GP Talk (2006) Discussion of the limited edition, MINI Cooper S (R53)-based, John Cooper Works GP.

Stock GP?

Old Aug 24, 2007 | 01:08 PM
  #51  
Edge's Avatar
Edge
AdMINIstrator
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,975
Likes: 0
From: Annandale, VA (near Wash. DC)
Originally Posted by 70spop
Heh... I found a source I can get them from, but it's pricey! Always open to buying a "used" set in excellent condition.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #52  
lhoboy's Avatar
lhoboy
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
From: DC
Originally Posted by Edge
...and the JCW exhaust... and the JCW injectors... and a larger intercooler... and less weight (including the trailing arms)... and lighter wheels...

.
Certainly the vehicle wheel weight contributes a bit, but the IC and injectors are not bottlenecks. I've seen no data on stock versus JCW exhaust. IMO that's not a bottleneck either. And unless anyone has the data, it's their opinion that it is a bottleneck.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 01:59 PM
  #53  
lhoboy's Avatar
lhoboy
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
From: DC
Originally Posted by azminiman
bit my toung bit my toung I CANT

NOT!!! sorry not even close. ( my 04 S had the mods.. not even close to the GP )

No I will not be modding my GP ( doent need it ) ( Ok I put a works gill )

To those who dont own, or have never driven a GP, the car is complete. The only way to expain it.. when my 04 had all the mods done, yea it was faster.(not as fast as the GP )and it never all felt totaly in tune.. and doent compare to the GP. The GP is totaly in sync.

As for the collector portion.. NOT predictable.. As a past auto wholesaler,and a frequent visitor to the Barrett Jackson auction...all I can say is... study books on collector cars.

and thats all I have to say about that.
The reason your '04 was much slower than the GP is that you had gearing as tall as the empire state building. You are comparing apples and oranges. When I swapped out to an '05 tranny, it gave a bigger boost in performance than my earlier upgrade to a full JCW tune kit.

It's clear that the GP is synced well, but it could use a tune and a pulley as well.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 02:07 PM
  #54  
Edge's Avatar
Edge
AdMINIstrator
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,975
Likes: 0
From: Annandale, VA (near Wash. DC)
Originally Posted by azminiman
No I will not be modding my GP ( doent need it ) ( Ok I put a works gill )
Works gill? Whazzat? Even if you meant to say Works grill, there was no such thing for the R53. Did you mean the aero grill? If so, it was never made or sold as a JCW accessory for the R53.
Originally Posted by lhoboy
Certainly the vehicle wheel weight contributes a bit, but the IC and injectors are not bottlenecks. I've seen no data on stock versus JCW exhaust. IMO that's not a bottleneck either. And unless anyone has the data, it's their opinion that it is a bottleneck.
I never said they were "bottlenecks", but they are factors that potentially (or definitely, I'm not the expert on them) contribute to the overall performance.

My point was that you seemed to be grossly oversimplifying the "performance part" differences between the stock R53 MCS and the GP (or even a regular JCW R53, for that matter).

Everything plays a role, even if it is very small. I can't speak with any certainty to the direct benefits of the IC or exhaust (although I don't think they hurt), but I'd be very surprised if the injectors made absolutely no performance difference.

Oh... and BTW, the wheels are not the only weight difference! Trailing arms, rear seat delete, etc. Can those be done to a regular R53? Of course! But we were talking about stock, the last time I checked.

Again, I was only trying to correct what I saw as oversimplification.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 02:45 PM
  #55  
Jim Ray's Avatar
Jim Ray
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by 70spop
'65 Chevy Evening Orchid? That would look great with the silver top and red mirrors.

Oh, man, you are going to make me have to get out the spray gun again. That is Sherry's main gripe about the GP, the fact that there are so many of them around. We got used to the Daisy car and the Flame car being one off vehicles.

I have been wanting to put Kosei 15" wheels on it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 02:46 PM
  #56  
AprilWhine's Avatar
AprilWhine
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Vegas! USA
Nice find on the orchid Corvair! Yes, that's what I have in mind, but not metallic.

Edge, no way I can give up those wheels! For one thing, Fuzzy called dibs long ago:

 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #57  
Edge's Avatar
Edge
AdMINIstrator
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,975
Likes: 0
From: Annandale, VA (near Wash. DC)
Originally Posted by AprilWhine
Edge, no way I can give up those wheels! For one thing, Fuzzy called dibs long ago
DARN!
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #58  
70spop's Avatar
70spop
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by AprilWhine
Nice find on the orchid Corvair! Yes, that's what I have in mind, but not metallic.
Hmmmm, I love the metallic Chevy color (also the same as Pontiac's Iris Mist - also from 1965), but I don't know that I'd like it non-metallic. Might look too much like poi.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #59  
lhoboy's Avatar
lhoboy
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
From: DC
Originally Posted by Edge
Works gill? Whazzat? Even if you meant to say Works grill, there was no such thing for the R53. Did you mean the aero grill? If so, it was never made or sold as a JCW accessory for the R53.I never said they were "bottlenecks", but they are factors that potentially (or definitely, I'm not the expert on them) contribute to the overall performance.

My point was that you seemed to be grossly oversimplifying the "performance part" differences between the stock R53 MCS and the GP (or even a regular JCW R53, for that matter).

Everything plays a role, even if it is very small. I can't speak with any certainty to the direct benefits of the IC or exhaust (although I don't think they hurt), but I'd be very surprised if the injectors made absolutely no performance difference.

Oh... and BTW, the wheels are not the only weight difference! Trailing arms, rear seat delete, etc. Can those be done to a regular R53? Of course! But we were talking about stock, the last time I checked.

Again, I was only trying to correct what I saw as oversimplification.
I was considering the trailing arm/ seat delete in the vehicle weight (typo: left out "and" between vehicle and wheel). The 380 injectors are not needed to provide the additional power generated by the JCW or the GP. They merely provide an additional safety margin from running lean at high rpm.

Powerplant differences between JCW and GP:
................................JCW..........GP
1) Flash 7 hp
2) IC__ 0 hp...............10 fin......12 fin
.........= 7 hp

Certainly, 99% of difference between the power of the JCW and the GP is in the flash. The difference between the stock (same as JCW) IC and the GP has no impact on the dyno. I know, I've done it.

Powerplant differences between JCW and MCS:
...............................MCS.........GP
1) Flash .....?
2) Pulley.... ? ............... 0%.........13.8%
3) Head .....?.................160 cfm.....170cfm
4) Injectors ?..................340cc.......380cc
5) Exhaust .?
............= 40 hp

As the head on the JCW/GPs has a very mild porting, it does flow marginally better. That that would be over come by upgrading the MCS with a 15% rather than a JCW pulley. The 340 injectors, though operating in the upper end of the range are not restricting the fuel requirement in the lower 200 hp range.

Check out the tunes that LDG is doing with nothing more than a 15% pulley and a flash on MCSs. 190 WHP. Pretty close, if not dead on GP numbers.

Oh yes, do shed those pounds.

You are absolutely right though about the GP being a well balance system. Mixing and matching a bunch of bolt-on parts from different vendors who may or probably don't have a significant R&D budget is not going to yield the same overall driving satisfaction as selecting a series of parts that BMW has engineered as a system. The pulley and the flash fit into the tuning category which the manyfacturer has to compromise on to meet EPA requirements. That's not to say you can't generate more power or torque at various engine speeds, but you are far more likely to end up with driveability issues. Have you noticed all the posts about tuners with OBC issues, blown engine, etc.?

My 2cents, some fact, some opinion. My statement may have been oversimplified, but the thought process was not.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #60  
camelpilot's Avatar
camelpilot
Banned
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: City of Angels, Cali
Originally Posted by SMSgt Bo

Thank God there are people left in the world who can’t keep their unsolicited opinions to themselves.

I’m sure Mr. "Clown" would be very appreciative for his education. I imagine Mr. "Clown" would thank Mr. “knows what they’re talking about” by informing him that he paid for his car/bike/whatever with his own hard earned cash, pays for the insurance, unscheduled maintenance, periodic service and gasoline from his own pocket, and when Mr. “knows what they’re talking about” wants to throw a few extra dollars his way, he may muster enough interest to give a damn what he thinks. Until then you may want to keep your pearls of wisdom to yourself.

There, I feel much better now!
well you obviously dont know wut you're talking about, you have dinan MINI parts on your car. lol.

are you the type of person that will let things of historical significance be destroyed by people that dont know any better? im guessing you are.
 

Last edited by camelpilot; Aug 24, 2007 at 03:30 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:16 PM
  #61  
camelpilot's Avatar
camelpilot
Banned
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: City of Angels, Cali
Originally Posted by lhoboy
Very true. In fact, the only differences between the 2 that actually make the GP faster is a very mildly ported head, an undersized SC pulley and the flash.

For a thousand bucks you can install a 15% pulley and a new flash on an MCS and have something stronger than a GP.
I hate to say it but.... you cant make a stock R53 faster than a GP, for less than it cost for the GP.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:23 PM
  #62  
70spop's Avatar
70spop
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by camelpilot
I hate to say it but.... you cant make a stock R53 faster than a GP, for less than it cost for the GP.
*grabs popcorn and sits back*
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:29 PM
  #63  
Edge's Avatar
Edge
AdMINIstrator
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,975
Likes: 0
From: Annandale, VA (near Wash. DC)
Originally Posted by camelpilot
I hate to say it but.... you cant make a stock R53 faster than a GP, for less than it cost for the GP.
Originally Posted by 70spop
*grabs popcorn and sits back*
Heh.

camelpilot, I am not going to get into the nitty-gritty on this (I'm sure lhoboy will do that), but think you might have made too bold a statement. Take a totally bare-bones 05/06 MCS (i.e. no options, except maybe LSD), rip out the rear seats and any other "extras", and spend a little money on appropriate suspension, brakes & engine mods, and I am quite confident it will outaccelerate, outhandle and outbrake a GP... for less than $31,500 or whatever the final GP price was.

however...

I doubt the end result will have anywhere near the "complete package" smooth refinement that the GP gives you, not to mention the exclusivity/cache.

That's the one thing I love about my JCW... it's smooth as butta... and every modified MCS I've driven hasn't reached that "refined" feel, even though some of them were faster. Is it all in my head? Maybe... but I just love how my JCW drives. The GP is the same... and then some (yes, I've driven one).

NOTE: "Refined" feel is in terms of R53s. R56s need not apply, they are a totally different feel altogether (for better or worse, depending on your preferences).
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:29 PM
  #64  
lhoboy's Avatar
lhoboy
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
From: DC
Originally Posted by camelpilot
I hate to say it but.... you cant make a stock R53 faster than a GP, for less than it cost for the GP.

OK, here's the offer: At my own expense I will have your R53 ('05 or '06) tweaked for less than the difference in cost between the R53 and the GP. If I fail, you have a much faster car. If I succeed, your car is mine. How do you want to measure: drag strip, dyno or road track? Butt dyno doesn't count.

That will determine where and how I spend my money.
 

Last edited by lhoboy; Aug 24, 2007 at 03:32 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:33 PM
  #65  
camelpilot's Avatar
camelpilot
Banned
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: City of Angels, Cali
Originally Posted by 70spop
*grabs popcorn and sits back*
dont make me add up the parts in your sig, then drive up there for second part of the evidence
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #66  
mozzarella's Avatar
mozzarella
Banned
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by camelpilot
I hate to say it but.... you cant make a stock R53 faster than a GP, for less than it cost for the GP.
I'll bet you can you would have about 6 or 7 grand to play with, thinking about I'm sure you could.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:42 PM
  #67  
camelpilot's Avatar
camelpilot
Banned
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: City of Angels, Cali
Originally Posted by lhoboy
OK, here's the offer: At my own expense I will have your R53 ('05 or '06) tweaked for less than the difference in cost between the R53 and the GP. If I fail, you have a much faster car. If I succeed, your car is mine. How do you want to measure: drag strip, dyno or road track? Butt dyno doesn't count.

That will determine where and how I spend my money.
hey thats a mighty fine offer....

But my 2004 MCS that I paid $25k for, already has the following mods: sprot, prem, cold packages. other mods: wms pulley, alta intake, wms head & cam, jcw exhaust, jdm uss, jdm under floor wings, ipod :P. STOCK suspension. Cost of mods, i aint telling. But over 5k if I add up with the labour.

Now I'm not sure who you will get to tweak the car, but stay realistic about it, and count labour at $100 per hour for all your tweaking.

Also include the additional tweaking involved for the tooner crap that dont work or run right. lol.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:44 PM
  #68  
camelpilot's Avatar
camelpilot
Banned
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: City of Angels, Cali
Originally Posted by mozzarella
I'll bet you can you would have about 6 or 7 grand to play with, thinking about I'm sure you could.
yeah ... thats what I thought before I started....
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #69  
mozzarella's Avatar
mozzarella
Banned
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by camelpilot
yeah ... thats what I thought before I started....
You don't think so? Just quickly thinking about it seems easy if you spend the money well.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #70  
iscruz7769's Avatar
iscruz7769
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
Originally Posted by camelpilot
I hate to say it but.... you cant make a stock R53 faster than a GP, for less than it cost for the GP.
Sure you can... Buy a used one for 15K and modify it.

I went to Puerto Rico on vacation and saw a heavily modified 04 R53 spank the caca out of a GP on straights, turns, uphill, downhill, pretty much all over the track, and NOT a full race car by the way. At the end of the day, the GP owner trailered his car and the R53 owner bolted his plates back in place and drove home . Is just a matter of finding the right combination and do a lot of tuning. With just the regular bolt ons is pretty much impossible, but once you go inside the motor, that's a different story.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:50 PM
  #71  
camelpilot's Avatar
camelpilot
Banned
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: City of Angels, Cali
Originally Posted by iscruz7769
Sure you can... Buy a used one for 15K and modify it.

I went to Puerto Rico on vacation and saw a heavily modified 04 R53 spank the caca out of a GP on straights, turns, uphill, downhill, pretty much all over the track, and NOT a full race car by the way. At the end of the day, the GP owner trailered his car and the R53 owner bolted his plates back in place and drove home . Is just a matter of finding the right combination and do a lot of tuning. With just the regular bolt ons is pretty much impossible, but once you go inside the motor, that's a different story.
I beleive it! But ask the R53 owner how much and what it took to get to where he is....

Even buying used at 15 is pushing it (good idea btw)
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 04:30 PM
  #72  
70spop's Avatar
70spop
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by camelpilot
dont make me add up the parts in your sig, then drive up there for second part of the evidence
MY car surely wouldn't beat a GP. It's basically just an all JCW MCS with a different exhaust and springs, and it's not running at peak form right now anyway.

I wasn't disagreeing or agreeing with your statement. I just thought it would be sure to generate.... er, discussion.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 04:37 PM
  #73  
camelpilot's Avatar
camelpilot
Banned
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: City of Angels, Cali
Originally Posted by 70spop
MY car surely wouldn't beat a GP. It's basically just an all JCW MCS with a different exhaust and springs, and it's not running at peak form right now anyway.

I wasn't disagreeing or agreeing with your statement. I just thought it would be sure to generate.... er, discussion.
discussion, sure! i know your kind! trouble maker! besides, takes one to know one

only diff is sometiems when im bored i like to make my own popcorn
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 04:53 PM
  #74  
SoCal_Mini's Avatar
SoCal_Mini
3rd Gear
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: San Diego CA
play nice kids...
Anyway - CamelPilot doesn't drive his GP - its just a garage queen

haha
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 05:00 PM
  #75  
camelpilot's Avatar
camelpilot
Banned
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: City of Angels, Cali
oh noes, it's le shark! another trouble maker...

you mind your own busyness. dont u have some hot brawd you have to buy dinner for tonight? give her a ride on your little red crotch rocket.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:17 PM.