Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Torque steer and 15% pulley

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 07:28 PM
  #1  
ronmichael's Avatar
ronmichael
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Philly, PA
Torque steer and 15% pulley

I have a 2006 MCSCa. Only upgrades are a rear sway bar, the JCW air intake, an M7 strut bar and M7 under strut system. I am thinking of finally getting a 15% reduction pulley from Helix.

My big concern about the upgrade is torque steer. I know the 15% upgrade will introduce torque steer, and that is one thing I can't live with. So is there anything I could do to eliminate it? I've seen some mention of upgrading engine mounts or something other things... which makes me worry that a "cheap" pulley upgrade will lead me to many other expensive upgrades.

I know this has been discussed before (there is a very long thread from 2004) but I thought I'd just ask to see what the general consenus is these days.
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 09:13 PM
  #2  
Ryephile's Avatar
Ryephile
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,009
Likes: 32
From: Metro-Detroit
R53's don't have any appreciable torque steer. I've put down over 250wLb-Ft with my R53 with no torque steer issues at all. No really, I'm serious. The 212wLb-Ft that I had in my R56 however, that was a handful. Slightly different geometries bring havok.

Short story shorter, just install the pulley and enjoy.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 02:04 AM
  #3  
Johan's Avatar
Johan
5th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
From: The Swamp
Originally Posted by ronmichael
My big concern about the upgrade is torque steer. I know the 15% upgrade will introduce torque steer, and that is one thing I can't live with.
my recommendation would be don't do it if you already "know" you can't live with it.

IMO you are not going to get tq steer from what mods you have.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 05:37 AM
  #4  
norm03s's Avatar
norm03s
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 2
From: Ellicott City, Maryland USA
Originally Posted by ronmichael
I have a 2006 MCSCa. Only upgrades are a rear sway bar, the JCW air intake, an M7 strut bar and M7 under strut system. I am thinking of finally getting a 15% reduction pulley from Helix.

My big concern about the upgrade is torque steer. I know the 15% upgrade will introduce torque steer, and that is one thing I can't live with. So is there anything I could do to eliminate it? I've seen some mention of upgrading engine mounts or something other things... which makes me worry that a "cheap" pulley upgrade will lead me to many other expensive upgrades.

I know this has been discussed before (there is a very long thread from 2004) but I thought I'd just ask to see what the general consenus is these days.

I know the 15% upgrade will introduce torque steer
What Ryephile said +1

which makes me worry that a "cheap" pulley upgrade will lead me to many other expensive upgrades.
Looks like your already on that road

upgrades are a rear sway bar, the JCW air intake, an M7 strut bar and M7 under strut system.
Just go to Helix and get the pulley you know you want it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 10:19 AM
  #5  
ronmichael's Avatar
ronmichael
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Philly, PA
Interesting comments so far. Thanks everyone. From what I had read in past threads, it sounded like at least a few people got some noticable torque steer after just the 15% pulley install. But perhaps they had done more that I hadn't realized.

And I suppose if it does create torque steer, I could always have the stock pulley re-installed. But I feel a little less worried that this'll happen.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #6  
Crashton's Avatar
Crashton
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 3
From: Over there on MA
My advice would be to try & find someone local to you with a 15% pulley. Drive that car & see what you think.

My opinion is the 15% didn't give me any additional torque steer. My car is a 2006 6 speed, with LSD.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 12:55 PM
  #7  
RedSkunk's Avatar
RedSkunk
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MINIapolis
Originally Posted by Ryephile
R53's don't have any appreciable torque steer. I've put down over 250wLb-Ft with my R53 with no torque steer issues at all. No really, I'm serious. The 212wLb-Ft that I had in my R56 however, that was a handful. Slightly different geometries bring havok.

Short story shorter, just install the pulley and enjoy.
Key word -> "appreciable." These things have torque steer. The question is how much you're willing to put up with.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #8  
k_h_d's Avatar
k_h_d
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 3
Any front wheel drive car has the potential to exhibit torque steer. If its a problem then get a rear wheel drive car. The mini is great because in straight line it really has no torque steer (if on a level road). In the turns you will feel it more. The R53 needs the pulley. Probably the only reason its not on there from the factory is so Mini can charge for a JCW upgrade that has about a 14%ish pulley on it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 02:06 PM
  #9  
Bradley99's Avatar
Bradley99
3rd Gear
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: 3rd Stone from the Sun
I was reading recently that torque steer occurs when the half shafts are not horizontal. This might happen if the car were lowered. If torque steer were a problem I'd think you'd have experienced it with the stock suspension. A 15% doesn't make that much more power than stock.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 03:17 PM
  #10  
gnatster's Avatar
gnatster
6th Gear
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Bradley99
I was reading recently that torque steer occurs when the half shafts are not horizontal. This might happen if the car were lowered. If torque steer were a problem I'd think you'd have experienced it with the stock suspension. A 15% doesn't make that much more power than stock.
Normal suspension movement would cause the half shafts to move away from horizontal. Torque steer is reduced if the angles are the same, they don't have to be horizontal. The main cause in front engine cars is half shafts being of unequal length.

I had more torque steer with the OEM setup then I do now with a highly modded engine and a Quaife. The LSD really helps with torque steer.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 04:55 PM
  #11  
ATCQL's Avatar
ATCQL
5th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
I agree with Crashton's remarks,i have never experienced this problem with my 05 MCS.Q
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 06:27 PM
  #12  
Ryephile's Avatar
Ryephile
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,009
Likes: 32
From: Metro-Detroit
Originally Posted by RedSkunk
Key word -> "appreciable." These things have torque steer. The question is how much you're willing to put up with.
Go drive any other front driver and you'll come back saying that "appreciable = relatively none". Dodge Omni GLHS, R56, and Neon's all have marked to violent torque steer. If you want to nit pick how negligible the R53's torque steer is, you're better off in a RWD setup.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 08:14 PM
  #13  
polizei's Avatar
polizei
6th Gear
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,398
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
I know my mods are not "crazy" but I feel hardly any tq steer, and that's with needing an alignment! Just do it and you won't regret it... and if you can't deal with little issues, I'm not sure if the MINI is the right car for you.

-Cody
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #14  
MINIMM's Avatar
MINIMM
4th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Texas
I have a 2006 S Auto with a 15%, 380 JCW Injectors, Borla exhaust, lowered, camber plates, etc and I have very little if any torque steer.

That is one of the many things I like about the Mini very little torque steer, at least before the 07's. They are a different story.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #15  
the platform's Avatar
the platform
5th Gear
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 603
Likes: 1
From: too far from Europe!
PUT THE PULLEY ON!
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #16  
RedSkunk's Avatar
RedSkunk
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MINIapolis
Originally Posted by Ryephile
Go drive any other front driver and you'll come back saying that "appreciable = relatively none". Dodge Omni GLHS, R56, and Neon's all have marked to violent torque steer. If you want to nit pick how negligible the R53's torque steer is, you're better off in a RWD setup.
I wasn't nitpicking, I was countering your asinine claim.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 01:30 PM
  #17  
BlimeyCabrio's Avatar
BlimeyCabrio
6th Gear
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,773
Likes: 9
From: Holly Springs, NC
I have very similar mods (less the strut bar) on the same car and tranny... I haven't noticed significant / objectionable torque steer before or after the pulley... It's just pure bliss. You'll be so busy grinning you won't care. Oh yeah, I have MTH tune now also... which does make a bit of difference in smoothness over just the pulley...
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 01:41 PM
  #18  
Jahmills's Avatar
Jahmills
5th Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 646
Likes: 1
From: Illadelphia
Yeah, I never noticed it on my MINI with the 15%, but my little POS Civic that I use as a daily driver has it with it's whopping 127hp.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 05:15 PM
  #19  
MRmidge's Avatar
MRmidge
3rd Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 160
Likes: 1
From: Perkiomenville, Pa
The only time I notice any torque steer is during, extremly hard acceleration from a stop, and and extremely hard braking, but it's only at the very begining of the operation and fades quickly.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 08:56 PM
  #20  
caminifan's Avatar
caminifan
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 4
Here is another with no torque steer. As was posted earlier, torque steer comes from unequal length driveshafts (or, manufacturing sample variations creating a pseudo unequal driveshaft situation). It manifests itself in a turn when you get on the go pedal. I have a 17% s/c reduction pulley on my 2005 MCSa and there is no torque steer. In a previous life, I owned a 1986 VW GTI and it had a serious case of torque steer - get on the go pedal in a turn with that car, and you had a knock down drag-out fight with the steering wheel.

Further edit: If the OP doesn't have torque steer without the s/c reduction pulley, adding the s/c reduction pulley will not in-and-of-itself add torque steer.
 

Last edited by caminifan; Oct 11, 2007 at 09:00 PM. Reason: See Further edit line
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 06:31 AM
  #21  
ronmichael's Avatar
ronmichael
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Philly, PA
The thing is, torque steer is not all about drive shaft lengths. I'm no mechanical expert but if you Google or Wikipedia torque steer you will find many technical explanations that include lots of other factors that contribute to torque steer besides drive shaft lengths.

If you put enough power in the MINI, you will get torque steer.

But it does seem that the common consensus from the board (and from experts like the people at Helix) is that a 15% pulley upgrade won't introduce an appreciable amount of torque steer on a car with few other performance modifications.
 
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 01:13 PM
  #22  
Ryephile's Avatar
Ryephile
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,009
Likes: 32
From: Metro-Detroit
Originally Posted by RedSkunk
I wasn't nitpicking, I was countering your asinine claim.
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
Main Entry: as·i·nine
Pronunciation: 'a-s&-"nIn
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin asininus, from asinus ***
1 : extremely or utterly foolish <an asinine excuse>
2 : of, relating to, or resembling an ***


Claiming my claim is asinine is asinine in itself, ironically.
 

Last edited by Ryephile; Oct 12, 2007 at 08:23 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 11:14 PM
  #23  
caminifan's Avatar
caminifan
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by ronmichael
The thing is, torque steer is not all about drive shaft lengths. I'm no mechanical expert but if you Google or Wikipedia torque steer you will find many technical explanations that include lots of other factors that contribute to torque steer besides drive shaft lengths.

If you put enough power in the MINI, you will get torque steer.

But it does seem that the common consensus from the board (and from experts like the people at Helix) is that a 15% pulley upgrade won't introduce an appreciable amount of torque steer on a car with few other performance modifications.
Just for fun, I Wikipedia'd torque steer. Here is what came back:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torque_steer

Under Root causes, the first bullet lists different driveshaft length.

Under Ways to reduce the effect of torque steer, the first bullet lists using an intermediate shaft to get both driveshafts to be equal in length.

What do you propose as an alternative source for torque steer in the MINI?
 

Last edited by caminifan; Oct 12, 2007 at 11:15 PM. Reason: Spelling error
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #24  
ronmichael's Avatar
ronmichael
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Philly, PA
Did you just read the first bullet point of each section? The list of causes has driveshaft length as the first item. But there are more. And the list of remedies includes equal driveshaft length as well as others.

Plus it's Wikipedia. I'm sure at some point that article probably claimed that torque steer was caused by gremlins.

Read the entire article. And Google the issue and look at other sources. At the very least, read the posts here from people with MINIs that do exhibit torque steer. If drive shaft length was the only factor, there should be no way to get a first gen MINI to exhibit torque steer - but lots of people can testify that you can get torque steer on a MINI. Even in stock form you get some torque steer, just very very minimally and only under extreme circumstances.
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #25  
ronmichael's Avatar
ronmichael
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Philly, PA
PS - also take note of this line in Wikipedia:

So the equal length of the driveshafts reduce the torque steer effect.

Notice the word REDUCE not eliminate.

And again, take notice of all the other bullet items in Causes and Remedies.

I knew this thread was going to end this way. Ugh.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:38 PM.