R50/53 Saying Goodbye..
Originally Posted by greatgro
I bought a 94 and 95 Mustang GT new. 94 was the new model year. I put over 50k miles on each of them - NOT ONE problem. Never had a repair in 50k miles - oil changes only.
I also put 100k miles on a 1997 Escort (I know its new owner - it now has 120k miles and going strong). That too was a first model year. All I did in 100k miles was change the oil, brakes and tires. NOTHING broke - and I even submerged it under water. I got caught in a bad storm and went down a flooded street. Other than the car not starting for one full day, it was fine. I have no reservations about getting a Mustang in the spring.
I also put 100k miles on a 1997 Escort (I know its new owner - it now has 120k miles and going strong). That too was a first model year. All I did in 100k miles was change the oil, brakes and tires. NOTHING broke - and I even submerged it under water. I got caught in a bad storm and went down a flooded street. Other than the car not starting for one full day, it was fine. I have no reservations about getting a Mustang in the spring.

That '97 Escort of yours in reality was a Mazda Protege and that explains the solid reliability of those cars. My wife had a '97 Mercury Tracer LS which was essentially the same as the Ford Escort. We also experienced very few, if any, problems with it. Interesting to note that 1997 was the launch year of the last generation Escort/Tracer before they were replaced by the less reliable Ford Focus in late 1999.
In fact, Consumer Reports only recommends the '97-'00 Escort/Tracer as the ONLY used car from Ford.
Your '94-'95 Mustang GTs although were first year models after a "major" redesign (Which was mostly exterior and interior) were essentially the same 1978 Ford Fairmont chassis that was used in the 1979-1993 first generation (Post Mustang II) Ford Mustang. Of course it had to be reliable as that platform by 1994 had been in use for nearly 15 years.
The 1994-2004 Mustang still used the old Fairmont RWD chassis but Ford was successful at keeping the car looking up to date even if its build quality and driving characteristics were more akin to its disco era origins.
The 2005 Mustang is the first ever and most significant redesign in over 25 years and this car is all-new from the ground up. Ford's quality track record with ALL NEW designs has been less than stellar and they have always managed to botched critical new vehicle launches due to teething quality problems.
I would approach any all new first year design (Specially from Ford) with caution. Otherwise I think the '05 Mustang is finally again what a Mustang should be but personally I have never attracted to pony cars and the image thier portray.
Originally Posted by The Dave
Did you get the GT?
IMO the V6 isn't worth getting.
IMO the V6 isn't worth getting.
Jim
Originally Posted by Cooperman
Did not get the GT-$5,000 more than the V-6 Premium. You need to drive the V-6...it's outstanding. I drove the V-8, loved the extra 90 horses, but felt it too much for my daughter, who will be driving it in a year.
Jim
Jim
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Calvin77
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
30
May 9, 2003 02:21 PM



