Drivetrain GRS Intercooler Evaluation (WMS)
#1
GRS Intercooler Evaluation (WMS)
Here is a link to the GRS testing and results:
http://www.webbmotorsports.com/forum...opic.php?t=643
Enjoy!
Randy
720-841-1002
303-683-4424
randy@webbmotorsports.com
http://www.webbmotorsports.com/forum...opic.php?t=643
Enjoy!
Randy
720-841-1002
303-683-4424
randy@webbmotorsports.com
#2
Hi Randy, thanks for the info on the GRS...
I was just wondering what your findings of the ALTA IC are when compared with the GRS.
The only reason I ask is because I just yesterday put in an order for an Alta IC and am now wondering if going the GRS IC route would be best.
Thanks!
ps - The IC is being installed over at Helix, along with e 19% pulley, oil catch can, GIAC ecu, and JCW injectors. (adding to a CAI, Borla, and exhaust header).
pps- Alta Site states for its IC, in which case the numbers seem comparable ----------"Dyno results on otherwise stock mini cooper s show 7 hp and 5 ft/lbs torque at the wheels from 2000 rpm to redline and beyond. Modified cars (pulley, intake and exhaust) produce an additional 9-11 hp and 7-9 ft/lbs torque." --------in which case the numbers seem competative/comparable. I'm so confused
ppps- not arguing anything - I'm not too familiar with things like this - just trying to learn so I can make the best decision with the help of other's expertise/advise.
I was just wondering what your findings of the ALTA IC are when compared with the GRS.
The only reason I ask is because I just yesterday put in an order for an Alta IC and am now wondering if going the GRS IC route would be best.
Thanks!
ps - The IC is being installed over at Helix, along with e 19% pulley, oil catch can, GIAC ecu, and JCW injectors. (adding to a CAI, Borla, and exhaust header).
pps- Alta Site states for its IC, in which case the numbers seem comparable ----------"Dyno results on otherwise stock mini cooper s show 7 hp and 5 ft/lbs torque at the wheels from 2000 rpm to redline and beyond. Modified cars (pulley, intake and exhaust) produce an additional 9-11 hp and 7-9 ft/lbs torque." --------in which case the numbers seem competative/comparable. I'm so confused
ppps- not arguing anything - I'm not too familiar with things like this - just trying to learn so I can make the best decision with the help of other's expertise/advise.
#3
Randy,
Looks good. I read your write up and I know that a more readable dyno chart is to follow but I was wondering if the gains were across the board or its mainly peak. Also, what sort of mods are on the test car? Where does an intercooler such as this fit into the mod timeline? Thanks.
--
Cheese
Looks good. I read your write up and I know that a more readable dyno chart is to follow but I was wondering if the gains were across the board or its mainly peak. Also, what sort of mods are on the test car? Where does an intercooler such as this fit into the mod timeline? Thanks.
--
Cheese
#4
Great writeup and some good numbers as well! This piece looks beautiful. I especially like the diverter-in-the-hood arrangement.
It also looks like GRS has some actual mounting tabs unlike the other big intercoolers on the market. Big plus in my book, since those others get beaten by mounting bosses due to being held in place solely by the boots. Is this the case?
It also looks like GRS has some actual mounting tabs unlike the other big intercoolers on the market. Big plus in my book, since those others get beaten by mounting bosses due to being held in place solely by the boots. Is this the case?
#7
Originally Posted by BriNYU
Hi Randy, thanks for the info on the GRS...
I was just wondering what your findings of the ALTA IC are when compared with the GRS.
The only reason I ask is because I just yesterday put in an order for an Alta IC and am now wondering if going the GRS IC route would be best.
Thanks!
ps - The IC is being installed over at Helix, along with e 19% pulley, oil catch can, GIAC ecu, and JCW injectors. (adding to a CAI, Borla, and exhaust header).
pps- Alta Site states for its IC, in which case the numbers seem comparable ----------"Dyno results on otherwise stock mini cooper s show 7 hp and 5 ft/lbs torque at the wheels from 2000 rpm to redline and beyond. Modified cars (pulley, intake and exhaust) produce an additional 9-11 hp and 7-9 ft/lbs torque." --------in which case the numbers seem competative/comparable. I'm so confused
ppps- not arguing anything - I'm not too familiar with things like this - just trying to learn so I can make the best decision with the help of other's expertise/advise.
I was just wondering what your findings of the ALTA IC are when compared with the GRS.
The only reason I ask is because I just yesterday put in an order for an Alta IC and am now wondering if going the GRS IC route would be best.
Thanks!
ps - The IC is being installed over at Helix, along with e 19% pulley, oil catch can, GIAC ecu, and JCW injectors. (adding to a CAI, Borla, and exhaust header).
pps- Alta Site states for its IC, in which case the numbers seem comparable ----------"Dyno results on otherwise stock mini cooper s show 7 hp and 5 ft/lbs torque at the wheels from 2000 rpm to redline and beyond. Modified cars (pulley, intake and exhaust) produce an additional 9-11 hp and 7-9 ft/lbs torque." --------in which case the numbers seem competative/comparable. I'm so confused
ppps- not arguing anything - I'm not too familiar with things like this - just trying to learn so I can make the best decision with the help of other's expertise/advise.
I don't think you can go wrong with either unit. Have fun at Helix!
Cheese,
The overlay charts were absolutely horrible when scanned, but once I can directly upload them, I think it'll be easy to see the results. There was a gain in torque and horsepower pretty much across the board.
Greatbear,
The GRS does have mounting tabs, and so far they have worked like a champ. Even when you remove the bolts, the tabs are where they should be alignment-wise, so there shouldn't be any cracking issues even way down the road. Like I said above, I think the fit and finish, in addition to the construction method of having a bonded core, puts this unit in a great position.
kbseto,
Well, the price just destroys the RMS, but the RMS will still outperform this unit. It does so in all environments, but that can't be said in all water-air cases - I have seen some serious heat soak issues from some designs of water-air units. On track, the air-air typically trash those.
Hope that helps!
Randy
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Originally Posted by RandyBMC
Cheese,
The overlay charts were absolutely horrible when scanned, but once I can directly upload them, I think it'll be easy to see the results. There was a gain in torque and horsepower pretty much across the board.
The overlay charts were absolutely horrible when scanned, but once I can directly upload them, I think it'll be easy to see the results. There was a gain in torque and horsepower pretty much across the board.
--
Cheese
#10
#11
Randy, thank you for the interesting test result and the informative write-up! I have a question regarding the air diverter. Is it mounted on top of the intercooler or is it mounted on the underside of the bonnet scoop? Can you post a picture of the actual diverter and also can you describe the "tricked" diverter in more detail? :smile:
#12
The diffuser mounts to the bonnnet, so that when it is shut, the unit matches up to the diffuser on the bonnet. Both pieces of the diffuser are mounted to the bonnet.
I'm off to Buffalo, and the car is over at the shop, so I'll have to post more pics when I get back.
Hope that helps!
Randy
I'm off to Buffalo, and the car is over at the shop, so I'll have to post more pics when I get back.
Hope that helps!
Randy
#13
Originally Posted by RandyBMC
The diffuser mounts to the bonnnet, so that when it is shut, the unit matches up to the diffuser on the bonnet. Both pieces of the diffuser are mounted to the bonnet.
I'm off to Buffalo, and the car is over at the shop, so I'll have to post more pics when I get back.
Hope that helps!
Randy
I'm off to Buffalo, and the car is over at the shop, so I'll have to post more pics when I get back.
Hope that helps!
Randy
i am just wondering.. i have the GRS unit's old diverter piece (smaller) and it's sitting too low, do you have the same problem? do you forsee any problems if i see around 1mm to 3 mm of intercooler's side when the bonnet's closed?
#15
Randy,
Just to make sure we get some info correct with our part. The pressure drop as measured by you was actually “.3 bar or so…” which is actually less of a pressure drop then the GRS unit at .5 bar.
QUOTED from webmotorsports forum board
http://www.webbmotorsports.com/forum...opic.php?t=278
Alta Intercooler Specs
“…….There is a slightly greater pressure drop across the unit, about .3 psi or so, but the temps are significantly lower, so your density is better…………”
RandyBMC
Owner
Also the testing you did on ours was a long time ago before we went to the cast endtanks. I am sure our WHP numbers will be better now. Thanks for the initial testing on our part. To this day we still use the data you gave us. You surely have helped sell our parts.
Just to make sure we get some info correct with our part. The pressure drop as measured by you was actually “.3 bar or so…” which is actually less of a pressure drop then the GRS unit at .5 bar.
QUOTED from webmotorsports forum board
http://www.webbmotorsports.com/forum...opic.php?t=278
Alta Intercooler Specs
“…….There is a slightly greater pressure drop across the unit, about .3 psi or so, but the temps are significantly lower, so your density is better…………”
RandyBMC
Owner
Also the testing you did on ours was a long time ago before we went to the cast endtanks. I am sure our WHP numbers will be better now. Thanks for the initial testing on our part. To this day we still use the data you gave us. You surely have helped sell our parts.
#16
#17
Originally Posted by ALTA2
Randy,
Just to make sure we get some info correct with our part. The pressure drop as measured by you was actually “.3 bar or so…” which is actually less of a pressure drop then the GRS unit at .5 bar.
QUOTED from webmotorsports forum board
http://www.webbmotorsports.com/forum...opic.php?t=278
Alta Intercooler Specs
“…….There is a slightly greater pressure drop across the unit, about .3 psi or so, but the temps are significantly lower, so your density is better…………”
RandyBMC
Owner
Also the testing you did on ours was a long time ago before we went to the cast endtanks. I am sure our WHP numbers will be better now. Thanks for the initial testing on our part. To this day we still use the data you gave us. You surely have helped sell our parts.
Just to make sure we get some info correct with our part. The pressure drop as measured by you was actually “.3 bar or so…” which is actually less of a pressure drop then the GRS unit at .5 bar.
QUOTED from webmotorsports forum board
http://www.webbmotorsports.com/forum...opic.php?t=278
Alta Intercooler Specs
“…….There is a slightly greater pressure drop across the unit, about .3 psi or so, but the temps are significantly lower, so your density is better…………”
RandyBMC
Owner
Also the testing you did on ours was a long time ago before we went to the cast endtanks. I am sure our WHP numbers will be better now. Thanks for the initial testing on our part. To this day we still use the data you gave us. You surely have helped sell our parts.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gar56
MINIs & Minis for Sale
1
11-15-2016 06:41 AM
IQRaceworks
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
51
10-10-2015 03:54 PM