Stock Problems/Issues Discussions related to warranty related issues and repairs, or other problems with the OEM parts and software for MINI Clubman (R55), Cooper and Cooper S(R56), and Cabrio (R57).

does the r56 suffer from **STRUT TOWER MUSHROOMING**?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 09:41 PM
  #1  
fafnir's Avatar
fafnir
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
does the r56 suffer from **STRUT TOWER MUSHROOMING**?

for those of you who already have the 07 r56, does the front suffer from strut tower mushrooming/deforming?

can someone take a picture of what the strut towers look like up close? (macro)?

if it does, does 06 camber plates work on the 07 r56?

thanks for the time



_
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 09:49 PM
  #2  
skitelluride531's Avatar
skitelluride531
Former Vendor
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX & Boston, MA (Babson College)
???

They are not even available yet.......
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 09:57 PM
  #3  
not-so-rednwhitecooper's Avatar
not-so-rednwhitecooper
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,883
Likes: 3
From: Chardon, Ohio
they are avaliable in europe.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 10:57 PM
  #4  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
It shouldn't be as bad...

I think the R56 has more suspension travel.

Matt
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 12:51 AM
  #5  
dwdyer's Avatar
dwdyer
5th Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 826
Likes: 2
From: Austin, TX
It's probably a bit too early to tell, I think.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 12:22 PM
  #6  
SMSgt Bo's Avatar
SMSgt Bo
2nd Gear
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Blue Ridge Mountains of NC
Originally Posted by dwdyer
It's probably a bit too early to tell, I think.
Maybe not, one of the GP owners in the States mushroomed a strut tower on his drive home from the dealership.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #7  
MINIAC's Avatar
MINIAC
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 94
From: Tsunami Zone
The GP is NOT an R56
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 01:09 PM
  #8  
R56MCS's Avatar
R56MCS
Banned
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,208
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MINIAC
The GP is NOT an R56
True.

No signs of this on my R56 MCS, I asked MINI HQ in Oxford about this via e-mail, they said that they were aware of the issue in previous models and that steps had been taken to address the problem, they would not specify what these measures were though.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 01:32 PM
  #9  
erickvonzipper's Avatar
erickvonzipper
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
Originally Posted by R56MCS
True.

No signs of this on my R56 MCS, I asked MINI HQ in Oxford about this via e-mail, they said that they were aware of the issue in previous models and that steps had been taken to address the problem, they would not specify what these measures were though.
They probably specced it out with a coupla additional layers of aluminum foil.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 05:18 PM
  #10  
glangford's Avatar
glangford
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Obviously more metal (thicker) may help. If the tower mushrooms the metal has exceeded its yield limit. All metal undergoes movement (strain) when subjected to stress (load), if within the yield limit, it reverts to its shape, if it exceeds the yield limit, it deforms. This would seem to be an easy problem to fix with either a little more metal, varying the shape (hence the load path), or a combination of the two. I'd be surprised if they didn't fix this, given they knew of it. Having more travel in springs and struts help somewhat as well as some of the energy is dampened and not all transmitted to the tower, but probably not as much as just more metal and minimizing the load path.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 08:34 PM
  #11  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
IT's 0.8" more travel....

that will do the most to prevent it. In a % terms, it's quite an increase in travel.

Matt
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 09:35 PM
  #12  
fafnir's Avatar
fafnir
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
could someone with a r56 take a picture of their strut tower top? e.g. if its still flat or is it domed now and also if they could take a few caliper measurements of how thick the metal is?

thanks for the time



_
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:09 AM
  #13  
R56MCS's Avatar
R56MCS
Banned
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,208
Likes: 0
I'll take some pics later today and post them here.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 03:07 AM
  #14  
SMSgt Bo's Avatar
SMSgt Bo
2nd Gear
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Blue Ridge Mountains of NC
Originally Posted by MINIAC
The GP is NOT an R56
I am well aware of that. :impatient My post was in response to:

Originally Posted by dwdyer
It's probably a bit too early to tell, I think.
Since mushrooming was such a problem on the old Mini (to the extent that it has occured within the first day of ownership); isn't it conceivable that if such a problem exists on the new Mini that it could manifest itself as early as its maiden voyage to its new home?
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 04:49 AM
  #15  
glangford's Avatar
glangford
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Engine Bay Pics

There is another thread further down called engine bay pics. Doesn't look like top of strut tower is flat, somewhat slightly domed. Don't know about first gen, so I can't compare. If it was flat, using a more domed shape will help. Flat would be the worst.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 05:29 AM
  #16  
SMSgt Bo's Avatar
SMSgt Bo
2nd Gear
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Blue Ridge Mountains of NC
There's a concept... pre-shroomed from the factory!
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 05:35 AM
  #17  
Skiploder's Avatar
Skiploder
Banned
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SMSgt Bo
I am well aware of that. :impatient My post was in response to:



Since mushrooming was such a problem on the old Mini (to the extent that it has occured within the first day of ownership); isn't it conceivable that if such a problem exists on the new Mini that it could manifest itself as early as its maiden voyage to its new home?
In general it took awhile for the issue to be recognized in the R53 - to the tune of a couple of years.

.......and they just don't spontaneously do it. It takes a pretty decent jolt.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 06:46 AM
  #18  
R56MCS's Avatar
R56MCS
Banned
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,208
Likes: 0
Some Pics as requested - the raised portion is 2 mm thick approx.





 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 11:39 PM
  #19  
OasisT's Avatar
OasisT
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Thanks for the pics.

If anyone is ever so brave to take a nut off(no, not a genital, lol), are the hole's underneath the strut tower nuts slotted at all to allow for some camber gain? If so, thats good news. It sorta looks like they might be slotted since the three nut's on the strut tower have an ultra fat bottom to possibly provide extra support.

Anyone feel like taking one off too see? :-)
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 03:30 AM
  #20  
R56MCS's Avatar
R56MCS
Banned
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,208
Likes: 0
I haven't taken the nut off, but have just checked the strut towers after 1200 miles of driving, predominately on bumpy back roads and there are no signs of mushrooming.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 04:14 AM
  #21  
GRMPer's Avatar
GRMPer
4th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 3
Interesting, it looks like it's got a pin on the strut mount and two holes in the sheetmetal. doesn't that look like you could rotate the strut bearing towards the back? that might be like BMW's old "Offset" upper bearings for the E30/E36 cars.

(just speculation)
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 09:15 AM
  #22  
FLKeith's Avatar
FLKeith
4th Gear
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 405
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by GRMPer
Interesting, it looks like it's got a pin on the strut mount and two holes in the sheetmetal. doesn't that look like you could rotate the strut bearing towards the back? that might be like BMW's old "Offset" upper bearings for the E30/E36 cars.

(just speculation)
What would rotating it do to the geometry?
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 11:47 AM
  #23  
surfblue's Avatar
surfblue
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Repetition or Theft??

Originally Posted by erickvonzipper
They probably specced it out with a coupla additional layers of aluminum foil.
You posted that line before, Zip! Either that or youre stealing your comedy material.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 11:56 AM
  #24  
07PepperS's Avatar
07PepperS
3rd Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 252
Likes: 1
From: Bonits Springs FL
can someone pls explain - if this is an issue - why are you not going to the dealer about it

I'd B knock knock knocking on Mr Service's door asap. But, again, I have very limited info and experience. But, if it were my 06 Ridgeline doing this - HONDA would know for sure

Such a long wait for my little Peppa - hummmmm I need a friend..

Thanks for the education on this topic - and lets pray the 07 stays away from mushrooms period!
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 05:09 PM
  #25  
GRMPer's Avatar
GRMPer
4th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 3
If the strut top bearing/mount assembly is assymetrical, rotating it one way or the other would change camber. Not sure if this is the case here, though.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:37 PM.