R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 Headlight on vs headlight off MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 04:46 PM
  #1  
mellowmcs's Avatar
mellowmcs
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: Danville
Headlight on vs headlight off MPG

On my last trip from norcal to socal I left the headlight on all the way. I set the cruise at about 80mph but I got worse MPG. The trip previous to that I got 34.xxmpg. This last trip I got 32.0xMPG... AC was on for both trips.

Anyone else experience this?
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 04:56 PM
  #2  
Hellion's Avatar
Hellion
3rd Gear
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
I can not see how headlights change MPG look for something else as the variable
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #3  
rickyaustin's Avatar
rickyaustin
1st Gear
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Headwind/tailwind may have been a factor also?
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 05:39 PM
  #4  
sgrobben's Avatar
sgrobben
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
The law of conservation of energy will tell you your MPG must be affected by any powered device in the car. But I doubt it would be 2mpg. Probably some small fraction of that can be attributed to the headlights. I'd guess some environmental factor was at play?
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #5  
r56mini's Avatar
r56mini
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
From: home
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 05:43 PM
  #6  
bart5467's Avatar
bart5467
4th Gear
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas
Originally Posted by r56mini
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.

 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 05:43 PM
  #7  
RS_man's Avatar
RS_man
2nd Gear
15 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: NoCO
Originally Posted by r56mini
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.
Agreed
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #8  
MUShadd's Avatar
MUShadd
6th Gear
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 1
From: Destin, FL
i'd look to blame winds, or maybe a change in elevation from point A to point B. interesting though.
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 06:14 PM
  #9  
mellowmcs's Avatar
mellowmcs
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: Danville
Originally Posted by r56mini
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.
well that's what I did wrong. I didn't go fast enough
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 06:33 PM
  #10  
Pretzel Logic's Avatar
Pretzel Logic
3rd Gear
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, ME
Originally Posted by r56mini
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.
Now it all makes sense.
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 07:07 PM
  #11  
ToBFree's Avatar
ToBFree
4th Gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 593
Likes: 3
From: Rootstown, OH
Yur wax job is wearing off. Everyone knows a freshly waxed MINI slips through the air with less resistance than a not-so-lately-waxed MINI. Unless of course you speed shine just prior to the trip. You have to clay bar too because those little hard to see particles all slow the MINI down.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 07:13 AM
  #12  
narkose's Avatar
narkose
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh PA
Originally Posted by Hellion
I can not see how headlights change MPG look for something else as the variable
With anything on, your alternator is providing great load for the motor to work against. As some one else said, I would be surprised that it took as much off the fuel consumption as was stated by the OP.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 07:58 AM
  #13  
SDMike's Avatar
SDMike
5th Gear
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Wow... just.... wow
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #14  
mellowmcs's Avatar
mellowmcs
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: Danville
Originally Posted by SDMike
Wow... just.... wow
why just wow?

you've never made any threads in jest before?
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #15  
FlyingZ06's Avatar
FlyingZ06
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
is he really serious?
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #16  
dhoosee's Avatar
dhoosee
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 2
From: Wheaton, IL USA
Originally Posted by r56mini
The photons from the headlights slow the time down as the car travels through the path of the photons traveling at the speed of the light. Therefore, the velocity of the car has to be recalculated accordingly. Because less time is spent to travel the same distance, the speedometer reading is slower than it is.

miles/gal = miles/hour x time spent x 1/fuel used.
Therefore, as the speed goes up miles/gal improves. So you get better mpg with the headlights on.



"Zat ist CRAAAZY!!!!!"
 

Last edited by dhoosee; Jul 1, 2008 at 11:56 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 11:42 AM
  #17  
donaldj's Avatar
donaldj
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by sgrobben
The law of conservation of energy will tell you your MPG must be affected by any powered device in the car.
In practical application this isn't necessarily the case, though. Your alternator is causing loss on the drive system, true, but it may be creating extra electricity in the system that is simply going to waste. Adding another electrical device can use up some of that waste with no further loss in the system.

I remember an article in the paper when daytime running lights were first being implemented in the US. The manufacturer, in this case GM, predicted that the lights being on all the time might consume, at most, 2 gallons of gas over the life of the vehicle.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #18  
Robin Casady's Avatar
Robin Casady
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 4
From: Paradise
If you were using Auto A/C with the same internal temp setting both times, ambient temp and sunlight vs. overcast could affect the amount the A/C comes on.

The amount of traffic could also affect mpg. Did you have to disengage cruise control on either trip because of traffic?
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #19  
lhoboy's Avatar
lhoboy
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
From: DC
Originally Posted by FlyingZ06
is he really serious?
I hope so. Otherwise I have been driving under a misconception with my lights on for years.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:21 PM
  #20  
mellowmcs's Avatar
mellowmcs
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: Danville
Originally Posted by Robin Casady
If you were using Auto A/C with the same internal temp setting both times, ambient temp and sunlight vs. overcast could affect the amount the A/C comes on.

The amount of traffic could also affect mpg. Did you have to disengage cruise control on either trip because of traffic?
several times. i don't remember when i didn't have to disengage on that trip. it's about 320miles on the freeway for me so i'm bound to hit traffic where i have to slow down.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 02:17 PM
  #21  
terryg's Avatar
terryg
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Lost in ATL
Light has mass. The thrust from pushing the light out of the front of the car slows the car down significantly. The lights also give off heat, which causes the air molecules in front of the car to become agitated, and the friction slows the vehicle down even more.

Relocating the headlights to the rear of the vehicle should greatly increase your gas mileage. As an added side effect, it also makes it easier to back up at night.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #22  
SimpsonGI's Avatar
SimpsonGI
Coordinator :: Emerald MINI Car Club
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, OR
Originally Posted by SDMike
Wow... just.... wow
Originally Posted by mellowmcs
why just wow?

you've never made any threads in jest before?
Originally Posted by FlyingZ06
is he really serious?
I would say not considering the OP's response above.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 05:52 PM
  #23  
ngweibing's Avatar
ngweibing
6th Gear
iTrader: (11)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,070
Likes: 1
From: pittsburgh( southside), PA
i could not verify cos my daytime running lights is always on...
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 06:02 PM
  #24  
Frank Matyja's Avatar
Frank Matyja
Blew By U
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 290
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
I'm not an engineer, but from my old Cobra racing days it was felt that the more drain that you put on your electrical system, the harder the alternator has to work. The harder the alternator has to work takes more horsepower to turn the alternator. Hence in race cars quick recovery batteries to take the load off of the alternator. If there is someone out there who can confirm this I would appreciate it. I know that when Throw an extra draw on the electrical system in the mini I can temporarily here the RPMs drop slightly. This to me would indicate the extra load.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 06:16 PM
  #25  
staz87's Avatar
staz87
2nd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
I remember reading in PM that daylight running lights can reduce mileage by .1 MPG.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:29 AM.