JCW Garage Interested in John Cooper Works (JCW) parts for your 1st Generation MINI? This is where JCW upgrades and accessories for the Cooper (R50), Cabrio (R52), and Cooper S (R53) MINIs are discussed.

JCW GP Disappointing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #26  
Old 02-23-2006, 05:47 PM
newbs49's Avatar
newbs49
newbs49 is offline
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: North Tonawanda NY
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll let you all know how the car is when mine arrives
 
  #27  
Old 02-23-2006, 06:49 PM
Aviators's Avatar
Aviators
Aviators is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crazyaboutmini
well that aero kit is suppose to make the car more slippier throught the air, so if your going to replace them your actually going to decrease the performance of the GP so function before form here... and come on guys, if you do the match the GP will even have a better power/weight ratio than the honda's priced dc5 type r which i believe can spank a mcs anytime! i don't know if you guys know, but that has to be the best track ready front drive car that came straight from the factory ever. so there, drive the thing before you start hating the thing.
with no disrespect to mini- I'll wager $100 that says 4 good drivers on a track with 2 in a JCW '06 Mini (engine/brakes) and 2 in the GP and you'll see no time differences w/ the GP.

CERTAINLY none due to the body kit despite what dealers will try to claim.

Hell my neighbor told me his 20" wing on his civic deployed "mad d()wnF0Rce yO!"


not that this means it's not a good buy, or not a good car, simply that it's not going to be significantly faster.
 
  #28  
Old 02-23-2006, 08:37 PM
crazyaboutmini's Avatar
crazyaboutmini
crazyaboutmini is offline
4th Gear
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no time difference between the two even both drivers try? even the GP has 8hp more and has less mass to swing around because it weighs 100lbs less:impatient ?
 
  #29  
Old 02-24-2006, 07:24 AM
Aviators's Avatar
Aviators
Aviators is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crazyaboutmini
no time difference between the two even both drivers try? even the GP has 8hp more and has less mass to swing around because it weighs 100lbs less:impatient ?
minimal, 8hp (or a 3.8% increase in power) isn't going to do much, the 100lbs is a decent bit of weight loss, but as people said simply drop the rear seat out of the mini at the track and you're down what, 40lbs? So a 60lbs net difference?

So ~3.8% more power and ~3.5% less weight? (and that's not factoring in the removal of the stock rear seat in the non-GP car)

IMHO times will come down soley to driver and who's faster on that particular date on that particular track.
 
  #30  
Old 02-24-2006, 07:45 AM
blue agave's Avatar
blue agave
blue agave is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mid Coast Maine
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't underestimate the likely millions of design dollars that went into BMW painting the mirrors red to match the brake calipers! Di ya all misss that?

As for the 100 lbs., are you telling me that in similarly equipped/modded S's with similarly skilled drivers, the car with the driver who eats fewer Big Mac's will win more often with statistical significance? I can understand the difference losing the sprung weight at the corners by going to lighter tires and wheels, but not on the chassis side of the equation.
 
  #31  
Old 02-24-2006, 07:59 AM
juicedMini06's Avatar
juicedMini06
juicedMini06 is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Marion, NC
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what is the MSRP on the car?
 
  #32  
Old 02-24-2006, 09:57 AM
XAlfa's Avatar
XAlfa
XAlfa is offline
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by blue agave
I can understand the difference losing the sprung weight at the corners by going to lighter tires and wheels...
Too bad this didn't happen. I believe this car has 18" wheels which probably weigh north of 20lbs, and runflats...
 
  #33  
Old 02-24-2006, 10:16 AM
gr8britwjh's Avatar
gr8britwjh
gr8britwjh is offline
4th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XAlfa
Too bad this didn't happen. I believe this car has 18" wheels which probably weigh north of 20lbs, and runflats...
The OEM runflats alone for (JCW) 18" rims weigh 27 lbs .

If the GP wheels are indeed around 20 lbs (i.e. 3-4 lbs lighter than the JCW rims) then the rim+tire combo would still be equal to the heavy S-Lites people are always complaining about .
 
  #34  
Old 02-24-2006, 12:30 PM
chows4us's Avatar
chows4us
chows4us is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 15,478
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Is that JCW wing creating all that downforce on the rear?

What is the point of a huge rear wing on a FWD vehicle????
 
  #35  
Old 02-24-2006, 01:49 PM
Aviators's Avatar
Aviators
Aviators is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chows4us
Is that JCW wing creating all that downforce on the rear?

What is the point of a huge rear wing on a FWD vehicle????
Originally Posted by Aviators
"mad d()wnF0Rce yO!"

 
  #36  
Old 02-24-2006, 06:33 PM
saakey's Avatar
saakey
saakey is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd like the motor and rear wing for my car...and that's it
 
  #37  
Old 02-24-2006, 06:34 PM
crazyaboutmini's Avatar
crazyaboutmini
crazyaboutmini is offline
4th Gear
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
then lets start a "dissappointed by GP by how it looks tread"... and the fact you mention there will be a difference means you would lose that wager because those difference are basic "go faster" rules. time will tell all the enhancements would do to the car... but for me i would of put the money on the GP if both drivers are good like you said...
 
  #38  
Old 02-24-2006, 07:41 PM
Aviators's Avatar
Aviators
Aviators is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crazyaboutmini
then lets start a "dissappointed by GP by how it looks tread"... and the fact you mention there will be a difference means you would lose that wager because those difference are basic "go faster" rules. time will tell all the enhancements would do to the car... but for me i would of put the money on the GP if both drivers are good like you said...
No I'm dissapointed w/ the performance, if they actually kicked out a true track performer akin to the E36 M3 Lightweight, I would buy one.

Again to each their own, but to think that's gonna run circles, or even have any REAL WORLD advantage over a stock JCW isn't the case IMHO, it will come SOLELY down to driver vs. driver
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cutelildevil666
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
23
09-12-2015 09:36 PM
Tylerlanger1
MINIs & Minis for Sale
0
08-21-2015 03:03 PM
ECSTuning
Vendor Announcements
0
08-19-2015 12:51 PM
ECSTuning
Vendor Announcements
0
08-12-2015 01:24 PM
noreen99
Navigation & Audio
0
08-08-2015 08:21 AM



Quick Reply: JCW GP Disappointing



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:45 PM.