Suspension alignment settings recommendations for autox
#1
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
alignment settings recommendations for autox
My car has the following suspension mods:
h sport camber plates
Alta rear sway bar 22mm
h sport rear control arms
stock r53 sport suspension struts and springs
17" yoko es100
what alignment setting would improve handling for autox?
thinking about close to -2.0 camber upfront to start with...
h sport camber plates
Alta rear sway bar 22mm
h sport rear control arms
stock r53 sport suspension struts and springs
17" yoko es100
what alignment setting would improve handling for autox?
thinking about close to -2.0 camber upfront to start with...
#2
My car has the following suspension mods:
h sport camber plates
Alta rear sway bar 22mm
h sport rear control arms
stock r53 sport suspension struts and springs
17" yoko es100
what alignment setting would improve handling for autox?
thinking about close to -2.0 camber upfront to start with...
h sport camber plates
Alta rear sway bar 22mm
h sport rear control arms
stock r53 sport suspension struts and springs
17" yoko es100
what alignment setting would improve handling for autox?
thinking about close to -2.0 camber upfront to start with...
front:
camber (fixed) 1.7 deg, 1.4 deg front (would use -2.0 with adjustables)
total toe zero
rear:
camber -1 to -1.2
total toe .18 deg. in
I use these for road driving as well; I am running STX class with a very small club, so I do not have much competition. I don't feel like compromising road stability with a more extreme setup that would give slightly quicker times. A slightly faster setup would use more toe-out in front, and near zero toe in rear. If you are using R tires, probably more front camber would help.
#4
Front camber as much negative as you can (probably about -2.2deg). Max possible probably won't be the same on both sides, so get all you can while keeping them even. The limiting factor will be the springs running into the inside of the wheel well. Going to 2.5" diameter springs (I've done it, as did the GRM article) allows a greater range of adjustment. -3deg or more is great in sweepers, but I found that on our surfaces and courses my traction for accelerating and braking was compromised too much so I dialed it back a touch (-2.8) Your mileage may vary.
Rear I'd start with about -1.6 to -1.8 depending on how much rotation you like. Less rear camber will translate to more rotation. You've already got the larger bar on the rear, so I prefered -2.2F, -1.8R when I was using stock style barrel shaped springs up front. That gave the car a very planted feel that tracked well in quick transitions (typical courses in our local regions have plenty of slaloms and garages) but could still be made to rotate well for turns and tighter turns. You may prefer something else.
For toe, I used to put 25K miles a year on when street driving before I got a DD beater, so I always went for 0 toe front and rear. Toe is what chews up tires if you get aggressive with settings, much more so than camber. Again, this resulted in handling that worked well for me. If you don't think the car turns in fast enough, then you might try a little toe out up front (1/8" to 1/4", the latter being pretty aggressive relative to tire wear). If you do high speed track days, you might consider just a touch of toe in at the rear to make the car a little more stable.
That should get you to a good starting point. Have fun!
Scott
90SM
Rear I'd start with about -1.6 to -1.8 depending on how much rotation you like. Less rear camber will translate to more rotation. You've already got the larger bar on the rear, so I prefered -2.2F, -1.8R when I was using stock style barrel shaped springs up front. That gave the car a very planted feel that tracked well in quick transitions (typical courses in our local regions have plenty of slaloms and garages) but could still be made to rotate well for turns and tighter turns. You may prefer something else.
For toe, I used to put 25K miles a year on when street driving before I got a DD beater, so I always went for 0 toe front and rear. Toe is what chews up tires if you get aggressive with settings, much more so than camber. Again, this resulted in handling that worked well for me. If you don't think the car turns in fast enough, then you might try a little toe out up front (1/8" to 1/4", the latter being pretty aggressive relative to tire wear). If you do high speed track days, you might consider just a touch of toe in at the rear to make the car a little more stable.
That should get you to a good starting point. Have fun!
Scott
90SM
#5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ebowling
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
90
08-04-2019 09:15 AM
AZN Optics
Interior/Exterior Products
0
08-21-2015 02:02 PM
minipopkart
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
2
08-13-2015 05:22 AM