R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 My Real World MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 11:27 PM
  #1  
Mini-Wingnut's Avatar
Mini-Wingnut
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
My Real World MPG



Here's my actual MPG from the first 2000 miles (MCS). The interesting thing is that the OBC rates me at 21.2 MPG. One would have to drive like "the little old lady from Pasadena" to get anywhere near what the window sticker states.
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 11:33 PM
  #2  
Arthurbang's Avatar
Arthurbang
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
I have the regular Mini cooper, not an S, but I've had mine for almost 3 months (shortly after you, on September 18th, also from Long Beach Mini btw). And I have not had anything lower than 28 mpg. I took the car up to San Francisco this weekend and had two 31 and 32 mpg tanks for the trip up and back. I believe my OBC says somewhere between 28-30. My average mileage per tank is usually close to 375, even though the OBC usually tells me I can go about 425.

For what it's worth, I drive 5 days a week to work from Huntington Beach to Anaheim, and then my girlfriend lives in Long Beach and head there several days a week. Just out of curiosity, how many miles have you racked up so far?
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 11:50 PM
  #3  
Motor On's Avatar
Motor On
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,848
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by Mini-Wingnut


Here's my actual MPG from the first 2000 miles (MCS). The interesting thing is that the OBC rates me at 21.2 MPG. One would have to drive like "the little old lady from Pasadena" to get anywhere near what the window sticker states.
It's a baby engine you've got to wait a while, stock I averaged 24 highway with some city, ALTA CAI less humidity even highway city mix I know get 28-30, 33 highway when around 70 (decrease over that speed) and I can pull in 35-36 if I'm under 60 and no traffic to deal with (rural non highway) I don't have an OBC so I use a similar method to your chart. BUt after a year I'm at 45.8k so everything runs a little more cohesive.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:10 AM
  #4  
Arthurbang's Avatar
Arthurbang
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
I now see that you're at around 2000 miles. Amazingly, in less than 3 months, I already have around 5500 miles on the car.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:17 AM
  #5  
abuzavi's Avatar
abuzavi
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 1
From: Oahu, Hawai'i
With a stock 06 S and 700 miles, I'm averaging 22+ MPG.

Of course, I live in Germany, love the autobahns, and drive it like it's stolen. Still, 22 is acceptable for the conditions!
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:28 AM
  #6  
Motor On's Avatar
Motor On
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,848
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by abuzavi
With a stock 06 S and 700 miles, I'm averaging 22+ MPG.

Of course, I live in Germany, love the autobahns, and drive it like it's stolen. Still, 22 is acceptable for the conditions!
Thats a lot better than I'd get in your situation. I have proved the driving like I stole it (time on a road course) to mean 15mpg of course you're still in the break-in and shouldn't be much past 4500 RPM yet, 5l-6.5k is a golden good time, and worth the wait
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:37 AM
  #7  
R56MCS's Avatar
R56MCS
Banned
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,208
Likes: 0
My 07 MCS is now down to 34 mpg, but most of its 200 mile shave been in urban conditions so I'm not suprised.

I run mine on 97 octane though, may be this has something to do with it. Standard fuel is 95 RON in the UK, premium is 97/98, as far as I know we can't even buy 91 here. Assuming that 91 costs less you may find that compared with more expensive fuel you are getting further per buck.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 10:06 AM
  #8  
thomasdmini's Avatar
thomasdmini
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
I've been quite surprised at the drastic effect even "a bit" of urban driving does to the average on a tank. About 4 miles of my 18 mile commute is "traffic/ traffic light" type driving. It can very quickly take me from a 28/29 mpg to a 21/22 mpg. The traffic-y stuff is all accelerate, stop, sit driving.

Reports on Mixed-use "fun but not psycho" MPG averages for the MCS seem to cluster around 24mpg. Haven't heard too many convincing reports outside of that average.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #9  
jibeho's Avatar
jibeho
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Grasonville, MD
I get 27-30 MPG even on tanks that I track with. I have notice a slight bump now that I don't run the A/C as much.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 10:25 AM
  #10  
H.A.W.G.'s Avatar
H.A.W.G.
5th Gear
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 749
Likes: 1
From: Lexington, SC
I havent done the math, but I get a little more than 400 miles to the tank
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 11:29 AM
  #11  
MaxN's Avatar
MaxN
Reverse Gear
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by R56MCS
My 07 MCS is now down to 34 mpg, but most of its 200 mile shave been in urban conditions so I'm not suprised.

I run mine on 97 octane though, may be this has something to do with it. Standard fuel is 95 RON in the UK, premium is 97/98, as far as I know we can't even buy 91 here. Assuming that 91 costs less you may find that compared with more expensive fuel you are getting further per buck.
There is a difference between the US and Europe octance systems used.

In Europe you use the RON value, in the USA it is (RON+MON)/2

from wikipedia....

Research Octane Number (RON) is determined by running the fuel through a specific test engine with a variable compression ratio under controlled conditions

Motor Octane Number (MON) or the aviation lean octane rating, which is a better measure of how the fuel behaves when under load. MON testing uses a similar test engine to that used in RON testing, but with a preheated fuel mixture, a higher engine speed, and variable ignition timing to further stress the fuel's knock resistance.

Depending on the composition of the fuel, the MON of a modern gasoline will be about 8 to 10 points lower than the RON. Normally fuel specifications require both a minimum RON and a minimum MON.

In most countries (including all of Europe and Australia) the "headline" octane that would be shown on the pump is the RON, but in the United States and some other countries the headline number is the average of the RON and the MON, sometimes called the Anti-Knock Index (AKI), Road Octane Number (RdON), Pump Octane Number (PON), or (R+M)/2. Because of the 8 to 10 point difference noted above, this means that the octane in the United States will be about 4 to 5 points lower than the same fuel elsewhere: 87 octane fuel, the "regular" gasoline in the US and Canada, would be 91-95 (regular) in Europe.
Effectively running on 97/98 in Europe is the same as running it on 91 (maybe 93) in the USA.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 11:29 AM
  #12  
valcom111t's Avatar
valcom111t
4th Gear
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
According to the computer, I'm getting 27.6 with my MCS with 1600 miles. Judging from the way I drive, you all must be totally nuts!
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #13  
MaxN's Avatar
MaxN
Reverse Gear
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 0
Over the last (ahem) 37K miles, my MCS has averaged 24.5mpg according to the OBC. The speedo is a little out compared to the GPS, it is 3-4% over.

Calculating from the fuel stubs and GPS distance travelled on a few long trips I put the error at less that 1/2 mpg. On my mix of road-trips, commutes, track days and california traffic I think that 24-25mpg is acceptable.

The absolute best I have seen is 31mpg, the worst is single-figures at Laguna Seca where I was consuming ~30% of a gallon of gas every lap........
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 11:44 AM
  #14  
jst4fun's Avatar
jst4fun
Coordinator :: Alabama Motoring Society
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: Panama City Beach, FL
Wow, I have an 05 now fully DINANed but even before any MODs I never got worse than 26 even in everyday city traffic. Musta been that Alabama clean air...
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 11:45 AM
  #15  
rrudorf's Avatar
rrudorf
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Oakland Twp., MI
I am relatively easy on the gas and get a combined 25.2mpg always.

RR (05 MCS)
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #16  
scooterboy's Avatar
scooterboy
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
I can get the advertised 37 mpg in my MC if I limit myself to 65mph on the highway. Since I never do that, I end up with 33-34 mpg instead. I always get at least 450 miles out of a tankful.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #17  
2bkalm's Avatar
2bkalm
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
actual miles

Originally Posted by Mini-Wingnut


Here's my actual MPG from the first 2000 miles (MCS). The interesting thing is that the OBC rates me at 21.2 MPG. One would have to drive like "the little old lady from Pasadena" to get anywhere near what the window sticker states.
yes: I got my MCSca on Nov 8th '06 and I'm get really bad milage too. It's starting to worry me a bit because when I bought it I read stuff about how good MPG they get...I have a bit over 2000 on at I'm averaging about 18 mpg with mostly local driving and I have to fill up at around 240 miles on speedo. So the real question is how long is the break in period until I will see an increase of MPG ?? km
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:07 PM
  #18  
fj0's Avatar
fj0
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
I average 18-19mpg.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:13 PM
  #19  
callen's Avatar
callen
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
My

2006 MC gets 30 mpg...no matter where I drive it....city or hwy. Course on hwy its 70 plus mph. I've got about 12K miles on him now. Thought it would go up after broken in..but not yet. I don't use OBC...use Odom and gallons.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #20  
redhotchilis's Avatar
redhotchilis
1st Gear
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
I've got 4,800 miles on my MCSa and I've averaged around 24mpg. Best was 26, worst was 22. The tank I'm working on now is definitely on track to set a new low - I've been using the manual mode hard in the last few days.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:20 PM
  #21  
jymontoya's Avatar
jymontoya
5th Gear
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
WHO CARES! it's fast!
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:28 PM
  #22  
fj0's Avatar
fj0
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
Originally Posted by jymontoya
WHO CARES! it's fast!
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:32 PM
  #23  
mbcoops's Avatar
mbcoops
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: NJerz
I don't drive like the little old lady from pasadena, and my 05 MCS gets right around 30mpg. I do a lot of highway driving. Two tanks ago I got horrible mileage, somewhere south of 25 mpg, so I put in a bottle of Redline SI-1 and now all is back to normal.

mb
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:35 PM
  #24  
MiniBetterThanBeer's Avatar
MiniBetterThanBeer
2nd Gear
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 100
Likes: 2
Hey Mini-Wingnut!
I did my own mpg calculations too and here's what I got for the first year of ownership:
24.723 mpg from mixed driving at a cost of $0.111/mile (last year's prices ranged from $2.099 to $3.739/gallon -- remember that crap in September?!).

Before the MINI arrived, I committed to always filling-up (to know how much of the previous tank is consumed), saving the receipts, and then plotting everything on a spreadsheet. I knew there'd be many uncontrolled variables (such as seasonal temps, times of day, lead-footing, etc.) but I just wanted to find out if different gas chains could have better gas, if my driving style could shame the EPA estimates, and whether my gas expenditures could feed all the children on that commercial...

Yes, everyone, I had a lot of free time; for every fill-up I lost a whopping 15 seconds of my life that I never got back! I don't think all those people who also lost 15 seconds waiting for me to pull away ever got their time back either... but the information gleaned from my pseudo-scientific study was worth the trouble. Especially knowing that I could fatten all of those children...


Originally Posted by Mini-Wingnut


Here's my actual MPG from the first 2000 miles (MCS). The interesting thing is that the OBC rates me at 21.2 MPG. One would have to drive like "the little old lady from Pasadena" to get anywhere near what the window sticker states.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #25  
BECOKA's Avatar
BECOKA
4th Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale CA
Originally Posted by R56MCS
My 07 MCS is now down to 34 mpg, but most of its 200 mile shave been in urban conditions so I'm not suprised.

I run mine on 97 octane though, may be this has something to do with it. Standard fuel is 95 RON in the UK, premium is 97/98, as far as I know we can't even buy 91 here. Assuming that 91 costs less you may find that compared with more expensive fuel you are getting further per buck.
How did you get an 07' so quickly?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:23 AM.