R52 :: Cabrio Talk (2005-2008) Cooper and Cooper S convertible (R52) discussion.

R52 2008 Convertible

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 09:47 AM
  #1  
mparillo's Avatar
mparillo
Thread Starter
|
Neutral
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
2008 Convertible

I have had my 2008 convertible for a week now and have a couple of questions.

1. The manual says gas tank is 13.2 gals. plus 2.1 gals. reserve. Is that a total tank size of 15.3? When I got gas for the 1st time the gage showed 1/4 of tank remaining & the red light in the gage came on, which would indicate appx. 2 gals. left. But when I fillied up I put in 12.3 gallons. Which means I only had .9 gals left or 3 gals left. My trip computer said I had 60 miles range left. That would indicate it's realy closed to a 15 gal tank???

2. I got my MINI with the Chrono package which gives me the tach & speedo next to each other. It also comes with the on-board computer. The manual says I am able to scroll through the functions for avg. speed avg. mpg etc. it also says and current speed. I dont get the current spped just average speed. The dealer says it's an option you have to order, someone else said it's a programable feature???

I thank all those in advance for any comments or thoughts regarding these issues. THANKS.....Mike in Fl.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 10:30 AM
  #2  
ScottRiqui's Avatar
ScottRiqui
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 8
From: Norfolk, VA
I don't think the fuel capacity is 13.2 gallons PLUS a 2.1 gallon reserve. It's closer to 13.2 gallons *total*, although I've been able to put a little more than that in a near-empty tank, which is probably from the extra volume of the filler neck. I do know that one time when the "miles remaining" readout on the OBC got down to 3 miles left, I still wasn't able to put anywhere near 15.3 gallons in it.

I have a cabrio with the Chrono Pack as well, and if you have the Chrono Pack, you lose the ability to display current speed in the OBC display. I think this is the case with NAV-equipped cars as well. I believe the reasoning is that since the Chrono/Nav packages relocate the speedometer to the steering column, there's no need for a digital speed readout in the OBC.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #3  
BlimeyCabrio's Avatar
BlimeyCabrio
6th Gear
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,773
Likes: 9
From: Holly Springs, NC
Yeah... what he ^ said.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #4  
CR&PW&JB's Avatar
CR&PW&JB
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,326
Likes: 6
From: PA
Yeah... what Blimey said.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 04:24 PM
  #5  
BlimeyCabrio's Avatar
BlimeyCabrio
6th Gear
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,773
Likes: 9
From: Holly Springs, NC
By the way:

1) the fuel gauge isn't even CLOSE to being "symmetric" - the last 1/4 goes a WHOLE LOT faster than the first 1/4.
2) My red light comes on at (I think) closer to 1/8 tank vs. 1/4
3) The "miles remaining" estimate on the computer is notoriously inaccurate ... I've seen it drop from 20ish to 0 in as little as 4 miles. I've also driven at least 5 miles on "0" range remaining - so who knows...
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 04:26 PM
  #6  
CR&PW&JB's Avatar
CR&PW&JB
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,326
Likes: 6
From: PA
Yeah... what he ^ said.


okay, okay...I'll stop now.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #7  
BlimeyCabrio's Avatar
BlimeyCabrio
6th Gear
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,773
Likes: 9
From: Holly Springs, NC
You are very wise, CPJ.

 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #8  
CR&PW&JB's Avatar
CR&PW&JB
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,326
Likes: 6
From: PA
Thank you, BC.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 03:32 AM
  #9  
cg1's Avatar
cg1
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BlimeyCabrio
By the way:

1) the fuel gauge isn't even CLOSE to being "symmetric" - the last 1/4 goes a WHOLE LOT faster than the first 1/4.
2) My red light comes on at (I think) closer to 1/8 tank vs. 1/4
3) The "miles remaining" estimate on the computer is notoriously inaccurate ... I've seen it drop from 20ish to 0 in as little as 4 miles. I've also driven at least 5 miles on "0" range remaining - so who knows...
This statement holds true for every car I have ever owned !
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 05:54 AM
  #10  
MiniDaMoocher's Avatar
MiniDaMoocher
4th Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Westminster, CO
I used to own an 1985 325e which had an onboard computer that did the exact same thing. It was so inconsistant that we would never use it. Though it would always register 0 if you ran out of gas.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 05:56 AM
  #11  
PuppetMaster2u's Avatar
PuppetMaster2u
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati Ohio area
I think the "miles remaining" is an estimate that takes into account (a) the amt of fuel left in the tank; multiplied by (b) the current average miles per gallon referenced by the on-board computer.
So I suspect if ya generally drive aggresive, then drive like granny - you'll stretch that last gallon out...but drive like granny, then burn up the last bit & it'll go faster than you expect?
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2007 | 03:21 AM
  #12  
SuperMINIs's Avatar
SuperMINIs
3rd Gear
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Whoa... now I am confused. What the other guy said. huh?
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 06:16 AM
  #13  
ericscottf's Avatar
ericscottf
4th Gear
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 313
Likes: 3
I once got stranded with the OBC saying i had 25 miles left before empty! The car wouldn't start, but it still said 25! After getting some gas, it started right up. how impolite!
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 06:27 AM
  #14  
cristo's Avatar
cristo
Alliance Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 229
From: York, Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by ScottRiqui
I don't think the fuel capacity is 13.2 gallons PLUS a 2.1 gallon reserve. It's closer to 13.2 gallons *total*, although I've been able to put a little more than that in a near-empty tank, which is probably from the extra volume of the filler neck. I do know that one time when the "miles remaining" readout on the OBC got down to 3 miles left, I still wasn't able to put anywhere near 15.3 gallons in it.

I have a cabrio with the Chrono Pack as well, and if you have the Chrono Pack, you lose the ability to display current speed in the OBC display. I think this is the case with NAV-equipped cars as well. I believe the reasoning is that since the Chrono/Nav packages relocate the speedometer to the steering column, there's no need for a digital speed readout in the OBC.
Originally Posted by BlimeyCabrio
Yeah... what he ^ said.
Originally Posted by CR&PW&JB
Yeah... what Blimey said.
Originally Posted by CR&PW&JB
Yeah... what he ^ said.


okay, okay...I'll stop now.
Originally Posted by SuperMINIs
Whoa... now I am confused. What the other guy said. huh?
Yeah, what he ^ said that he ^^ said that he ^^^ said that he ^^^^ said
that he ^^^^^ said.
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 06:42 AM
  #15  
eager2own's Avatar
eager2own
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 0
From: Southlake, TX
Yeah, what he ^ said that he ^^ said that he ^^^ said that he ^^^^ said
that he ^^^^^ said.
+1
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 06:58 AM
  #16  
Loony2N's Avatar
Loony2N
6th Gear
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 15,966
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by BlimeyCabrio
By the way:

1) the fuel gauge isn't even CLOSE to being "symmetric" - the last 1/4 goes a WHOLE LOT faster than the first 1/4.
2) My red light comes on at (I think) closer to 1/8 tank vs. 1/4
3) The "miles remaining" estimate on the computer is notoriously inaccurate ... I've seen it drop from 20ish to 0 in as little as 4 miles. I've also driven at least 5 miles on "0" range remaining - so who knows...
Item #1 is intentionally programmed into every car. The reason is to make you feel like you are getting good mileage. While (mostly) full, the gauge reflects less fuel used than actual. Later, it has to "catch up" so it drops more rapidly.

The distance to empty isn't really inaccurate; it's just not very useful. It takes real-time readings, so if you are sitting at a light, based on consumption at that time it may say you have 30 miles to go. Then you take off from the light and suddenly you have 6 miles left. Of course, the less fuel in your tank at the moment, the more dramatic the moment to moment differences are.
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 07:28 AM
  #17  
eager2own's Avatar
eager2own
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 0
From: Southlake, TX
It takes real-time readings, so if you are sitting at a light, based on consumption at that time it may say you have 30 miles to go.
Partly correct - the computer calculates your remaining range based on your driving over the last 20 miles. . . otherwise, while getting 0 mpg at a light, your computer would expect your range to be 0.

Item #1 is intentionally programmed into every car. The reason is to make you feel like you are getting good mileage. While (mostly) full, the gauge reflects less fuel used than actual. Later, it has to "catch up" so it drops more rapidly.
Can't really comment on that, 'cause I like to think car designers give us more credit than that. I prefer to think that it's psychological (you notice the quicker drop in gas when you're down to 1/4 tank) or because fluctuations in fuel available due to the ptich of the car are more pronounced with less fuel in the tank than more (which really does happen).
 

Last edited by eager2own; Jan 3, 2008 at 07:38 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 09:21 AM
  #18  
BlimeyCabrio's Avatar
BlimeyCabrio
6th Gear
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,773
Likes: 9
From: Holly Springs, NC
Originally Posted by eager2own
Can't really comment on that, 'cause I like to think car designers give us more credit than that. I prefer to think that it's psychological (you notice the quicker drop in gas when you're down to 1/4 tank) or because fluctuations in fuel available due to the ptich of the car are more pronounced with less fuel in the tank than more (which really does happen).
I've always thought that it had more to do with tank geometry and the fuel level sensor - sensor measures the "height" of fuel in the tank, but the volume per unit height is much smaller at the bottom of most tanks where they kinda taper down. But this is of course (a) an assumption (though a pretty rational one) and (b) a gross generalization.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 05:12 AM
  #19  
PuppetMaster2u's Avatar
PuppetMaster2u
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati Ohio area
I s'pose my last post might have been tough to follow but I still think it calculates based on (a) how much gas is left in the tank multiplied by (b) your Avg Miles per Gallon counter? (I got nothing to back that theory up though?)

I s'pose we could try this test: (I would except mine's garaged till the snow melts!)
  1. Take a look and see what the computer calculates your Miles Remaining is (make a note). (lets say its currently 20 MPG x the 5 gallons left = 100 Miles Remaining)
  2. Reset your Avg Miles per Gallon counter.
  3. Drive 5 or 10 miles...nice and easy, which should inflate your new Avg Miles per Gallon. (lets say now it reads 30 MPG x the 5 gallons left = 150 Miles Remaining?)
  4. Look again and see what the computer calculates your Miles Remaining to be (make another note).
  5. Finally, reset the Avg Miles per Gallon counter again.
  6. Drive 5 or 10 more miles, but this time really hammer it; which should drastically DEflate your new Avg Miles per Gallon. (lets say now it reads 10 MPG x the 5 gallons left = 50 Miles Remaining?)
  7. Look again and see what the computer calculates your Miles Remaining?
  8. Is there a change? (more than the 10-20 miles you drove for the test?) Is the change drastic? If there is a drastic change in Miles Remaining (my example was 50 Miles vs 150 Miles Remaining), then it would support the idea that it is calc'd using the Avg Miles per Gallon multiplied by amt of fuel in the tank?
Who wants to try it for us?
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 10:27 AM
  #20  
eager2own's Avatar
eager2own
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 0
From: Southlake, TX
^ Or we could look in that dreaded owner's manual -- 20 miles / 30 km
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 08:58 AM
  #21  
PuppetMaster2u's Avatar
PuppetMaster2u
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati Ohio area
LOL - Brilliant Idea!
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 09:36 AM
  #22  
MINIBee's Avatar
MINIBee
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
I regularly put more than 14 gallons in my tank, and I have driven more than 10 miles with the OBC range saying zero (I like to live on the wild side).
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 06:32 PM
  #23  
Marylander's Avatar
Marylander
1st Gear
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Highland, MD
Originally Posted by MiniDaMoocher
Though it would always register 0 if you ran out of gas.
LOL, very funny.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #24  
johnwenn's Avatar
johnwenn
Neutral
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
the other day my wife said the mini needed gas. I got in and sure enough it said 0 miles left. I live about 10 miles from the gas station and drove there and put 15 gal in the tank. since then i have asked my wife to stop and put her own gas in and not make me live on the wild side.
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #25  
ScottRiqui's Avatar
ScottRiqui
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 8
From: Norfolk, VA
Originally Posted by BlimeyCabrio
I've always thought that it had more to do with tank geometry and the fuel level sensor - sensor measures the "height" of fuel in the tank, but the volume per unit height is much smaller at the bottom of most tanks where they kinda taper down. But this is of course (a) an assumption (though a pretty rational one) and (b) a gross generalization.
That's pretty much it. Because of the way the fuel-level senders work (linearly-variable resistor attached to a float), the gauge needle won't drop at a constant rate unless the tank is a uniform shape, such that each inch of fuel level equates to a constant volume of fuel.

I had a 1972 Mercedes that got around the problem by not spacing the fuel "ticks" evenly on the gauge face. There wasn't even a needle's-width of space between the "Full" and "3/4" marks, and there was only a little over a needle's-width between "1/4" and "Empty". The space between "3/4" and "1/4" probably accounted for 75-85% of the needle travel.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:53 AM.