When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Based on those numbers on a stock Mini you could have saved yourself the hassle of putting on a M62 on your car.
Bill
The test car on the graph apparently puts out about 144 whp (tire achievment) and 193 bhp...I think a M62 might do better than that. This looks to ba about a 6 whp increase due to the tune...and I understand that whp is not always the reason to do the tune!
The test car on the graph apparently puts out about 144 whp (tire achievment) and 193 bhp...I think a M62 might do better than that. This looks to ba about a 6 whp increase due to the tune...and I understand that whp is not always the reason to do the tune!
I don't want to spoil the party but is there a 'before' dyno of the stock MCS? This doesn't mean anything....
In Holland 2 MCS's had 193 and 195hp with the MTH tunerfile + the MTH header.
I don't want to spoil the party but is there a 'before' dyno of the stock MCS? This doesn't mean anything....
In Holland 2 MCS's had 193 and 195hp with the MTH tunerfile + the MTH header.
No, there is not. This was the only dyno plot that was sent to me.
The test car on the graph apparently puts out about 144 whp (tire achievment) and 193 bhp...I think a M62 might do better than that. This looks to ba about a 6 whp increase due to the tune...and I understand that whp is not always the reason to do the tune!
Look again, the 144 is in kw...which is 193 whp, which is, depending on the number you use for drivetrain loss, lets assume 12% is about 216 at the crank.
Results seem a little high with just software, but to each there own.
Look again, the 144 is in kw...which is 193 whp, which is, depending on the number you use for drivetrain loss, lets assume 12% is about 216 at the crank.
Results seem a little high with just software, but to each there own.
If it is with only software then that's great stuff. I was interpreting the "normal achievement" as bhp and the "tire achievemnt" as whp....? Any more German help out there?
I don't want to spoil the party but is there a 'before' dyno of the stock MCS? This doesn't mean anything....
In Holland 2 MCS's had 193 and 195hp with the MTH tunerfile + the MTH header.
Look again, the 144 is in kw...which is 193 whp, which is, depending on the number you use for drivetrain loss, lets assume 12% is about 216 at the crank.
Results seem a little high with just software, but to each there own.
147.3HP is at the wheels
195.6HP is at the cranck
Over 20% drivetrainloss. Seems a bit much. This is why the crankhp number is so high.