Site Feedback Open forum for discussion of this site. Post your kudos or criticism so that we can continually improve service to the new MINI community.

What happened to technical discussions on this board?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #101  
gnatster's Avatar
gnatster
6th Gear
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
And ya'll wonder where the technical discussions went to...

Think we can all stop the grandstanding now please.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #102  
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 8
From: oh10
In terms of the original topic. I think most of it comes down to demographics. I've noticed it a lot while browsing the clubman forums. It makes a lot of sense that you'll start bringing in various demographics (and thus new interests) when MINI starts marketing cars that reach out to even more people. Just wait for the SAV release and the new members that come with it, that will throw a whole new demographic into the mix.

It's been the same issue all along. MINI created a car that somehow reaches a ridiculous number of demographics. You get 17 year olds and 80 year olds. You get people with stripped out race cars and you get a Mother and Father who pack up their children and dog for a long drive. It's only becoming more apparent because many of the original members from the tech side of things have left the site for various reasons and with them went many of the tech discussions.

Give the R56 a little more time. People will start tearing into the turbo and try getting crazy with things. It should help out the tech discussion a bit (hopefully). I know that 02 and early 03 were pretty boring when it came to tech discussion. The only mods really available were a few simple intakes and exhausts . It took a while before we could start comparing coilovers or intercoolers.

I'm surprised that NAM's perceived value seems to be so heavily linked to its technical content in some of these posts.
For some people that is where the value lies. People find value in sites for different reasons. Some come here to joke around and chat about various off-topic things with close friends that they've developed over the years. Others want to come here and discuss technical things and contemplate new projects. Even though there are DIY's for many of the possible mods in the archives, for some it can be sad to no longer see new technical discussions to participate in each day.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 04:30 PM
  #103  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
There was nothing selective about it...

Originally Posted by gnatster
Not sure where you are getting that from Matt but it's incomplete. Since Midnight on the server there has been:

New Threads Today 26
New Posts Today 525
Unique Members Today 1,460
New Users Today 15

Data as of 11:48 PT

I think you were a little selective in choosing to make a point. I agree, this more a gossipy community then a tech site now.

Some interesting stats...

http://www.quantcast.com/northameric...raffic#summary
I went to "Today's Posts", copied the list into Excel, and cleaned it up for submission. Yes it was just one moment in time chosen at random, but it is what it is.

To bring the point more to the theme of the thread, I guess I'm just getting the feeling that the "lifestyle" part of mini ownership is a larger percentage of what goes on here than the "let's take it apart and make it better". This isn't saying it's good or bad, just that from where I sit this looks to be the changes that have happened over time. There are lots of reasons why this could be, and each and everyone of them are open to debate.

Whatever, life goes on.

Matt
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 04:34 PM
  #104  
Edge's Avatar
Edge
AdMINIstrator
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,975
Likes: 0
From: Annandale, VA (near Wash. DC)
Despite the more heavy focus on the larger MINI community for a while, this thread has again gone back to talking a lot about the site itself (not counting the personal sniping between some folks ).

Therefore I'm moving it to Site Feedback.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #105  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
Just did it again

FAMOUS NAME GAME
What happened to technical discussions on this board?
Air Horn - An exercise in taking a mod to the extreme!
First Aid Kit Location (08 & 09)
How Many Posts
Opinions on lowering springs installation?
MINIs at CES
Word Association (2005 and Onward Edition)
Show pics of your lowered MINI S!!!
M7 Super-AGS on a Factory JCW
Gorgeous girls in MINIs...
Song Lyrics Game ...
Oil Change How-to
Must be winter, quiet here
Even More Random Thoughts...
New game... Once upon a time
What car from your past do you regret giving up?
C.A.R.B Legal Intake
Free Classic Mini...
Ireland Engineering Exhaust
NOS

Better than before for sure, but still much more lean than "the early days"....

Matt
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #106  
CIGARGUY's Avatar
CIGARGUY
3rd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Jeffersonville, IN
Hmm....Controversy here, controversy on MU.....anyone else see the common denominator here?
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #107  
minimarks's Avatar
minimarks
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 1
From: Winston-Salem, NC
Hey as much as I like the technical discussions, I've also sat here and laughed my **** off at some threads, no reason why they both can't exist on the same site...
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 05:48 PM
  #108  
JIMINNI's Avatar
JIMINNI
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 3
From: Fresno Ca.
Originally Posted by minimarks
Hey as much as I like the technical discussions, I've also sat here and laughed my **** off at some threads, no reason why they both can't exist on the same site...
+1 Also it can be used as just a discussion thread. Our club as a thread that has 14,000 replys and 175,000 views, just talking and stuff
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 07:26 PM
  #109  
mach schnell's Avatar
mach schnell
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: right behind you!
Originally Posted by CIGARGUY
Hmm....Controversy here, controversy on MU.....anyone else see the common denominator here?
wow, i must not be spending enough time on mu - what's going on over there?
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 07:29 PM
  #110  
Revolution Mini Works's Avatar
Revolution Mini Works
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,878
Likes: 2
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by mach schnell
wow, i must not be spending enough time on mu - what's going on over there?


lots of cake eating
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 08:05 PM
  #111  
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 8
From: oh10
Originally Posted by Revolution Mini Works
lots of cake eating
This is true, free cake and pony rides
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 10:36 PM
  #112  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
This is more like it!

https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...from-audi.html

Matt
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 10:51 PM
  #113  
big howe's Avatar
big howe
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
Yes, we have one. I feel like I need to go out and buy a 56 to participate.

The wife won't like that.
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 04:44 AM
  #114  
PGT's Avatar
PGT
Banned
iTrader: (11)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: DC Metro
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
thing is...most people who want that don't need that. the stock bov isn't an issue until running MUCH more boost.

edit - it would be very easy and cheap to build a test rig using an air compressor as the source. Unless you know the psi threshold that overloads the stock bov, there's not much point messing with it.

in general, playing around with the bov leads to drivability issues as it affects the afr's
 

Last edited by PGT; Jan 13, 2009 at 05:22 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 08:20 AM
  #115  
mach schnell's Avatar
mach schnell
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: right behind you!
so wait - is everyone suggesting that threads containing pix ppl are finding on the internet of random women who may or may not be standing near a MINI, and/or sending PM's of "not so PG rated" pix to each other and all the commentary about anatomy is not technical ???

perhaps the commoners to that thread have suddenly increased their buying of aftermarket performance parts for their MINI's, if for any reason - now they can get home faster to get on the internet and drool and giggle over pictures of women! does that grease be gone stuff that auto mechanics use to wash their hands work good on sticky substances and cleaning computer screens? - maybe they could start a technical thread on how to clean up such little messes or not get caught by their wives/gfs looking at other women on the internet
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 11:20 AM
  #116  
DOPAMINE's Avatar
DOPAMINE
5th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: nyc
Originally Posted by Rally@StanceDesign
I'm not sure how a preference for performance or aesthetics would determine a lack or presence of "technical" discussion. There's plenty of room for technical discussion pertaining to aesthetic mods just as much as with performance mods. You can have a discussion of the technical nature of fitting wide wheels and making them fit whether you want the wide wheels to be wrapped in wide r-compounds or if you just want wide wheels because you like the look. You can go into the technical discussion on stack height or camber to improve handling or you can have the same technical discussion about those topics just to go lower to look good.

Seems like you can have a technical discussion about aesthetic mods (or other subjects such as detailing mentioned earlier in this thread) just as you can with HP numbers or track handling.

There's no denying that many on M|U prefer modding for looks more than performance, but that hardly means that the discussion isn't technical when we discuss wheel fitment, suspension geometry, or the process of bodywork. There are also plenty of performance minded members and discussions on M|U as well....
whatever. fashion before function.
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 06:23 PM
  #117  
minimarks's Avatar
minimarks
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 1
From: Winston-Salem, NC
Fashionably functional!
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 06:41 PM
  #118  
BlimeyCabrio's Avatar
BlimeyCabrio
6th Gear
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,773
Likes: 9
From: Holly Springs, NC
I prefer functionally fashionable. But whatever.
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 07:36 PM
  #119  
minimarks's Avatar
minimarks
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 1
From: Winston-Salem, NC
Don't know Blimey but functionally fashionable sounds too much like a designer diaper or something..... Guess we'd have to factor the AF ratios first...
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 10:51 AM
  #120  
Kelly Girl's Avatar
Kelly Girl
Banned
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: in a house
Hey, i was checking out the main "forum" page and there really isn't a clearly marked general category for "TECH DISCUSSIONS"

mebe a more obvious TECH DISCUSSION with subcategories is needed?

(sorry to actually suggest a solution, as i am a firm believer of fashion over function, for example the Stiletto Heel)
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 11:17 AM
  #121  
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 8
From: oh10
Again, you can have technical discussions about fashion just as much as performance. It's entirely possible to discuss the technical aspects that go into designing a stiletto heel (or walking in them i guess?)

Technically the "'modification" area with subgroups for the type of modifications is a place meant for technical discussion. Besides possibly showing pictures of your modification, most of the discussion in those areas would be considered "technical" whether it's discussing the proper way to wire a subwoofer, install bonnet stripes, or get the IAT's down. Technical discussion is defined as "of,relating to, or requiring special knowledge to be understood" which seems to mostly be found in the modification areas of the forum.

A new "tech discussion" area would just be filled with the same information or discussions found in those forum segments.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #122  
Kelly Girl's Avatar
Kelly Girl
Banned
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: in a house
all i'm saying for the less than savvy n00b, a clearly marked tech forum might be a welcome change..
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 02:19 PM
  #123  
mach schnell's Avatar
mach schnell
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: right behind you!
i see the point, if it is that threads like who wants a free mini that turn into 60 + pages of cake recipes and tv show references and questions about what color plaid table cloth you have in your farm, etc
- OR - ,
threads discussing bikini clad women and people sharing pictures via PM clearly depict a mentality of joe schmo drivers just diddling around the internet for sake of boredom at home and work vs the serious car enthusiast who is only gonna talk shop 24hrs a day.

the MINI offers a lot of personality and a strong history of performance. it attracts a variety of owners and admirers and as such, a very colorful variety of personalities and interests would emerge on an internet forum. therefore, technical, as mentioned above, would manifest a kaleidoscope of definitions and interpretations.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 02:27 PM
  #124  
Kelly Girl's Avatar
Kelly Girl
Banned
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: in a house
does that then make me Joe Schmoe if i don't seek out any techinical advise, information, or shop talk here?
cause i sure as hell get better tech advise/help/recommendations elsewhere

Maybe a tech advise/info/Q&A could exist on NAM, due to the fact that all other 'technically' inclined threads veer dangerously off topic in the land of m7, i love/hate RMW, Alta, rims/tires/wheel discussion, coil v. spring v. bags..

then Dr O would have something better to do with his time
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 05:17 PM
  #125  
mach schnell's Avatar
mach schnell
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: right behind you!
Originally Posted by Kelly Girl
does that then make me Joe Schmoe if i don't seek out any techinical advise, information, or shop talk here?
cause i sure as hell get better tech advise/help/recommendations elsewhere

Maybe a tech advise/info/Q&A could exist on NAM, due to the fact that all other 'technically' inclined threads veer dangerously off topic in the land of m7, i love/hate RMW, Alta, rims/tires/wheel discussion, coil v. spring v. bags..

then Dr O would have something better to do with his time
yours is a good point - but i think that any internet forum runs the risk of becoming overly saturated with opinion and/or speculation vs fact/experience. it's like trying to find out about a new pulley - everyone wants to tell you about theirs, or how they feel about theirs or why a less expensive one must be bad, but little evidence really comes out. it is frustrating when you wanna weigh your options on parts to buy, technology to use, but it at least gives you a venue to gather input.

i think a truly effective technical forum would allow a member to post a question that could be viewed by all, but only those with "Technical" privileges could post a response. imagine if you went to a medical forum and asked a question about an antihypertensive (disclaimer - talk to your doctor this is just an analogy!) and you got a bunch of lay people's opinions maybe with a few scattered educated responses. you need to weigh that information accordingly. but if you went to a similar forum where the answers were posted by the appropriate technical staff, then your willingess to accept the answer/data may be higher. however, a forum of opinion carries no cost - one that offers valid, reliable information most likely would carry an expense.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:27 PM.