Suspension Springs, struts, coilovers, sway-bars, camber plates, and all other modifications to suspension components for Cooper (R50), Cabrio (R52), and Cooper S (R53) MINIs.

Suspension Who has autoX'd on progressive springs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #26  
jasonsmf's Avatar
jasonsmf
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Elyria, Ohio
I have used both progressive rate and linear rate on my car for autox. The car was terrible on the progressive springs, it would turn in nice, but as the the car settled on the springs, it would go into snap oversteer. Ask anyone who watched me at the MOTD autox this year....Honestly, I wasn't trying to put on a drift show! Same exact setup, with linear springs made the car 10X nicer to drive, and much faster.

FWIW, in addition to linear springs, I am also running r-compound tires, a 22mm rear bar and roughly 2.25 deg negative camber up front. I use all three adjustment positions on the rear bar, depending on the conditions of the autox course. Playing with the rear bar and tire pressures, I can make the car an oversteering beast or a tame driver with some lift throttle oversteer.
Jason
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 04:42 PM
  #27  
Z06C5R's Avatar
Z06C5R
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: IA
Originally Posted by jasonsmf
as the the car settled on the springs, it would go into snap oversteer.
That's kinda what I was thinking would happen... The final rate on H-sport springs is over 50% more than front. Definitely don't want that if it's anything like you describe.

I wonder why more people don't make linear springs? Cheaper to make, safer to drive on, better handling characteristics...
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #28  
JustGo4It_'s Avatar
JustGo4It_
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA.
Coil overs is the answer if you are looking for ultimate adjust ability. A waste of money for a street car. Alignment, sway bar and shock settings can cure your under steer. A little toe out in the rear and stiffer compression helps your rotation. Softening your front bar gives you better corner exit bite and cures the push. The end result is a well balanced car.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 06:55 AM
  #29  
Z06C5R's Avatar
Z06C5R
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: IA
CO's certainly would be the ultimate answer, but I just don't have the funds. And it'd be mostly wasted too, since the car will probably see no more than a handful of autoX events each season.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 09:29 PM
  #30  
markldriskill's Avatar
markldriskill
5th Gear
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 824
Likes: 1
From: Long Beach, CA
Originally Posted by Z06C5R
Forgive me, but I must admit I'm pretty biased. It's just that I've forged my driving style on RWD and oversteer... I like to be able to turn the car with the gas, so it really irks me when a car little other than plow (*cough Subaru cough*...). HOWEVER, if I can get good lift-throttle rotation, I'll likely be pretty well dialed in to drive the car as-is... My primary autoX car is unfortunately plagued with an open diff, so I actually end up using mostly lift throttle to rotate the thing anyhow, despite the fact that it's RWD.

So yes, ignore my anti-FWD narrowmindedness. I'm sure that will all go away as soon as get to really test the limits of this thing.
If I disliked driving the MINI, I think I would get something else as soon as I could. Save yourself some headaches. Sell the MINI to someone who wants it, and get yourself a Miata or ___(?).

You just sound like you have been or want be a roadster (read "engine-behind-the-FWs-and-RWD") guy. Nothing wrong with that. Every configuration has strengths and weaknesses. And every driver has preferences. Why should you drive around (on the street or AutoX or anywhere) in a car you don't like driving?
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 10:08 PM
  #31  
Some Guy's Avatar
Some Guy
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 11
From: CT
Come to the CARTCT AX on the 19th and learn, it doesn't plow super bad, especially if you jack up the pressure on the rear tires.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #32  
Z06C5R's Avatar
Z06C5R
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: IA
It's certainly not that I don't enjoy driving the MINI - In fact I'd even venture to say that I enjoy driving it as much as my pride-and-joy 240Z that was built largely with my own 2 hands. It's just that I've never associated FWD with high performance is all. Based on what I've experienced thus far, this car is going to be a real eye-opener.

Case-and-point: I was getting on one of my favorite on-ramps the other evening, and I predictably found myself going way too fast (seems to happen a lot in this car...). I didn't have a chance to glance over at the spedo, but I was probably 10mph faster than my established "safe" speed for this particular corner. As I started into the corner, I could really feel the front end of the car loading up, and I was just waiting for it to start to slide. I didn't want to brake as that would have upset the chassis for sure, so I just gently rolled off the throttle to let a little speed bleed off. To my great surprise, the rear of the car actually started to rotate just a weeee bit. Needless to say, I was impressed. Even my RWD cars probably would have understeered momentarily in that situation. 22mm RSB FTW!

I'll have to do some experimentation in a safer environment, like autoX, but thus far things look promising! This chassis definetly seems to produce a lot of overall grip...
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #33  
txwerks's Avatar
txwerks
Banned
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
Originally Posted by Z06C5R
This chassis definetly seems to produce a lot of overall grip...
Oh man, you can generate a LOT of grip - we routinely see 1.2's sustained on street tires and 1.45 G's on r-comps. And, one of our customers has seen 1.7 G's on r-comps at Road Atlanta...
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 07:45 PM
  #34  
Z06C5R's Avatar
Z06C5R
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: IA
1.2G sustained on street tires? With what suspension setup? That's almost Elise-level grip! Damn!
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 08:51 PM
  #35  
mini_macky's Avatar
mini_macky
5th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
so, in an autoX, you get faster time with linear springs compared to progressive because of the predictability of linear springs/
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 09:04 PM
  #36  
Z06C5R's Avatar
Z06C5R
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: IA
The predictability should theoretically make the car easier to drive... Which basically means you have the potential to make it go faster without an increased risk of loosing control.

At least that's what I've gotten from this thread thus far.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #37  
mini_macky's Avatar
mini_macky
5th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Z06C5R: yeah, keyword being theoretically. i guess it would be too far fetched to ask someone who has tried his/her Mini in an autoX using progressive AND linear springs in the same day (swapping springs at the event itself) for a real comparison when it comes to lap times

is it that obvious that i have progressive springs in my Mini? Eibach pro-kit springs (in my Mini), H&R and Tein are the options available to Mini owners here in the Philippines
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 06:24 AM
  #38  
txwerks's Avatar
txwerks
Banned
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
Originally Posted by Z06C5R
1.2G sustained on street tires? With what suspension setup? That's almost Elise-level grip! Damn!
Every suspension part we have... our coilovers, camber plates, adjustable endlinks, rear swaybar, etc.

Cornerweighted - 50/50 cross
-2.7 degrees camber front
-1.5 degrees camber rear
0 toe front
slight toe in rear

225/45R16 Hankook RS-2's on 16x7 OZ Ultraleggeras (+37 ET and our BBK spaces the fronts out another 4mm)
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 08:07 AM
  #39  
meb's Avatar
meb
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 1
After optimizing geometry (camber) for grip, and RC (for geometric roll control), sport springs and dampers offer the driver more control, not more grip...grip, afterwhich, is a function of tire compound...all else equal.

And in some cases, control may overshadow the need for higher grip.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #40  
GOTCURVES's Avatar
GOTCURVES
4th Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Sedona, AZ.
At an autox this past Sunday me and a friend did a little checking on lat G's and this is what we found.

My set up: H-sport lower springs (progresswive rate) control arms adj RASB adj camber plates and 205/50 15" 615's

My friends set up: Cross coilovers control arms adj RASB and 225/40 16" Dizera's

The best lateral G he could pull on course was 1.07.
My best was 1.08.

The tires have alot to do with the outcome of this info, but the results would suggest that I have gotten used to the springs. BTW I will be switching to the Cross coilovers for the spring series, not that I have any issues with the springs I just want the adjustability of the Cross CO under my baby. Besides I need new cartriges for the struts (I have a bad one on the drivers rear) which keeps me from putting down what little power I have to the ground on right hand sweepers.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steffen.Johnson
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
42
Jan 25, 2023 02:47 PM
CooperSharp
MINI Parts for Sale
1
Oct 12, 2015 09:21 AM
Mini Mania
Suspension Products
0
Oct 1, 2015 11:53 AM
Mini Mania
Suspension Products
0
Oct 1, 2015 11:14 AM
nshannon29
MINI Parts for Sale
0
Sep 30, 2015 05:21 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:10 PM.