R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 Headlight on vs headlight off MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-30-2008, 04:46 PM
mellowmcs's Avatar
mellowmcs
mellowmcs is offline
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Danville
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Headlight on vs headlight off MPG

On my last trip from norcal to socal I left the headlight on all the way. I set the cruise at about 80mph but I got worse MPG. The trip previous to that I got 34.xxmpg. This last trip I got 32.0xMPG... AC was on for both trips.

Anyone else experience this?
 
  #2  
Old 06-30-2008, 04:56 PM
Hellion's Avatar
Hellion
Hellion is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can not see how headlights change MPG look for something else as the variable
 
  #3  
Old 06-30-2008, 05:09 PM
rickyaustin's Avatar
rickyaustin
rickyaustin is offline
1st Gear
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Headwind/tailwind may have been a factor also?
 
  #4  
Old 06-30-2008, 05:39 PM
sgrobben's Avatar
sgrobben
sgrobben is offline
1st Gear
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The law of conservation of energy will tell you your MPG must be affected by any powered device in the car. But I doubt it would be 2mpg. Probably some small fraction of that can be attributed to the headlights. I'd guess some environmental factor was at play?
 
  #5  
Old 06-30-2008, 05:42 PM
r56mini's Avatar
r56mini
r56mini is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: home
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.
 
  #6  
Old 06-30-2008, 05:43 PM
bart5467's Avatar
bart5467
bart5467 is offline
4th Gear
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by r56mini
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.

 
  #7  
Old 06-30-2008, 05:43 PM
RS_man's Avatar
RS_man
RS_man is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by r56mini
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.
Agreed
 
  #8  
Old 06-30-2008, 05:46 PM
MUShadd's Avatar
MUShadd
MUShadd is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Destin, FL
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i'd look to blame winds, or maybe a change in elevation from point A to point B. interesting though.
 
  #9  
Old 06-30-2008, 06:14 PM
mellowmcs's Avatar
mellowmcs
mellowmcs is offline
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Danville
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by r56mini
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.
well that's what I did wrong. I didn't go fast enough
 
  #10  
Old 06-30-2008, 06:33 PM
Pretzel Logic's Avatar
Pretzel Logic
Pretzel Logic is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auburn, ME
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by r56mini
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.
Now it all makes sense.
 
  #11  
Old 06-30-2008, 07:07 PM
ToBFree's Avatar
ToBFree
ToBFree is offline
4th Gear
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Yur wax job is wearing off. Everyone knows a freshly waxed MINI slips through the air with less resistance than a not-so-lately-waxed MINI. Unless of course you speed shine just prior to the trip. You have to clay bar too because those little hard to see particles all slow the MINI down.
 
  #12  
Old 07-01-2008, 07:13 AM
narkose's Avatar
narkose
narkose is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hellion
I can not see how headlights change MPG look for something else as the variable
With anything on, your alternator is providing great load for the motor to work against. As some one else said, I would be surprised that it took as much off the fuel consumption as was stated by the OP.
 
  #13  
Old 07-01-2008, 07:58 AM
SDMike's Avatar
SDMike
SDMike is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow... just.... wow
 
  #14  
Old 07-01-2008, 10:59 AM
mellowmcs's Avatar
mellowmcs
mellowmcs is offline
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Danville
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SDMike
Wow... just.... wow
why just wow?

you've never made any threads in jest before?
 
  #15  
Old 07-01-2008, 11:07 AM
FlyingZ06's Avatar
FlyingZ06
FlyingZ06 is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is he really serious?
 
  #16  
Old 07-01-2008, 11:07 AM
dhoosee's Avatar
dhoosee
dhoosee is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wheaton, IL USA
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by r56mini
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.



"Zat ist CRAAAZY!!!!!"
 

Last edited by dhoosee; 07-01-2008 at 11:56 AM.
  #17  
Old 07-01-2008, 11:42 AM
donaldj's Avatar
donaldj
donaldj is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sgrobben
The law of conservation of energy will tell you your MPG must be affected by any powered device in the car.
In practical application this isn't necessarily the case, though. Your alternator is causing loss on the drive system, true, but it may be creating extra electricity in the system that is simply going to waste. Adding another electrical device can use up some of that waste with no further loss in the system.

I remember an article in the paper when daytime running lights were first being implemented in the US. The manufacturer, in this case GM, predicted that the lights being on all the time might consume, at most, 2 gallons of gas over the life of the vehicle.
 
  #18  
Old 07-01-2008, 12:10 PM
Robin Casady's Avatar
Robin Casady
Robin Casady is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Paradise
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
If you were using Auto A/C with the same internal temp setting both times, ambient temp and sunlight vs. overcast could affect the amount the A/C comes on.

The amount of traffic could also affect mpg. Did you have to disengage cruise control on either trip because of traffic?
 
  #19  
Old 07-01-2008, 12:18 PM
lhoboy's Avatar
lhoboy
lhoboy is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlyingZ06
is he really serious?
I hope so. Otherwise I have been driving under a misconception with my lights on for years.
 
  #20  
Old 07-01-2008, 12:21 PM
mellowmcs's Avatar
mellowmcs
mellowmcs is offline
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Danville
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Robin Casady
If you were using Auto A/C with the same internal temp setting both times, ambient temp and sunlight vs. overcast could affect the amount the A/C comes on.

The amount of traffic could also affect mpg. Did you have to disengage cruise control on either trip because of traffic?
several times. i don't remember when i didn't have to disengage on that trip. it's about 320miles on the freeway for me so i'm bound to hit traffic where i have to slow down.
 
  #21  
Old 07-01-2008, 02:17 PM
terryg's Avatar
terryg
terryg is offline
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost in ATL
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Light has mass. The thrust from pushing the light out of the front of the car slows the car down significantly. The lights also give off heat, which causes the air molecules in front of the car to become agitated, and the friction slows the vehicle down even more.

Relocating the headlights to the rear of the vehicle should greatly increase your gas mileage. As an added side effect, it also makes it easier to back up at night.
 
  #22  
Old 07-01-2008, 05:37 PM
SimpsonGI's Avatar
SimpsonGI
SimpsonGI is offline
Coordinator :: Emerald MINI Car Club
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SDMike
Wow... just.... wow
Originally Posted by mellowmcs
why just wow?

you've never made any threads in jest before?
Originally Posted by FlyingZ06
is he really serious?
I would say not considering the OP's response above.
 
  #23  
Old 07-01-2008, 05:52 PM
ngweibing's Avatar
ngweibing
ngweibing is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: pittsburgh( southside), PA
Posts: 4,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i could not verify cos my daytime running lights is always on...
 
  #24  
Old 07-01-2008, 06:02 PM
Frank Matyja's Avatar
Frank Matyja
Frank Matyja is offline
Blew By U
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm not an engineer, but from my old Cobra racing days it was felt that the more drain that you put on your electrical system, the harder the alternator has to work. The harder the alternator has to work takes more horsepower to turn the alternator. Hence in race cars quick recovery batteries to take the load off of the alternator. If there is someone out there who can confirm this I would appreciate it. I know that when Throw an extra draw on the electrical system in the mini I can temporarily here the RPMs drop slightly. This to me would indicate the extra load.
 
  #25  
Old 07-01-2008, 06:16 PM
staz87's Avatar
staz87
staz87 is offline
2nd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember reading in PM that daylight running lights can reduce mileage by .1 MPG.
 


Quick Reply: R56 Headlight on vs headlight off MPG



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:44 AM.