R50/53 Mini Versus Ford Excursion
If I may chime in on the SUV clamor. They are a necessary evil, unfortunately. W/ 4 kids, where in a Mini do you put them?? For that matter where in any sedan or station wagon do you put them along w/ all their stuff?? Never mind the dog, or camping equipment. That brings up another point, ever gone 4 wheeling w/ a Mini?? That first pebble you drive over might high center you. Some of us not only belong to a Mini club but also to 4wheel drive clubs and yes, we do use them to go "off-highway" (that's the PC way of saying 4 wheeling
) So when we all go camping, who wants to load up the Mini and drive???? Or shall we take the 'Cruiser..
Just havin' fun.
And yes there are those that shouldn't be driving anything, much less an SUV. They are just plain old stupid drivers that would hit the side of a building if they didn't have speed dial on their cell phone and had to dial conventionally.
Later
BDMini. '05 MCS, '00 'Burban, '75 Toyota LandCruiser FJ55
) So when we all go camping, who wants to load up the Mini and drive???? Or shall we take the 'Cruiser..
Just havin' fun.
And yes there are those that shouldn't be driving anything, much less an SUV. They are just plain old stupid drivers that would hit the side of a building if they didn't have speed dial on their cell phone and had to dial conventionally.
Later
BDMini. '05 MCS, '00 'Burban, '75 Toyota LandCruiser FJ55
Originally Posted by bdmini
If I may chime in on the SUV clamor. They are a necessary evil, unfortunately. W/ 4 kids, where in a Mini do you put them?? For that matter where in any sedan or station wagon do you put them along w/ all their stuff?? Never mind the dog, or camping equipment.
Oh, but wait, minivans aren't "cool" enough? Give me a break - what is it about SUVs that makes them so "cool"? It just looks stupid on paved roads. Not tough, but pompous, IMO!
In all honesty, I only believe there are two truly valid reasons to own an SUV:
1) The need to tow something heavy from time to time, like a boat.
2) Off-roading. Note that for "camping" above, most people don't go that far off the road for camping with their family. Certainly not enough to require 4WD/AWD usually.
Now, in your case BDMini, you have indicated that you do go 4-wheeling. So you would certainly fall into the 5% category, of people who can justify their SUV. The fact is though, 95% of SUV owners can't. And if the government had regulated SUVs like CARS instead of trucks, as they SHOULD, we wouldn't be in this mess. After all, they are used like cars 95% of the time.
Of course, this is still America, and anyone can buy any vehicle they want. I just wish the regulations were the same, based upon real world type of use. Large, heavy SUVs only make the roads more dangerous for everyone else. And just like second hand smoke, that issue DOES go beyond simple "individual choice".
I concur w/ you Edge. I can't tell you how many times people have come into my shop w/ a perceived mechanical problem only to find that they have accidentally shifted their 4WD into 4 wheel high....oops
Later
Later
Spot on Edge - vans were designed for family hauling and are safer all around - for the passengers as well as others on the road for many reasons. Very few people take their SUVs off road or tow big stuff, and even for those that do it for a high percentage the demand is infrequent and could be filled by the occasional renting of the appropriate truck for that.
My former bro in law, a police officer, knew this and managed to raise 4 very tall kids just fine using family vans and sedans.
My former bro in law, a police officer, knew this and managed to raise 4 very tall kids just fine using family vans and sedans.
Originally Posted by Super Coop
Sorry that you got hit by an idiot. However, she was not an idiot because she drove an SUV, she would be an idiot no matter what she drove. I drive a big gas sucking SUV that only occasionally goes into 4WD. I've never been in a ditch either before, during, or after a snowfall. I drink coffee while I'm driving it. Does that make me an idiot? I also drive a MCS. I also drink coffee in that. Out of a travel cup I bought at the MINI dealer.
Next time anybody feels that a full size SUV is worthless, hook up a tandem axle trailer loaded with a race car to their MINI and tow it to a race track 10 hours away.
I'm lucky enought to have several vehicles to use, so I can pick one out that suits my need for that day. Usually it's the MINI. However, a lot of people can only afford or want one vehicle, so they buy one that fills a wide variety of requirements. Like it or not, a Utility Vehicle, Sport or not, fills that requirement for a lot of people.
Next time anybody feels that a full size SUV is worthless, hook up a tandem axle trailer loaded with a race car to their MINI and tow it to a race track 10 hours away.
I'm lucky enought to have several vehicles to use, so I can pick one out that suits my need for that day. Usually it's the MINI. However, a lot of people can only afford or want one vehicle, so they buy one that fills a wide variety of requirements. Like it or not, a Utility Vehicle, Sport or not, fills that requirement for a lot of people.
Anyway, there is nothing wrong with owning anything large if you know how to drive it. Keep on motoring bro, truck, mini and all!
Originally Posted by daflake
Anyway, there is nothing wrong with owning anything large if you know how to drive it. Keep on motoring bro, truck, mini and all! 
Not quite Mini related, but it adds to this thread
The fuel consumption issue isn't a good argument against SUV's especially when comparing them to minivans. A quick check on Vehix revealed some interesting #'s.'06 Chrysler Town & Country 18mpg. city--25mpg. hwy.
'05 Kia Sedona LX 15mpg. city--20mpg. hwy.
'05 Honda Odessey 19mpg. city--23mpg. hwy.
'05 Ford Freestar SEL 17mpg. city--23mpg. hwy.
'05 Audi Allroad Quattro 4.2L 16mpg. city--21mpg. hwy.
'05 Audi Allroad Quattro 2.7L 16mpg. city--22mpg. hwy.
in comparison to the big, bad, SUV's (all w/ 4x4 options)
'05 Chevy Suburban 5.3L 14mpg. city--18mpg. hwy.
'05 Ford Expedition 5.4L 14mpg. city--19mpg. hwy.
'05 Hummer H3 16mpg. city--20mpg. hwy.
Anyways, just some #'s to chew on. Sorry it's not Mini related, but all this shows is that minivans aren't necessarily a great alternative if gas consumption is one of your chiefest concerns. This comparison isn't meant as an excuse for misusing our natural resources, but solely placed here to show some comparison between some common vehicles.
Later
p.s. The Audi's fuel consumption really surprised me w/ how thirsty they
are.
I appreciate the feedback and do realize that a lot of people buy large SUVs for the "wrong" reasons, bit it's a free country and people can buy whatever they can afford.
I don't think that people turn into bad drivers when they get behind the wheel of an SUV, I think they're bad no matter what they're in. Let's face it, most people have just enough driving talent to get to wherever they're going without crashing. To most people, driving is a neccesity, not a passion. A vehicle is an appliance, not an object of affection. We're different here. We're enthusiasts. We love to drive, take it serious, and truly enjoy our cars. They're not just transporatation, they're a part of our lifestyle and we devote a lot of time to them.
For what it's worth, my girlfriend and I each ride motorcycles - British of course - Triumph Speed Triples. So obviously, we are very aware of people in cars doing boneheaded moves around us that could potentially kill us or maim us for life. On two occasions (once for me, once for her) we've had close calls close enough that I approached the driver to "counsel" them on their driving. Both were in cars, not SUVs.
MINIs are "huge" compared to a bike.
Motor safe.
Dave
I don't think that people turn into bad drivers when they get behind the wheel of an SUV, I think they're bad no matter what they're in. Let's face it, most people have just enough driving talent to get to wherever they're going without crashing. To most people, driving is a neccesity, not a passion. A vehicle is an appliance, not an object of affection. We're different here. We're enthusiasts. We love to drive, take it serious, and truly enjoy our cars. They're not just transporatation, they're a part of our lifestyle and we devote a lot of time to them.
For what it's worth, my girlfriend and I each ride motorcycles - British of course - Triumph Speed Triples. So obviously, we are very aware of people in cars doing boneheaded moves around us that could potentially kill us or maim us for life. On two occasions (once for me, once for her) we've had close calls close enough that I approached the driver to "counsel" them on their driving. Both were in cars, not SUVs.
MINIs are "huge" compared to a bike.
Motor safe.
Dave
I have always thought that there should be an additional test for oversized vehicles. I think that it is obvious that you have to have better abilities to manuver a vehicle like that, so why not test them for it?
Originally Posted by daflake
I have always thought that there should be an additional test for oversized vehicles. I think that it is obvious that you have to have better abilities to manuver a vehicle like that, so why not test them for it?
And here's a personal opinion sure to stir up debate, so I'm wearing fire-proof underwear:
As children, we learn that women have a lower center of gravity than men. I have watched women take vehicles through maneuvers that Formula 1 drivers would balk at, all while having a casual conversation or sipping coffee. My personal theory is that their lower center of gravity makes them feel more stable in high-speed maneuvers, sometimes more stable than what the vehicle can achieve.
This is not a bash on women, but perhaps a recognition of a physiological difference, and one that could potentially equate to a higher susceptibility to vehicular accidents. Furthermore, it's a difference that becomes more pronounced in a vehicle that's already easy to upset.
Originally Posted by daflake
I have always thought that there should be an additional test for oversized vehicles. I think that it is obvious that you have to have better abilities to manuver a vehicle like that, so why not test them for it?
So sorry to hear about your accident, but please don't bash all suv drivers, I happen to have both, a suv and a mini, I agree that a lot of the bigger vechicle drivers are not very intuned to what they are doing, but so are car drivers, the problem almost always seems to be that they have a phone stuck to their ear and in their own little world. I have had more close calls in the mini than in any other vechicle I have ever owned, and no, not all of them were from SUV drivers, last week, I had a car run a red light, thank god I was paying attention, otherwise, she would have slammed me in the side.
Anyway, glad the damage appears to be minimal and I hope they get it fixed quickly for you. To answer your questions concerning your insurance going up after the wreck, it shouldn't since it wasn't your fault, and your insurance company will sue her for the $$.
Anyway, glad the damage appears to be minimal and I hope they get it fixed quickly for you. To answer your questions concerning your insurance going up after the wreck, it shouldn't since it wasn't your fault, and your insurance company will sue her for the $$.
Originally Posted by buzzy
Originally Posted by Super Coop
On two occasions (once for me, once for her) we've had close calls close enough that I approached the driver to "counsel" them on their driving. Both were in cars, not SUVs.
Originally Posted by JeffS
That's a good way to get yourself hurt. I had a friend who got runover by the driver while walking back to his bike after such a conversation.
Originally Posted by buzzy
Good article
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gil-galad
Eastern Iowa MINIs
63
Nov 17, 2016 02:54 PM
ECSTuning
Drivetrain Products
0
Aug 10, 2015 01:59 PM
tippin
F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+)
3
Aug 5, 2015 08:43 AM



