Tires, Wheels, & Brakes Discussion about wheels, tires, and brakes for the new MINI.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Are these 17's or 18's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 06:54 PM
  #1  
dmeyer's Avatar
dmeyer
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Are these 17's or 18's?

Anyone know if these are 17s or 18s? This pic is from the OZ Racing site.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 06:58 PM
  #2  
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 8
From: oh10
It's probably a photoshop to be honest....


But it looks like 17's
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:02 PM
  #3  
dmeyer's Avatar
dmeyer
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Trying to decide on 17" or 18" Ultraleggeras....
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:06 PM
  #4  
XAlfa's Avatar
XAlfa
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by dmeyer
Trying to decide on 17" or 18" Ultraleggeras....
What are your criteria?
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:09 PM
  #5  
dmeyer's Avatar
dmeyer
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by XAlfa
What are your criteria?
Handling is key. I drove a JCW car that had the JCW suspension, the 18" JCW wheels and runflats. It was a bit too rough for me but i suspect thats because of the combination of all three.

I suppose the question is, what are the performance pros and cons of the sizes? I do not plan to use runflats.

Anyone have a pic of a car with JCW brakes that runs similar 18's?
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #6  
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 8
From: oh10
for exceptional handling, and acceleration...paired with price and the ability to run the JCW brakes.....i would say neither, get 16s for the performance.

18s are bling and nothing else.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:17 PM
  #7  
XAlfa's Avatar
XAlfa
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
But with those OZ's, you can have your bling along with decent performance. The 18 ULs are only 16lbs. I personally dig all the feedback from a low profile tire on a big wheel. I run SL 18s with non-runflats and JCW suspension. 80 miles a day and loving it.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:21 PM
  #8  
dmeyer's Avatar
dmeyer
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by XAlfa
But with those OZ's, you can have your bling along with decent performance. The 18 ULs are only 16lbs. I personally dig all the feedback from a low profile tire on a big wheel. I run SL 18s with non-runflats and JCW suspension. 80 miles a day and loving it.
From what I've heard, the 18 lo pro non-runflats are typically about as rough as the 17" runflats...Haven't had a chance to drive a non-runflat car though...
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:26 PM
  #9  
XAlfa's Avatar
XAlfa
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by dmeyer
From what I've heard, the 18 lo pro non-runflats are typically about as rough as the 17" runflats...Haven't had a chance to drive a non-runflat car though...
I found the stock 17 runflats to be a bit harsher than the non-runflat 18s.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:41 PM.