I know you've been working on another project, and it looks pretty sweet!
Did you get my voicemail?
I know you've been working on another project, and it looks pretty sweet!
Did you get my voicemail?
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
Joaquin, what about engine movement? I left about 3/4" between my diverter and the manifold and the diverter is bent down to let air flow under the manifold. Are you running an engine damper? Before I put mine on, the engine moved 3/4" totally--now it moves about 3/8".
And are you going to add sides to the diverter, like I have? What about air that will leak out the sides?
Lookin' good, my man!
And are you going to add sides to the diverter, like I have? What about air that will leak out the sides?
Lookin' good, my man!
Yes, I have a damper, I actually have the very first one from LordOfTheFlies(i'm the one who showed him how to mount it with no brackets)but, I think I may experiment with different style damper.
I am going to fence off the IMD, I just have to figure out the best way to do it.
Last edited by Partsman; May 15, 2007 at 08:49 PM.
Joaquin, looks good! I like the bleeder access, the overall more finished look. I look forward to playing some catch-up with you all! I'm thinking about wrapping the hose to better retain the heat within it, and still have a diverter for improved directional flow for the intake manifold.
I'm really intrigued by the heat sink! For validation that this works, I'd say get two indetical chunks of scrap metal, the only difference is that one will have a heat sink. Heat each one up with something like a torch, or leave them both in the afternoon soon, and see what kind of delta there is between the two. Maybe even have a fan to provide some airflow as well...
I'm really intrigued by the heat sink! For validation that this works, I'd say get two indetical chunks of scrap metal, the only difference is that one will have a heat sink. Heat each one up with something like a torch, or leave them both in the afternoon soon, and see what kind of delta there is between the two. Maybe even have a fan to provide some airflow as well...

My cell is dead...please PM me?
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
Joaquin, looks good! I like the bleeder access, the overall more finished look. I look forward to playing some catch-up with you all! I'm thinking about wrapping the hose to better retain the heat within it, and still have a diverter for improved directional flow for the intake manifold.
Originally Posted by TonyB
I'm really intrigued by the heat sink! For validation that this works, I'd say get two indetical chunks of scrap metal, the only difference is that one will have a heat sink. Heat each one up with something like a torch, or leave them both in the afternoon soon, and see what kind of delta there is between the two. Maybe even have a fan to provide some airflow as well...
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
No, I mean your version of the IMD. I've been waiting to see your design.
PM sent.
PM sent.
Sid, or anyone else, what do these heat sinks cost, and are there some types better than others, or better for this application?
I think it will be hard to discern if this works on our MINI, with so many dynamics at play. I really hope we can get some proof with some simple, controlled testing, like what I provided in my previous post...
I think it will be hard to discern if this works on our MINI, with so many dynamics at play. I really hope we can get some proof with some simple, controlled testing, like what I provided in my previous post...








