Cooper (non S) Modifications specific to the MINI Cooper (R50).

Cooper Power To Weight Ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 11:06 PM
  #26  
RandyBMC's Avatar
RandyBMC
Temporarily Banned
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,382
Likes: 2
From: Denver
Absolutely. This is one of the reasons I settled on the 16" wheel as opposed to a 17 or 18. I really get in depth on the phone when I discuss this point with folks. I will even be going to get a 15 for SCCA stuff to keep the weight farthest from the center of the hub as low as possible. The Hoosier helps in this regard as well - they are very light.

For cost to weight to performance ratios, I have developed the 16" tire/wheel package on my website. This has been tested extensively on the track and at the autocross course.

Check out the success we had this weekend over on the Racing and Competition forum :smile: .
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 01:38 AM
  #27  
Kohu'ulaMINI's Avatar
Kohu'ulaMINI
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: MINIlani,HI
Another weight shedding idea for the Cooper;
Remove the spare tire and tool kit.
Lightening the nut behind the wheel via Jerod Subway diet is a little more difficult.

For autocrossing, use light weight 15" wheels (to remain in stock class) and sticky tires.
My last 2 auto-X cars had 13" wheels, better for launching off the gate.

Does anyone have 15" holeys for sale?
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 02:23 AM
  #28  
LaBoy_Mini's Avatar
LaBoy_Mini
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Beverly Hills
Thank you 0_MINI for the info and a very good one too.
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 02:35 AM
  #29  
LaBoy_Mini's Avatar
LaBoy_Mini
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Beverly Hills
Point taken 0_MINI

Posted: Apr 14, 2003 - 04:40 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The issue becomes the fact that when you lose the weight on the Cooper, the person with an S still has that option as well...

I like the Cooper and the S - both are great cars and both serve different purposes, but the S is a better performance foundation, for several reasons.

1. The larger swaybars and slightly higher rate springs
2. The additional 48 horsepower
3. The supercharger whine
4. The aftermarket availablity of S vs. Cooper effective modifications
5. The Getrag 6 speed gearbox
6. Dark Silver
7. Did I mention the additional 48 horsepower?

The 130 hp goal seems pretty reasonable - but it will take a full exhaust, an intake, and some good luck. 140 will be tough without going to the head and cam.

The other issue relates to #4. The aftermarket for the Cooper is a much tougher proposition, as the Cooper is pretty well optimized stock from the numbers we've seen. You really can't get that nuch out of it with the exhaust for example - maybe 6 horsepower or so. Compared to the S numbers of 10-13 horspower, you start to see that not only are there more options for the S, but they are more effective as well. For instance, after all of your weight reduction and horsepower increases on the Cooper, you may be able to get down to 16/1 or so, but factor in a hot rod S, like mine, which has roughly 210 hp at the flywheel and weighs 2648 lbs - 12.6lbs/hp!

Hope that helps.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Randy, you don't play fair!

Of course it's not possible to dispute any of your points except #6!!

I think some of us relish the challenge of getting more performance out of the Cooper. I also think there is a purity and simplicity to the Cooper that the S does not possess. Given that the MINI mod market is in its infancy, I hope for more significant gains for the Cooper as the aftermarket matures.

The goal is to sneek up on an unsuspecting (stock ) S and show it tail lights!! :smile: :smile: :smile:
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 09:27 PM
  #30  
Vollgas's Avatar
Vollgas
6th Gear
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL
Weight reductions for R50
Aftermarket seats, stock seats 52lbs, sparcos 38lbs.
Battery, go to Braille.
Brake calipers, stock very heavy, wilwoods very light.
RSD
CF hood & hatch back.
Wheels
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 07:39 AM
  #31  
NH_MCS's Avatar
NH_MCS
3rd Gear
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 167
Likes: 3
From: NH
This has to the take the cake for reviving an old thread. However it's still as relevant today as it was 8 years ago.
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 09:46 AM
  #32  
rjtrout2000's Avatar
rjtrout2000
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by NH_MCS
This has to the take the cake for reviving an old thread. However it's still as relevant today as it was 8 years ago.

Absolutely! I have a plan to lighten the R50 this summer:
  1. Remove Rear Seat (35 pounds)
  2. Remove Spare tire and tool kit (40 pounds)
  3. Swap for Sparco Sprint seats (net savings of 40 pounds for the seats)
  4. Braille Battery (done already, have the 9 pounder)
  5. Removed the S-lites and roll the flik Arctic (25 pounds per to 16.5 pounds per)
That is a savings of about 150 pounds total. I lightened the nut behind the wheel by about 40 pounds this year so, the Mini should be good to go!
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2021 | 08:59 PM
  #33  
Barry Lawson's Avatar
Barry Lawson
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
[QjoOTE=6f7;101043]>>(less weight than run flats !)
<<

I found that the weights of the 205/45/17 Pirelli runflats and the 205/45/17 Yokohama AVS are both: ~22lbs

Do you have different numbers?

No

_________________
No[/QUOTE]
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mini_r53
Suspension
54
May 29, 2015 11:49 AM
amazingrando
General MINI Talk
6
Jun 7, 2007 04:44 PM
Loosemosse
Drivetrain (Cooper S)
49
Apr 17, 2006 03:17 PM
SMKKVK
Drivetrain (Cooper S)
1
May 15, 2004 05:37 PM
dave
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
20
Jan 8, 2004 07:15 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:45 PM.