R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 M MIni 300 hp

Old Oct 22, 2005 | 08:30 AM
  #51  
lhoboy's Avatar
lhoboy
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
From: DC
Originally Posted by CooperSigma
I agree 100%. I was highly dissappointed to hear that there wasn't a bigger engine going into the new Mini. I don't care HOW big of a turbo you put on it, the bottom line is that the small displacement will ultimately hold you back if you're looking for good downlow power.
So how do you explain the 2200 cc 1000 hp formula 1 cars?

Yes, for low end torque a 400 ci stroker may be preferrable.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 10:59 AM
  #52  
CooperSigma's Avatar
CooperSigma
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by lhoboy
So how do you explain the 2200 cc 1000 hp formula 1 cars?

Yes, for low end torque a 400 ci stroker may be preferrable.
Easily. Let's see, as far as I know(read here:correct me if I'm wrong), those engines aren't really designed for longevity, meaning years of use. Also, their redlines are astronomical, another thing which makes a daily-driver fairly worthless.

Also, F1 cars weight what, half of what our Minis do? They're able to properly perform so well because of that. I'd like to see an F1 engine in say, a WRC car and THEN let's see what it can do.

In conclusion, I was generalizing with street use in mind.

Consider this, if the "no replacement for displacement" wasn't true, then why has Suburu upped the size of their boxer engines in the last few iterations? The Rex used to have a 2.0 block, but since they know their customers want more grunt, those cars now come with the 2.5 block. Hell, the STi comes with a 3.0 block, why? Because they know the customers want low-end power.

So, I will admit that I stand by my statement that if our engines had a bigger engine to begin with, they'd be a hell of a lot faster.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 12:09 PM
  #53  
mybroscoop's Avatar
mybroscoop
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: ann arbor michigan
The wrx has a 2.0 liter block and the STI has a 2.5 liter block. They do make 3.0 liter H6 though, slap a turbo on that and lets see what it can do!
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #54  
pcnorton's Avatar
pcnorton
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Back IN Chicopee
Originally Posted by lhoboy
So how do you explain the 2200 cc 1000 hp formula 1 cars?

.
Very simply, they don't have to last but one race before a rebuild. Whats that in miles?


Paul
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #55  
CooperSigma's Avatar
CooperSigma
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mybroscoop
The wrx has a 2.0 liter block and the STI has a 2.5 liter block. They do make 3.0 liter H6 though, slap a turbo on that and lets see what it can do!
You are correct, I was mixing the STi up with their...um...Forester I think.

But yes, they've put the 2.5 in the '06 Rexes.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 12:58 PM
  #56  
zerofighter's Avatar
zerofighter
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB Canada
I don't think the M division would even think about doing a MINI.

To qualify to become an M car, it must:
- be RWD
- have a manual tranmission, but now we are seeing SMGs.

That is why the X5 4.8 is not an M car, due to its being AWD, and having an automatic tranny.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #57  
minimc's Avatar
minimc
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by zerofighter
I don't think the M division would even think about doing a MINI.

To qualify to become an M car, it must:
- be RWD
- have a manual tranmission, but now we are seeing SMGs.

That is why the X5 4.8 is not an M car, due to its being AWD, and having an automatic tranny.
Yeah, but there was also probably a time when corporate BMW said they'd never sell a FWD product.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 01:12 PM
  #58  
supersand's Avatar
supersand
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by MCLeonard
I'd be happy with 200whp if they would also shed about 600lbs. Drop weight and everything else works better too, brakes, springs, turning, and of course acceleration. I have a vehicle that makes only 125 hp. 0-60 in 3 seconds, top speed 160mph. Turns and brakes like nothing else. Weighs 600lbs with me on board. I think we have seen that the 4 cyl can put out 200hp. I just wish they would offer a stripper model MINI that was lighter. What really gets me is these show cars that have high power but they have added 1000lbs of sound gear. It really is all about power to weight.
I second this sentiment. No need for a huge engine, just less total mass. One more possible plus would be better fuel economy.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 11:19 AM
  #59  
lhoboy's Avatar
lhoboy
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
From: DC
Originally Posted by pcnorton
Very simply, they don't have to last but one race before a rebuild. Whats that in miles?


Paul
Try pushing your JCW MCS (or mine) at full throttle for more than a couple hours and you'll be rebuilding your engine as well. The biggest difference in the Formula engines is the size and strength of the components. The crankshaft, for example, has the cross section rivaling that of an eighteen wheeler. Of course, the smaller displacement engines generate the big power at engine speeds well above 10,000 rpm. "Low end" power can be managed with gearing. I could go on and on. Use a small displacement, use a large displacement engine. You can achieve massive power any which way, reliably! You have to design the entire system to get both, not just tweak one parameter (ie. stuff in a larger engine).
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #60  
pcnorton's Avatar
pcnorton
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Back IN Chicopee
Originally Posted by lhoboy
Try pushing your JCW MCS (or mine) at full throttle for more than a couple hours and you'll be rebuilding your engine as well. The biggest difference in the Formula engines is the size and strength of the components. The crankshaft, for example, has the cross section rivaling that of an eighteen wheeler. Of course, the smaller displacement engines generate the big power at engine speeds well above 10,000 rpm. "Low end" power can be managed with gearing. I could go on and on. Use a small displacement, use a large displacement engine. You can achieve massive power any which way, reliably! You have to design the entire system to get both, not just tweak one parameter (ie. stuff in a larger engine).
Sorry don't buy it. There is a huge difference between an engine operation at the high efficiency of F1 engines and the detuned JCW Works. Much less stress. Even at full throttle the stress on the Mini components are way less.

The component of a F1 engine are the lightest possible for the maximum weight to strength ratios. The rev higher faster---more friction. More wear.


Paul
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 06:19 PM
  #61  
motorsports3's Avatar
motorsports3
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Originally Posted by mtbscott
Sounds like you're all about straightline performance (not that there's anything wrong with that:smile: ), but that's not what the M series of cars is all about. Pumping out 300 hp through the front wheels in a heavily front-weight biased car would never meet the handling/braking dynamics of the straight line acceleration.
My MINI when it was 215 hp was as fast or faster than e36 and e46 m3s and would out handle them too. If a MINI was from factory 300hp it would not be as cheap as it is and would not make any sence for beemer to sell them. That would be my guess.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #62  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pcnorton
Sorry don't buy it. There is a huge difference between an engine operation at the high efficiency of F1 engines and the detuned JCW Works. Much less stress. Even at full throttle the stress on the Mini components are way less.

The component of a F1 engine are the lightest possible for the maximum weight to strength ratios. The rev higher faster---more friction. More wear.


Paul
I never said it had to be with the existing engine.......there are many platforms that could produce 300 hp
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 07:22 PM
  #63  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
GOOD ON MATE!!!

Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
Is that a statement of fact or a statement of your opinion?

Think what you want, however, I must interject, as others have in other threads, that the throttle pedel in the MINI Cooper is NOT an On/Off switch.

Again, each is entitled to an opinion, and I'll go happily thru the twisties in my 300hp+ front-wheel-drive MCS by pushing my proportional throttle pedal to the correct angle to achieve proper traction for the condition of the road.

Motor On!
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 02:38 AM
  #64  
effusant's Avatar
effusant
3rd Gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 1
From: on the edge of forever
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
The amount of HP a car's engine has, has NOTHING to do with how well the car handles. Suspension component settings, tire choice, total weight of car, and overall weight distribution does.


  • How can the HP dictate how a spring expands, or how a shock absorber compresses?
  • How does the HP rating change ride height or skew the geometery of the suspension system?
  • How does the HP rating modify the stickyness of your tires?
First, generally speaking, engines that make more power will be heavier. That will have the effects of pushing the weight balance forward of center as well as changing how the suspension moves (more weight will lower the period of oscillation). Next, having more torque and power causes the weight to shift. Ever see an old truck with a huge v8 and a twisted bed? A powerful engine can turn a frame. Even a moderately built engine will usually be able to twist a car enough for the suspension to respond. Try goosing the throttle while not in gear. You will feel the car move. And finally, when you're handling close to the limit of the suspension, the engine can push you past the limits of traction, if not properly controlled. And then there's torque steer, too. Differentials tend to put more power through one wheel or the other. It has to do with the design of the planetary gears inside, and shouldn't be much of an issue with a limited slip diff. IIRC, this will push one side of the car slightly faster than the other, effectively steering away from the side getting the power.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 08:16 AM
  #65  
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by effusant
First, generally speaking, engines that make more power will be heavier.That will have the effects of pushing the weight balance forward of center as well as changing how the suspension moves (more weight will lower the period of oscillation).
Dude, we're not dropping in a V8! People who are adding a turbo, aren't adding much more than 30 kilos of weight into the engine compartment.

Originally Posted by effusant
Next, having more torque and power causes the weight to shift.
Throttle position issue, see my comments earlier in this thread!

Originally Posted by effusant
Ever see an old truck with a huge v8 and a twisted bed? A powerful engine can turn a frame. Even a moderately built engine will usually be able to twist a car enough for the suspension to respond. Try goosing the throttle while not in gear.
Throttle control issue, see my comments earlier in this thread.

Originally Posted by effusant
You will feel the car move. And finally, when you're handling close to the limit of the suspension, the engine can push you past the limits of traction, if not properly controlled.
Once again this comes down to, user input to the gas pedal. See my comments earlier in this thread.

Originally Posted by effusant
And then there's torque steer, too. Differentials tend to put more power through one wheel or the other. It has to do with the design of the planetary gears inside, and shouldn't be much of an issue with a limited slip diff. IIRC, this will push one side of the car slightly faster than the other, effectively steering away from the side getting the power.
And, again, this comes down to the driver's responsibility to control wheel spin with their right foot.

Anything else where you can attribute an engines power to suspension handling?
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 09:00 AM
  #66  
JeffS's Avatar
JeffS
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by Ryephile
Mitsubishi and Subaru don't count, eh?
Show me a 300HP Mitsubishi... yes, the subaru does in STI form. Maybe the $33K price tag has an extra transmission or two built in there. Of course, if you've been following these cars you know that both companies, especially mitsu, have been strict with warranty coverage -- for the reasons I mentioned above.


Originally Posted by Ryephile
Ok, what would you prefer to see? After all, throwing out ideas IS the point of this thread!
Sorry, I guess I should just let the dreamers dream. My "dream" would be a 200HP 2000lb mini. -- which will never happen.

Of course, I'd like to have a 300HP 2000lb mini - which will also never happen - but if it ever did, the cost would be so high that I wouldn't buy one anyway. The closer the cost gets to 30K, the more likely I am to buy an S2000/Evo/STi. The closer the cost gets to 40K, the more likely I am to buy an Elise.

Realistically, mini COULD have put a decent engine in the car at the same pricepoint. There are plenty of 4 cylinder engines making this power without forced induction. Either go that route and lower the price, or keep the FI and shoot for low 200's (think Cobalt SS, Ion Redline, SRT) . They could even have increased fuel efficiency at the same time if they'd wanted to. I can only conclude that chose not to, which sucks.

I've always thought that dumbing down cars to justify a price point is a bad idea. Then again, what do I know... people are already spending much more money on these cars than I ever thought they would. Of course, those people typically are the ones buying a "unique" car, not a "performance" car.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 09:48 AM
  #67  
TonyB's Avatar
TonyB
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 2
From: a canyon, south Bay Area
Originally Posted by JeffS
...Sorry, I guess I should just let the dreamers dream. My "dream" would be a 200HP 2000lb mini. -- which will never happen.

--- About 4 years ago I was a little bummed to learn that our little cars were actually quite portly... While 2,000 pounds is doable for our MINI, it will be gutted and stripped-out big time. I'm rapidly approaching 2,400 lbs though, and I'm incrementing upwards to 240 bhp. Quite happy with the results thus far...

Realistically, mini COULD have put a decent engine in the car at the same pricepoint. There are plenty of 4 cylinder engines making this power without forced induction. Either go that route and lower the price, or keep the FI and shoot for low 200's (think Cobalt SS, Ion Redline, SRT) . They could even have increased fuel efficiency at the same time if they'd wanted to. I can only conclude that chose not to, which sucks.

--- Not too sure about fitment of those engines, but the Cobalt one (I think Ecotec) would have been nice for sure as it already has a butt-load of tuning options. As far as NA, the Mazda 2.3 engine like in the Mazda 3's would have been cool. I guess this is also Ford these days, so it would be the Duratec. Cosworth has done much with these engines... 260 bhp, and still NA if I'm not mistaken! The Caterham 260 utilizes this baby... Again, fitment, hard to say what all was considered, and the trade-offs made. In a FWD car with a short wheel base, more and more uumph is not always the best solution I suppose...

I've always thought that dumbing down cars to justify a price point is a bad idea. Then again, what do I know... people are already spending much more money on these cars than I ever thought they would. Of course, those people typically are the ones buying a "unique" car, not a "performance" car.

--- For a sub $20k car (my MCS MSRP was 19 something), I would bet that the MINI has lured owners with more disposable income and with average salaries above that of any car in this price range. I generally don't make such bold statements, but I truly believe this to be accurate. If so, when one is willing and able, things happen. On the right track, with an investment of $5k (give or take), the MINI will more than hold its own. Think onasled at Lime Rock. Showed my pop that vid yesterday with him at LR with the Porsches
.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 04:55 PM
  #68  
effusant's Avatar
effusant
3rd Gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 1
From: on the edge of forever
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
waa waa waa
I didn't say a capable driver can't control more power. I replied to your questions of how tweaking and engine for more power can affect the operation of the suspension.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 06:54 PM
  #69  
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by effusant
I didn't say a capable driver can't control more power. I replied to your questions of how tweaking and engine for more power can affect the operation of the suspension.
1st, you took my question totally out of context. 2nd, since you can't communicate in an adult manner, I don't plan to discuss this issue with anymore with you.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cereall
Stock Problems/Issues
14
Sep 5, 2019 06:05 PM
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
28
Dec 23, 2015 10:36 AM
Dashdog
MINIs & Minis for Sale
0
Aug 10, 2015 06:17 AM
ECSTuning
Vendor Announcements
0
Aug 7, 2015 08:02 AM
ECSTuning
Interior/Exterior Products
0
Aug 7, 2015 05:56 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:30 AM.