R52 Body roll in MCSC
Originally Posted by strider209
Spyder, how long did it take you to install? Also how stiff is the ride with the new bar? I'll be getting an rspeed rear sway shortly and installing next weekend.
The install was approximately 3 hours by myself. I had to go buy tools and was interupted multiple times so, it is an approximation. I would highly recommend a friend to help you out.
As far as the ride...up and down the ride is the same...side to side, less leaning. I have it set at the middle but changing to the stiffest setting soon. Now the front needs to be tightened.
I installed the red bar by mini mania 22mm.
Next install...pss9 or pulley.
Originally Posted by BlackSpyder
Strider:
The install was approximately 3 hours by myself. I had to go buy tools and was interupted multiple times so, it is an approximation. I would highly recommend a friend to help you out.
As far as the ride...up and down the ride is the same...side to side, less leaning. I have it set at the middle but changing to the stiffest setting soon. Now the front needs to be tightened.
I installed the red bar by mini mania 22mm.
Next install...pss9 or pulley.
The install was approximately 3 hours by myself. I had to go buy tools and was interupted multiple times so, it is an approximation. I would highly recommend a friend to help you out.
As far as the ride...up and down the ride is the same...side to side, less leaning. I have it set at the middle but changing to the stiffest setting soon. Now the front needs to be tightened.
I installed the red bar by mini mania 22mm.
Next install...pss9 or pulley.
Originally Posted by GeorgefromAmherst
I have a naive question for you. I got a new MCSC last month, and I love it. What I don't love is the body roll on corners compared with my old MCS. Of course this is due to the fact that you can't get the sport suspension plus on the convertibles. You can't even get the JCW suspension for the convertible. Is there something that I can do to make cornering better?
Coil overs give you adjustability and control for the ride stiffness and ride height. They are easy to adjust with one favorite setting for street use that is compliant and comfortable and another setting for stiffer ride when you need more performance. You can also add the stiffer adjustable rear sway bar to help reduce understeer when cornering fast.
I installed the H-sport competition rear sway bar on my MCSC yesterday, and had a slight fitment problem. The rear subframe is actually resting slightly on the bar's rubber bushings (after dropping the subframe, replacing the stock bar, and then securing the subframe, I had to drop the subframe again in order to thread the bolts for the bushings into the frame, then resecure the subframe again). So far, I've motored about 250 miles with no problems - however, there's a nagging question in my mind about whether this will cause trouble down the road once the subframe wears out the edge of the rubber bushing. I even thought about using a Dremel to cut off the part of the subframe that's resting on the bushing. Anyone encounter a similar situation? How did you solve it?
doesn't sound right
Originally Posted by latte hiatus
I installed the H-sport competition rear sway bar on my MCSC yesterday, and had a slight fitment problem. The rear subframe is actually resting slightly on the bar's rubber bushings (after dropping the subframe, replacing the stock bar, and then securing the subframe, I had to drop the subframe again in order to thread the bolts for the bushings into the frame, then resecure the subframe again). So far, I've motored about 250 miles with no problems - however, there's a nagging question in my mind about whether this will cause trouble down the road once the subframe wears out the edge of the rubber bushing. I even thought about using a Dremel to cut off the part of the subframe that's resting on the bushing. Anyone encounter a similar situation? How did you solve it?
Also I think it's a good idea to get the rear toe / thrust angle adjusted after loosening the rear subframe. I have access to an alignment machine so I did my own and it was WAY out. (I also did springs and lower control arms at the same time).
Ryephile,
What you've described is roll couple, the relationship between roll centers and the centers of gravity - plural becasue these are not the same for front and rear.
The reason I'm responding to your reply is roll couple is a misunderstood concept and is in many instances vital to proper handling. A MacPhearson strut is a compromised suspension set-up. One of the drawbacks with a Mac strut is the effect on the CG and RC as the suspension is lowered. If you lower this strut by one inch, the CG is lowered by one inch. However, the RC may be lowered by as much as two inches. Who cares you ask? Weight transfer acts on roll centers first, then the CG and then thru every other part of the car until it finally acts on the tires. In the above example, the RC and CG are now two inches farther apart. The connection between the RC and CG is an invisible lever arm. Increase a lever arm and resulting forces are increased. As I've written many many times before, we sometimes do not feel this greater force becasue we've installed heavier springs and dampers to keep it in check. Unfortunately, in this scenario, much of the extra work load performed by these new springs and dampers is consumed by much greater roll couple.
There is an optimal relationship between spring and damper rates, AND, roll couple. Do not assume lowering roll centers is a good thing unless the distance between the roll centers and the centers of gravity are unchanged or made shorter. Also, when lowering any suspension, it is highly advisable to keep an eye on 'new' roll center migration - where the roll centers move to under complete suspension load.
What you've described is roll couple, the relationship between roll centers and the centers of gravity - plural becasue these are not the same for front and rear.
The reason I'm responding to your reply is roll couple is a misunderstood concept and is in many instances vital to proper handling. A MacPhearson strut is a compromised suspension set-up. One of the drawbacks with a Mac strut is the effect on the CG and RC as the suspension is lowered. If you lower this strut by one inch, the CG is lowered by one inch. However, the RC may be lowered by as much as two inches. Who cares you ask? Weight transfer acts on roll centers first, then the CG and then thru every other part of the car until it finally acts on the tires. In the above example, the RC and CG are now two inches farther apart. The connection between the RC and CG is an invisible lever arm. Increase a lever arm and resulting forces are increased. As I've written many many times before, we sometimes do not feel this greater force becasue we've installed heavier springs and dampers to keep it in check. Unfortunately, in this scenario, much of the extra work load performed by these new springs and dampers is consumed by much greater roll couple.
There is an optimal relationship between spring and damper rates, AND, roll couple. Do not assume lowering roll centers is a good thing unless the distance between the roll centers and the centers of gravity are unchanged or made shorter. Also, when lowering any suspension, it is highly advisable to keep an eye on 'new' roll center migration - where the roll centers move to under complete suspension load.
Originally Posted by Ryephile
The sway bar set would reduce body roll and raise suspension frequency (more manuverable)
The springs would improve handling by lowering the roll center (also less body lean) and the center of gravity.
The springs would improve handling by lowering the roll center (also less body lean) and the center of gravity.
Originally Posted by Ryephile
I would tend to think the primary reason for the more compliant suspension is the customer base demands a more compliant ride, and not that the chassis isn't up to the task.
I would like to have less body roll but also retain the same ride height as roads around here are not the greatest and my driveway has a decent grade to it. What exactly were the changes to the suspension in mid 03?
Body roll can be controlled in many ways. But first, don't think of body roll as a finite movement within time. Think 'rate of roll', the amount of time weight transfers to the tires. You can control roll by changing the amount of time it takes to get to full compression - on the outside tires of course. This is the job of the dampers. All dampers will use up every bit of suspension travel given the right circumstances. How quickly this happens will determine how effective a given damper is at controlling body weight transfer.
Originally Posted by latte hiatus
I installed the H-sport competition rear sway bar on my MCSC yesterday, and had a slight fitment problem. The rear subframe is actually resting slightly on the bar's rubber bushings (after dropping the subframe, replacing the stock bar, and then securing the subframe, I had to drop the subframe again in order to thread the bolts for the bushings into the frame, then resecure the subframe again). So far, I've motored about 250 miles with no problems - however, there's a nagging question in my mind about whether this will cause trouble down the road once the subframe wears out the edge of the rubber bushing. I even thought about using a Dremel to cut off the part of the subframe that's resting on the bushing. Anyone encounter a similar situation? How did you solve it?
Originally Posted by orthomini
i used a dremel when i installed my rspeed bar. (since removed) i would ues some kind of paint or rubberized coatong to prevent rust. BTW i dont see how the subframe is adjustable as it seems the bolts fill the holes ie. not slotted, and everything bolts back up.

As for the part about adjusting the subframe, were you referring to rough68fish's post?
yes, i dont see how the subframe is adjustable. the part the contacts the top of the bushing is the cars body from what i remember, not the subframe; and yes pretty much just excess material as you noted.
Originally Posted by meb
There is an optimal relationship between spring and damper rates, AND, roll couple. Do not assume lowering roll centers is a good thing unless the distance between the roll centers and the centers of gravity are unchanged or made shorter. Also, when lowering any suspension, it is highly advisable to keep an eye on 'new' roll center migration - where the roll centers move to under complete suspension load.
Also . . . I was entirely geared up to install an H-Sport comp sway bar in my 05 MCSc until I heard about this fitment conflict.
Latte, have you done anything slicing and dicing yet? A photograph would go a long way in explaining exactly what the conflict is to those of us who haven't yet stared at the underside of a cabriolet.
Originally Posted by StallionAJG
Latte, have you done anything slicing and dicing yet? A photograph would go a long way in explaining exactly what the conflict is to those of us who haven't yet stared at the underside of a cabriolet.
In fact, I just might want to adjust mine to the middle setting, and that'd be a great time to snap a photograph.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Emnotek
Vendor Announcements
0
Sep 29, 2015 07:37 AM
Mini Mania
Drivetrain Products
0
Sep 28, 2015 09:13 AM
Mini Mania
Vendor Announcements
0
Sep 25, 2015 12:32 PM




