Suspension Are these alignment specs good?
Are these alignment specs good?
I just got an alignment today after putting on H&R springs last week. Can someone tell me if these specs look good?
The technician told me the rears were fine so he didn't adjust much, but he had more to adjust in the front. He said these specs are now within the "normal stock" numbers.
The technician told me the rears were fine so he didn't adjust much, but he had more to adjust in the front. He said these specs are now within the "normal stock" numbers.
I did give them a week to settle, hope that was enough time. I don't know if he removed any plastic pin in the front. He only said if I wanted further adjustments up front to get some camber plates. I'll see how the tires wear and consider getting them if needed.
I'd go for less than 3/16 rear toe in, (try for 1/16), and, as above, a little more front negative
camber (especially on the right) by pulling the pin (front toe will need to be re-adjusted again after that),
but otherwise looks fine. I'd usually shoot for 0 - 1/16 toe in on the front.
camber (especially on the right) by pulling the pin (front toe will need to be re-adjusted again after that),
but otherwise looks fine. I'd usually shoot for 0 - 1/16 toe in on the front.
When you say "Do these specs look good" it depends on what you wanting to do with the car. DD, Auto-X, track day etc. For a DD if driven on the highway a lot your going to wear the inside of the rear tires most likely with -1.9 but there probably isn't enough adj to be able to make to change it much. You'll need to rotate on a regular basis to help with that. No rule of thumb BUT the guys that are going aggressive with their alignment and have the ability to make those adj are running say -1.8 to -2.3 in the front and half of that in the rear say -1.0 to -1.3 I'd go as far as to say no one on purpose is running more neg. camber in the rear then in the front assuming your car has enough adj room to change it.. Lowering a stock MINI will give you neg camber in the rear and there is very little adj room built into the car from the factory..
When you say "Do these specs look good" it depends on what you wanting to do with the car. DD, Auto-X, track day etc. For a DD if driven on the highway a lot your going to wear the inside of the rear tires most likely with -1.9 but there probably isn't enough adj to be able to make to change it much. You'll need to rotate on a regular basis to help with that. No rule of thumb BUT the guys that are going aggressive with their alignment and have the ability to make those adj are running say -1.8 to -2.3 in the front and half of that in the rear say -1.0 to -1.3 I'd go as far as to say no one on purpose is running more neg. camber in the rear then in the front assuming your car has enough adj room to change it.. Lowering a stock MINI will give you neg camber in the rear and there is very little adj room built into the car from the factory..
Trending Topics
FWIW - I think that is way too much negative in the rear. I run -2.2 front(IE fixed camber plates) and -1.2 in the rear and find that to be the right ratio F/R. Mine is a DD but that is pretty aggressive. Too much rear negative camber increases rear grip and negates the effects of the rear sway bar upgrade (assuming you did that). Simply put, you increase the already prevalent understeer our little cars have.
Since the fronts wear out about twice as fast as the rears, you should do fine if
rotating frequently. Sure, -1.0 to -1.5 would be better for camber in the back than
-1.9, but it's whether it's worth getting adjustable control arms for that .75 degree
of adjustment is up to you. Stock alignment is -1.5 +/- 0.5, so yes, you're within
factory specs.
rotating frequently. Sure, -1.0 to -1.5 would be better for camber in the back than
-1.9, but it's whether it's worth getting adjustable control arms for that .75 degree
of adjustment is up to you. Stock alignment is -1.5 +/- 0.5, so yes, you're within
factory specs.
I didn't do the adj control arms at first but think if you look around and find a used set on the cheap it will be worth your while. Granted with that current setup you don't have to worry about the rear end coming around on you on.
Since the fronts wear out about twice as fast as the rears, you should do fine if
rotating frequently. Sure, -1.0 to -1.5 would be better for camber in the back than
-1.9, but it's whether it's worth getting adjustable control arms for that .75 degree
of adjustment is up to you. Stock alignment is -1.5 +/- 0.5, so yes, you're within
factory specs.
rotating frequently. Sure, -1.0 to -1.5 would be better for camber in the back than
-1.9, but it's whether it's worth getting adjustable control arms for that .75 degree
of adjustment is up to you. Stock alignment is -1.5 +/- 0.5, so yes, you're within
factory specs.
Thanks to everyone who replied, very helpful.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kimolaoha
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
5
Dec 5, 2020 09:32 PM
R50/53 2002 R53 Creaking/Clacking
maestro39
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
3
Oct 27, 2015 02:38 PM
Powershift
MINIs & Minis for Sale
1
Aug 16, 2015 05:14 PM
minipopkart
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
2
Aug 13, 2015 05:22 AM







