R56 Lemoned in NY
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is the federal law governing warranties on consumer products.
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/...s/warranty.htm
I could see how it could come into play depending on how the dealor's responce to this issue and what sungar wants to see come of the situation.
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/...s/warranty.htm
I could see how it could come into play depending on how the dealor's responce to this issue and what sungar wants to see come of the situation.
I didn't say "would"... I said "could".
Either way, there are a ton of possible scenarios that could bring Magnussen Moss into play.
The most obvious could be the use of the incorrect fuel in the vehicle. The dealer could make the suggestion that the owner did not follow the proper fueling recommendations of the manufacturer over the past 6-weeks and therefore voiding the factory warranty on the fuel system of the vehicle.
Granted, I choose to believe what sunger said about the vehicle being fueled by the dealer... I also choose to believe that MINI has better customer service sence than that and would take responcibility if one of their employees had created the situtatiopn by using the incorrect grade of fuel... but I've heard of less scrupulous dealers making warranty arguments over smaller issues, so... as I said, it will depend on how the dealer chooses to handle the problem that will determine if it comes into play.
Either way, there are a ton of possible scenarios that could bring Magnussen Moss into play.
The most obvious could be the use of the incorrect fuel in the vehicle. The dealer could make the suggestion that the owner did not follow the proper fueling recommendations of the manufacturer over the past 6-weeks and therefore voiding the factory warranty on the fuel system of the vehicle.
Granted, I choose to believe what sunger said about the vehicle being fueled by the dealer... I also choose to believe that MINI has better customer service sence than that and would take responcibility if one of their employees had created the situtatiopn by using the incorrect grade of fuel... but I've heard of less scrupulous dealers making warranty arguments over smaller issues, so... as I said, it will depend on how the dealer chooses to handle the problem that will determine if it comes into play.
Zip

OT: Good luck with the car. Those occasional misfires in production can be tough. Hopefully you have a good dealer to work with on this.
okra, I don't need to waste my time. I had a 2004 MINI and it was far from faultless. There are thousands of 2007s already on the road running fine. Sorry if your ego can't take the fact that there's a newer model out there.
I didn't say "would"... I said "could".
Either way, there are a ton of possible scenarios that could bring Magnussen Moss into play.
The most obvious could be the use of the incorrect fuel in the vehicle. The dealer could make the suggestion that the owner did not follow the proper fueling recommendations of the manufacturer over the past 6-weeks and therefore voiding the factory warranty on the fuel system of the vehicle.
Granted, I choose to believe what sunger said about the vehicle being fueled by the dealer... I also choose to believe that MINI has better customer service sence than that and would take responcibility if one of their employees had created the situtatiopn by using the incorrect grade of fuel... but I've heard of less scrupulous dealers making warranty arguments over smaller issues, so... as I said, it will depend on how the dealer chooses to handle the problem that will determine if it comes into play.
Either way, there are a ton of possible scenarios that could bring Magnussen Moss into play.
The most obvious could be the use of the incorrect fuel in the vehicle. The dealer could make the suggestion that the owner did not follow the proper fueling recommendations of the manufacturer over the past 6-weeks and therefore voiding the factory warranty on the fuel system of the vehicle.
Granted, I choose to believe what sunger said about the vehicle being fueled by the dealer... I also choose to believe that MINI has better customer service sence than that and would take responcibility if one of their employees had created the situtatiopn by using the incorrect grade of fuel... but I've heard of less scrupulous dealers making warranty arguments over smaller issues, so... as I said, it will depend on how the dealer chooses to handle the problem that will determine if it comes into play.
Barring a warranty voiding scenario with the octane rating of the gas, is this not a lemon law issue?
Magnussen is essentially a Federal Lemon law act. However, I allows treble damages. The octane rating issue would generally not allow MINI to escape responsibility because (1) engine management compensated for octane variance, which has been demonstrated to vary greatly at the pumps and (2) such damage comes from long term misuse.
You can only go so far with engine management though, as it pertains to octane rating. The most significant variable is the engine compression ratio. The use of low octane fuel in a high compression engine can cause damage quite quickly, relatively speaking.
My Lexus IS250 engine's compression ratio is 12:1. No matter how much you retard timing or alter fuel/air ratios, low octane fuel has a very high propensity to pre-ignite causing potentially catastrophic engine failure just due to the extreme pressures involved.
Kexus is very clear about the engine warranty being violated if the damage occurs due to use of lower than the recommened octane fuel (91 or better is recommended).
I believe the Mini's enine is at a slightly lower comrpession ratio, but not much. Most direct injected gasoline/petrol engines have higher than normal compression ratios.
My Lexus IS250 engine's compression ratio is 12:1. No matter how much you retard timing or alter fuel/air ratios, low octane fuel has a very high propensity to pre-ignite causing potentially catastrophic engine failure just due to the extreme pressures involved.
Kexus is very clear about the engine warranty being violated if the damage occurs due to use of lower than the recommened octane fuel (91 or better is recommended).
I believe the Mini's enine is at a slightly lower comrpession ratio, but not much. Most direct injected gasoline/petrol engines have higher than normal compression ratios.
You can only go so far with engine management though, as it pertains to octane rating. The most significant variable is the engine compression ratio. The use of low octane fuel in a high compression engine can cause damage quite quickly, relatively speaking.
My Lexus IS250 engine's compression ratio is 12:1. No matter how much you retard timing or alter fuel/air ratios, low octane fuel has a very high propensity to pre-ignite causing potentially catastrophic engine failure just due to the extreme pressures involved.
Kexus is very clear about the engine warranty being violated if the damage occurs due to use of lower than the recommened octane fuel (91 or better is recommended).
I believe the Mini's enine is at a slightly lower comrpession ratio, but not much. Most direct injected gasoline/petrol engines have higher than normal compression ratios.
My Lexus IS250 engine's compression ratio is 12:1. No matter how much you retard timing or alter fuel/air ratios, low octane fuel has a very high propensity to pre-ignite causing potentially catastrophic engine failure just due to the extreme pressures involved.
Kexus is very clear about the engine warranty being violated if the damage occurs due to use of lower than the recommened octane fuel (91 or better is recommended).
I believe the Mini's enine is at a slightly lower comrpession ratio, but not much. Most direct injected gasoline/petrol engines have higher than normal compression ratios.
Ahhh. I do not have mine yet :(, so I do not have the owners manual. WAAAH!
But you are correct LynnEl. If they state 87 octane is ok, then they have to stand by it. I am surprised they would allow an octane that low in a turbocharged engine.
But you are correct LynnEl. If they state 87 octane is ok, then they have to stand by it. I am surprised they would allow an octane that low in a turbocharged engine.
Actually in NY the Law states that it is 4 of the same problem that kicks the law in.
Habberstad on Long Island. Actually they have been great. I guess it really isn't their fault. They have stated that they will attempt one more time to fix the problem, but will do what is right by refunding payments and alluding to getting a new car without having to go through the official Law "stuff".
While I am sorry to hear of your problems, the dealer sounds like someone I would want to work with.
In the end, you'll have a car that works flawlessly. You will lose on the time and inconvenience you've put into resolving this issue, but that's not all bad, considering what it would be like with a dealer who wasn't working with you so well.
In the end, you'll have a car that works flawlessly. You will lose on the time and inconvenience you've put into resolving this issue, but that's not all bad, considering what it would be like with a dealer who wasn't working with you so well.
While I am sorry to hear of your problems, the dealer sounds like someone I would want to work with.
In the end, you'll have a car that works flawlessly. You will lose on the time and inconvenience you've put into resolving this issue, but that's not all bad, considering what it would be like with a dealer who wasn't working with you so well.
In the end, you'll have a car that works flawlessly. You will lose on the time and inconvenience you've put into resolving this issue, but that's not all bad, considering what it would be like with a dealer who wasn't working with you so well.
The manual says premium is "recommended" but that you can use regular, of at least 87 octane.
Then, since you're taking away the one exampe that you asked for that could easily bring it into play... I would have to say I can't think of another without knowing more details of the situation.
I would agree that this issue should primarily be handled using the lemon law in that particular state. To suggest however, that Magnussen Moss couldn't come into play seems myopic (I had to look that one up, too
). Especially considering that one of the main points mentioned in the initial post was a suggestion by the dealership that the damage to the vehicle was caused by the improper fuel.
Habberstad on Long Island. Actually they have been great. I guess it really isn't their fault. They have stated that they will attempt one more time to fix the problem, but will do what is right by refunding payments and alluding to getting a new car without having to go through the official Law "stuff".
Habberstad...I was there the other day looking for floor mats. I bought my car from Mini of Manhattan.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
R50/53 Guidance on selling a 2005 S
Toolman
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
8
Jan 20, 2016 06:50 AM
jstines
Stock Problems/Issues
16
Sep 8, 2003 08:53 PM
BellePepper
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
26
Jul 17, 2003 08:34 AM



