Suspension 2.5 id spring length
#1
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#2
7" may be too long in front, depending on your spring rate. If you're anywhere close to 350 lbs/in, 6" will work much better. Unless you really like the monster truck look.
For the record, I've tried both on my car with PSS9s with the above spring rate. 7" sat at roughly stock height with the height adjustment set as low as it would go.
Scott
90SM
![Wink](https://www.northamericanmotoring.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
For the record, I've tried both on my car with PSS9s with the above spring rate. 7" sat at roughly stock height with the height adjustment set as low as it would go.
Scott
90SM
#3
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks,90STX,the reason i mentioned the sevens was because i have my threaded spring seat all the way to the top of the shock and when i measured the distance it was give or take six and half inches.Ithought maybe even eights and then lower it,what do you think?The measure was taken with wheel off the ground
#4
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
Well, you can look for differences between thread locations between Bilstein and H&R damper bodies, but I think you'll be surprised by how much less the 350lbs/in linear rate springs compress under static load.
Like I said, I originally tried 7" springs up front on the PSS9s. With the spring perch all the way down to the bottom of the threads, my ride height was really close to stock. I went to the 6" springs, same rate, and raised the lower perch about a 1/2". I'm lower than stock, but hardly slammed. The drop works pretty well for improved handling. Lower is not necessarily better, except possibly for esthetics if that's your preference.
I've still got the 7" long, 2.5"ID Hypercoil 350lb/in springs on the shelf. If you want to try them we could probably work something out. I could certainly be wrong, but I really don't think you'll be happy with the 7" springs in front.
FYI, I'm still on the original PSS9 rear springs. They're linear 345lb/in, so I haven't had a reason to replace them yet. I haven't measured the free length of those springs.
Scott
90SM
Like I said, I originally tried 7" springs up front on the PSS9s. With the spring perch all the way down to the bottom of the threads, my ride height was really close to stock. I went to the 6" springs, same rate, and raised the lower perch about a 1/2". I'm lower than stock, but hardly slammed. The drop works pretty well for improved handling. Lower is not necessarily better, except possibly for esthetics if that's your preference.
I've still got the 7" long, 2.5"ID Hypercoil 350lb/in springs on the shelf. If you want to try them we could probably work something out. I could certainly be wrong, but I really don't think you'll be happy with the 7" springs in front.
FYI, I'm still on the original PSS9 rear springs. They're linear 345lb/in, so I haven't had a reason to replace them yet. I haven't measured the free length of those springs.
Scott
90SM
#6
#7
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#9
Regards to linear rate springs:
Just keep in mind that for a given spring length, the block hieght changes as the rates changes. A 7", 500# spring has a shorter block hieght than a 7" 250# spring. This is so because the coils are thicker.
Take the corner weight of your car - roughly 850lbs - and divide this by the spring rate and you will have a basic idea for how many inches the spring will compress once the 850lbs static load rests on the spring. Then subtract this from the spring length. What is left must be more than block height or the spring will bind - all the coils contact one another.
850lbs divided by 500# spring = 1.7 inches. If the free length of the spring is 4" - not to be confused with the actual length of the spring - subtract 1.7 inches and you get 2.3 inches of spring travel. Free length is a number to keep an eye on when choosing a spring rate and length. The two must be viewed together so that you maintain enough spring travel.
Ultimately, the shortest spring possible is best since a spring weighs a lot. A lighter spring reduces unsprung weight, and, the tendancy of a really long to want to buckle in the middle under load - there is a term for this but I cannot remember it.
THE CORNER WEIGHT EXAMPLE ABOVE IS FOR THE FRONT END
Just keep in mind that for a given spring length, the block hieght changes as the rates changes. A 7", 500# spring has a shorter block hieght than a 7" 250# spring. This is so because the coils are thicker.
Take the corner weight of your car - roughly 850lbs - and divide this by the spring rate and you will have a basic idea for how many inches the spring will compress once the 850lbs static load rests on the spring. Then subtract this from the spring length. What is left must be more than block height or the spring will bind - all the coils contact one another.
850lbs divided by 500# spring = 1.7 inches. If the free length of the spring is 4" - not to be confused with the actual length of the spring - subtract 1.7 inches and you get 2.3 inches of spring travel. Free length is a number to keep an eye on when choosing a spring rate and length. The two must be viewed together so that you maintain enough spring travel.
Ultimately, the shortest spring possible is best since a spring weighs a lot. A lighter spring reduces unsprung weight, and, the tendancy of a really long to want to buckle in the middle under load - there is a term for this but I cannot remember it.
THE CORNER WEIGHT EXAMPLE ABOVE IS FOR THE FRONT END
Last edited by meb; 01-10-2008 at 07:59 AM.
#10
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Emnotek
Vendor Announcements
0
09-29-2015 07:37 AM