Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R56) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Riss Racing MINI Exhaust needs your feedback!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #1  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Riss Racing MINI Exhaust needs your feedback!

MODERATORS: Our vendorship is set with Kong. Thank you!

Hey guys!

We have the exhaust done! It fits with both OEM, and RR downpipes. The system is completely bolt on no cutting required! It is extremely straight with very limited mandrel bends. I will post pics of it when we finish welding it all together. It is tac welded right now.

Like I said in my introduction to this community we value/apply the community feedback. So help us decide which muffler you would like used. Now please realize the pics shown below are mufflers we have used in the past. The tips can be changed bigger smaller etc...We are focusing on the muffler body for now. We recently made a change in our muffler design in the BMW community since we were tired of seeing the same exact round muffler with all cars. So we figured why not do the same in this community. The black octagon shaped mufflers can be in a mirror polish or coated as you see in the pics, and vise versa. The muffler in the pics is a little warped since it was a prototype first one we made. So don't worry about that either. What we are looking for is yes on round or yes on octagon. Thank you!






 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 05:36 PM
  #2  
bonehead04's Avatar
bonehead04
3rd Gear
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Black octagon FTW! But more importantly, we need sound clips and drive-bys!
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 05:42 PM
  #3  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by bonehead04
Black octagon FTW! But more importantly, we need sound clips and drive-bys!
Heres how it sounds on the M3. We will get the sound clips up with the MINI Catless/Catted RR DPs, and OEM with exhaust ASAP.

 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 05:46 PM
  #4  
countryboyshane's Avatar
countryboyshane
6th Gear
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 8
From: Bloomfield, MI
Are we really concerned with the style of the muffler? I care about performance first and then style becomes secondary. These boxy mufflers are new to me! As far as the tips go, I like them around 4" on the MCS and very "aggressive" looking. The angled cut is a step in the right direction, but some artistic innovation would be interesting to see.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 05:46 PM
  #5  
bonehead04's Avatar
bonehead04
3rd Gear
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Originally Posted by Riss Racing
Heres how it sounds on the M3. We will get the sound clips up with the MINI Catless/Catted RR DPs, and OEM with exhaust ASAP.

Sounds great. But you aren't seriously trying to compare the sound of the M3's V8 to the Mini?

Oh yeah, and the bigger the tips the better!
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 05:59 PM
  #6  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by bonehead04
Sounds great. But you aren't seriously trying to compare the sound of the M3's V8 to the Mini?

Oh yeah, and the bigger the tips the better!
No not trying to compare in any way. Just giving you an idea of how our exhausts sound when we are done. We make sure they all sound flawless. There were many tweaks made on the internals of that muffler to get the perfect M3 note. We will do the same with the MINI
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 06:01 PM
  #7  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by countryboyshane
Are we really concerned with the style of the muffler? I care about performance first and then style becomes secondary. These boxy mufflers are new to me! As far as the tips go, I like them around 4" on the MCS and very "aggressive" looking. The angled cut is a step in the right direction, but some artistic innovation would be interesting to see.
We are a performance first company. That is a straight through in and out muffler. There is not chamber or restriction at all. We had the feedback from forum member "M3THIS" to go with the biggest tips, and will follow the slant cut design as well
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 06:00 AM
  #8  
countryboyshane's Avatar
countryboyshane
6th Gear
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 8
From: Bloomfield, MI
Riss Racing,

I’m curious as to what data made your team conclude to go with 3” instead of 2.5” for the entire turbo-back exhaust system. Was the 3” causing something such as the exhaust temperature to go down creating a more dense flow in the pipe in turn causing some restriction? There is something counter-intuitive to it for me since in school we learned that bigger pipes give larger flow, but that was mostly working with liquids. Gases work in mysterious ways! I know the previous generation had 2.5” exhausts dominate the market and cars such as the Mitsubishi Evo have 2.5” too. Can you explain this a bit better to us? Oh yea, please don’t put a mid section resonator in the exhaust![FONT=Arial][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT]
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 06:37 AM
  #9  
KrautHammer's Avatar
KrautHammer
2nd Gear
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: GatorCountry
Third party independent dyno is the only thing that would cause me to consider this but somehow there is always a reason why it can't be done.
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 11:07 AM
  #10  
D Unit's Avatar
D Unit
4th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
Where does it say RR was planning on a 3" catback? I could of sworn I read somewhere they were considering a 2.75" catback because of the inside diameter of the downpipe but am not sure what they concluded.

Anyways, I vote for the oval polished one since I'm in Cali and looks the most OEM.
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 11:37 AM
  #11  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by countryboyshane
Riss Racing,

I’m curious as to what data made your team conclude to go with 3” instead of 2.5” for the entire turbo-back exhaust system. Was the 3” causing something such as the exhaust temperature to go down creating a more dense flow in the pipe in turn causing some restriction? There is something counter-intuitive to it for me since in school we learned that bigger pipes give larger flow, but that was mostly working with liquids. Gases work in mysterious ways! I know the previous generation had 2.5” exhausts dominate the market and cars such as the Mitsubishi Evo have 2.5” too. Can you explain this a bit better to us? Oh yea, please don’t put a mid section resonator in the exhaust![FONT=Arial][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT]
Great question! There are a lot of things that determine the exhaust piping we run. To be honest its always PER APPLICATION. What your looking out of your car/ low end/ top end etc...(realize we need to choose something that is the best possible for the everyday client. That usually will have a tune/intake/downpipe/exhaust basically minor bolt ons.)

Now there is always the "bigger the better" theory out there. This is not always the case, and I'll give you an example. When we first made the N54 downpipes we made a full 3 inch downpipe with a full 3 inch exhaust. This was absolute overkill. We made less power, the car ran poorly, and sounded horrible. We then made a 3 inch downpipe that tapered right at the end to 2.5 to mate up too all the other aftermarket/OEM exhausts. This was a huge improvement. It ran stronger, sounded great, and best of all fit with everything! (keep in mind each one of these downpipe versions we made. We sent to Vishnu/BMS for tons of dynos/testing) Durning this testing we realized we were leaving power on the table. The problem was that the 3 inch to an abrupt taper at 2.5 was causing back pressure. So our team came up with the current solution which was 3 inch / 2.75 / 2.5 SLOW TAPER. This was the home run. We got fluid flow, and the high horsepower records you see on the N54s now.

The first downpipe we started making for the MINI was 3 inch (since there is no true 3 inch downpipe on the market.) This downpipe in our opinion was the same issue we had with the N54 overkill. We then went with a 2.5 downpipe that would have very limited mandrel bends starting at 2.5 and ending at 2.5 with our exhaust system. During testing the 2.5 felt much better both down low & up top.

Exhaust is going to flow at its lowest point. This is the reason you use mandrel bends opposed to crush bends. No abruption is caused. This is also why you try to limit the bends as much as possible. I hope this answers your questions. Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 11:39 AM
  #12  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by KrautHammer
Third party independent dyno is the only thing that would cause me to consider this but somehow there is always a reason why it can't be done.
All of our products are always 3rd party dyno. I agree with you 100% this is how all products should be tested. So you don't run into the high claim HP numbers by companies to then find out you make no place near those numbers. All of our products that currently hold horsepower records were done by ACUTAL clients. Not just tuners. This is 100% 3rd party, and that's the way it should always be

My suggestion. When our products are in full release the community pick somebody, and each company send the products to them and let the best team win
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 11:40 AM
  #13  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by D Unit
Where does it say RR was planning on a 3" catback? I could of sworn I read somewhere they were considering a 2.75" catback because of the inside diameter of the downpipe but am not sure what they concluded.

Anyways, I vote for the oval polished one since I'm in Cali and looks the most OEM.
Please see above post for the answer to your question. PS thank you for the feedback on the muffler. We may just offer both options. Thank you!
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 11:41 AM
  #14  
jproz's Avatar
jproz
3rd Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
deleted. answered.
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 12:50 PM
  #15  
countryboyshane's Avatar
countryboyshane
6th Gear
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 8
From: Bloomfield, MI
Great answer Riss team. Definite answer. We appreciate your lengthy testing instead of relying on shear marketing force. You already have many of us bookmarking this page!
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #16  
Bigjoeski08's Avatar
Bigjoeski08
4th Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, RI
What are we looking at for prices?
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #17  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by Bigjoeski08
What are we looking at for prices?
We are still working out the pricing. I will update you guys the second we figure it out. Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 03:29 PM
  #18  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by countryboyshane
Great answer Riss team. Definite answer. We appreciate your lengthy testing instead of relying on shear marketing force. You already have many of us bookmarking this page!
Thank you for the kind words!
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 07:57 PM
  #19  
e30r56's Avatar
e30r56
4th Gear
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Lanham, MD
While I like the look of the box (reminds me of some e36 exhausts), I think oval will look the best on our rounded mini's.
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 08:19 PM
  #20  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by e30r56
While I like the look of the box (reminds me of some e36 exhausts), I think oval will look the best on our rounded mini's.
Thanks for your feedback! PS great color choice on your MINI!
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 01:10 AM
  #21  
Tubby's Avatar
Tubby
1st Gear
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
If you build it I will buy it.

I have held off on buying a full system to finish off my factory JCW until you have completed your exhaust. Your BMW systems are pieces of art!

Hope you ship to Australia!

The most important thing to me is sound. Happy to sacrifice a couple all out loud HP for a non boomy purr and growl. I have seen too many exhaust systems for all different cars that have chased absolute HP without real regard to sound quality. With a little development time and thought those same systems could have been made to sound beautiful while loosing very few HP.

To me you can't feel a couple HP but you certainly have to always hear an overly loud note.

The shape of the muffler does not really fuss me, its great looking tips which excite me.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 09:35 AM
  #22  
rasputinj's Avatar
rasputinj
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
How about a Clubman Exhaust, I can provide a car for fitting purposes if you need it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 09:45 AM
  #23  
slinger688's Avatar
slinger688
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,329
Likes: 12
Is there a performance/weight/sound/cost advantage to the design?

I like something different. Not sure I will buy it if there are not other tangible advantages of the design.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 09:47 AM
  #24  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by Tubby
If you build it I will buy it.

I have held off on buying a full system to finish off my factory JCW until you have completed your exhaust. Your BMW systems are pieces of art!

Hope you ship to Australia!

The most important thing to me is sound. Happy to sacrifice a couple all out loud HP for a non boomy purr and growl. I have seen too many exhaust systems for all different cars that have chased absolute HP without real regard to sound quality. With a little development time and thought those same systems could have been made to sound beautiful while loosing very few HP.

To me you can't feel a couple HP but you certainly have to always hear an overly loud note.

The shape of the muffler does not really fuss me, its great looking tips which excite me.
Thank you for the positive feedback! We put a lot of effort into our exhausts to get the correct note for each car. We ship worldwide, and have MANY clients in AUS running our BMW products

We will be making some adjustments to fit good sized tips with the correct slant cut. We will be running sections on the exhaust so you can swap from a resi to a catted section to a catless section very easily! Similar to what we did with the M3 Exhaust Link here: http://rissracing.com/alpha/?page_id...&product_id=26
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 09:49 AM
  #25  
Riss Racing's Avatar
Riss Racing
Thread Starter
|
Banned
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by slinger688
Is there a performance/weight/sound/cost advantage to the design?

I like something different. Not sure I will buy it if there are not other tangible advantages of the design.
The main advantage is being able to have a multi function exhaust as you can see by my post above. You will be able to run catless for track. Then simply bolt on your resi or catted piece for street. The sound as **** as we are will be amazing, and we always focus on performance first!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:29 PM.