D Stock 05/06 MCS G-Stock alignment question
#1
05/06 MCS G-Stock alignment question
Hi all
Recently purchased an 06 MCS and will be autocrossing it. I've read all the alignment setup posts, and have decided to run:
Front: 1/16 toe out, whatever neg. camber I can get (since no adjustment available anyway)
Rear: as little neg. camber as possible (which should be doable with the new 05/06 adjustment bolt on the rear)
However, I have heard people say to run no toe, toe in, AND toe out on the rear and am thoroughly confused about what to do. Suggestions on rear toe settings and what those settings would do to the handling characteristics of the car on the street and the autocross?
Thanks in advance
Recently purchased an 06 MCS and will be autocrossing it. I've read all the alignment setup posts, and have decided to run:
Front: 1/16 toe out, whatever neg. camber I can get (since no adjustment available anyway)
Rear: as little neg. camber as possible (which should be doable with the new 05/06 adjustment bolt on the rear)
However, I have heard people say to run no toe, toe in, AND toe out on the rear and am thoroughly confused about what to do. Suggestions on rear toe settings and what those settings would do to the handling characteristics of the car on the street and the autocross?
Thanks in advance
#2
For auto-x toe-out makes the car loose, rear rotates more. The rear toe has alot to do with how loose you want the car and how much negative camber you end up with in the rear. Some get less than -1.0, some do not. Less camber better rotation. End up with more than -1.0 you might want some toe-out for rotation. O toe is a good start and play with tire PSI for rotation and if you can't get enough for your liking then try some toe-out. I can't see any reason for toe-in on the rear on a front wheel drive car. With rear wheel it lets you get on the power a little earlier on corner exit. Hopefully someone else will chime in on some reason for toe-in on front wheel drive.
As far as the street. Toe in or out will add some more wear on tires, nothing substantial. Driving: it's the toe-out on the front you will notice. Car tramlining, pulling to right or left with the grooves of the road surface. 1/16 though shouldn't be a bother. The rear I doubt you will notice. Okay, let's say you hit a big bump, rear tires un-weight, when they come back down you might feel the rear hop a little (very, very little) to right or left.
You might be surprised how strange your car came from the factory. My car on the front was toe-in on one side and toe-out on the other.
Hope this helps in getting you some more feedback.
--Tom
As far as the street. Toe in or out will add some more wear on tires, nothing substantial. Driving: it's the toe-out on the front you will notice. Car tramlining, pulling to right or left with the grooves of the road surface. 1/16 though shouldn't be a bother. The rear I doubt you will notice. Okay, let's say you hit a big bump, rear tires un-weight, when they come back down you might feel the rear hop a little (very, very little) to right or left.
You might be surprised how strange your car came from the factory. My car on the front was toe-in on one side and toe-out on the other.
Hope this helps in getting you some more feedback.
--Tom
#3
After a year of autocrossing, I finally had my HS Mini aligned about a month ago. I asked the tech at the shop that does a lot of race/autocross work to give me as much negative camber in front as possible, as little as possible in back, and 1/8" toe out in front and 1/32" toe out in back. The alignment improved my times by at least a couple of tenths, and didn't make the car any more difficult to drive on the street. Removing negative camber in back and adding toe out helps the car rotate for autocrossing. I may experiment with some more toe out in back in the future, but I really like the alignment I have for now.
FWIW I wasn't able to get any more negative camber in front (about -.5° on both sides), but they did take out about half a degree of negative camber in back. The car had toe in at all four corners from the factory.
Some of the conflicting opinions may come from the fact that some people on NAM primarily autocross their cars, and others primarily open track their cars (and most people simply drive them vigorously on the street). The ideal alignment for an autocross will leave the car set up a lot more "loose" than the ideal alignment for a Mini that is driven at triple digit speeds on a race track.
-Keith
FWIW I wasn't able to get any more negative camber in front (about -.5° on both sides), but they did take out about half a degree of negative camber in back. The car had toe in at all four corners from the factory.
Some of the conflicting opinions may come from the fact that some people on NAM primarily autocross their cars, and others primarily open track their cars (and most people simply drive them vigorously on the street). The ideal alignment for an autocross will leave the car set up a lot more "loose" than the ideal alignment for a Mini that is driven at triple digit speeds on a race track.
-Keith
#4
4th Gear
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your alignment guy couldn't get any more camber in the front because it's not adjustable. Echo echo echo
I autocross (MCS/GS) and my set-up is: (me in the drivers seat)
Front left = camber:-1.0 Toe:1/8" out
Front right = camber:-0.9 Toe:1/8" out
Rear left = camber:-0.6 Toe:1/32 out
Rear right = camber:-0.7 Toe:1/32 out
The car is great on course. It turns in very well and is much better through sweepers than with the factory alignment, which was all over the place. I have, however, seen quite a difference in tire wear on the front. The inside edges wear much quicker. I'm going to go with 1/16 toe out when I align it next time and maybe closer to 0.0 toe in the rear. I would also add that getting your tire presures correct is as big a factor as the alignment. I run 42 in the front and anywhere from 51-55 psi in the rear. Those high presures in the rear tires sounded way too high, until I tried it. Now I can lift throttle just a little to tighten my line or lift completely and bring the rear end around as far as I want. Also, I seem to get less wheel spin with higher presure in the rears. I guess that's because when you add presure you are effectively increasing the spring rate.
My $.02
I autocross (MCS/GS) and my set-up is: (me in the drivers seat)
Front left = camber:-1.0 Toe:1/8" out
Front right = camber:-0.9 Toe:1/8" out
Rear left = camber:-0.6 Toe:1/32 out
Rear right = camber:-0.7 Toe:1/32 out
The car is great on course. It turns in very well and is much better through sweepers than with the factory alignment, which was all over the place. I have, however, seen quite a difference in tire wear on the front. The inside edges wear much quicker. I'm going to go with 1/16 toe out when I align it next time and maybe closer to 0.0 toe in the rear. I would also add that getting your tire presures correct is as big a factor as the alignment. I run 42 in the front and anywhere from 51-55 psi in the rear. Those high presures in the rear tires sounded way too high, until I tried it. Now I can lift throttle just a little to tighten my line or lift completely and bring the rear end around as far as I want. Also, I seem to get less wheel spin with higher presure in the rears. I guess that's because when you add presure you are effectively increasing the spring rate.
My $.02
#5
#6
Originally Posted by Wiggles
Your alignment guy couldn't get any more camber in the front because it's not adjustable. Echo echo echo
-Keith
#7
4th Gear
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TomA
Wiggles
Did you have to do anything to get that front camber, loosen a few bolts and retighten? I've got -.2 and -.3 in the front by one shop and was told by another that I had positive camber on the driver's side.
Tire psi 710s 42-44F to 52-54R.
--Tom
Did you have to do anything to get that front camber, loosen a few bolts and retighten? I've got -.2 and -.3 in the front by one shop and was told by another that I had positive camber on the driver's side.
Tire psi 710s 42-44F to 52-54R.
--Tom
Trending Topics
#8
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AZN Optics
Interior/Exterior Products
0
08-21-2015 02:02 PM
minipopkart
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
2
08-13-2015 05:22 AM