R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 MCSa vs VW GTI (automatic) 2008 editions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #51  
Old 06-25-2008, 04:27 PM
JudgeS's Avatar
JudgeS
JudgeS is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SINY
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nouse4aname
They're only listing the manual transmission speed specs there. Can't find official 0-60 listing for the auto.

No way the same engine going through vastly different gear ratios and a torque converter comes out to the same time down to the tenth of a second. Just not possible.

Most companies don't list the automatic spec because it's not very spectacular. VW's DSG is an exception, because it's really an automatic shifting manual.

For the '05 MCSa with the Aisin 6 speed auto:


http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...tic/index.html
Also realize that 0-60 times for MTs are not entirely consistant with what your average driver will put up, as its a professional who's getting paid to make close to perfect shifts. Often in reality, and on the drag strip the AT will put up the better times in real life as its not a product of the drivers skills.
 
  #52  
Old 06-25-2008, 04:59 PM
minimusprime's Avatar
minimusprime
minimusprime is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Flying My Roflcopter
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
test drove both... liked both... bought an r53.

both are great cars at what they do... but they are different. If it's daily driver you're looking for just get in them and test drive them and you'll know.

Build quality is the same (both are average at best) so don't worry about that. However if I was forced to buy an auto for some reason... the gti would win hands down.
 
  #53  
Old 06-25-2008, 05:21 PM
nouse4aname's Avatar
nouse4aname
nouse4aname is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 58
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JudgeS
Also realize that 0-60 times for MTs are not entirely consistant with what your average driver will put up, as its a professional who's getting paid to make close to perfect shifts. Often in reality, and on the drag strip the AT will put up the better times in real life as its not a product of the drivers skills.
The AT will put up more consistent times, but I would not at all consider it normal for an 'average' stick driver to give up a 1+ second advantage. The ones you've apparently seen at the strip must have been newbies still trying to figure out how to start without stalling.
 
  #54  
Old 06-25-2008, 05:27 PM
Jtrem's Avatar
Jtrem
Jtrem is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
I test drove an Auto GTI not too long ago. I liked the car a lot. Looks wise the Mini has it beat. I haven't test drove an R56 Auto, but I have test drove the Manuel R56. I like the way the R56 drives and handles. The VW seamed a little sluggish in acceleration (turbo lag) I have also heard many VW owners complain about reliability . I think it just comes down to personal preference. If I had to choose between the R32 and the R56 JCW that would be tuff.
 
  #55  
Old 06-25-2008, 05:39 PM
JudgeS's Avatar
JudgeS
JudgeS is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SINY
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nouse4aname
The AT will put up more consistent times, but I would not at all consider it normal for an 'average' stick driver to give up a 1+ second advantage. The ones you've apparently seen at the strip must have been newbies still trying to figure out how to start without stalling.
No, not at the track, drivers at the track are usually some of the better shifters out there (still I've seen them hesitate and not all noobs). Now, I would almost gurantee your "average" driver most certainly gives up 1 sec. compared to a professional, and that it is the norm. While 1 sec. means a lot at the track, its almost nothing in real world application.
 
  #56  
Old 06-25-2008, 05:44 PM
Mozza's Avatar
Mozza
Mozza is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
People regularly report 0-60 times .5 of a second quicker than MINI's published figures. MINI/BMW's 0-60 times, just like their HP figures, are notoriously conservative.
 
  #57  
Old 06-25-2008, 06:03 PM
nouse4aname's Avatar
nouse4aname
nouse4aname is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 58
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JudgeS
No, not at the track, drivers at the track are usually some of the better shifters out there (still I've seen them hesitate and not all noobs). Now, I would almost gurantee your "average" driver most certainly gives up 1 sec. compared to a professional, and that it is the norm. While 1 sec. means a lot at the track, its almost nothing in real world application.
Roughly 0.1second = 1 car length
10+ car lengths sure is a noticeable difference in the real world when you're trying to merge onto the interstate.
 
  #58  
Old 06-25-2008, 06:18 PM
mvn_esq's Avatar
mvn_esq
mvn_esq is offline
1st Gear
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by old81
I don't see many GTIs running around the countryside on a 30 car run.
No, they run around the countryside/highways/turnpikes in 50, 100, 200, and 300 car runs. The VDub community is huge. Dub shows are some of the biggest around. Waterfest, as much as I dislike it, draws around 10,000 in 2 days. H2O drew 7000 people last year. Believe me when I say this, the Dub is scene is enormous.
This is nothing against MINIs or the MINI scene.

Im actually in this same position, though Im looking into an R53. The GTI I was looking at was a cheap price but has a bunch of cosmetic damage. So that narrowed it down to a MINI.

VWs reliability has gotten much better. This newest generation is a much better car, both in performance and reliability. VW has also upped their warranty. Powertrain is now 5/60 or 5/50. Pretty good in my opinion.

I cant comment on an R56 as I have not driven one yet. But the new GTI compared to an R53 MINI, there isnt much difference. They handle pretty similarly, at least in my opinion.

I like both cars and my choice will come down to finances.
 
  #59  
Old 06-25-2008, 06:29 PM
JudgeS's Avatar
JudgeS
JudgeS is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SINY
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nouse4aname
Roughly 0.1second = 1 car length
10+ car lengths sure is a noticeable difference in the real world when you're trying to merge onto the interstate.
What the hell are you talking about, why would you do 0-60 to merge onto the interstate, and sorry in the real world 1 sec does not equal 10+ car lengths, dont know where you got that. Bottom line few shift as good as professionals, most make mistakes or missed time shifts that cost them at least a second.
 
  #60  
Old 06-25-2008, 06:40 PM
DC1's Avatar
DC1
DC1 is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've owned 2 Rabbits, and bought my daughter a Beetle and my son a Passat V6 wagon. Their cars are ok and have been reliable but not exciting. I tried to sell my S4 avant after ordering a mini but can't get enough $ to make it worth my while so I will just keep it (great car). Before I ordered the mini, I test drove the R32 and the GTI and was pretty unimpressed with style and interior (probably because I coming from a S4). Hated the hexagon grill. The mini on the other hand was so different to me and I thought the interior was clever, and driving it was much more fun. My MA, a better driver than me took me in the MCS and it was a blast so I ordered the new JCW09 to compensate for the S4 I was selling but will end up having both...
 
  #61  
Old 06-25-2008, 07:09 PM
nouse4aname's Avatar
nouse4aname
nouse4aname is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 58
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JudgeS
What the hell are you talking about, why would you do 0-60 to merge onto the interstate, and sorry in the real world 1 sec does not equal 10+ car lengths, dont know where you got that. Bottom line few shift as good as professionals, most make mistakes or missed time shifts that cost them at least a second.
You must not have many of those horrible cloverleaf interchanges where inevitably some freaked out person outright stops on the on-ramp, and you're forced to merge with 70mph traffic from a stop.

The increased performance/mileage is inherent in the efficiency of the drivetrain. Those official numbers are something more to be screwed up rather than driving perfection. As Mozza said, many report getting better than the official time.
 

Last edited by nouse4aname; 06-25-2008 at 07:16 PM.
  #62  
Old 06-25-2008, 07:25 PM
JudgeS's Avatar
JudgeS
JudgeS is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SINY
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nouse4aname
As Mozza said, many report getting better than the official time.
Yes but thats with both I'm sure, he didn't even indicate if he was talking about MTs or ATs.
 
  #63  
Old 06-25-2008, 07:28 PM
nouse4aname's Avatar
nouse4aname
nouse4aname is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 58
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well considering there's no AT official time to be found...
 
  #64  
Old 06-25-2008, 07:34 PM
Mozza's Avatar
Mozza
Mozza is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JudgeS
Yes but thats with both I'm sure, he didn't even indicate if he was talking about MTs or ATs.
The reports of quicker than published 0-60 times I referred to are of MT cars but I've also read that the AT is actually quicker than the MT 0-60. Make of that what you will.
 
  #65  
Old 06-25-2008, 07:45 PM
Pretzel Logic's Avatar
Pretzel Logic
Pretzel Logic is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auburn, ME
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've had a VR6 Jetta, My wife has owned a 2.0 Beetle, and my best friend had a 1.8T Passat. All were great cars, but none had the personality of an MC...
Good cars, but missing that "je ne sais quois"
Checkered VW cloth or not... these vehicles do not compare to the thrills an MC can offer. Personality, style, handling, finish/assembly, build quality...

Plus, they are BMWs, compared to Volkswagens...

A

(Yes I have owned several VWs and Audis)
 
  #66  
Old 06-25-2008, 07:46 PM
bgdc's Avatar
bgdc
bgdc is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by r56mini
GTI looks like a wedge.
All subjective. I have a Cooper S and I would not call it an attractive car. GTI isn't a beauty either but in reality, it's sorta in the eye of the beholder. Never bought a car for looks and don't see ever doing so...
 
  #67  
Old 06-25-2008, 08:21 PM
JudgeS's Avatar
JudgeS
JudgeS is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SINY
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thats true, personally I find very few cars that are not hacthbacks/wagons attractive, I know I'm in the minority, or have more of a european flavor, but I hate the look of anything with a trunk. With that I love the looks of the Cooper, and the A3, and like the looks of the GTI, I personally wish BMW brought the hatchback 1 series over instead of the ugly coupe version, but thats just me.
 
  #68  
Old 06-27-2008, 06:24 AM
Bezlar's Avatar
Bezlar
Bezlar is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 18 Posts
When I said smoke I meant straight line, not twistys. As far as the r56 goes when we test drove it, it did not seem to be as fast as my old r53. My old r53 was modded out pretty good pully, intake, exhuast. It is hard to replace the scream of the super charger.
 
  #69  
Old 06-27-2008, 01:33 PM
Wolfgang80's Avatar
Wolfgang80
Wolfgang80 is offline
4th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you need more cargo space and carry a 3rd or 4th passenger fairly often, the GTI is an easy choice.

If fun behind the wheel is a priority, the MINI is an easy choice.

You can have fun in a GTI, no doubt, and if you never drove a MINI, you'd feel great about the fun and utility of this package.

The MINI will win you over. Everything else that's 3K+ pounds will begin to feel like a land barge. Small sedans like the BMW 3 series will feel cumbersome. You will feel like you know and are experiencing something that everyone else in these boats has no clue about.

I drive mostly alone or with my GF. With the rear seats folded, I have plenty of room for anything this side of furniture and with the rear seats up, it's perfect for a trip to the grocery store.
 
  #70  
Old 06-27-2008, 06:24 PM
23cavsfan's Avatar
23cavsfan
23cavsfan is offline
1st Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just traded in my 2006 GTI MKV on a new MCS. I owned the GTI for two years and it was, to date, the best car I've owned. Stock vs stock, the GTI outperforms the MCS in both power and handling. After I added the APR ECU upgrade to the GTI, it was an absolute beast. I don't keep cars long, as it seems I get tired of them quickly. The look of the Mini has always appealed to me, so I decided to get one. I'm really happy with it so far. When choosing between the two, decide which is more important to you: performance or appearence. If performance is more important to you, go with the GTI.

Originally Posted by sunchaser99
It is hard to decide between these 2 cars. The MCS has the somewhat better MPG, and the better exterior look, but on the other hand for the same features the GTI is slightly less expensive, and IMO has a much better interior. I am not sure about the ride as I have not yet driven it, but isnt the performance pretty much the same for both?

What do you guys think? I know this is a biased forum but any honest opinions would be greatly appreciated.
 
  #71  
Old 06-27-2008, 08:18 PM
r56mini's Avatar
r56mini
r56mini is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: home
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bgdc
All subjective. I have a Cooper S and I would not call it an attractive car. GTI isn't a beauty either but in reality, it's sorta in the eye of the beholder. Never bought a car for looks and don't see ever doing so...
I agree but I disagree. I would buy a Lambo with 4cyl for $25000. Make that a 3cyl.
 
  #72  
Old 06-27-2008, 08:21 PM
r56mini's Avatar
r56mini
r56mini is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: home
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 23cavsfan
I just traded in my 2006 GTI MKV on a new MCS. I owned the GTI for two years and it was, to date, the best car I've owned. Stock vs stock, the GTI outperforms the MCS in both power and handling. After I added the APR ECU upgrade to the GTI, it was an absolute beast. I don't keep cars long, as it seems I get tired of them quickly. The look of the Mini has always appealed to me, so I decided to get one. I'm really happy with it so far. When choosing between the two, decide which is more important to you: performance or appearence. If performance is more important to you, go with the GTI.
If VW and MINI got together and combined MCS and GTI for best handling and best performance and best interior, wouldn't that be a winner?
 
  #73  
Old 06-29-2008, 01:13 AM
Momus's Avatar
Momus
Momus is offline
Neutral
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...omparison_test

With manual transmission, the MCS and GTI were almost identical. They both did 0-60 in 6.2 seconds and 95mph in the quarter. The GTI w/DSG will be faster than the MSCa. The MSC was significantly better on the skidpad and slalom.

If you want the top performer in the category, get a Mazdaspeed.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rohdeandschwarz
Stock Problems/Issues
15
05-16-2019 08:59 AM
CardinalsRule
General MINI Talk
9
06-11-2016 04:34 PM
rckrzy1
R55 :: Clubman Talk (2008+)
0
09-14-2015 04:19 PM
kjd186
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
2
09-09-2015 10:02 AM
Gen1Parts
MINIs & Minis for Sale
2
09-07-2015 03:50 PM



Quick Reply: R56 MCSa vs VW GTI (automatic) 2008 editions



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:13 AM.