Stock GP?
Certainly the vehicle wheel weight contributes a bit, but the IC and injectors are not bottlenecks. I've seen no data on stock versus JCW exhaust. IMO that's not a bottleneck either. And unless anyone has the data, it's their opinion that it is a bottleneck.
bit my toung
bit my toung
I CANT
NOT!!! sorry not even close. ( my 04 S had the mods.. not even close to the GP )
No I will not be modding my GP ( doent need it ) ( Ok I put a works gill )
To those who dont own, or have never driven a GP, the car is complete. The only way to expain it.. when my 04 had all the mods done, yea it was faster.(not as fast as the GP )and it never all felt totaly in tune.. and doent compare to the GP. The GP is totaly in sync.
As for the collector portion.. NOT predictable.. As a past auto wholesaler,and a frequent visitor to the Barrett Jackson auction...all I can say is... study books on collector cars.
and thats all I have to say about that.
bit my toung
I CANTNOT!!! sorry not even close. ( my 04 S had the mods.. not even close to the GP )
No I will not be modding my GP ( doent need it ) ( Ok I put a works gill )
To those who dont own, or have never driven a GP, the car is complete. The only way to expain it.. when my 04 had all the mods done, yea it was faster.(not as fast as the GP )and it never all felt totaly in tune.. and doent compare to the GP. The GP is totaly in sync.
As for the collector portion.. NOT predictable.. As a past auto wholesaler,and a frequent visitor to the Barrett Jackson auction...all I can say is... study books on collector cars.
and thats all I have to say about that.
It's clear that the GP is synced well, but it could use a tune and a pulley as well.
My point was that you seemed to be grossly oversimplifying the "performance part" differences between the stock R53 MCS and the GP (or even a regular JCW R53, for that matter).
Everything plays a role, even if it is very small. I can't speak with any certainty to the direct benefits of the IC or exhaust (although I don't think they hurt), but I'd be very surprised if the injectors made absolutely no performance difference.
Oh... and BTW, the wheels are not the only weight difference! Trailing arms, rear seat delete, etc. Can those be done to a regular R53? Of course! But we were talking about stock, the last time I checked.
Again, I was only trying to correct what I saw as oversimplification.
I have been wanting to put Kosei 15" wheels on it.
Works gill? Whazzat? Even if you meant to say Works grill, there was no such thing for the R53. Did you mean the aero grill? If so, it was never made or sold as a JCW accessory for the R53.I never said they were "bottlenecks", but they are factors that potentially (or definitely, I'm not the expert on them) contribute to the overall performance.
My point was that you seemed to be grossly oversimplifying the "performance part" differences between the stock R53 MCS and the GP (or even a regular JCW R53, for that matter).
Everything plays a role, even if it is very small. I can't speak with any certainty to the direct benefits of the IC or exhaust (although I don't think they hurt), but I'd be very surprised if the injectors made absolutely no performance difference.
Oh... and BTW, the wheels are not the only weight difference! Trailing arms, rear seat delete, etc. Can those be done to a regular R53? Of course! But we were talking about stock, the last time I checked.
Again, I was only trying to correct what I saw as oversimplification.
My point was that you seemed to be grossly oversimplifying the "performance part" differences between the stock R53 MCS and the GP (or even a regular JCW R53, for that matter).
Everything plays a role, even if it is very small. I can't speak with any certainty to the direct benefits of the IC or exhaust (although I don't think they hurt), but I'd be very surprised if the injectors made absolutely no performance difference.
Oh... and BTW, the wheels are not the only weight difference! Trailing arms, rear seat delete, etc. Can those be done to a regular R53? Of course! But we were talking about stock, the last time I checked.
Again, I was only trying to correct what I saw as oversimplification.
Powerplant differences between JCW and GP:
................................JCW..........GP
1) Flash 7 hp
2) IC__ 0 hp...............10 fin......12 fin
.........= 7 hp
Certainly, 99% of difference between the power of the JCW and the GP is in the flash. The difference between the stock (same as JCW) IC and the GP has no impact on the dyno. I know, I've done it.
Powerplant differences between JCW and MCS:
...............................MCS.........GP
1) Flash .....?
2) Pulley.... ? ............... 0%.........13.8%
3) Head .....?.................160 cfm.....170cfm
4) Injectors ?..................340cc.......380cc
5) Exhaust .?
............= 40 hp
As the head on the JCW/GPs has a very mild porting, it does flow marginally better. That that would be over come by upgrading the MCS with a 15% rather than a JCW pulley. The 340 injectors, though operating in the upper end of the range are not restricting the fuel requirement in the lower 200 hp range.
Check out the tunes that LDG is doing with nothing more than a 15% pulley and a flash on MCSs. 190 WHP. Pretty close, if not dead on GP numbers.
Oh yes, do shed those pounds.
You are absolutely right though about the GP being a well balance system. Mixing and matching a bunch of bolt-on parts from different vendors who may or probably don't have a significant R&D budget is not going to yield the same overall driving satisfaction as selecting a series of parts that BMW has engineered as a system. The pulley and the flash fit into the tuning category which the manyfacturer has to compromise on to meet EPA requirements. That's not to say you can't generate more power or torque at various engine speeds, but you are far more likely to end up with driveability issues. Have you noticed all the posts about tuners with OBC issues, blown engine, etc.?
My 2cents, some fact, some opinion. My statement may have been oversimplified, but the thought process was not.
Thank God there are people left in the world who can’t keep their unsolicited opinions to themselves.
I’m sure Mr. "Clown" would be very appreciative for his education. I imagine Mr. "Clown" would thank Mr. “knows what they’re talking about” by informing him that he paid for his car/bike/whatever with his own hard earned cash, pays for the insurance, unscheduled maintenance, periodic service and gasoline from his own pocket, and when Mr. “knows what they’re talking about” wants to throw a few extra dollars his way, he may muster enough interest to give a damn what he thinks. Until then you may want to keep your pearls of wisdom to yourself.
There, I feel much better now!
are you the type of person that will let things of historical significance be destroyed by people that dont know any better? im guessing you are.
Last edited by camelpilot; Aug 24, 2007 at 03:30 PM.
I hate to say it but.... you cant make a stock R53 faster than a GP, for less than it cost for the GP.
camelpilot, I am not going to get into the nitty-gritty on this (I'm sure lhoboy will do that), but think you might have made too bold a statement. Take a totally bare-bones 05/06 MCS (i.e. no options, except maybe LSD), rip out the rear seats and any other "extras", and spend a little money on appropriate suspension, brakes & engine mods, and I am quite confident it will outaccelerate, outhandle and outbrake a GP... for less than $31,500 or whatever the final GP price was.
however...
I doubt the end result will have anywhere near the "complete package" smooth refinement that the GP gives you, not to mention the exclusivity/cache.
That's the one thing I love about my JCW... it's smooth as butta... and every modified MCS I've driven hasn't reached that "refined" feel, even though some of them were faster. Is it all in my head? Maybe... but I just love how my JCW drives.
NOTE: "Refined" feel is in terms of R53s. R56s need not apply, they are a totally different feel altogether (for better or worse, depending on your preferences).
OK, here's the offer: At my own expense I will have your R53 ('05 or '06) tweaked for less than the difference in cost between the R53 and the GP. If I fail, you have a much faster car. If I succeed, your car is mine. How do you want to measure: drag strip, dyno or road track? Butt dyno doesn't count.
That will determine where and how I spend my money.
Last edited by lhoboy; Aug 24, 2007 at 03:32 PM.
I'll bet you can you would have about 6 or 7 grand to play with, thinking about I'm sure you could.
OK, here's the offer: At my own expense I will have your R53 ('05 or '06) tweaked for less than the difference in cost between the R53 and the GP. If I fail, you have a much faster car. If I succeed, your car is mine. How do you want to measure: drag strip, dyno or road track? Butt dyno doesn't count.
That will determine where and how I spend my money.
That will determine where and how I spend my money.
But my 2004 MCS that I paid $25k for, already has the following mods: sprot, prem, cold packages. other mods: wms pulley, alta intake, wms head & cam, jcw exhaust, jdm uss, jdm under floor wings, ipod :P. STOCK suspension. Cost of mods, i aint telling. But over 5k if I add up with the labour.
Now I'm not sure who you will get to tweak the car, but stay realistic about it, and count labour at $100 per hour for all your tweaking.
Also include the additional tweaking involved for the tooner crap that dont work or run right. lol.
I went to Puerto Rico on vacation and saw a heavily modified 04 R53 spank the caca out of a GP on straights, turns, uphill, downhill, pretty much all over the track, and NOT a full race car by the way. At the end of the day, the GP owner trailered his car and the R53 owner bolted his plates back in place and drove home
. Is just a matter of finding the right combination and do a lot of tuning. With just the regular bolt ons is pretty much impossible, but once you go inside the motor, that's a different story.
Sure you can... Buy a used one for 15K and modify it.
I went to Puerto Rico on vacation and saw a heavily modified 04 R53 spank the caca out of a GP on straights, turns, uphill, downhill, pretty much all over the track, and NOT a full race car by the way. At the end of the day, the GP owner trailered his car and the R53 owner bolted his plates back in place and drove home
. Is just a matter of finding the right combination and do a lot of tuning. With just the regular bolt ons is pretty much impossible, but once you go inside the motor, that's a different story.
I went to Puerto Rico on vacation and saw a heavily modified 04 R53 spank the caca out of a GP on straights, turns, uphill, downhill, pretty much all over the track, and NOT a full race car by the way. At the end of the day, the GP owner trailered his car and the R53 owner bolted his plates back in place and drove home
. Is just a matter of finding the right combination and do a lot of tuning. With just the regular bolt ons is pretty much impossible, but once you go inside the motor, that's a different story.
Even buying used at 15 is pushing it (good idea btw)
MY car surely wouldn't beat a GP. It's basically just an all JCW MCS with a different exhaust and springs, and it's not running at peak form right now anyway. I wasn't disagreeing or agreeing with your statement. I just thought it would be sure to generate.... er, discussion.
MY car surely wouldn't beat a GP. It's basically just an all JCW MCS with a different exhaust and springs, and it's not running at peak form right now anyway. I wasn't disagreeing or agreeing with your statement. I just thought it would be sure to generate.... er, discussion.

only diff is sometiems when im bored i like to make my own popcorn
oh noes, it's le shark! another trouble maker...
you mind your own busyness. dont u have some hot brawd you have to buy dinner for tonight? give her a ride on your little red crotch rocket.
you mind your own busyness. dont u have some hot brawd you have to buy dinner for tonight? give her a ride on your little red crotch rocket.





