Drivetrain Stock MCS dyno and TBE dyno
#1
Stock MCS dyno and TBE dyno
So my MCS is currently at a local shop (RevLine Motors in Kansas City) getting a custom turbo back exhaust built for it. Before doing so, I wanted to get a baseline dyno of my car while it was still bone stock. Now, I'm jumping the gun a little bit because I don't have copies of the dyno graphs yet, but I just got off of the phone with him and thought I'd go ahead and share the beginnings of the journey:
Stock R56 MCS: 177whp / 192wtq
The dyno was done in 3rd gear with Sport Mode on. I need to check on things like SAE correction, weather, and type of dyno that I know a lot of you all will want to know and I'll try to get that as soon as I can. The guys at the shop told me that their dyno is known as the "Heartbreaker" because it dynoes so low! This was the reason I was exceptionally surprised to see the above numbers.
The car is now being torn apart and my TBE is being assembled (had to order the turbo-downpipe flange after taking exhaust apart b/c we didn't know exact size/type). One bad thing during the process: a bolt stripped off in the turbo and we had to drill it out. All should be fine now and no rethreading should be needed.
I'll post here immediately once I get the dyno with the TBE and both graphs. Hope this information is helpful to anybody who might care...I know I like it so far!
Stock R56 MCS: 177whp / 192wtq
The dyno was done in 3rd gear with Sport Mode on. I need to check on things like SAE correction, weather, and type of dyno that I know a lot of you all will want to know and I'll try to get that as soon as I can. The guys at the shop told me that their dyno is known as the "Heartbreaker" because it dynoes so low! This was the reason I was exceptionally surprised to see the above numbers.
The car is now being torn apart and my TBE is being assembled (had to order the turbo-downpipe flange after taking exhaust apart b/c we didn't know exact size/type). One bad thing during the process: a bolt stripped off in the turbo and we had to drill it out. All should be fine now and no rethreading should be needed.
I'll post here immediately once I get the dyno with the TBE and both graphs. Hope this information is helpful to anybody who might care...I know I like it so far!
#4
#6
Those numbers are pretty typical. For the record, it's best to dyno in the SAME gear between base and test runs, however generally 4th gear or whatever the 1:1 gear is is generally accepted as "the norm".
#7
Possibly they did it in 3rd because that is what is 1:1 in a Civic (they're a Honda shop primarily). Not sure though. Oh well, from what I've gathered it's not that big of a deal, as the most important part is making sure the next run is in 3rd gear as well. Thanks for the input.
Oh yeah, Ryan, we ended up using a resonator, as I got a highflow SS from Vibrant for $50. So hopefully it doesn't sound like a Harley when we're done.
Oh yeah, Ryan, we ended up using a resonator, as I got a highflow SS from Vibrant for $50. So hopefully it doesn't sound like a Harley when we're done.
Trending Topics
#8
#10
Okay, so they said that we probably won't be able to replace the stock heat shield due to lack of bottom bracket that was on the OEM downpipe. Did anyone else have this problem (Ryephile?)? I'm wondering if this is going to be waaay too much heat. We're heat-wrapping as much as we can, but I still wonder if we should try to jimmy the thing to at least cover as much as we can. Also, on the air/fuel ratios, I don't know if we'll be able to do them on the post-TBE run either due to the O2 bung not being available as it will be an extended one (to fake out O2); they're tailpipe sensor is broken.
#11
#12
So I got the car back. First things first: wow, it is loud. Okay, not super loud, but just like Ryan was explaining with his system: loud on engine braking and loud on WOT above 3000rpm.
Build-wise, the quick run-down is 2.5" system, 304SS, no cats, Vibrant high-flow resonator, Magnaflow 3" in dual 2.5" out muffler (had to use a 2.5"-3" adapter because I had already bought the muffler when I thought I was going to build a 3" system), 3.5" polished tips.
So on to the dynos. I'll post the graphs as soon as I can but I'll try to explain all the numbers first. It was kind of a complicated process but I'll streamline the day: they called me after they finished it and dynoed it and told me that with the new system it lost power. I was like "wtf?!?!" so I drove down there. I asked them if they had let it warm up and had Sport button pushed and they said yes. Then I asked if they turned the ignition on/off a few times. They said no but that they had disconnected/reconnected the battery. So I figured we would give that a try and then it got fun. So I restarted the car about 4 times and then we dynoed it. It posted a few hp/tq above stock. Again: a few more. And so on for the next 5 runs. So the end result was a solid 12hp/12tq gain all the way across the power band (peak 189whp/206wtq). These runs were in 3rd gear as I wanted to stick with what the stock dyno was done in. The only thing is, turns out my tires were low on air (I never tended to them with the weather change), so that may account for a couple hp.
As far as the rest of the build goes, the reason we didn't use the stock downpipe bracket for the heatshield is because I wanted to leave my stock system completely intact. So we were able to get the top heat shield back on, but the bottom bracket is hanging loose (it shakes a little but you can't tell or hear it when you're driving. We were unable to get the side heatshield back on, but I may tinker with it in a few days to see what I can do. We did heatwrap the downpipe, so hopefully that somewhat makes up for it.
Sorry Terry, we were unable to do air/fuel ratios. I did however do a 4th gear run and it ended up being the same (I think 1hp/1tq difference). The only thing I'm kind of worried about at this point is what the very bottom of the powerband looks like because the dyno plots start at like 2900rpm. I know that there's not too much more below that, but I'm a city-driver and I really care the most about 1500-3000rpm range. But oh well, I'm pretty sure by the butt dyno that there wasn't the same loss in power that Ryan saw.
So I think that's it. What do you guys think? Any questions I can answer, just go ahead.
Build-wise, the quick run-down is 2.5" system, 304SS, no cats, Vibrant high-flow resonator, Magnaflow 3" in dual 2.5" out muffler (had to use a 2.5"-3" adapter because I had already bought the muffler when I thought I was going to build a 3" system), 3.5" polished tips.
So on to the dynos. I'll post the graphs as soon as I can but I'll try to explain all the numbers first. It was kind of a complicated process but I'll streamline the day: they called me after they finished it and dynoed it and told me that with the new system it lost power. I was like "wtf?!?!" so I drove down there. I asked them if they had let it warm up and had Sport button pushed and they said yes. Then I asked if they turned the ignition on/off a few times. They said no but that they had disconnected/reconnected the battery. So I figured we would give that a try and then it got fun. So I restarted the car about 4 times and then we dynoed it. It posted a few hp/tq above stock. Again: a few more. And so on for the next 5 runs. So the end result was a solid 12hp/12tq gain all the way across the power band (peak 189whp/206wtq). These runs were in 3rd gear as I wanted to stick with what the stock dyno was done in. The only thing is, turns out my tires were low on air (I never tended to them with the weather change), so that may account for a couple hp.
As far as the rest of the build goes, the reason we didn't use the stock downpipe bracket for the heatshield is because I wanted to leave my stock system completely intact. So we were able to get the top heat shield back on, but the bottom bracket is hanging loose (it shakes a little but you can't tell or hear it when you're driving. We were unable to get the side heatshield back on, but I may tinker with it in a few days to see what I can do. We did heatwrap the downpipe, so hopefully that somewhat makes up for it.
Sorry Terry, we were unable to do air/fuel ratios. I did however do a 4th gear run and it ended up being the same (I think 1hp/1tq difference). The only thing I'm kind of worried about at this point is what the very bottom of the powerband looks like because the dyno plots start at like 2900rpm. I know that there's not too much more below that, but I'm a city-driver and I really care the most about 1500-3000rpm range. But oh well, I'm pretty sure by the butt dyno that there wasn't the same loss in power that Ryan saw.
So I think that's it. What do you guys think? Any questions I can answer, just go ahead.
#14
#16
So I got the car back. First things first: wow, it is loud. Okay, not super loud, but just like Ryan was explaining with his system: loud on engine braking and loud on WOT above 3000rpm.
Build-wise, the quick run-down is 2.5" system, 304SS, no cats, Vibrant high-flow resonator, Magnaflow 3" in dual 2.5" out muffler (had to use a 2.5"-3" adapter because I had already bought the muffler when I thought I was going to build a 3" system), 3.5" polished tips.
So on to the dynos. I'll post the graphs as soon as I can but I'll try to explain all the numbers first. It was kind of a complicated process but I'll streamline the day: they called me after they finished it and dynoed it and told me that with the new system it lost power. I was like "wtf?!?!" so I drove down there. I asked them if they had let it warm up and had Sport button pushed and they said yes. Then I asked if they turned the ignition on/off a few times. They said no but that they had disconnected/reconnected the battery. So I figured we would give that a try and then it got fun. So I restarted the car about 4 times and then we dynoed it. It posted a few hp/tq above stock. Again: a few more. And so on for the next 5 runs. So the end result was a solid 12hp/12tq gain all the way across the power band (peak 189whp/206wtq). These runs were in 3rd gear as I wanted to stick with what the stock dyno was done in. The only thing is, turns out my tires were low on air (I never tended to them with the weather change), so that may account for a couple hp.
As far as the rest of the build goes, the reason we didn't use the stock downpipe bracket for the heatshield is because I wanted to leave my stock system completely intact. So we were able to get the top heat shield back on, but the bottom bracket is hanging loose (it shakes a little but you can't tell or hear it when you're driving. We were unable to get the side heatshield back on, but I may tinker with it in a few days to see what I can do. We did heatwrap the downpipe, so hopefully that somewhat makes up for it.
Sorry Terry, we were unable to do air/fuel ratios. I did however do a 4th gear run and it ended up being the same (I think 1hp/1tq difference). The only thing I'm kind of worried about at this point is what the very bottom of the powerband looks like because the dyno plots start at like 2900rpm. I know that there's not too much more below that, but I'm a city-driver and I really care the most about 1500-3000rpm range. But oh well, I'm pretty sure by the butt dyno that there wasn't the same loss in power that Ryan saw.
So I think that's it. What do you guys think? Any questions I can answer, just go ahead.
Build-wise, the quick run-down is 2.5" system, 304SS, no cats, Vibrant high-flow resonator, Magnaflow 3" in dual 2.5" out muffler (had to use a 2.5"-3" adapter because I had already bought the muffler when I thought I was going to build a 3" system), 3.5" polished tips.
So on to the dynos. I'll post the graphs as soon as I can but I'll try to explain all the numbers first. It was kind of a complicated process but I'll streamline the day: they called me after they finished it and dynoed it and told me that with the new system it lost power. I was like "wtf?!?!" so I drove down there. I asked them if they had let it warm up and had Sport button pushed and they said yes. Then I asked if they turned the ignition on/off a few times. They said no but that they had disconnected/reconnected the battery. So I figured we would give that a try and then it got fun. So I restarted the car about 4 times and then we dynoed it. It posted a few hp/tq above stock. Again: a few more. And so on for the next 5 runs. So the end result was a solid 12hp/12tq gain all the way across the power band (peak 189whp/206wtq). These runs were in 3rd gear as I wanted to stick with what the stock dyno was done in. The only thing is, turns out my tires were low on air (I never tended to them with the weather change), so that may account for a couple hp.
As far as the rest of the build goes, the reason we didn't use the stock downpipe bracket for the heatshield is because I wanted to leave my stock system completely intact. So we were able to get the top heat shield back on, but the bottom bracket is hanging loose (it shakes a little but you can't tell or hear it when you're driving. We were unable to get the side heatshield back on, but I may tinker with it in a few days to see what I can do. We did heatwrap the downpipe, so hopefully that somewhat makes up for it.
Sorry Terry, we were unable to do air/fuel ratios. I did however do a 4th gear run and it ended up being the same (I think 1hp/1tq difference). The only thing I'm kind of worried about at this point is what the very bottom of the powerband looks like because the dyno plots start at like 2900rpm. I know that there's not too much more below that, but I'm a city-driver and I really care the most about 1500-3000rpm range. But oh well, I'm pretty sure by the butt dyno that there wasn't the same loss in power that Ryan saw.
So I think that's it. What do you guys think? Any questions I can answer, just go ahead.
#17
The only problem I've had thus far is a weird one: my flat tire light is on. It first came on after we dynoed it so we checked pressures and they were in fact low but after reinflating the tires, it is still on. I even rechecked pressures this morning and they're still fine. May be unrelated, but weird nonetheless.
#19
#21
#22
#23
So here are the dyno graphs. This first one shows the TBE before ECU learning (blue) compared to stock (red). Notice the power loss all the way across the chart.
This one shows the TBE after starting and stopping the engine about 5 times and doing a few runs. Same goes for this one color-wise (stock is red, TBE is blue).
You can see that I gained a hefty amount of both HP and TQ all the way across the powerband. Another interesting point is that stock it took about 5.5 seconds to run through 3rd gear but after the TBE it blazed through the gear in 5.0 seconds. I wish that the graphs started a little earlier but I didn't know at the time that he started catching so late (I guess this is what I get for going to a Honda shop--they're used to only seeing power above 4k). Oh well. What you all think?
This one shows the TBE after starting and stopping the engine about 5 times and doing a few runs. Same goes for this one color-wise (stock is red, TBE is blue).
You can see that I gained a hefty amount of both HP and TQ all the way across the powerband. Another interesting point is that stock it took about 5.5 seconds to run through 3rd gear but after the TBE it blazed through the gear in 5.0 seconds. I wish that the graphs started a little earlier but I didn't know at the time that he started catching so late (I guess this is what I get for going to a Honda shop--they're used to only seeing power above 4k). Oh well. What you all think?
Last edited by ltjpunk7; 02-01-2008 at 11:07 AM.
#24
I think..
you spent a lot of money to ditch a cat, and get a small boost in power and a bit bigger boost in torque.
FWIW, I don't mean this to be a jerk. I too "rolled my own" exhaust for my R53, and it was so friggin noisy that it's next to my shed and the one-ball went back on. I think we both learned that there's more to making a good exhaust than just having one welded up.
If you don't have good design software, there's tons of trial and error to get something good. If you do have good software, there's less trial and error, but still some. Neither of us had good software!
Matt
ps, get a friggin cat for your street car!
FWIW, I don't mean this to be a jerk. I too "rolled my own" exhaust for my R53, and it was so friggin noisy that it's next to my shed and the one-ball went back on. I think we both learned that there's more to making a good exhaust than just having one welded up.
If you don't have good design software, there's tons of trial and error to get something good. If you do have good software, there's less trial and error, but still some. Neither of us had good software!
Matt
ps, get a friggin cat for your street car!
#25
you spent a lot of money to ditch a cat, and get a small boost in power and a bit bigger boost in torque.
FWIW, I don't mean this to be a jerk. I too "rolled my own" exhaust for my R53, and it was so friggin noisy that it's next to my shed and the one-ball went back on. I think we both learned that there's more to making a good exhaust than just having one welded up.
If you don't have good design software, there's tons of trial and error to get something good. If you do have good software, there's less trial and error, but still some. Neither of us had good software!
Matt
ps, get a friggin cat for your street car!
FWIW, I don't mean this to be a jerk. I too "rolled my own" exhaust for my R53, and it was so friggin noisy that it's next to my shed and the one-ball went back on. I think we both learned that there's more to making a good exhaust than just having one welded up.
If you don't have good design software, there's tons of trial and error to get something good. If you do have good software, there's less trial and error, but still some. Neither of us had good software!
Matt
ps, get a friggin cat for your street car!
But I guess this is where I am now, and I'm happy with the gains, so I can't really complain. I suppose the story will go differently in 10 years when I have a little bit more money to spend.