Suspension Springs, struts, coilovers, sway-bars, camber plates, and all other modifications to suspension components for Cooper (R50), Cabrio (R52), and Cooper S (R53) MINIs.

Suspension Wilwood weight vs stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 08:51 AM
  #1  
Myke@RPI's Avatar
Myke@RPI
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: The Park, SoCAL
Wilwood weight vs stock

does anyone know if the wilwood brake kit saves weight over stock? how heavy are the stock rotors? calipers? wilwoods? thanks!
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 09:06 AM
  #2  
quikmni's Avatar
quikmni
6th Gear
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 7
From: Orcutt, CA
I general yes. However the amount depends on which stock brakes (normal Gen I, JCW, Gen II) and which Wilwood kit (many different rotor diameters, rotor thicknesses, and caliper choices).

In the front, I went from a stock Gen I (2003 MCS) to a Wilwood/TCE 13"x0.81" rotor with FSL 4 Piston Caliper. My weight measurements were 19.4 lbs stock and 19.4 lbs for the Wilwood/TCE kit, so about the same weight. If you go with a smaller rotor you will probably save weight.

In the rear, I went from a stock Gen I (2003 MCS) to a Wilwood/TCE 11"x0.375" rotor using a caliper relocation bracket and the stock caliper. My weight measurements were 7.0 lbs stock and 8.4 lbs for the Wilwood kit, so a 1.4 lb gain.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 09:10 AM
  #3  
onasled's Avatar
onasled
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 3
From: Northeast CT
Originally Posted by quikmni
I general yes. However the amount depends on which stock brakes (normal Gen I, JCW, Gen II) and which Wilwood kit (many different rotor diameters, rotor thicknesses, and caliper choices).

In the front, I went from a stock Gen I (2003 MCS) to a Wilwood/TCE 13"x0.81" rotor with FSL 4 Piston Caliper. My weight measurements were 19.4 lbs stock and 19.4 lbs for the Wilwood/TCE kit, so about the same weight. If you go with a smaller rotor you will probably save weight.

In the rear, I went from a stock Gen I (2003 MCS) to a Wilwood/TCE 11"x0.375" rotor using a caliper relocation bracket and the stock caliper. My weight measurements were 7.0 lbs stock and 8.4 lbs for the Wilwood kit, so a 1.4 lb gain.
Really?? Hmmm, I remember a big weight savings in the front, but I could be wrong. Same as you have.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 09:13 AM
  #4  
DrPhilGandini's Avatar
DrPhilGandini
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
I too have the same BBK front and rear and recall it dropping weight, but I must admit I didn't put everything on a scale, so I won't hold to my impression.
Very interesting.
They look cool...
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 09:27 AM
  #5  
quikmni's Avatar
quikmni
6th Gear
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 7
From: Orcutt, CA
I too thought I had a weight reduction in the front but I went back and looked at the numbers I saved in a document file, I had noted 19.4 and 19.4. Maybe I entered the numbers wrong. However, in some ways it makes sense if you consider all the pieces. I think you save weight on the rotor/hat, are about the same on the caliper, gain some on pads, gain on the new bracket, and gain on the extra bolts.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 09:39 AM
  #6  
DrPhilGandini's Avatar
DrPhilGandini
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
Yes, the hat and rotors (despite the increase in size) certainly weigh less than the stock units. The caliper is huge but made of lighter material, the pads are bigger and there's that bracket. Do SS lines weigh more than rubber ones--maybe.
In the end, I don't think it's so much about the weight, as the performance on a track day. In daily driving in winter I often see lower performance if the pads are not up to temperature...
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #7  
Myke@RPI's Avatar
Myke@RPI
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: The Park, SoCAL
damn... I need the rear wilwood brakes to match my front... I know my stopping performance is compromised but i do know that it DOES slow the car down alot faster than my gen 1 mini cooper S brakes... its just when I try to brake extra hard there is no difference it just evokes ABS because the bias between front and rear is compromised... What do you guys think? I was considering just getting better rear pads(I have oem), slotted rear rotors and caliper stiffening bushings or should I get the kit? I am looking to track my vehicle... or do you think the rear wilwood will be night and day difference?
All I know about my wilwood kit is i opted to get the best kit they have... but i shouldnt have gotten cross-drilled and slotted, just slotted... cross drilling actually compromises heat disapation, ad can cause the rotor to crack easier under extrememe conditions
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #8  
quikmni's Avatar
quikmni
6th Gear
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 7
From: Orcutt, CA
I never had the BBK front without the larger rear rotor so I can not comment on the difference in front/rear balance. It just seemed to make sense to me to add the larger rear rotor to gain a little more torque on the rotor and to be able to dissipate a little more heat in the larger rotor. I have seen posts from people who are actually generating a lot of heat in the stock rear brakes when using a BBK on the front.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #9  
Longboard Mini's Avatar
Longboard Mini
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 1
From: Rancho Santa Margarita
If you want to loose weight you need to go with these. They save 2lb's over a round disc. They are Wilwood and will fit the TCE 13 and 12 front as well as Todd's rear kit. Not so much for the track guy but for the street and canyon guy they would be great.

I just think they are way cool.

 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #10  
Myke@RPI's Avatar
Myke@RPI
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: The Park, SoCAL
how much we talking about for those rotors longboard?
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 11:01 PM
  #11  
MINI_chili's Avatar
MINI_chili
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
This kit if from http://www.thebrakeman.com/
http://thebrakeman.com/revolution
"The 12.19 rotor weighs 4.4 pounds, and a 13" ProCast weighs 12.2 pounds. Our convoluted 13" ProCast rotors are also available if you want the look of the Revolution with the better sound-dampening of a cast rotor, they weigh 11 pounds each. The hat itself weighs 1.2 pounds."..... a front + rear kit is a bit over $3,000
the one on the left is the convoluted cast rotor and right is the storm kit's revolution rotor...

please note: I copied most of this info, but I may have messed up somewhere.
also note:"Lightweight rotors are a great idea if they will work for your style of driving and on the tracks you normally race at, however, don't try to use them where they don't belong. Tracks like Martinsville, Gafney, Hagerstown, Walkins Glen and others, were never meant for lightweight rotors. These tracks seriously test brakes and require large rotors to supply the brake system with sufficient resources to remove the heat being generated!"
If I had the $$$$ I definitely wouldn't mind a 4.4lb., 12.19" rotor
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #12  
OldRick's Avatar
OldRick
6th Gear
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 4
I have the 11.75" kit on my `05S, and the total weight was 2 lbs. less than OEM. Not a lot of difference, but these are much better brakes than stock, and fit my 15" and 16" wheels (SSR Comps).
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 08:09 PM
  #13  
Longboard Mini's Avatar
Longboard Mini
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 1
From: Rancho Santa Margarita
I talked to the Brakeman over a year ago. They make great stuff but like you found out they are $$$. They also make noise. Not sure why but they tell you in advance . The rotors look very cool though.

The Wilwood scalloped rotors aren't drilled and have a little more meat on them then the Brakeman's.

Longboard




Originally Posted by MINI_chili
This kit if from http://www.thebrakeman.com/
http://thebrakeman.com/revolution
"The 12.19 rotor weighs 4.4 pounds, and a 13" ProCast weighs 12.2 pounds. Our convoluted 13" ProCast rotors are also available if you want the look of the Revolution with the better sound-dampening of a cast rotor, they weigh 11 pounds each. The hat itself weighs 1.2 pounds."..... a front + rear kit is a bit over $3,000
the one on the left is the convoluted cast rotor and right is the storm kit's revolution rotor...

please note: I copied most of this info, but I may have messed up somewhere.
also note:"Lightweight rotors are a great idea if they will work for your style of driving and on the tracks you normally race at, however, don't try to use them where they don't belong. Tracks like Martinsville, Gafney, Hagerstown, Walkins Glen and others, were never meant for lightweight rotors. These tracks seriously test brakes and require large rotors to supply the brake system with sufficient resources to remove the heat being generated!"
If I had the $$$$ I definitely wouldn't mind a 4.4lb., 12.19" rotor
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colt45Magnus
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
16
Aug 27, 2024 05:03 AM
wesmc
R55 :: Clubman Talk (2008+)
8
Sep 28, 2015 12:07 PM
Southern Marylander
General MINI Talk
2
Sep 3, 2015 05:46 AM
Ntety
MINIs & Minis for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 08:39 PM
Mini Mania
Drivetrain Products
0
Sep 2, 2015 11:15 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:31 AM.