Suspension Toe in or toe out?
Toe in or toe out?
I've seen both suggested here and would like to know which is best for combination family car/auto-x car.
'02 MCS. OEM suspension with Helix camber plates(just installed). 22mm rear sway set on softest of 2 settings.
'02 MCS. OEM suspension with Helix camber plates(just installed). 22mm rear sway set on softest of 2 settings.
Toe out will increase intial turn-in grip. Toe-out will also cause the tires to 'drag' along straight roads. Toe-out will hurt braking - I know you know all this obehave. Toe out will help to alleviate the gyroscopic nature of big negative camber angles; once beyond about 1.75 neg degrees for the Mini, camber thrust and the gyroscopic characteristic become apparent. The gyroscopic characteristic manifests when the wheel hits a bump; it feels like a quick shimmy in the steering. Toe out tends to straighten the wheel a bit to offset this. Camber thrust occurs when one - non vertical - wheel hits a bump and the force causes a sideways thrust instead of a mostly vertical motion.
My Mini was set with 2 degrees negative camber and 1/64" toe in; I drive a lot of straight highway miles and the combo of toe out and neg camber will chew up tires. I experimented recently with 1 degree neg and 1.5 degree neg and steering feel while driving on the highway was much improved , especially at 1 degree neg. Curiosly, I percieved no change in the steering effort, nervousness or better intial grip upon turn-in when going from 2 degrees neg to 1 degree neg camber- toe will move from toe-in to toe-out with the adjustments I made. The difference in grip between 1 and 2 degrees neg is extremely noticable. The Megans were set on adjustment 13 for this test - fairly soft against 32 as the stiffest.
I'll leave the camber at 1.5 or a hair less for daily driving and move it back to 2 for track work. I do not know why toe changes did not materialize into something either good or bad, but I'm wondering if the Powerflex bushings have something to do with this...still thinking...
Hope this helps.
My Mini was set with 2 degrees negative camber and 1/64" toe in; I drive a lot of straight highway miles and the combo of toe out and neg camber will chew up tires. I experimented recently with 1 degree neg and 1.5 degree neg and steering feel while driving on the highway was much improved , especially at 1 degree neg. Curiosly, I percieved no change in the steering effort, nervousness or better intial grip upon turn-in when going from 2 degrees neg to 1 degree neg camber- toe will move from toe-in to toe-out with the adjustments I made. The difference in grip between 1 and 2 degrees neg is extremely noticable. The Megans were set on adjustment 13 for this test - fairly soft against 32 as the stiffest.
I'll leave the camber at 1.5 or a hair less for daily driving and move it back to 2 for track work. I do not know why toe changes did not materialize into something either good or bad, but I'm wondering if the Powerflex bushings have something to do with this...still thinking...
Hope this helps.
Originally Posted by snooter
Thought this was the Hokey Pokey thread, my bad 


i have too much toe-out dialed in my walk.
my wife has toe-in but she still wanders around too much while at the Mall.
not sure what the heck's going on with that...
I to have powerfelx bushing up front and IE fixed cmaber plates up front and IE (Ireland Engineering) lower arms and control arm insetrs in the rear. This combination moves around a lot less than the facory bushings. I am running zero toe front a rear - with just a tiney favor towards neg tow. So my static tow is like -1/32 in front an -1/16 in rear. With this "static" algiment - (all they can measure at a shop) your will get some tiney amount of toe in in front under power (the power will pull the tires in). Under braking you will get significant toe out at both ends - this is great for turn in - but can be sqwirly on the track or street. I would recoemnd about 1/16 in at both ends for street - if the car wanders to much for your taste on the highway then go with -1/8 in front.
Wes
Wes
I went from 1/16 in (set from the factory) to 3/32 out for my last auto-x. Even though I was running 205's vice 215's I had much less understeer on turn in. I don't have my camber plates yet so that's my only adjustment. By the way, it was a rain race so I don't have a dry race to compare yet.
See you at Pungo tomorrow,
Russ
See you at Pungo tomorrow,
Russ
I'd leave the camber at Auto-X levels and change only the toe because it's simple enough to count full turns when adjusting them at an event--so you could even set them back for the drive home. Toe-out on the highway gets tiresome really fast, but the quicker turn-in is marvelous.
Adjusting front camber to more negative automatically adds toe-in which is such a hassle to set right each time that I'd rather just run lots of camber all of the time and replace the tires more frequently.
Adjusting front camber to more negative automatically adds toe-in which is such a hassle to set right each time that I'd rather just run lots of camber all of the time and replace the tires more frequently.
Trending Topics
I run -2.5 with 1/8 out front, -1.9 with no toe back. My car turns in amazingly well at autocrossing and on the street. The drawback is that highway driving is like trying to walk a straight line on tip-toes. When I really get into the power of the Turbokomressor there's a "Holy Sh*t!!" factor in keeping the beast in a straight line as I unload the front wheels.
If I was looking for a compromise I'd go 0 toe front and back.
If I was looking for a compromise I'd go 0 toe front and back.
Originally Posted by meb
Toe out will increase intial turn-in grip. Toe-out will also cause the tires to 'drag' along straight roads. Toe-out will hurt braking - I know you know all this obehave. Toe out will help to alleviate the gyroscopic nature of big negative camber angles; once beyond about 1.75 neg degrees for the Mini, camber thrust and the gyroscopic characteristic become apparent. The gyroscopic characteristic manifests when the wheel hits a bump; it feels like a quick shimmy in the steering. Toe out tends to straighten the wheel a bit to offset this. Camber thrust occurs when one - non vertical - wheel hits a bump and the force causes a sideways thrust instead of a mostly vertical motion.
My Mini was set with 2 degrees negative camber and 1/64" toe in; I drive a lot of straight highway miles and the combo of toe out and neg camber will chew up tires. I experimented recently with 1 degree neg and 1.5 degree neg and steering feel while driving on the highway was much improved , especially at 1 degree neg. Curiosly, I percieved no change in the steering effort, nervousness or better intial grip upon turn-in when going from 2 degrees neg to 1 degree neg camber- toe will move from toe-in to toe-out with the adjustments I made. The difference in grip between 1 and 2 degrees neg is extremely noticable. The Megans were set on adjustment 13 for this test - fairly soft against 32 as the stiffest.
I'll leave the camber at 1.5 or a hair less for daily driving and move it back to 2 for track work. I do not know why toe changes did not materialize into something either good or bad, but I'm wondering if the Powerflex bushings have something to do with this...still thinking...
Hope this helps.
My Mini was set with 2 degrees negative camber and 1/64" toe in; I drive a lot of straight highway miles and the combo of toe out and neg camber will chew up tires. I experimented recently with 1 degree neg and 1.5 degree neg and steering feel while driving on the highway was much improved , especially at 1 degree neg. Curiosly, I percieved no change in the steering effort, nervousness or better intial grip upon turn-in when going from 2 degrees neg to 1 degree neg camber- toe will move from toe-in to toe-out with the adjustments I made. The difference in grip between 1 and 2 degrees neg is extremely noticable. The Megans were set on adjustment 13 for this test - fairly soft against 32 as the stiffest.
I'll leave the camber at 1.5 or a hair less for daily driving and move it back to 2 for track work. I do not know why toe changes did not materialize into something either good or bad, but I'm wondering if the Powerflex bushings have something to do with this...still thinking...
Hope this helps.
Dead on. The reasoning behind the settings was what I really needed a grasp on.
Just finished reading Chassis Engineering by Herb Adams and still need help
Good book for those interested. Not enough reference to FWD though.
Check me on this if you would. The more negative I go with camber the more toe in I pick up. Is that right? This is due to the steering arms being behind the knuckle, correct?
TIA
Originally Posted by obehave
Dead on. The reasoning behind the settings was what I really needed a grasp on.
Just finished reading Chassis Engineering by Herb Adams and still need help
Good book for those interested. Not enough reference to FWD though.
Check me on this if you would. The more negative I go with camber the more toe in I pick up. Is that right? This is due to the steering arms being behind the knuckle, correct?
TIA
Just finished reading Chassis Engineering by Herb Adams and still need help
Good book for those interested. Not enough reference to FWD though.
Check me on this if you would. The more negative I go with camber the more toe in I pick up. Is that right? This is due to the steering arms being behind the knuckle, correct?
TIA
BTW just got the camber plates for mine.. and reset them.. currently running 1.75 neg camber with 1.5 neg caster and 0 toe. Works good on the street and cloverleafs
oh and for those wondering a Front steer car is when the steering Knuckle is infront of the axle.. and a Rear steer car is where the Knuckle is behind the axle. Alot of Race teams perfer a Front steer car due to if kissing the wall and bending a steering rod it will cause the car to naturall drift away from the wall, while a Rear steer will want to drift into the wall. Beside that a placement of the steering box , rack an other things for weight.. there really isnt much of a difference
When I removed the cob webs from my brain a while back...I think that there might be another reason; negative camber in many instances is a great partner to toe out. so adjusting camber has a more natural affect on toe from a racer's standpoint.
Originally Posted by obehave
Sounds like -1.5 and 1/8th out are me best compromise.
Sound good?
Sound good?
-Keith
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SMF (Street Modified FWD) Why and how to add camber plates for Auto-X?
minihune
SCCA Solo and ProSolo
14
Jul 18, 2004 06:09 PM



