Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R56) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain M7 AGS-R Cold Air Intake

Old Sep 21, 2007 | 09:51 PM
  #26  
e30r56's Avatar
e30r56
4th Gear
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Lanham, MD
It's also not "just" a cold air intake. It is a well designed and tested ram air intake.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2007 | 11:12 AM
  #27  
SuwaneeM3's Avatar
SuwaneeM3
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta,GA
i dont know if there is such a thing as "ram air" for fuel injected cars... more so for turbo charged engines.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2007 | 04:04 PM
  #28  
bradchatellier's Avatar
bradchatellier
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Would the AGS-R CAI be compatible with (and a suitable upgrade for) a R56 with the JCW Engine Tuning Kit? It just seems so well designed, I'm kinda salivating.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 06:46 AM
  #29  
a96bimmerm3's Avatar
a96bimmerm3
5th Gear
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 603
Likes: 1
From: Aventura, Florida
Originally Posted by bradchatellier
Would the AGS-R CAI be compatible with (and a suitable upgrade for) a R56 with the JCW Engine Tuning Kit? It just seems so well designed, I'm kinda salivating.
I'm gonna go out ona limb and say yes, because it replaces the airbox. But now you've paid $2000 for JCW and another $600+ for an intake. :impatient

Can we see more pics of the underside of the airbox?
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 07:54 AM
  #30  
e30r56's Avatar
e30r56
4th Gear
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Lanham, MD
Originally Posted by SuwaneeM3
i dont know if there is such a thing as "ram air" for fuel injected cars... more so for turbo charged engines.
Why not? The air is being "rammed" directly into the filter via a scoop. I don't really see that big of a difference between this and a carbed muscle car of old. Both will suck air in just fine on their own, but benefit from cool air having a straight shot to the filter.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 08:07 AM
  #31  
JustJAY's Avatar
JustJAY
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 1
From: MD
Man, that is just HOT. To bad M7 can't make something like that for the old Rs that could tie into the side air intake. Nice job.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 09:05 AM
  #32  
dirkinoff's Avatar
dirkinoff
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: PDX, OR.
VERY nice! But Sweet jebus That thing is crazy money!! To rich for my blood, Very nice though.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 03:44 PM
  #33  
isellem's Avatar
isellem
5th Gear
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 2
From: out and aboot
Originally Posted by e30r56
Why not? The air is being "rammed" directly into the filter via a scoop. I don't really see that big of a difference between this and a carbed muscle car of old. Both will suck air in just fine on their own, but benefit from cool air having a straight shot to the filter.

thats becuase you don't understand how a turbocharger works...

raming air into a turbo is alot like peeing in the ocean... sure... it makes a differnce... but its pretty minute in the grand scheme of things...

also all of that lovely "cold ram air" is superheated when being compressed in the incredibly HOT turbo. This is why it is most important to have a very efficent intercooler as opposed to a cold air intake... because its more important to control the air that actually enters the engine... than to control the air that enters the turbo.
 
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 06:20 AM
  #34  
Gardus's Avatar
Gardus
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 115
Likes: 4
isellem what you're saying it's true, but it's also true that it's better to have less air restriction and a bigger filtering area, so the turbo can suck a bit better... and if the air it's colder is also better, even if the gain is less than in a NA engine.

I think that with a turbo/supercharged engine the engine scoop is more effective if used for the intercooler, like in the mk1 MCS and the Impreza, but using it for the filter is not a so bad idea, look at all the turbocharged car that run in amateur drag races, without a headlight so the filter can breath thru it, or at the BBR 300hp turbocharged mk1 MCS, with that big filter over the engine behind the scoop, and it's still one of the fastest mini.

Of course in terms of perfomarcance a bigger turbo or a more efficient intercooler is a lot more effective.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 06:04 AM
  #35  
MiniMacPR's Avatar
MiniMacPR
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: San Juan, PR
Originally Posted by cooldaddy
to proof it's indeed the best performing intake as stated? That would be nice... it looks well thought out though
Originally Posted by M7
. We will have some datalogging graphs to share very soon with temperature deltas that will show why keeping the intake charge cool is of major importance.


Peter
M7 Tuning
562-608-8123
Originally Posted by joshK
When can we see some before/after dyno numbers? I've seen the 4 intakes that are out for the R56 and the only actual numbers I've seen have been from Alta and Gruppe M (although even with those kits, I would like to see before/after WHP numbers - stock and intake only - on the same graph).

I'll be waiting to choose the intake I'll be going with until I see numbers. This one looks great though. I'm hoping it has the numbers to match the looks :0)
Originally Posted by umterp08
wow, look at that thing. Its great. I cant wait to see some numbers.
Originally Posted by M7
Hello...

We will have all the numbers that are expected from us and more.
With that said real world numbers will clarify how effective the
this system is on the road. Airflow is the secret to getting the most
out of the AGS-R but not everything.......

Peter
M7 tuning
562-608-8123
Originally Posted by a96bimmerm3
This thread is useless without numbers.... and some pics of the parts dissasembled.
Originally Posted by rattmobbins
Whatev dude. Why did you even waste the time to post that? Especially after they JUST posted saying the numbers would be up soon? :impatient

BUMP for numbers!
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #36  
M7's Avatar
M7
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 2
From: los angeles
Hi there...

Nardo is currently working on a CAN-Bus interface tying in all the
in car sensors etc.
We will have more soon.

Peter
M7 Tuning
562-608-8123
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 12:10 AM
  #37  
isellem's Avatar
isellem
5th Gear
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 2
From: out and aboot
Originally Posted by Gardus
isellem what you're saying it's true, but it's also true that it's better to have less air restriction and a bigger filtering area, so the turbo can suck a bit better... and if the air it's colder is also better, even if the gain is less than in a NA engine.

I think that with a turbo/supercharged engine the engine scoop is more effective if used for the intercooler, like in the mk1 MCS and the Impreza, but using it for the filter is not a so bad idea, look at all the turbocharged car that run in amateur drag races, without a headlight so the filter can breath thru it, or at the BBR 300hp turbocharged mk1 MCS, with that big filter over the engine behind the scoop, and it's still one of the fastest mini.

Of course in terms of perfomarcance a bigger turbo or a more efficient intercooler is a lot more effective.
while you are correct and that it is effective. The removal of a headlight on a drag car is for that last ounce of power, that extreme move to remove even more weight and possibly get something else extra out of it. Also, drag turbo cars do not run airfilters... they often run just a mesh screen over the inlet.

My argument, which i personanlly think you understand and are relating to in the last sentance of your post, is that the time, effort/energy and money spent on this is better spent elsewhere on the engine. i haven't read it for myself yet but i have been told that this system makes about 7hp... now compare that to mike4572s intake for 55 dollars.

or spend that 600 bucks or so and spend it on an intercooler and you will get ALOT more out of it that out of a so called "ram air" system (that admittedly by m7 doesn' really make a big differnce)
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 05:20 AM
  #38  
PGT's Avatar
PGT
Banned
iTrader: (11)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: DC Metro
the intercooler is more important to giving the car a cool intake charge than any air filter system...it's forced induction after all (ram air is not > the turbo's ability to suck air in). most OEM systems are plenty capable to well beyond stock power levels if a hi-flow filter is put in the stock airbox. it will be nice to see some hard data showing M7 has outdone BMW engineers.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 05:49 AM
  #39  
a96bimmerm3's Avatar
a96bimmerm3
5th Gear
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 603
Likes: 1
From: Aventura, Florida
Any worry about the front part of the intake melting? Its right over the turbo and heat shield, just a thought. Screw the can bus lets dyno the car

Have fun!
Josh
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 05:58 AM
  #40  
PGT's Avatar
PGT
Banned
iTrader: (11)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: DC Metro
a dyno doesn't begin to approximate real world driving conditions with respect to something like an intake or intercooler. you'd need a proper dyno room setup

Originally Posted by Gale Banks
A properly engineered, fully instrumented dyno cell costs at least one million dollars. An engine dyno cell with full emissions equipment costs around $2.5 million. Dyno test cells at this level of accuracy are found at GM, Ford, Daimler-Chrysler, CAT, Cummins, and International to name a few. Aftermarket companies rarely have this level of equipment.
http://bankspower.com/im_DieselPower_db_sum05.cfm
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #41  
Gardus's Avatar
Gardus
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 115
Likes: 4
Well maybe if you don't use the scoop a cooper bonnet could be better...less drag, and in my opinion, it even looks better.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #42  
Gardus's Avatar
Gardus
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 115
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by PGT
a dyno doesn't begin to approximate real world driving conditions with respect to something like an intake or intercooler. you'd need a proper dyno room setup



http://bankspower.com/im_DieselPower_db_sum05.cfm
I think the acceleration times, even with a stopwatch and looking at the tacho, are often more reliable than a dyno.

Try a 50-90 kph in 2nd or 90-130 in 3rd, or the 0-160 kph... When you have seconds of difference, then you know the money were well spent.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #43  
a96bimmerm3's Avatar
a96bimmerm3
5th Gear
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 603
Likes: 1
From: Aventura, Florida
Originally Posted by PGT
a dyno doesn't begin to approximate real world driving conditions with respect to something like an intake or intercooler. you'd need a proper dyno room setup



http://bankspower.com/im_DieselPower_db_sum05.cfm
Granted, but given a baseline it gives you a pretty good idea and an easily quantifiable power number for not a retarded amount of money. If you want to test the intake or IC just blow a LOT of air on the front of the car. Should be fine. Theres no replacement for real world testing but unfortunately you cant quantify very much. Need an F1 style rolling road, which I don't have the money to rent!

Back to the topic. Any idea if the front part of the intake would melt? And other pics of the components we cant see?
 

Last edited by a96bimmerm3; Sep 30, 2007 at 05:12 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 05:20 AM
  #44  
MiniMacPR's Avatar
MiniMacPR
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: San Juan, PR
Originally Posted by Gardus
Well maybe if you don't use the scoop a cooper bonnet could be better...less drag, and in my opinion, it even looks better.

Wouldn't that just defeat the purpose of this thread?
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 09:48 AM
  #45  
maxmini's Avatar
maxmini
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 9
From: L.A ca
Originally Posted by a96bimmerm3
Any worry about the front part of the intake melting? Its right over the turbo and heat shield, just a thought. Screw the can bus lets dyno the car

Have fun!
Josh
We have a new product coming that will address that issue as well. We first noticed this problem when our stock scoop showed signs of deformation due to heat after a very hot test session. The prototype piece has been signed off on and we will be showing that shortly. It will work with all r-56 turbo applications.
Regarding dyno testing , as this item works primarily with the rush of incoming cool air it's benefits will be harder to detect. I'm not saying it will not get dynoed, we are just not looking for much in that particular type of test.

Randy
M7 Tuning
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #46  
-Vampyre-'s Avatar
-Vampyre-
3rd Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Orlando Florida
Can i buy one yet?
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #47  
MiniMacPR's Avatar
MiniMacPR
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: San Juan, PR
Originally Posted by MiniMacPR
BUMP for numbers!
B U M P
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 07:42 PM
  #48  
M7's Avatar
M7
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 2
From: los angeles
Thank you for waiting and not making a stink.....

The issue is SEMA, yes SEMA is big-time for my composite shop who is taking all the resources from small guys like me, and giving them to the big boys (read Honda, Toyota, and Nissan). But with that said I have been promissed lay-up time next week...so cross your fingers.


Peter
M7 Tuning
562-608-8123
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 08:51 PM
  #49  
andyde's Avatar
andyde
5th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 760
Likes: 1
From: Houston
[quote=M7;1757638]

.. I will make the next intake in Mellow Yellow with a CF
top cover.

(slow turning head-Matrix style)... that looks AWESOME!

I am now getting depressed..........which mod do I do first..
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2007 | 10:53 AM
  #50  
n1tr0's Avatar
n1tr0
5th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 5
From: WA
so ?
any updates, just got my latest issue of MC2, first page, wham, there it is.
of course I still don't see any numbers or it listed on your site. I don't see the intercooler diverter/funnel on your site either.
nice oem look, the fiberglass unit sounds like a fair price, similar to the ddm unit, but what are you working on to protect it from being cooked by the turbo ?
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 PM.