R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 Over $40 to fill up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 09:40 AM
  #126  
ScottRiqui's Avatar
ScottRiqui
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 8
From: Norfolk, VA
I think the government enjoys portraying "Big Oil" as the bad guy - it help keep some of the heat off of them.

Truth be told, even Exxon-Mobil's $40 billion annual profits aren't that unreasonable, percentage-wise. There are a LOT of other big companies in other industries (like banking, pharmaceuticals, and technology) that have higher profit margins. They're just not as big as Exxon-Mobil, so the actual dollar amount of their profit is smaller and as a result, people aren't (as) outraged. But when you start talking about "$1300 in profit per second", people that don't understand the sheer amount of money that Exxon-Mobil has to spend each year automatically start thinking "price gouging" and "collusion", and it's easier for the government to target the oil companies.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #127  
drb5's Avatar
drb5
Neutral
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
God you guys have it good!

At the moment, the cost for our premium super unleaded is circa £1.15 a litre, which is roughly $10.50 for a gallon.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #128  
Minidrivr's Avatar
Minidrivr
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by ScottRiqui
I think the government enjoys portraying "Big Oil" as the bad guy - it help keep some of the heat off of them.

Truth be told, even Exxon-Mobil's $40 billion annual profits aren't that unreasonable, percentage-wise. There are a LOT of other big companies in other industries (like banking, pharmaceuticals, and technology) that have higher profit margins. They're just not as big as Exxon-Mobil, so the actual dollar amount of their profit is smaller and as a result, people aren't (as) outraged. But when you start talking about "$1300 in profit per second", people that don't understand the sheer amount of money that Exxon-Mobil has to spend each year automatically start thinking "price gouging" and "collusion", and it's easier for the government to target the oil companies.
I saw a show on either Discovery or History channel about the drilling rig Shell built to drill in the gulf that's over 1000' feet tall. I don't remember all the numbers, but it cost a bloody fortune (threw in "bloody" since we drive Mini's ). They spent all the money and don't know until they are drilling if it's really going to pay off. They make a lot, and spend a lot.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 12:07 PM
  #129  
mauigrownmini's Avatar
mauigrownmini
1st Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
$4.40 at some places on Maui
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #130  
tedbone72P's Avatar
tedbone72P
3rd Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 1
From: Boynton Beach FL
Cousins in Greece paying 1.82 Euro per liter
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 12:30 PM
  #131  
Eric_Rowland's Avatar
Eric_Rowland
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,382
Likes: 47
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Originally Posted by ScottRiqui
...But when you start talking about "$1300 in profit per second", people that don't understand the sheer amount of money that Exxon-Mobil has to spend each year automatically start thinking "price gouging" and "collusion", and it's easier for the government to target the oil companies.
Does it make anyone feel better that they pay $950/second ($29.864B) in income taxes? (though only $5.1B is US income tax, and another $9.2B in other US taxes - note that of total sales of $390B, only $121B (31%) is made in the US) They spent $200B ($6,300/sec) on crude oil.

See details in their EDGAR filing. (financials start on page 50)
 

Last edited by Eric_Rowland; Mar 15, 2008 at 12:32 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 12:41 PM
  #132  
cristo's Avatar
cristo
Alliance Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 230
From: York, Pennsylvania
Hey, whoever's in charge of collecting taxes:

"You're doing it wrong!"

see below
 

Last edited by cristo; Mar 15, 2008 at 12:47 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 12:45 PM
  #133  
cristo's Avatar
cristo
Alliance Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 230
From: York, Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by Eric_Rowland
Does it make anyone feel better that they pay $950/second ($29.864B) in income taxes? NO (though only $5.1B is US income tax, and another $9.2B in other US taxes - note that of total sales of $390B, only $121B (31%) is made in the US) They spent $200B ($6,300/sec) on crude oil.

See details in their EDGAR filing. (financials start on page 50)

29.864/390 = 0.076574...
5.1/121 = 0.042148...
So their tax bracket is 7.65% total worldwide and 4.21% in the US alone ???
Boo Hoo, ... I wish I was in that tax bracket !!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #134  
CR&PW&JB's Avatar
CR&PW&JB
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,326
Likes: 6
From: PA
$3.51 for premium today.

While I don't like the rate that gas is going up, I just have to remind myself that most of the world has been paying this much for gas for decades. We used to fill up 2.5 gallon tanks with gas from the Air Force base to take with us driving around Europe in the mid 80's.

While we were paying $1.10 a gallon, or whatever it was at that time, a gallon of gas on the German economy, using the current exchange rate, would have cost about $6. And the exchange rate wasn't all that bad at the time.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 12:59 PM
  #135  
Desert_Sand's Avatar
Desert_Sand
6th Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: ....where I stop the car...
Originally Posted by CR&PW&JB
$3.51 for premium today.

While I don't like the rate that gas is going up, I just have to remind myself that most of the world has been paying this much for gas for decades. We used to fill up 2.5 gallon tanks with gas from the Air Force base to take with us driving around Europe in the mid 80's.

While we were paying $1.10 a gallon, or whatever it was at that time, a gallon of gas on the German economy, using the current exchange rate, would have cost about $6. And the exchange rate wasn't all that bad at the time.
That is because the government taxes it to deah. The cost of the GAS is relatively similar.

My father tried to use that argument on me during the 80's and 90's, and it still is like comparing apples to oranges.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 01:04 PM
  #136  
Eric_Rowland's Avatar
Eric_Rowland
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,382
Likes: 47
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Originally Posted by cristo
29.864/390 = 0.076574...
5.1/121 = 0.042148...
So their tax bracket is 7.65% total worldwide and 4.21% in the US alone ???
Boo Hoo, ... I wish I was in that tax bracket !!!
Nope - $121B was sales, not EBIT - I didn't look up what their US profits were. You can't look at tax/sales, as income taxes are based on profits, not sales. You don't pay taxes on your gross income, you pay on your taxable income. Cost of doing business (including the cost of extracting/obtaining oil) differs drastically depending on locale. It's quite possible that other countries impose higher taxes though. They paid 42.4% on their $70.5B in profit.
In addition to the $200B for crude oil, they paid another $72B in 'sales and other taxes/duties', ~$60B in production/sales/etc. Costs of $334B on $404B of total revenue - hence the $70B profit.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #137  
CR&PW&JB's Avatar
CR&PW&JB
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,326
Likes: 6
From: PA
Originally Posted by Desert_Sand
That is because the government taxes it to deah. The cost of the GAS is relatively similar.

My father tried to use that argument on me during the 80's and 90's, and it still is like comparing apples to oranges.
Regardless of who is bilking the others around the world, I'm just glad we're not getting similarly bilked. That was my point. I wasn't trying to say we should be thinking US gas companies.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #138  
ScottRiqui's Avatar
ScottRiqui
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 8
From: Norfolk, VA
Originally Posted by cristo
29.864/390 = 0.076574...
5.1/121 = 0.042148...
So their tax bracket is 7.65% total worldwide and 4.21% in the US alone ???
Boo Hoo, ... I wish I was in that tax bracket !!!
I think comparing business taxes to personal taxes is sort of "apples and oranges". If you compare E-M's tax burden to their gross revenue, it's going to seem pretty low. But the same can be said of personal taxes, if you use gross income before any deductions or adjustments.

Taking my total tax bill and dividing it by my gross unadjusted income, the ratio is 7.8%, or in the same ballpark as E-M's.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 02:06 PM
  #139  
cristo's Avatar
cristo
Alliance Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 230
From: York, Pennsylvania
Taking my total tax bill and dividing it by my gross unadjusted income, my ratio is 20.08%
(Fed + State + Local income tax --not counting FICA, sales tax, occupational tax, gasoline taxes,
additional taxes on insurance, lodging, etc.)
 

Last edited by cristo; Mar 15, 2008 at 02:08 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 02:12 PM
  #140  
ScottRiqui's Avatar
ScottRiqui
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 8
From: Norfolk, VA
Ah - in an effort to compare fairly to the E-M numbers posted above, I was just using my federal tax bill, not federal + state (no local income tax for me).

If I include my state income tax bill, the tax-to-gross income ratio goes up to 10.2%. I'm pretty sure the E-M numbers in post #130 didn't include state taxes, though.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 02:26 PM
  #141  
cristo's Avatar
cristo
Alliance Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 230
From: York, Pennsylvania
Ok, 15.52% for Federal income tax alone for me.

To be fair, if we look at page 50, they did pay 42.38% of their taxable income on income taxes,
but they get a lot of breaks that I don't in adjusting their taxable income.

On our return we paid 33.54% of our taxable income on income taxes (Fed State Local Medicare SS)

and on page 78 it shows state taxes were also included.
 

Last edited by cristo; Mar 15, 2008 at 02:41 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 05:38 PM
  #142  
Flats's Avatar
Flats
1st Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ScottRiqui
I think the government enjoys portraying "Big Oil" as the bad guy - it help keep some of the heat off of them.

Truth be told, even Exxon-Mobil's $40 billion annual profits aren't that unreasonable, percentage-wise. There are a LOT of other big companies in other industries (like banking, pharmaceuticals, and technology) that have higher profit margins. They're just not as big as Exxon-Mobil, so the actual dollar amount of their profit is smaller and as a result, people aren't (as) outraged. But when you start talking about "$1300 in profit per second", people that don't understand the sheer amount of money that Exxon-Mobil has to spend each year automatically start thinking "price gouging" and "collusion", and it's easier for the government to target the oil companies.
Finally, Someone esle who understands. If only the other 99% of the US could see this clearly. Maybe Congress will finally wake up to.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #143  
CR&PW&JB's Avatar
CR&PW&JB
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,326
Likes: 6
From: PA
What do you Big Oil supporters say when you come across an intersection with three competing gas stations and everyone of them has the exact same prices for all octane's of gas ? And this isn't an isolated case. In fact, I'd say it's most often the case.

No collusion going on here ?

Of course, you can guess how I see it... "hey, let's all jack up the price the same so we ALL make a killing".
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 08:03 PM
  #144  
daffodildeb's Avatar
daffodildeb
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,743
Likes: 5
From: Hot Springs Village, AR
Originally Posted by cristo
Ok, 15.52% for Federal income tax alone for me.
You're complaining about being in the 15% bracket? I remember those days...and probably will again when I become a Wally World greeter.

Or am I missing something here?
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 12:08 AM
  #145  
Eric_Rowland's Avatar
Eric_Rowland
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,382
Likes: 47
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Originally Posted by CR&PW&JB
What do you Big Oil supporters say when you come across an intersection with three competing gas stations and everyone of them has the exact same prices for all octane's of gas ? And this isn't an isolated case. In fact, I'd say it's most often the case.

No collusion going on here ?

Of course, you can guess how I see it... "hey, let's all jack up the price the same so we ALL make a killing".
As I may be a perceived 'big oil supporter', I'd say that all the prices being the same would indicate competition. Otherwise, why wouldn't they all be a dime higher than <insert current price at the pump here>? Why? Because then you'd drive down the street.
That's not to say that there hasn't been collusion, but similar pricing just means that they can see the same signs you do, and if they price a penny lower (actually, I see this all the time) their competitor will do the same thing if they think that will get them marginal sales.
If there was collusion, why did gas prices ever come down from their (until recently) 1982 historical highs?

We actually had a local case where a man who owned a Shell franchise died during a hunger strike WRT high gas prices. He didn't claim collusion though.

The oil companies are no saints, but at 11% profit margins, they aren't making egregious returns, either.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 06:27 AM
  #146  
NashvilleMiniStan's Avatar
NashvilleMiniStan
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
The problem is with the government not let more oil to be drilled around the United States and more refineries.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 06:30 AM
  #147  
fishey72's Avatar
fishey72
5th Gear
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Asheville, NC
Originally Posted by CR&PW&JB
What do you Big Oil supporters say when you come across an intersection with three competing gas stations and everyone of them has the exact same prices for all octane's of gas ? No collusion going on here ?

Of course, you can guess how I see it... "hey, let's all jack up the price the same so we ALL make a killing".
Gasoline and oil are fungible, where the product is easily exchanged for another. Most gasoline stations of competing brands are getting the gasoline from the same transfer station or refinery anyway, and thus paying the same price. There is no incentive to compete on price.

Gas stations only make about 1% profit on the gasoline itself, so there is no reason to compete. Unless they can get you in the door and sell you cheese doodles and sodas, there is your profit motive.

Most people don't understand what $10 bbl oil did to the oil and gas industry. It caused the closure and consolidation of refineries and oil companies with years of slim profits. This causing massive underinvestment in infrastructure and is part of the reason we are at the prices we are at now.

Gasoline is $.21 a cup (at $3.50 gal). What other product can you buy for that price (besides municipal water)? Possibly milk depending on where you live...
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 06:58 AM
  #148  
fishey72's Avatar
fishey72
5th Gear
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Asheville, NC
Originally Posted by NashvilleMiniStan
The problem is with the government not let more oil to be drilled around the United States and more refineries.
I would greatly disagree.

The USA is the most drilled country in the world. 50% of all O&G wells are in our territory. This country is a veritable pin cushion of wells.

Now certainly there are some small known finds (small being less than 100 million barrels) in areas that are not allowed for environmental or similar good reasons. Frankly, these fields are not big enough to sway prices a world market level anyway.

US oil production has been in terminal decline since 1970. (see chart)

I don't work for the oil industry, but am a civil engineer who has worked in the oil fields. I had well and pipeline projects stalled for 10 years since the infrastructure costs did not justify production, until oil crested $30 bbl. Then we could not hire people fast enough to get the work done.

The markets are in check, except demand is winning and supply is loosing.
 
Attached Thumbnails Over  to fill up-oil-production-graph.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 07:57 AM
  #149  
goosefraba's Avatar
goosefraba
3rd Gear
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Be glad you are not filling up a 30 gallon SUV tank.... = >$100
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 02:43 PM
  #150  
daffodildeb's Avatar
daffodildeb
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,743
Likes: 5
From: Hot Springs Village, AR
Originally Posted by goosefraba
Be glad you are not filling up a 30 gallon SUV tank.... = >$100
Yeah, my next-door neighbor just brought home his new Hummer. The big one.

Idiot. Environmental butcher. Too bad a gas station can't selectively change the pump price to $10 a gallon, just for him...

Are they still giving tax credits/benefits/deductions for the Hummer, when it's used for business?
 

Last edited by daffodildeb; Mar 16, 2008 at 02:45 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:04 AM.