R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 remote turbo on a mini

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 10:18 AM
  #1  
astroBlackMetallic_Mini's Avatar
astroBlackMetallic_Mini
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 14
From: FL
remote turbo on a mini

anyone ever done / considered a "remote turbo" on their mini? seems like the R53 would be a great candidate; make it a "one ball" exhaust and use that newly made space for turbo placement. since the turbo is NOT in the engine bay, this could potentially clear up the overheating issues that are commonly seen with twin charged setups.

even "cooler" would be to use an exhaust dump valve hooked up to the turbo with active ecu management. This way, you could basically press a button that would open the exhaust dump valve, which would drive the turbo, enabling a twin charged system. at the same time, the computer map is adjusted for the extra power, enabling full turbo use.

yes, its over complicated, but think of me as the "Rube Goldberg" of engines lol jk.

Thoughts? Never heard of a "remote turbo"? its a neat idea. Google it, and check the Images link!
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 10:35 AM
  #2  
04liquidS's Avatar
04liquidS
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa
Ive seen them done a whole bunch on older Fbodys and the like. I never understood them. Seemed like there was so much piping it wasnt worth it. I always wondered how bad the lag was, or how efficient that kind of setup really is on a street car.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 10:50 AM
  #3  
astroBlackMetallic_Mini's Avatar
astroBlackMetallic_Mini
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 14
From: FL
well, you Dont need a turbo manifold for one, you may not even need an intercoler for 2 (since the pipe to the throttle is so long and the turbo gets so much air, it cools it quite efficiently), its much easier to install one where you have a ton of room (back underside of the car) for 3.

lag, probably, bad, prolly not, as it should be a pressurized system anyway. efficient, why not? how is it any different than putting the turbo under the hood?

piping, well, its Longer, but not More complicated per say... may be even Less complicated, since you can bring the pipe up from where ever you want under the engine.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 10:53 AM
  #4  
ThumperMCS's Avatar
ThumperMCS
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 19
From: OC, CA
Originally Posted by astroBlackMetallic_Mini
anyone ever done / considered a "remote turbo" on their mini? seems like the R53 would be a great candidate; make it a "one ball" exhaust and use that newly made space for turbo placement. since the turbo is NOT in the engine bay, this could potentially clear up the overheating issues that are commonly seen with twin charged setups.

even "cooler" would be to use an exhaust dump valve hooked up to the turbo with active ecu management. This way, you could basically press a button that would open the exhaust dump valve, which would drive the turbo, enabling a twin charged system. at the same time, the computer map is adjusted for the extra power, enabling full turbo use.

yes, its over complicated, but think of me as the "Rube Goldberg" of engines lol jk.

Thoughts? Never heard of a "remote turbo"? its a neat idea. Google it, and check the Images link!
Moving the turbo back does not solve any of the issues with twincharging, it probably just complicates the setup even more.

The problem with heat on TC setups stems from the fact you are running two FI sources, doesn't matter where you put them. You are cramming heated compressed air from the turbo into the supercharger where it is compressed and heated even more.

Twincharging was THE thing in the MINI world back in circa-2006...but I can tell you, there is a reason you don't see them anymore. For big power...you go Turbo-only or Rotrex, pick your poison. And FWIW, some M45 cars now are making as much if not more power than some of the old twincharged cars were making back in the day.

Originally Posted by 04liquidS
Ive seen them done a whole bunch on older Fbodys and the like. I never understood them. Seemed like there was so much piping it wasnt worth it. I always wondered how bad the lag was, or how efficient that kind of setup really is on a street car.
That's the thing, they aren't efficient, its too much distance for the boost to travel. They are cool for show, or if you really want to turbo something that has ZERO space up front...I've seen someone try to do E60 M5's with it and as far as I know, it never panned out. Tuning rear setups is a nightmare.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 11:14 AM
  #5  
BlwnAway's Avatar
BlwnAway
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 315
From: Arnold, MO.
Eric @ Helix has a T/C setup with the turbo in the rear right now, was @ the dragon with it this year.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 11:53 AM
  #6  
Ambient Thermal Management's Avatar
Ambient Thermal Management
Former Vendor
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Boom
You Tube
"> You Tube
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350">
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
Jul 16, 2020 12:54 PM
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
28
Dec 23, 2015 10:36 AM
rckrzy1
Drivetrain (Cooper S)
4
Aug 11, 2015 06:06 PM
Ambient Thermal Management
Drivetrain (Cooper S)
0
Aug 7, 2015 12:27 PM
tippin
F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+)
3
Aug 5, 2015 08:43 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:21 PM.