F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (F55/F56) hatchback discussions.

F55/F56 F56 Cooper S + JCW Tuning Kit + NM Power Module = 264bhp / 301 ft-lbs of torque!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #51  
Old 11-27-2015, 10:39 AM
Minnie.the.Moocher's Avatar
Minnie.the.Moocher
Minnie.the.Moocher is offline
OVERDRIVE
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: earth PNW
Posts: 5,390
Received 570 Likes on 486 Posts
Remus Responder, PedalBox, Powerpedal, etc. They all seem to be the same thing. Isn't it just a glorified Sport Button? It isn't magic, or am I missing something?
 
  #52  
Old 11-27-2015, 10:45 AM
MINIAC's Avatar
MINIAC
MINIAC is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tsunami Zone
Posts: 2,319
Received 94 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by Minnie.the.Moocher
Remus Responder, PedalBox, Powerpedal, etc. They all seem to be the same thing.
Sounds like the SprintBooster for the 1st and 2nd Gen MINI.
 
  #53  
Old 11-27-2015, 10:47 AM
J_L's Avatar
J_L
J_L is offline
5th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 645
Received 114 Likes on 86 Posts
You're right- pretty much does what the sport button does. Which I'll happily take! As I understand it, they work to reduce / eliminate the lag & dampening that is designed into drive-by-wire throttles. Gives you control that's closer to a real cable throttle. At the $300 that most of these cost, I was gonna pass, but at 225, seems worth a shot to me. I'll post a full review in its own thread once I get mine.
 
  #54  
Old 11-27-2015, 11:09 AM
GregoryK's Avatar
GregoryK
GregoryK is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Far North
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
I have a 6 speed manuals. 2010 mcs, 2014 mcs and now a 2016 jcw. Although the gas pedals are all identical I notice that the gen 3 cars all have this blip thing when you feather the gas pedal. Haven't drive an auto so not sure if it displays the same symptoms...I find it really annoying. It happens in sport mode too.
Do you think this thing will correct this problem? ..or had anyone else noticed it?
 
  #55  
Old 11-27-2015, 11:45 AM
J_L's Avatar
J_L
J_L is offline
5th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 645
Received 114 Likes on 86 Posts
I notice that too. And I think that a big reason why this is a feature is that the drive-by-wire is set up to actually prevent you adding blips, in the goal of efficiency. I think it's just the computer preventing stalls. Doesn't bother me- actually I like it. Of course, I'd like it more if the throttle was sensitive enough to let me do my own blipping... and hopefully the Responder will help with that. But I really doubt any of the throttle modifier things will stop the computer from doing it when it sees a stall coming.
 
  #56  
Old 11-27-2015, 12:19 PM
GregoryK's Avatar
GregoryK
GregoryK is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Far North
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
I wonder if you can switch of the anti-stall feature in the software. Bet you can. Wonder if this condition happens in BMW land too...
 
  #57  
Old 11-27-2015, 03:49 PM
atlantaorange's Avatar
atlantaorange
atlantaorange is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: atlanta
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
definitely ordering the responder. just installed the NM module tonight, running on the low setting. haven't driven too much yet but WOW. huge difference, car is way more responsive. hits 60mph before i can blink... this is my first turbo car and i can see why everyone loves tuning them. such a small dollar investment for a lot more power. I honestly don't think i would want much more as the torque steer is more noticeable, without better tires than the stock pirrellis it would be hard to put the power down without allot of wheel spin unless in a straight line.

I am loving the mini and with the NM it is where i want the car to be. next is the responder then maybe the jcw pro suspension.
 
  #58  
Old 12-01-2015, 07:19 PM
atlantaorange's Avatar
atlantaorange
atlantaorange is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: atlanta
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
responder is on the way!

i still cannot believe the difference with the NM. damn, the car is honestly a little scary around town, still getting used to front wheel drive. i am glad the brakes on this things are so good. having a little too much fun!
 
  #59  
Old 12-01-2015, 09:21 PM
mct's Avatar
mct
mct is offline
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
  #60  
Old 12-02-2015, 09:35 AM
hanzov69's Avatar
hanzov69
hanzov69 is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fuсk NAM
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey, mct..
It wasn't clear from your original post, are you the one running the NM + JCW tune? Or was that someone else? Looking at the figures, it seems like a no-brainer. I've got the JCW tune on my F56, thinking about the NM but wanted to get real world driving feedback. Dyno figures are awesome, but what are the feelings on the overall experience "butt dyno" response?
 
  #61  
Old 12-03-2015, 01:29 PM
mct's Avatar
mct
mct is offline
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
butt dyno response is amazing!!!! Definitely a SICK combination!
 
  #62  
Old 12-07-2015, 08:56 AM
B_Swift's Avatar
B_Swift
B_Swift is offline
1st Gear
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Plainfield, IL
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct me if I am wrong, but the JCW Pro Tuning Kit is basically an exhaust and tune. So why would NM or BMS not be able to just overtake that and set up a better tune? It seems back asswards to pay for a JCW tune and then get another to overwrite it.
 
  #63  
Old 12-07-2015, 09:32 AM
mct's Avatar
mct
mct is offline
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Yea you are incorrect. They do not overwrite anything at all. They are plug-in/piggyback modules. They simply ADD to what you already have - not overwrite. Basically the modules both work similarly in that they trick the ECU to think it is producing 2 - 4 PSI lower that what is actually being output, resulting in the ECU generating an additional 2 - 4 PSI of boost.
 
  #64  
Old 12-30-2015, 12:29 PM
vetsvette's Avatar
vetsvette
vetsvette is offline
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: South Central Virginia
Posts: 3,896
Received 451 Likes on 344 Posts
Need some help ASAP

I'm having the tuning kit installed next Wednesday. My dilemma is being this close to Christmas I don't want to spend the $150 for the JCW tips yet. I'd rather add them in another month or so. I need to know what the inlet size of the tip is so I can order some decent, but cheap alternatives to use for a while. Does anyone know what the exit size is for the JCW Pro exhaust? Any help would be appreciated.
 
  #65  
Old 12-30-2015, 12:33 PM
mct's Avatar
mct
mct is offline
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Next time I run out to the car, I can measure for you.
 
  #66  
Old 12-30-2015, 01:03 PM
vetsvette's Avatar
vetsvette
vetsvette is offline
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: South Central Virginia
Posts: 3,896
Received 451 Likes on 344 Posts
Thanks man. Much appreciated.
 
  #67  
Old 12-30-2015, 03:57 PM
mct's Avatar
mct
mct is offline
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
The tips are just a hair over 3" wide
 
  #68  
Old 12-30-2015, 04:35 PM
vetsvette's Avatar
vetsvette
vetsvette is offline
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: South Central Virginia
Posts: 3,896
Received 451 Likes on 344 Posts
That's the exit size of the tip. I need to know the inlet size or the size of the pipe itself so I can order the correct tips.
 
  #69  
Old 12-30-2015, 05:38 PM
mct's Avatar
mct
mct is offline
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
No that was the inside pipe - not the outer tips
 
  #70  
Old 01-02-2016, 09:24 AM
vetsvette's Avatar
vetsvette
vetsvette is offline
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: South Central Virginia
Posts: 3,896
Received 451 Likes on 344 Posts
After spending most of a day searching for a cheap, but decent alternative for the JCW Pro tips I finally said screw it and ordered the JCW chrome tips. Got my parts guy to match the best online price I found. Ended up costing ~$150 OTD for the pair.
I have an appointment Wednesday to have the tuning kit installed and my rear fogs coded. Can't wait!

Appreciate the help mct.
 
  #71  
Old 01-02-2016, 04:51 PM
normtrum's Avatar
normtrum
normtrum is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 189
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
I absolutely love the "sports upgrade". I have a JCW, so it was exhaust only, but still I love the sound, I love the little extra pull I seem to get, I love the tips, hell I even love those 2 foam circular pieces with the hole in the middle that fits perfectly in your cup holder where you're meant to place your Bluetooth ****!

Now after reading this thread I'm going after the NM mod.
This is a great forum!
 
  #72  
Old 01-15-2016, 04:06 PM
USA-RET's Avatar
USA-RET
USA-RET is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Bonita Springs Florida
Posts: 1,331
Received 164 Likes on 127 Posts
First off, thanks for posting all the info from the Dyno days with comparisons between the JCW, Stock MCS, and your car w/ JCW kit and again after the NM tuner installed.

I just ordered the JCW kit from my dealer and will see how much I like it and then go for the NM tuner if I still want more UUMPH!.

I'd guess your dyno numbers with the JCW tuner were done with the open exhaust (track) rather than the sport mode.

You have any idea if there is a HP/Torque loss if you go with the closed exhaust (sport setting)? I'm a little confused since some say you get the HP/ Torque gain in either position, The open (track) setting only changes the exhaust note. True or false? Anyone? Bueller?
 
  #73  
Old 01-15-2016, 08:28 PM
mct's Avatar
mct
mct is offline
5th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by USA-RET
First off, thanks for posting all the info from the Dyno days with comparisons between the JCW, Stock MCS, and your car w/ JCW kit and again after the NM tuner installed.

I just ordered the JCW kit from my dealer and will see how much I like it and then go for the NM tuner if I still want more UUMPH!.

I'd guess your dyno numbers with the JCW tuner were done with the open exhaust (track) rather than the sport mode.

You have any idea if there is a HP/Torque loss if you go with the closed exhaust (sport setting)? I'm a little confused since some say you get the HP/ Torque gain in either position, The open (track) setting only changes the exhaust note. True or false? Anyone? Bueller?
Excellent question regarding the flap open vs closed. All Dyno runs were done with flap open. Will have to do some runs with flap closed. The feeling I have is with the flap open it feels more sporty but that could simply be the enhanced sound making the experience more visceral.
 
  #74  
Old 08-16-2016, 06:58 PM
ranger052's Avatar
ranger052
ranger052 is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Sorry for bringinhh this thread back to life.

So to resume, is it safe to run JCW Tuning Kit and NM module ( low settings ) on a Mini S?

Thanks
 
  #75  
Old 08-17-2016, 03:49 AM
vetsvette's Avatar
vetsvette
vetsvette is offline
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: South Central Virginia
Posts: 3,896
Received 451 Likes on 344 Posts
Yes. It's the exact combination I've been running since the first of the year. No adverse effects and I like it more every day.
 


Quick Reply: F55/F56 F56 Cooper S + JCW Tuning Kit + NM Power Module = 264bhp / 301 ft-lbs of torque!!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:46 PM.